Hier wat meer info over de hologram technologie.
Sorry voor de lap tekst, maar het is een interressante alternatieve theorie.
Proof that holography can be filemd and fotographed ( watch Bill Clinton wave his hand though a holograph. and therea are about 5 examples to view examples of comercial holography filmed live.
video section link
http://www.zebraimaging.com/clients/ford/menu.ford.htm main site :
http://www.zebraimaging.com b). analysing the 911 "aircraft" ghosts
(http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane/index.htm
c) discussing the blue ribbon project ( sorta out there... but there)
http://www.aoreport.com/news6.htm Project Blue Beam - God in the clouds
http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/religion/bluebeam.htm5.6 Airborne Holographic Projector
Het bestaat echt!
http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/volume4/chap03/b5_6.htm![]()
-11 Mystery Unravelled
Stefan Grossmann On Cloakanddagger Radio Show
http://www.gallerize.com/Gallerize.News.htmHow Military Hightech Was Used On 9-11-2001
The author of this website, Dr. Stefan Grossmann, was on Lenny
Bloom\'s Cloakanddagger Radio Show last night (www.cloakanddagger.ca).
For one hour, he informed listeners in Canada and the northern U.S.A.
how military hightech was used on 9-11-2001 in order to simulate
realistic-looking holographic projections of airplanes into the World
Trade Center. While he was looking at engineering graphics of the
event on his computer screen, he verbally informed the listeners:
Watch this CNN video of the second impact
http://www.gallerize.com/Gallerize.News-Dateien/ABC.News.1.wmv(WTC south tower) in slow motion – the ENTIRE plane including the
wing tips etc. \"glide\" unobstructed (despite steel walls!) into the
building – they do not interact with the solid steel frame that
surrounds the building – no jolt, no wobble – the explosion is
delayed after the impact despite the fact that the wing tanks of the
alleged Boeing 767-200 are full of explosive kerosene and \"fly
through\" that what is functionally a solid steel wall. (A note aside:
a single brick falling on a wing let the space shuttle crash!)
Premise a: The hole in the WTC south tower is considerably smaller
than the alleged Boeing 767-200.
Premise b: The CNN video (and other videos by ABC, Spiegel TV etc.)
show that the ENTIRE plane \"glided\" into the building.
Conclusion: Before the eyes of millions of people, the outer wings
(at least a total of 30 feet), the tail rudder and the tail winglets
of the alleged \"airplane\" flew through the steel perimeter wall of
the WTC2 tower WITHOUT LEAVING A HOLE! Physics mandates us to
believe: the alleged \"airplane\" was no solid object. It was a
hologram! The Pentagon has \"airborne holographic projector\"
technology mounted on a cruise missile,
http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/volume4/chap03/b5_6.htm (details were
declared a military secret in 1994, more about this in my writings).
The hole lets in a cruise missile which was flying inside a much
bigger hologram, disguising it as a \"hijacked passenger plane\".
Further, the video shows us the \"lightning beep\" flashing up just
before the plane\'s nose glides into the wall of steel perimeter
columns. This is a scalar weapon (see Col. Thomas E. Bearden at
http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm and elsewhere on
his huge web site) like it was used in Bagdhad 2003 out of a U.S.
tank to melt cars and buses (see report at
http://www.rense.com/general40/secret.htm ). This \"scalar weapon\" is
an advanced laser-analogous weapon that can melt steel in an instant.
It created the \"hole\" to let a disguised cruise missile in the
building. The hole was not created by a solid object. (The real
hijacked planes were exchanged against the flying objects long before
coming close to the buildings, see
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/plissken.htm and
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/operation_pearl.htm.The laser-analogous scalar flash can also be seen on the (uncensored
version of the) amateur video (Naudet video) of the first crash
(north tower),
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa11.htm (explaining the
flash as the firing of a missile, which it was not – it was a scalar
flash with about the same effect).
The \"flying objects\" that \"hit\" WTC tower 1 and the Pentagon were
also such holographically disguised cruise missiles. At the Pentagon,
Corporal Jason Ingersoll of the Marine Corps photo lab actually
photographed the initial impact hole before the wall sagged and fell –
again, the hole is only 15-20 feet big, much too small for a Boeing
757-200 to pass through, but big enough for a cruise missile – was
the cigar-shaped object draped in a blue foil that a team of soldiers
carried away from the Pentagon crash site on their shoulders the
smoking gun/cruise missile?
