quote:When I wrote last week about how northern Idaho was surging with COVID cases, to the point that hospitals had triggered a plan to ration medical care, I got a slew of correspondence from people there saying: No we aren’t.
“We don’t have any outbreaks here,” one insisted. “I know a few people working in Kootenai Health, the largest hospital in the area, and they are not busy at all. They are actually overstaffed in the ER.”
Wrote another: “I am in Coeur d’Alene and serve hundreds of customers and I’ve heard of nobody that’s been hospitalized, or who has even got COVID. I am disgusted at the inaccuracy of your article.”
Said a third: “More fearmongering by the media about our so-called ‘pandemic.’”
I wrote back to these Idahoans, attaching an alert from Kootenai Health itself, the main hospital in their own town, Coeur d’Alene. It’s entitled “Kootenai Health implements crisis standards of care as COVID-19 cases soar.” It details how the hospital is so jammed it converted its conference room into an overflow field clinic for COVID patients.
One of the Idahoans wrote back, not to say he may have misjudged the situation, but to instead accuse the hospital of now being part of my conspiracy: “My initial thought on reading this is the hospital may be falsely reporting to get more COVID funding. I will dig into it.”
Hier het artikel. (CNN)quote:Op zondag 19 september 2021 21:28 schreef Koekoekskind het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]
*Gevonden op bovenstaande subreddit.
Was een marketingstunt van een reclame bureau, website riep gewoon op je te laten vaccineren.quote:Op donderdag 23 september 2021 08:26 schreef KingRadler het volgende:
[..]
Hier het artikel. (CNN)
https://edition.cnn.com/2(...)ency-trnd/index.html
Mensen laten sterven is gewoon big business in Amerika
https://thehill.com/homen(...)-exposed-to-covid-19quote:Florida makes quarantine optional for students exposed to COVID-19
Florida's newly appointed surgeon general signed new protocols on Wednesday allowing parents to decide whether or not to quarantine their children or send them to school after being exposed to someone with COVID-19.
Joseph Ladapo, who was sworn in on Tuesday, got rid of a previous rule that required students to quarantine at home for at least four days if they were exposed to someone with COVID-19, The Associated Press reported.
Under his new rules, students may continue attending school in-person “without restrictions or disparate treatment,” as long as they are asymptomatic.
“Quarantining healthy students is incredibly damaging for their educational advancement,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said on Wednesday. "It’s also disruptive for families. We are going to be following a symptoms-based approach.”
Andrew Spar, president of the Florida Education Association, spoke out against the state's new rules, the AP reported.
“Limiting districts’ options and blocking them from following CDC guidelines is not in the best interest of the health of our students, employees or families,” Spar said.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends unvaccinated people quarantine for 14 days if they have been within six feet of someone who has tested positive for COVID-19 for at least 15 minutes — though it makes exceptions in schools if the contact stayed at least three feet away from the infected individual and both were properly masked the entire time.
Most school-aged children, those under the age of 12, are still not eligible to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Though children are believed to be less likely to develop severe cases of COVID-19, health experts have warned that they are just as capable of spreading the virus.
Ladapo's appointment as Florida's top public health official sparked criticism from DeSantis' opponents over Ladapo's opposition to vaccine and mask mandates.
“Instead of going with a trusted advocate for science, DeSantis is once again playing games with peoples’ lives by appointing someone who has trafficked anti-vaccine and anti-mask rhetoric," said Democratic National Committee spokesperson Adonna Biel.
DeSantis' spokesperson Christina Pushaw defended the hire. “Like Governor DeSantis, Dr. Ladapo is not against vaccines or masks — he is against vaccine mandates and forced-masking,” she said.
“The state should be promoting good health," Ladapo said during a press conference on Tuesday, "and vaccination isn’t the only path to that. It’s been treated almost like a religion, and that’s just senseless."
