Pfizer sponsort inmiddels veel tv-programma's

Zie hier een korte compilatie van korter dan 1 minuut waaruit blijkt dat Pfizer veel aan sponsoring doet:


Is dit echt nodig voor een bedrijf dat een serieus product verkoopt? Ondermijnen ze op deze manier niet hun eigen boodschap door zichzelf zo commercieel te presenteren? Gaat het Pfizer om het redden van levens denken jullie of is de motivatie om geld te verdienen een stuk groter voor dit bedrijf? En wanneer deze gesponsorde programma's gaan praten over Corona en vaccins, zijn ze dan nog wel te vertrouwen als ze gesponsord worden door een vaccinproducent?

[ Bericht 11% gewijzigd door Probably_on_pcp op 21-10-2021 20:28:23 ]

quote:

Op donderdag 21 oktober 2021 20:34 schreef CryptoPunk het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]
[ afbeelding ]

quote:

Op donderdag 21 oktober 2021 20:42 schreef Nober het volgende:
[ twitter ]

[ twitter ]

Volgens de mensen in de gesloten COR-versie van dit topic, maakt dit allemaal niets uit. Het is gewoon een bedrijf dat gewoon reclame maakt!

COR / Is het handig dat Pfizer veel reclame maakt voor zichzelf?

Mooi normaal bedrijf dat Pfizer dat gewoon normale reclames maakt aldus de normies:



https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/pfizer

1 van de grootste boetes in de Health Care wereld ooit voor Pfizer:

Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History

Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing

WASHINGTON – American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together "Pfizer") have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products, the Justice Department announced today.

Pharmacia & Upjohn Company has agreed to plead guilty to a felony violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for misbranding Bextra with the intent to defraud or mislead. Bextra is an anti-inflammatory drug that Pfizer pulled from the market in 2005. Under the provisions of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, a company must specify the intended uses of a product in its new drug application to FDA. Once approved, the drug may not be marketed or promoted for so-called "off-label" uses – i.e., any use not specified in an application and approved by FDA. Pfizer promoted the sale of Bextra for several uses and dosages that the FDA specifically declined to approve due to safety concerns. The company will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the United States for any matter. Pharmacia & Upjohn will also forfeit $105 million, for a total criminal resolution of $1.3 billion.

In addition, Pfizer has agreed to pay $1 billion to resolve allegations under the civil False Claims Act that the company illegally promoted four drugs – Bextra; Geodon, an anti-psychotic drug; Zyvox, an antibiotic; and Lyrica, an anti-epileptic drug – and caused false claims to be submitted to government health care programs for uses that were not medically accepted indications and therefore not covered by those programs. The civil settlement also resolves allegations that Pfizer paid kickbacks to health care providers to induce them to prescribe these, as well as other, drugs. The federal share of the civil settlement is $668,514,830 and the state Medicaid share of the civil settlement is $331,485,170. This is the largest civil fraud settlement in history against a pharmaceutical company.

https://www.justice.gov/o(...)ttlement-its-history