Peru, de volgende Andesdomino?

quote:

De volgende presidentiële verkiezingen in Peru zijn in april 2006, maar de campagnes zijn al in alle hevigheid losgebarsten. Hoewel de kandidaten eerbiedig hebben beloofd om elkaar te zullen respecteren, zal de campagne waarschijnlijk net zo vuil worden als voorheen.

Onvoorspelbaar
Een van de belangrijkste kandidaten is Alan Garcia, de voormalig president van 1985 tot 1990. Hij werpt zichzelf nogmaals in de ring als leider van de centrumlinkse Partido Aprista. Garcia wordt algemeen veroordeeld wegens wanbeleid, maar hij is een behoedzame en charismatische politicus met een intuïtieve flair. Zijn belangrijkste tegenstander is Valentin Paniagua, van de christen-democratische Partido Accion Popular (AP), die kort het presidentschap bekleedde tussen 2000 en 2001.
Van de huidige president Alejandro Toledo hoeven beiden weinig te vrezen. Volgens herhaalde opiniepeilingen is hij op dit moment het meest impopulaire staatshoofd van Latijns-Amerika. Slechts tien procent van de bevolking steunt hem nog. En dat terwijl de macro-economische cijfers met 4,5 procent groei van het BNP in 2005 goed zijn. Maar zoals overal in Latijns Amerika, hebben de armen van die groei weinig voordeel gehad.
Ruim zevenentwintig politieke partijen hebben zich laten registreren. Peru kent een kiessysteem waarin de twee kandidaten die met de meeste stemmen uit de eerste ronde tevoorschijn komen, het in een tweede ronde uitvechten als geen van beiden een openlijke meerderheid in de eerste wint. Dit maakt voorspellingen moeilijk. Veel zal afhangen van de vraag wat de verliezers van de eerste ronde doen: aan wie geven zij hun stem? Opinieonderzoeken laten wel zien dat het anti-Garciagevoel veel sterker is dan het anti-Paniaguasentiment.
De andere kandidaten hopen op een herhaling van 1990 toen Fujimori, een onbekende ‘buitenlander’, president werd op grond van de breed gevoelde ontevredenheid over de traditionele kandidaten. Fujimori, nu in ballingschap in Japan, behoudt aanzienlijke populariteit onder de lage inkomens in Peru. De kiesautoriteiten twijfelen echter of hij wel mag meedoen aan de verkiezingen.

Alternatief
De politieke partijen in Peru worden algemeen beschouwd als corrupt en niet in dienst van de belangen van de gewone mensen. In Ecuador en Bolivia werden na langdurige protesten in april en juni dit jaar, presidenten om die reden van het toneel geveegd. In Peru daarentegen, slaagt Toledo erin te overleven. Het politieke protest in Peru blijft lokaal en kent geen nationale coördinatie.
De belangrijkste oppositiepartijen, hoofdzakelijk de Partido Aprista en het rechtse Unidad Nacional (UN), hebben weinig gedaan om de kiezers voor zich te winnen. Ze verzetten zich niet tegen Toledo uit de vrees de Peruviaanse democratie te zullen destabiliseren. Hoewel er wel ernstige demonstraties zijn geweest - bijvoorbeeld anti-privatiseringsrellen in Arequipa (2003), protesten van cocaboeren, conflicten tussen mijnbouwbedrijven en boerengemeenschappen – bleef het effect daarvan tot dusver beperkt.
Het centrumlinkse Partido Aprista verraste vele waarnemers toen het in 2001 de verkiezingen bijna won door zich op specifieke zwakheden in het liberale model te concentreren. Dat zal de Partido Aprista zeker weer doen. Nochtans zal kandidaat Alan Garcia niet het model zélf uitdagen. De meeste kandidaten steunen het liberale economische model, hoewel ze zich ervan bewust zijn dat dit niet populair is. Om te illustreren hoe groot de overeenstemming op hoofdpunten is: op 27 september kwamen de partijsecretarissen van de Partido Aprista en UN al bijeen om afspraken te maken over ‘de toekomstige regeerbaarheid van het land.’