Weet ik maar diep van binnen doen begrafenis ondernemers goede zaken door Corona.quote:Op donderdag 23 september 2021 10:40 schreef George_of_the_Jungle het volgende:
[..]
Was een marketingstunt van een reclame bureau, website riep gewoon op je te laten vaccineren.
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/09/21/us/covid-vaccine-billboard-funeral-home-ad-agency-trnd/index.html
https://wilmorefuneralhome.com/
Niet van binnen, die doen gewoon goede zaken.quote:Op donderdag 23 september 2021 14:55 schreef KingRadler het volgende:
[..]
Weet ik maar diep van binnen doen begrafenis ondernemers goede zaken door Corona.
quote:all 14 beds in the intensive care unit — all with the same disease, all unvaccinated.
She thought of the abuse she’d received from one man’s angry family members, who had berated her for not treating him with ivermectin, a deworming drug falsely promoted as a cure in conspiracy circles but that the FDA has warned against using in COVID patients. She thought of how police had to remove the man’s family after his son-in-law told her, “If you don’t do this, I have a lot of ways to get people to do something, and they’re all sitting in my gun safe at home.”
...
As of Saturday, there were 686 patients hospitalized in the state with COVID, 180 of them in ICUs. That’s hundreds more than what flooded hospitals during the previous surge in December 2020, before safe and effective vaccines were widely available. (NOTE: Idaho heeft 1,7 miloen inwoners)
...
Currently, 50 of the 51 COVID patients in ICUs part of the St. Luke's Health System — a chain covering southeastern Idaho, eastern Oregon, and northern Nevada — are unvaccinated. Hospitalizations have soared. In July, there were 33 patients with COVID across all the St. Luke's hospitals. This week, there were 289. Currently, more than two-thirds of ALL patients in St. Luke’s facilities are being treated for the same virus, Jim Souza, St. Luke’s chief physician executive, told reporters in an online briefing on Tuesday.
...
Patients are younger (averaging 58 years old, down from 72), they are sicker and require more mechanical ventilation, they are staying in the ICU longer, and they are dying more frequently (the ICU mortality rate has jumped from 28% to 43%). Some 80 people have died from COVID in St. Luke’s hospitals in just the past three weeks.
“In a really morbid exercise, just in the month of September, if you look at the ages of the people we have lost and you apply to them average lifespans, we have lost more than 1,100 life years,” Souza said.
Vaccinatieplicht in januari dus voor alle kinderen van 5 jaar en ouder.quote:De Amerikaanse staat Californië stelt een coronavaccinatie vanaf januari verplicht voor kinderen die naar school gaan, zodra de inenting is goedgekeurd voor alle kinderen. Momenteel is een coronavaccin goedgekeurd voor kinderen van 12 jaar en ouder.
De Amerikaanse voedsel- en geneesmiddelenautoriteit FDA overlegt deze maand over het toestaan van het vaccin van Pfizer/BioNTech voor kinderen vanaf 5 jaar oud.
Meerdere scholen in de staat hebben de verplichting al ingevoerd. Zo moeten kinderen in Los Angeles vanaf hun twaalfde ingeënt zijn en openbare scholen in San Diego hanteren de leeftijd van 16 jaar.
https://www.ad.nl/binnenl(...)-waku-waku~a33336f0/
Al meer dan 700.000 coronadoden in de VSquote:Al meer dan 700.000 coronadoden in de VS
Sinds de uitbraak van de pandemie zijn al meer dan 700.000 mensen in de Verenigde Staten overleden aan de gevolgen van een besmetting met het coronavirus. Dat blijkt uit cijfers van de Johns Hopkins Universiteit. Het gaat om het equivalent van de bevolking van hoofdstad Washington.
Belga
05:04
Dagelijks overlijden nog steeds honderden Amerikanen aan het coronavirus, ondanks de vaccinatiecampagne. De VS zijn het zwaarst getroffen land door het coronavirus, voor Brazilië met bijna 600.000 doden en India met 450.000. In België gaat het om ruim 25.000 overlijdens.