The actual barrel-shaped projector pod of the military\'s \"airborne
holographic projector\" was found to be shown in the video footage,
http://www.rense.com/Datapages/wtcobj.htm.The whole thing is: use of military hightech in order to trick the
people into seeing \"hijacked airplanes\" – subsequently, the buildings
fell due to explosives in controlled demolitions, as seen by firemen,
recorded on video and documented by U.S. government seismic
measurement stations.
Update On 9-11 Hologram Theory:
The author of this website, Dr. Stefan Grossmann, was on Lenny Bloom’s Cloakanddagger Radio Show last night (www.cloakanddagger.ca). In his second radio appearance, Grossmann followed up on his theory that on 9-11-2001, the World Trade Center was not hit by hijacked planes but was penetrated by military hightech holograms. Holograms are movie-like projections that look 98% real. The U.S. military developed hologram technology since the 1970s for PsyOps/military deception. Prominent in the newly found evidence is a photo by Carmen Taylor (AP) that shows us the hidden clues why the so-called “hijacked plane” was not real:
Check deze PDF over het gebruik van Holographic technology bij 911
www.gallerize.com/media/0. %20Frequently%20Asked%20Questions.pdf
12. Hologram Missiles:
I keep getting asked: „What is a hologram missile?”
Hologram missiles were used in the cold war to shoot down airplanes.
In his book „Gravitobiology” (1991), the retired Pentagon weapons analyst Col. Thomas E. Bearden gives a graphic account of an example of a hologram missile (downing of the Arrow DC 8 with 248 U.S. soldiers on board and 8 civilian crew members at Gander, Newfoundland, December 12, 1985; see online excerpts from the book at Bearden’s web site,
www.cheniere.org):
„Once the weapon was focused, Soviets fired an electromagnetic missile directly at the aircraft, using distance-independent holography, employing the internal Whittaker EM wave structures of the scalar potential beams. The interfering sky beams flared as an electromagnetic missile formed and shot to the aircraft. (The EM missile strike was seen by the witness as just a ball or beam of light that streaked from the glowing beams in the clouds, down to the aircraft.) The EM missile struck the aircraft in the right side of its fuselage ahead of the engines and blasted a hole right through the fuselage. This anomalous hole was noted. It was tested and found to have no chemical residues, proving that it was not due to a chemical explosion or a terrorist bomb. However, it was due to the strike of the EM missile!
The fierce ball of EM energy penetrated the fuselage and struck the aircraft’s interior plastics, explosively igniting them instantly - all just at liftoff. Multiple independent witnesses saw the aircraft glowing with an orange light, from the fierce firelight shining out the windows and the radiant energy of the locked-on interferometry beams. Interestingly, the witness that saw the beams form in the sky, and the beam shoot down and strike the aircraft, was not allowed to present her testimony to the official board of investigation.“
This technology is a spin-off of Nazi radar science from alleged Gray Alien sources. Today it has been refined to look extremely life-like, colorful, life-size, moving (secret U.S. government program „Ghost Gun”, reportedly in cooperation with the Walt Disney Corp. since their input to the Apollo moon landing hoax that cost the U.S. taxpayer $30 billion). I find in my book that such holographic camouflage was used around a real (hard, physical) cruise missile because a pure hologram such as in the example mentioned above would have emitted far too much light to look realistic.
If one compares the mainstream media’s videos (such as the Evan Fairbanks video, the diverse CNN videos etc.) then one finds that the right wing of the plane lit up bright white shortly before entry (possibly due to the fact that the flying object partly rolled-over to the left) but that upon entry into the shadow wedge the light did not stop shining:
This supports the theory that the flying object was no real Boeing but was a military missile camouflaged to look like a Boeing, the camouflage consisting of a holographic cover made of light.
Before entry time, the flying object was unable to reflect the bright morning sunlight; and this lack of glistening reflection is equally telling since hologram camouflage is non-reflective and in this respect optically different than metal (note that the plane in the following stills was flying in the bright morning sunlight where planes normally glisten and shine) :
http://thewebfairy.com/whatzit/plane/[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door Aurora025 op 01-09-2004 15:46:43 ]
The Irish Massacre was incited by the Jesuits on October 23, 1641, the feast day of Ignatius Loyola, and lasted until Oliver Cromwell landed in Drogheda in 1649 to put an end to it.