Peru is uitzonderlijk in Latijns-Amerika vanwege de afwezigheid van een sterke linkse oppositie. Van het krachtige Izquierda Unida (Verenigde Linkerzijde) van de jaren tachtig, is tegenwoordig weinig meer over. Er zijn hoogstens een paar kleine zwaar ideologische partijen die weinig steun in de samenleving vinden. Juist door het ontbreken van een links front, zoals dat in veel Latijns Amerikaanse landen wél bestaat, zijn er nog geen massale protesten in de hoofdstad Lima geweest om het aftreden van de president eisen. De Peruviaanse bevolking wacht dus de verkiezingen van volgend jaar af om met Alejandro Toledo af te rekenen.

quote:

Fujimori registers candidacy for Peru presidential race despite congressional ban
LIMA, Peru -- Jailed former President Alberto Fujimori's supporters registered his candidacy Friday for April's elections, ignoring a congressional ban on his holding public office and his fight against extradition from Chile.

Fujimori's daughter Keiko and hundreds of partisans, carrying banners with Fujimori's smiling face and the words "for his honor," arrived at the National Election Board to add the former president's name to the list of candidates registered for the race.

The board, which has until Monday to decide on his bid to run, was widely expected to turn it down.

The registration of his candidacy came hours after the Chilean judge handling Fujimori's extradition case ordered him to remain under arrest, possibly for months, while the case is processed.

Fujimori is fighting extradition to Peru to face a dozen charges involving human rights abuses and corruption. He arrived unexpectedly in Chile in November following five years in exile in Tokyo, where he flew in 2000 when his decade-long autocratic regime collapsed.

Shortly after he fled to Japan, the homeland of his parents, Peru's Congress banned Fujimori from holding public office until February 2011.

Fujimori's supporters argue the ban violated his rights since he has not been found guilty of any crime.

Peru's Constitutional Tribunal ruled in February that the ban was valid and blocked him from running for public office. But the election board has the final say on whether to accept his candidacy.

Fujimori denies all the accusations against him, calling them an attempt to undercut his run for president.

Despite the charges, many Peruvians remember Fujimori, a university dean before his election, as a leader who ended the economic chaos of the 1980s and defeated leftist guerrillas who bloodied Peru for more than a decade.

"Until Fujimori, Peru was governed by cowards. Fujimori is a real man. We need him because he is the only one who can save Peru," said Juana Santillan, a 54-year-old housewife who was among the crowd celebrating the registry of his candidacy.

Another supporter, Juan Carlos Carranza, a 22-year college student, said he was for Fujimori because he worked hard to improve the lives of the poor.

"Fujimori was always working. Holidays and Sundays didn't exist for him," Carranza said. "He dirtied his shoes to create public projects needed by the poor."

Since Fujimori's detention in Chile, polls show a drop in support for a Fujimori presidential bid.

Polls also show that a nationalistic former army colonel, Ollanta Humala, a political outsider much like Fujimori was in 1990, is rapidly gaining support among Peru's poor, traditionally Fujimori's power base.

In recent weeks, Fujimori followers have seized a half-dozen provincial airports to demand that their leader be allowed to run, but there have been no huge street demonstrations on his behalf. (AP)

quote:

COHA's Report on Upcoming Peru's Presidential Elections

Jan. 5 2006

Press Release - Council On Hemispheric Affairs

This analysis was prepared by COHA Rearch Fellow Alex Sánchez.

Production assistant: Hartford Campbell.

In recent weeks, retired lieutenant colonel Ollanta Moises Humala Tasso suddenly has become the most talked about name in Peruvian politics and a force to be reckoned with in the polls for the upcoming April 2006 presidential elections. Like Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, a failed former coup planner and controversial military officer, Ollanta has inundated his audiences using fervid nationalist rhetoric while playing the “I am not one of them” card to gain popularity among the masses while bashing the country’s traditional elites. Sufficiently different from Bolivia’s Evo Morales or Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, the only comparison that readily comes to mind are the early years of Argentina’s man of all seasons Juan Perón. What Latin America (and certainly Washington) is clearly watching is whether Peru under a Ollanta presidency would be the next domino to fall, the next presidential victory of a recruit for the pink tide, affording this leftist movement with a continued momentum that could next sweep Ecuador and Mexico into its ranks when those countries hold their elections later this year.

Today, Ollanta has managed to become one of the three top contenders for the presidency, and is expected to reach a second round, whereby he could eventually emerge victorious. What has many in the international arena, particularly in Washington, uneasy is that Humala is enough of a tierra incognita when it comes to his foreign and economic policy ideas that, should he win, Peru’s future including its commitment to the war against drugs could be entirely uncertain. Similarly a Ollanta presidency could produce another membership in MERCOSUR and another ally in the South American anti-U.S. trade block. Ollanta also could enter into a joint effort with Morales' Bolivia to place conditions on their participation in Washington's anti-drug campaign.