Iets meer dan 64 procent van de Amerikaanse bevolking, of zowat 215 miljoen mensen, heeft ten minste één dosis van een coronavaccin gekregen.
Die krijg je niet zomaar meer terug.quote:Op zaterdag 2 oktober 2021 13:18 schreef zakjapannertje het volgende:
[..]
Al meer dan 700.000 coronadoden in de VS
https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws(...)700-000-coronadoden/
quote:Op zondag 3 oktober 2021 11:18 schreef KingRadler het volgende:
[..]
Die krijg je niet zomaar meer terug.
https://nos.nl/liveblog/2(...)je-op-europese-kaartquote:10 UUR GELEDEN
'Vooral kinderen uit minderheidsgroepen in VS verloren ouder door coronavirus'
In de Verenigde Staten hebben meer dan 120.000 kinderen een ouder of verzorger verloren door het coronavirus. Vooral zwarte kinderen en kinderen van Latijns-Amerikaanse afkomst werden hard getroffen, stelt een onderzoek van het medische tijdschrift Pediatrics.
Van de 120.000 kinderen in de VS die een ouder of verzorger door het coronavirus hebben verloren, behoort 65 procent tot een etnische of raciale minderheidsgroep, zoals de zwarte of Latijns-Amerikaanse gemeenschap. Deze minderheidsgroepen vormen gezamenlijk 39 procent van de totale Amerikaanse populatie. Ter vergelijking: de onderzoekers schatten dat 35 procent van de getroffen 120.000 kinderen wit is, terwijl witte mensen 61 procent van de Amerikaanse bevolking vormen.
Een eerdere studie schatte dat tot februari ongeveer 40.000 kinderen een ouder verloor vanwege covid-19. De nieuwe cijfers zijn echter niet tegenstrijdig met de oude, stellen de onderzoekers. In het nieuwe onderzoek zijn namelijk ook 'primaire' grootouders meegenomen, oftewel opa's en oma's die voor hun kleinkinderen zorgen. Volgens de onderzoekers komt dat bij de twee genoemde minderheidsgroepen relatief vaak voor.
"Deze resultaten tonen aan welke kinderen het kwetsbaarst zijn door de pandemie en waar extra hulpmiddelen naartoe moeten gaan", zegt Alexandra Blenkinsop, een van de onderzoekers tegen persbureau AP.
Ik heb wel eens gelezen/gehoord dat ze daar werknemersrechten niet zo belangrijk vinden en dat je daar voor de meest onnozele dingen ontslagen kan worden. Dus het verbaast me niks dat dit daar voorkomt.quote:
Ik mag ook hopen dat die werknemers daar verder ook niet over miepen. Ze hebben zelf gekozen voor dat extreme kapitalistische systeem. Gebrainwashed om te denken dat om elke onnozelheid ontslagen te worden freedom betekent.quote:Op vrijdag 8 oktober 2021 12:13 schreef Morrigan het volgende:
[..]
Ik heb wel eens gelezen/gehoord dat ze daar werknemersrechten niet zo belangrijk vinden en dat je daar voor de meest onnozele dingen ontslagen kan worden. Dus het verbaast me niks dat dit daar voorkomt.
Klopt. In vergelijking met Europa zijn wetten zijn veel meer gericht op beschermen van bedrijven dan beschermen van mensen.quote:Op vrijdag 8 oktober 2021 12:13 schreef Morrigan het volgende:
[..]
Ik heb wel eens gelezen/gehoord dat ze daar werknemersrechten niet zo belangrijk vinden en dat je daar voor de meest onnozele dingen ontslagen kan worden. Dus het verbaast me niks dat dit daar voorkomt.
Idaho, gaat lekker daar of niet?quote:Op vrijdag 8 oktober 2021 12:18 schreef George_of_the_Jungle het volgende:
Wat artikelen uit C'oeur d'Alene, Idaho, waar ik (anti-vax) familie heb wonen.