Ollanta, the History

Humala first become a local household name in October 2000 when he led a failed, if non-violent, military uprising against strongman Alberto Fujimori (currently being detained in Chile where Lima authorities just requested his extradition). In that action, Ollanta and his brother, Major Antauro Humala ( who are sons of a well-known Marxist-Leninist thinker), leading about 70 soldiers and reservists from their base in the Peruvian Andes, hid in the mountains as they picked up supplies while seeking support from the towns through which they crossed. Their goal was to demand the resignation of the then-commanding general of the army, General Villanueva Ruesta. Ironically, this uprising occurred the very same day that Fujimori chose to remove Villanueva from his post. The ever-exuberant Ollanta then decided to switch his demands to calling for the president’s resignation (which occurred in November of the same year, after which the latter fled to Brunei and from there to exile in Japan).

Such a move in itself is not unique to Peruvian history. In 1948 General Manuel A. Odria staged a revolt in southern Peru. He traveled through one southern city after another, beginning in Arequipa, and collected supplies and supporters along the way so that by the time he arrived in Lima, the military strongman had built up massive popular support, with members of the public literally walking behind him. The then-president, José Luis Bustamante y Rivero promptly relinquished power and Odria thereafter harshly ruled the country until 1956.

Humala’s Rendezvous with Destiny

In Ollanta’s case, his attempted uprising was short lived. After two weeks in the field, he and his followers, only a dozen of whom remained from the original 70, gave up. No court marshal proceedings followed, but Ollanta was forced into retirement. In 2001, now with Toledo as president, Ollanta returned to active service, and between 2002- 2003 he was sent to the military section of the Peruvian embassy in Paris, where former UN Secretary General Javier Pérez de Cuellar was serving as ambassador. Ollanta kept a low profile for the next several years, moving from France to the Peruvian embassy in South Korea. In 2004 he was asked to retire as part of a process of “national renovation.”

Meanwhile Ollanta’s brother Antauro, a retired major and co-conspirator in the 2000 uprising, slowly began stoking a new populist campaign. Antauro went on to found the newspaper Ollanta, which was sold at the very low price of 50 cents. Antauro’s support base utilizes military reservists to sell the paper in the streets. His supporters, who wear military fatigues when they sell the papers which serve as a symbol of protest, raise the question, given their knowledge of the military procedures (since they are mostly military reservists and former soldiers), could infiltrate army bases whenever they desire. On January 1 of last year, Antauro Humala led an uprising of his own in the Andean town of Andahualyas. He and his supporters – around 160 army reservists - commandeered a police station, killing four policemen while seizing a handful of hostages for four days before surrendering (one of Humala’s supporters was also killed). There were three goals of this failed uprising: Toledo’s resignation, the resignation of then-Minister of Defense Roberto Chiabra (because he had promoted General Luis Munoz as commander of the army) and the demand that Ollanta be reinstated to the army and promoted. Currently, Antauro is in the Piedras Gordas prison as a consequence of his uprising. Ollanta, in France at the time of his brother’s failed coup attempt, declared (according to the Peruvian wire-service AgenciaPeru.com) “ that the etnocaceristas [Antauro’s group] are people who are carrying out a daring action by asking the resignation of a president that has lost legitimacy.”

Ollanta returned to Peru from South Korea last February and shortly after his arrival he declared on the Peruvian radio station CPN that he had presented a request to be reinstated once again into the army. He explained that, “this is an opportunity that I give the army to reconsider their bad decision. Otherwise I will enter politics.” He was not reinstated and in June he announced that he would run for the presidency in the country’s upcoming April 2006 elections.

Politics, Polls and Numbers

In 2001 Alejandro Toledo was elected to the presidency as partially the result of his repeatedly playing the “race” card, which entailed that he often stressed his ethnicity (he was the first ever native Peruvian to be elected president). However, his numerous speeches about his roots as a shoe-shine boy quickly lost credence among Peruvians of all classes, who were turned off by his neo-liberal economic policies and the numerous scandals in which he and his family were involved. Among others, Toledo eventually was forced to acknowledge an illegitimate daughter by another woman; his wife, known as “Lady Karp,” has been accused of sanctioning fraud by means of an NGO which she administered. Meanwhile, one of Toledo’s brothers purportedly punched a reporter and used government vehicles for personal use. Dislike for Toledo has become so widespread that his popularity ratings have not been able to overtake the 15% mark in months, and his party Perú Posible is having serious issues coming up with possible candidates for the elections. It is within this context that Ollanta Humala slowly began gaining popularity as a candidate who was “not of the corrupt bunch,” as Toledo and Fujimori were regarded before him. Interestingly, Ollanta, himself an indigenous Peruvian, has not used the “race” card in his speeches.

Humala has risen to be second or third in most poll rankings. On December 27, the Peruvian daily La República, published the results of a poll project carried out by the public opinion company Idice that put Ollanta at 21% of support, the same as held by Unidad Nacional leader Lourdes Flores, supposedly the front runner. Former president Alan Garcia Perez of the APRA party comes third with 19% support. It is assumed that no candidate will receive the necessary 50% of votes in the April elections, so there will have to be a second round of balloting in May between the two candidates who obtain the most votes.

In spite of Ollanta’s popularity among the masses, his poor, Unión Por el Perú (UPP) is not doing as well in the polls when it comes to congressional seats. Curiously, even though Humala is the leader of the Partido Nacionalista Peruano (Peruvian Nationalist Party), he is running as a candidate of the UPP, which was originally formed by former UN Secretary General Perez de Cuellar in 1995 when he ran against Fujimori in the presidential elections of that year. When Fujimori won, Perez de Cuellar lost interest in the party and eventually drifted away from it. Today UPP is comprised of a group of left-leaning figures, mostly low level union leaders and university lecturers, without a “famous face” to represent it. Thus far, Ollanta’s UPP has an approximate 14% approval rating when it comes to legislative elections, which means that it will most likely get between 17 – 20 seats out of the 120- member Peruvian Congress. Should Ollanta be elected president, in order to be effective, he will have to find some way to attract some members of the most powerful parties in Congress to back his agenda, such as the APRA or UN. While this may make sense from a political point of view, any attempt by Ollanta to directly approach such parties would likely profoundly alienate much of his support among his base who would see him as a sell-out, along the lines of Toledo. On December 11, Mauricio Molder, congressman and secretary general of the APRA, declared to Agencia Andina that he “takes into consideration a possible alliance. In politics […] one never says never.” He was referring to an alliance between APRA and Ollanta in a possible second-round of presidential balloting.

Ollanta and Antauro

One of the main source of the radicalism that composes Ollanta’s weltanschauung is the muddled thinking of his brother Antauro. It is Antauro, using as his mouthpiece his Ollanta newspaper (which has been published since 2003) who has done some of the most radical and jingoist pronouncements that are quite often, and perhaps unfairly, tied to Ollanta. In an April 2005 article, regarding the March 11 bomb attacks in Madrid, the Ollanta editorial page claimed that the true culprits of the attacks “are not Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden, [but] are George Bush, [former Spanish Prime Minister] José María Aznar, his government and the King of Spain, descendent of the terrorists that annihilated the people of the Indies [Central America and the Caribbean].”

It is because of such reasoning that Ollanta has repeatedly attempted to distance himself from his brother. An example of this is that Antauro Humala is not part of Ollanta’s UPP Party, but has actually created his own party, the Partido Etnocacerista del Peru ( Etnocacerist Party of Peru). The name is connected to that of the Peruvian army hero Andres Avelino Cáceres, who led a guerrilla war for years in the Peruvian Andes against Chile during the War of the Pacific in the latter part of the 19th century. In spite of the nationalist name of the party, Antauro’s ideology seems to be an amalgamation of populist rhetoric combined with Communist/Marxist triumphalism that were taught to him by his father when he was a youth.