Lees vooral ook de comments eronder.
https://www.facebook.com/CDAPress/posts/4646049312114128
https://cdapress.com/news/2021/oct/07/fight-real/
quote:U.S. Adults' Estimates of COVID-19 Hospitalization Risk
The American public's understanding of the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines may have been put to the test in recent weeks as national public health leaders openly debated whether a booster shot is needed for the general population. Meanwhile, a large gap in vaccination rates persists between Democrats and Republicans, possibly reflecting partisans' different views on the relative risks of COVID-19 versus the vaccines.
In August, Gallup surveyed over 3,000 U.S. adults on their understanding of the likelihood of hospitalization after contracting COVID-19 among those who have versus have not been vaccinated. The results show that most Americans overstate the risk of hospitalization for both groups: 92% overstate the risk that unvaccinated people will be hospitalized, and 62% overstate the risk for vaccinated people. At the same time, U.S. adults are fairly accurate at estimating the effectiveness of vaccines at preventing hospitalization, with the median respondent putting it at 80%.
Democrats provide much higher and more accurate vaccine efficacy estimates than Republicans (88% vs. 50%), and unvaccinated Republicans have a median vaccine efficacy of 0%, compared with 73% for vaccinated Republicans. The results suggest that the low vaccine uptake among Republicans may be driven, at least in part, by an inaccurate understanding of the published data on vaccine effectiveness
Background
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, political affiliation has been a strong predictor of attitudes and behaviors related to disease risks and mitigation. Gallup's monthly tracking of adult (18+) vaccination rates in the U.S. reveals a deep political divide. As of September 2021, 92% of Democrats reported having had at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine compared with 56% of Republicans.
Previous Gallup research has found that the American public has a poor understanding of the true risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and that misperceptions vary by political party. In December 2020, through the Franklin Templeton-Gallup Economics of Recovery Study, we asked 5,000 U.S. adults: "As far as you know, what percentage of people who have been infected by the coronavirus needed to be hospitalized?" Only 18% provided the correct answer, which at that time was between 1% and 5%, and a higher percentage of Republicans (26%) gave the correct response than did Democrats (just 10%). Likewise, experimental research from Gallup and Franklin Templeton found that providing people information about high vaccine efficacy led to greater acceptance of the vaccine.
Data from Gallup's most recent COVID-19 Panel survey, in August, is especially relevant to the public's understanding of vaccine efficacy; in recent weeks, the Biden administration, health officials, and many in the media have expressed concerns about breakthrough infections stemming from the Delta variant of SARS-CoV2, pointing to rising infections, hospitalizations and deaths. On Aug. 18, the Department of Health and Human Services announced that it was making plans for administering booster shots to people who are already vaccinated, pending FDA approval. This caused some debate among experts. For example, on September 13, medical scholars published an analysis in a leading journal concluding that "Current evidence does not appear to show a need for boosting in the general population." Four days later, on September 17, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration panel rejected Pfizer's application for broad emergency use of a third dose, opting instead to restrict such authorization for only select groups of higher-risk persons.
In light of these debates, Gallup tested public understanding of the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines by asking 3,158 U.S. adults two questions during a field period of August 16-22. The items tested respondents' overall assessment of COVID hospitalization risks facing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, allowing researchers to calculate the implied efficacy of vaccines.
The items were the following:
• As far as you know, what percentage of unvaccinated people have been hospitalized due to the coronavirus?
• As far as you know, what percentage of fully vaccinated people have been hospitalized due to the coronavirus?
• The implied efficacy of vaccines is calculated by subtracting the second response from the first and dividing by the first. If a respondent answers that 10% of unvaccinated people have been hospitalized from COVID and 5% of vaccinated people, this implies a vaccine efficacy of 50%.