Ollanta, on the other hand, has significantly toned down his rhetoric in recent weeks after his candidacy took on more gravitas. He now is surrounded by journalists wherever he goes as well as businessmen seeking him out for clarification of his economic policies. He has approached all kinds of groups that are willing to listen to him, which include business groups, academics, as well as an attempted meeting, which ultimately did not come to fruition, with the editor of the influential Peruvian daily Correo, Aldo Mariategui. In spite of that, Ollanta’s party’s website continues to be filled with extremist rhetoric like its calling for a Second Republic and the creation of a Constitutional Assembly as well as proclaiming that his movement is “anti-imperialist, and [… does] not accept the notion and imposition of a unipolar world.” In a December 31 interview with the Peruvian daily La Primera, he proclaimed that his candidacy is the best thing that could happen to the country, because of the quality of other candidates running with him. He described the Peruvian political class as “nation sellers.” He also said, regarding a possible free-trade agreement with the U.S. “ this government [referring to the Toledo presidency] does not have the legitimacy to accept this treaty [… Toledo] does not even have a 10% approval rating.”

In a bizarre twist of events, on December 25, the Peruvian media widely reported that Antauro had sent a letter to Ollanta from his prison cell, on December 18 where he accused the latter of behaving like a traditional politician and not recognizing the “sacrifice” performed by his “Etnocacerist” group. Antauro furthermore asked that his party members not support his brother Ollanta, but rather vote for him, for the congressional seat that he is running for from prison.

Foreign Policy and Possible Friends?

One of the main issues regarding Ollanta Humala is that, in spite of everything that has been written about him, it is still unclear what his manifesto and ideologies consists of. Some have been quick to compare him to the recently elected president of Bolivia, the cocalero leader Evo Morales. For a time, the Peruvian media speculated that Ollanta and Evo were actually friends; however, both of them have denied that they had even met.

It would be unwise to leap ahead and with conviction declare Ollanta to be a leader who inevitably could become the Peruvian equivalent of Evo Morales, who in turn could become Bolivia’s Hugo Chávez. There was much talk when Toledo was elected that, because of his indigenous roots, inexorably he would take Peru down a populist path. However, in reality, Toledo became one of Washington’s most reliable parents in the region, and who followed its neo-liberal economic policies such as supporting bilateral free trade agreements. Another example of a failed recruit to the South American left was Ecuadorian President Lucio Gutierrez, himself a retired colonel and a former coup leader. Gutierrez was also elected on a populist platform and many believed that he would become a sort of Ecuadorian Hugo Chavez. In reality, Gutierrez did little, if anything, to break away from traditional Ecuadorian politics or the traditional controlling political elites. Even more, Gutierrez supported the U.S. military presence at the country’s naval and air force base at Manta, in spite of the fact that on numerous occasions when he was campaigning, he declared that if he was elected he would shut down Manta and expel the U.S forces from the country. Because of these discrepancies, he was later pressured out of office by his former indigenous allies.

One reason to believe that Ollanta might join the “pink tide” of Latin American leftist-movements is that his Nationalist Party proclaims that they will “fight to build the great Latin American nation, as a new power with sovereignty in the global world [following] the integrationist struggles by the liberators Simón Bolivar and José de San Martín.” At the same time, like in the La Primera interview, Ollanta criticizes politicians for having given up Peruvian territory like the Trapecio Amazónico to Colombia and Tiwinza to Ecuador.

Military Politics

One of the yet answered questions about a possible Ollanta presidency is how the Peruvian military will react. In principle one would think that Ollanta would be well received by the country’s armed forces since he is a former military man himself. While he does have the recorded support of several retired generals and colonels, his armed forces’ backing is in fact minimal. In a recent speech, General Paul Da Silva, commander of the 7th infantry brigade in the northern city of Lambayeque, declared that someone who stood up in arms against the government (referring to the 2000 uprising) cannot be elected president. Da Silva was one of the members of the commando group Chavin de Huantar which freed the hostages from the Japanese Embassy takeover in 1997. Other military leaders have expressed similar concern. There are several reasons for this lack of broad support for a fellow career officer. The 2000 uprising, while it was staged against an authoritarian regime, seemed more like a rowdy, unorganized escapade - an “undisciplined act” - for which fellow Peruvian military officers instinctively had very little sympathy.

Furthermore, the nationalist rhetoric used in Ollanta (which does not necessarily reflect Ollanta’s beliefs), while being supported by all Peruvians, fails to have its feet in reality. In espousing its tenet of territorialism, the newspaper often mentions the necessity to gain back the territories Peru lost to Chile today during the 19th century War of the Pacific, and how Chile is a security threat, if not the outright “enemy.” The problem is that, while this type of rhetoric is popular and has been cited time and time again over the years, very few Peruvian military officers see the logic in threatening Chile today for the simple reason that they realize that a war with its southern neighbor would mean bringing on a disastrous defeat. Perhaps this is the core reason why Ollanta is disliked by the Peruvian military; the belief that if he is elected he will take the country down a warpath that Peru is hardly ready to carry out and which would bring with it catastrophic consequences.

Another group of officers (colonels and generals) do not want Ollanta as president for a more selfish reason. These are the officers that signed the infamous “Subjugation Act” of 1999 whereby they essentially swore loyalty to Fujimori and his intelligence henchman, Vladimiro Montesinos. These officers are afraid they will be forced into retirement (or made to stand trial) since Ollanta has the “aura” of being an extreme nationalist who would not tolerate politicized officers like those who submitted to Fujimori. Recently, Ollanta declared that he was against Division General Cesar Reinoso being selected as the new commander general of the army because, in Ollanta’s view, Reinoso was a political choice by President Toledo. At the same time, General Reinoso himself declared in his first speech that he would not allow politics on military bases. He could have been eluding to the very important fact that in the upcoming April elections, members of the Peruvian armed forces and police (around 150,000 overall) will be allowed, for the first time, to cast a vote in a general election.

A subject on which Ollanta has kept mum about has to do with the proposal by congressman Luis Ibérico of the government-allied FIM party, to offer amnesty to 618 military officers accused of human rights violations during the 1980’s and 90’s war against terrorist movements in Peru. Ibérico, chairman of the Congress’ Defense Commission, has said that it would be “unjust” if these officers would be forced to stand trial and that the current rebirth of insurgent movements in the country is due to the fact that the military is suffering from “an unacceptable judicial prosecution.” The 618 were accused by the 2003 report issued by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Toledo as well as presidential candidates like Garcia have declared themselves against any law that might forgive these accused officers. Ollanta undoubtedly is weighing where to position himself. Support for the amnesty might earn him thousands of votes when the military goes to the polls, but it might also alienate his support base in the Andes where the population suffered military atrocities as well as atrocities by leftist terrorist groups for decades. Meanwhile, the officers of Ollanta’s military academy class (who currently are mostly colonels) were too young (rank of majors) to sign the 1999 subjugation Act. It is unclear where they stand on the issue of supporting their classmate, Ollanta.

Future for the Worst or Best?

Retired army officer, failed coup leader-turned-politician Ollanta Humala today is a serious candidate for Peru’s presidency. The disaffection and alienation that the Andean nation’s indigenous and poor have towards traditional politics and the political elite is a card that has been successfully used in Peruvian history by newcomer politicians. Unfortunately, this tendency brought a 10-year costly and brutal dictatorship (under Fujimori) and, most recently, an incompetent president in the form of Toledo. Reading his speeches and interviews, it is easy to get the feeling that, should Ollanta be elected, he probably would be no friend of Washington. Then again, Ollanta’s stress on Peru’s greatness is in marked conflict with his declarations in favor of a Latin America unity based on General San Martin and Simón Bolivar’s dreams. His amalgamation of a stem of confused goals and ideas might get him elected, since they appeal to different sectors of the country, but it might not be enough to keep him in power for long or effectively enable him to rule.

One thing is certain, Ollanta is not the first former military officer who ran for the Peruvian presidency. In October 1931, lieutenant colonel Luis M. Sánchez Cerro was elected as the constitutional president of the nation (he had ruled the country for a year after overthrowing dictator Augusto Leguía in 1930). His main opponent at the time was the founder of the APRA party, Victor Raul Haya de la Torre who, like APRA candidate Alan Garcia today, was regarded as a silver-tongued speaker. Sánchez Cerro did not live to do much, he was assassinated in 1933, little over a year into his presidency. Since then Peru has foundered with little likelihood that whatever the outcome of next April’s elections, its problems will remain in front of it.

quote:

1992 "Auto-coup"
During Fujimori's first term in office, the APRA and FREDEMO parties remained in control of both chambers of Congress (the Chamber of Deputies and Senate), thus hampering his ability to get the legislation he wanted onto the statute books. In response to this, Fujimori mounted an auto-coup (in Spanish: autogolpe; sometimes called the Fuji-coup, or fujigolpe) — that is, a coup d'état against his own government, on April 5, 1992. The intent was to restructure the organs of the Peruvian government and constitutiton in such a way as to increase the president's power and control. The phrase "auto-coup" was in itself controversial, as Fujimori and his supporters maintained the acts were merely a "restructuring" of the government in the interests of efficiency, and not something more radical or authoritarian.

Fujimori dissolved the Congress and called elections for a new body named the "Democratic Constitutional Congress" (Congreso Constituyente Democrático); Fujimori received a majority in this new congress, which later drafted the 1993 Constitution. He also set about co-opting the judiciary and curtailing constitutional rights with states-of-emergency and curfews, as well as enacting controversial "severe emergency laws" to deal with terrorism, mainly from the Maoist "Shining Path" guerillas (see "Anti-terrorism" section below).

There was little initial domestic resistance to the auto-coup, in fact it was welcomed. An opinion poll carried out shortly thereafter indicated that Fujimori's decision to dissolve Congress and restructure the judicial system had a 73% approval rating. The economic and political situation was so poor at the time that for many Peruvians believed things could only get better. At the time, Fujimori's bold and risky economic reforms (the "Fujishock") were widely considered successful.

However, international reactions to the auto-coup were different: International financial organisations delayed planned or projected loans, and the United States government suspended all aid to Peru other than humanitarian assistance, as did Germany and Spain. Venezuela broke off diplomatic relations, and Argentina withdrew its ambassador. Chile joined Argentina in requesting that Peru be suspended from the Organization of American States. The coup appeared to threaten the economic recovery strategy of reinsertion, and complicated the process of clearing arrears with the IMF.

Even before the coup, relations with the United States had been strained because of Fujimori's reluctance to sign an accord that would increase U.S. and Peruvian military efforts in eradicating coca fields. Although Fujimori eventually signed the accord in May 1991, in order to get desperately needed aid, the disagreements did little to enhance bilateral relations. Peruvians saw drugs as primarily a U.S. problem and the least of their concerns, given the economic crisis, Shining Path and MRTA insurgents, and an outbreak of cholera, which further isolated Peru because of a resulting ban on food imports.

However, two weeks after the auto-coup, the George H.W. Bush administration changed their position and officially recognised Fujimori as the legitimate leader of Peru. The Organization of American States and the U.S. agreed that Fujimori's coup may have been extreme, but they did not want to see Peru return to the deteriorating state that it had been in before. In fact, the coup came not long after the U.S. government and media had launched a media offensive against the Shining Path rural insurgent movement. On March 12, 1992, Undersecretary of State for Latin American Affairs Bernard Aronson told the US Congress: "The international community and respected human rights organizations must focus the spotlight of world attention on the threat which Shining Path poses... Latin America has seen violence and terror, but none like this. Make no mistake; if Shining Path were to take power, we would see genocide." Given Washington's concerns, long-term repercussions of the auto-coup turned out to be modest.

Fujimori himself claimed that the auto-coup was necessary to break with the deeply-entrenched interests which were hindering him from rescuing Peru from the chaotic state in which García had left it [4]. Critics suggest Fujimori could not have implemented his drastic liberal economic reforms under and with the co-operation of the dissolved parliament. And, since Fujimori as president would ultimately be held responsible for the success or failure of his government and considering the opposition he was facing, in hindsight his daring reforms make sense.

quote:

De Peruaanse ex-president Alberto Fujimori is in beroep gegaan tegen de beslissing van de kiescommissie in Peru om hem uit te sluiten van de presidentsverkiezingen van april. De kiescommissie sloot Fujimori uit omdat hij volgens een parlementsbesluit uit 2001 geen publieke functies meer mag vervullen. De ex-president zit momenteel gevangen in buurland Chili. De Peruaanse minister van Justitie Alejandro Tudela noemt de poging van Fujimori om toch aan de verkiezingen mee te doen 'zelfmoord'. Tudela waarschuwde de aanhangers van de ex-president dat de politie zal ingrijpen bij mogelijke demonstraties. Peru heeft Chili om de uitlevering van Fujimori gevraagd, om hem te berechten wegens corruptie en schending van mensenrechten.

quote:

Toledo: Chávez destabiliseert Latijns Amerika


11/01 18:04
President Alejandro Toledo van Peru vindt dat zijn Venezolaanse ambtgenoot Hugo Chávez bezig is om Latijns Amerika te destabiliseren. Volgens Toledo bemoeit Chávez zich met zaken waar hij zich niet mee moet bemoeien. Chávez is de president van Venezuela, niet van Latijns Amerika, zei Toledo. De Venezolaanse president heeft zich nadrukkelijk uitgesproken over zijn favoriete presidentskandidaat in Peru, dat in april naar de stembus gaat. Die links-populistische kandidaat, Ollanta Humala, kon tot enkele maanden geleden in Peru op weinig steun rekenen onder de bevolking, maar is bezig aan een opmars. De kandidaat van rechts, Lourdes Flores, gaat in de peilingen aan kop.

quote:

Op maandag 20 februari 2006 21:11 schreef DionysuZ het volgende:
inderdaad. Tot nu toe staan de beweringen van Floripas nog recht overeind, en ze zullen door een persoonlijke aanval echt niet verdwijnen .

quote:

Op woensdag 22 februari 2006 12:38 schreef One_of_the_few het volgende:

[..]

Lima veilig?

quote:

Op zaterdag 25 februari 2006 17:04 schreef DiegoArmandoMaradona het volgende:
Je begrijpt de definitie van Terrorisme niet

quote:

Op zaterdag 25 februari 2006 17:09 schreef Floripas het volgende:

[..]

De regering, een bevolkingsgroep, een ideologie, enzovoorts.

quote:

Op zaterdag 25 februari 2006 17:14 schreef Floripas het volgende:

[..]

Noem mij eens een ideologie die niet voor ellende zorgt.

quote:

Op zaterdag 25 februari 2006 19:16 schreef Floripas het volgende:

[..]

Jij bent een nog matiger discussiant dan die voedbalheld.

quote:

(RPP Noticias) En medio de un verdadero caos, golpes, contusiones, vidrios rotos, apretujones y objetos contundentes que volaban por los aires, el candidato presidencial de Unión por el Perú Ollanta Humala llegó hasta la Universidad Ricardo Palma, donde emitió su voto acompañado de su esposa Nadine Heredia.

Llegar hasta su mesa de sufragio le llevó aproximadamente veinte minutos, mientras vidrios de las ventanas caían debido a la presencia de la prensa nacional e internacional así como de numerosos curiosos quienes proferían frases en su contra.

Antes de ingresar a su mesa de sufragio y muy sonriente, Humala Tasso señaló que se siente muy emocionado porque es la primera vez que vota. El candidato de UPP votó en la Mesa 243692 de la Universidad Ricardo Palma.





Tras emitir su voto, Humala Tasso se quedó prácticamente "secuestrado" al interior de la mencionada casa de estudios superiores por cerca de una hora, debido a que era imposible su salida por la gran cantidad de personas que se encontraban en el lugar. La policía pasada más de media hora y del desorden generalizado recién se aproximó al local con el fin de tratar de contener el desconcierto.

En las afueras numerosas personas gritaban frases en contra de la candidatura de Ollanta Humala y arrojaban vidrios rotos.

El candidato tuvo que ser retirado por la policía que lo cubrió con sus escudos durante todo el recorrido como medida de protección y seguridad, ante cualquier inconveniente.

quote:

Op zondag 9 april 2006 23:21 schreef nirvana het volgende:
Humala lijkt me zeker, het percentage zal afwijken maar 5 % meer dan zowel Garcia als Flores lijkt me meer dan de foutmarge. En hopelijk gaat het inderdaad niet tussen Humala en Garcia. De komende uren zal het duidelijk worden.

quote:

Op dinsdag 11 april 2006 00:27 schreef DiegoArmandoMaradona het volgende:
Ik denk dat Alan gewonnen heeft morgen

quote:

La lideresa de Unidad Nacional Lourdes Flores Nano obtiene hasta el momento el 62.20% de los votos válidos de los peruanos en el extranjero, según resultados de la Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales (ONPE) al 3.82% de actas escrutadas.


Le sigue de lejos Martha Chávez, de Alianza por el Futuro, con 14.31%; el líder aprista Alan García Pérez con 8.49%; y el candidato de Unión por el Perú, Ollanta Humala, con el 7.95%.


Restauración Nacional llegó a 2.24%; el Frente de Centro 1.79%; y el Partido Socialista, de Javier Diez Canseco, 1.12%.


De acuerdo a cifras de la ONPE, 457.891 ciudadanos peruanos que viven en el exterior estuvieron hábiles de participar en los comicios generales del domingo último, cifra que corresponde al 2.8% de los ciudadanos que participaron en los comicios, cuyo total es 16 millones 494.906.