How the Public Understands Hospitalization Risk
For both vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, very few adults reported a correct answer, which is less than one percent. See the discussion in the appendix for details about the correct hospitalization rates and efficacy estimates. Only 8% of U.S. adults gave correct answers for the unvaccinated population and 38% for the vaccinated population.
Partisanship was a strong predictor of accuracy, but party accuracy varied by whether the respondent was assessing the risk of the vaccinated or unvaccinated populations.
For unvaccinated hospitalization risk, 2% of Democrats responded correctly, compared with 16% of Republicans. In fact, 41% of Democrats replied that at least 50% of unvaccinated people have been hospitalized due to COVID-19.
By contrast, Democrats were more likely to estimate hospitalization risk for the vaccinated population correctly: 42% of Democrats compared with 33% of Republicans correctly reported that less than one percent of vaccinated people have been hospitalized. Very few respondents thought the risks exceed 50% (only 2% of Democrats and 7% of Republicans).
Public Understanding of Vaccine Efficacy
The relative reduction of risk from vaccination is known as the efficacy estimate. U.S. CDC data suggest that vaccines are roughly 99% effective at reducing hospitalizations. Careful studies that attempt to compare people living in the same area who face similar risks find efficacy rates around 95%, even against Delta variant, for the most common vaccines found in the United States (Pfizer, Moderna).
We used individual responses to the items on hospitalization probabilities for vaccinated and unvaccinated people to calculate an implied efficacy rate, which is the percentage reduction in risk for the vaccinated group. Again, partisanship is a strong predictor of the accuracy of these estimates. U.S. adults estimated a median efficacy rate of 80%, which is close to the actual rate. Democrats, however, were even more accurate, with a median efficacy rate of 88%. Republicans, however, expressed an efficacy rate of only 50%.
Vaccination status was also a strong predictor of efficacy estimates. Unvaccinated Republicans reported risk rates that implied zero benefit of vaccination -- an efficacy rate of 0%. By contrast, vaccinated Republicans reported an estimated efficacy of 73%, much closer to the truth. Unvaccinated Independents were also far off (12% efficacy), but vaccinated independents were close (83%) to Democrats. For Democrats, vaccination status made little difference, however. Unvaccinated Democrats still reported 80% efficacy rates. Given previous studies on the effects of the media and information during COVID, one possible reason is that Democrats are more consistently exposed to information that favorably portrays vaccine efficacy.
Discussion
Democrats are more likely to overstate hospitalization risks for unvaccinated people, which may fuel efforts, often led by Democratic Party leaders, to enforce both mask and vaccine mandates. At the same time, Republicans overstate risks to vaccinated people, leading to very low vaccine efficacy estimates. This may be one of the reasons that so many Republicans have been reluctant to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Previous research links these behavioral patterns to differences in information exposure. If so, vaccine acceptance is unlikely to significantly increase among Republicans until their trusted media or other information sources emphasize the benefits of vaccination.
Appendix: The Actual Risk and Implied Efficacy
The correct answers to hospitalization risk can be calculated using data from the Department of Health and Human Services (via HealthData.gov) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). One needs only the following figures: 1) the population of vaccinated and unvaccinated people 2) total hospitalizations resulting from COVID-19 3) hospitalizations of vaccinated people. We used data through August 9, 2021, one week before the survey was fielded. At that time, total hospitalizations from COVID-19 were estimated to be 2.6 million, with 7,608 vaccinations found among vaccinated people. The size of the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations was nearly equal on August 9 (with 168 million vaccinated and 163 million unvaccinated).
A simplistic analysis of these numbers would yield hospitalization rates of 0.005% for the vaccinated population (1 case in 22,118) and 1.6% for the unvaccinated population (1 case in 62), but those numbers exaggerate the benefits of the vaccine because the unvaccinated population confronted many more days of risk, since vaccination was gradually rolled out starting in December of 2020. For that reason, we take the average population totals over the relevant periods for each population (March 1, 2020-Aug. 9, 2021 for the unvaccinated population and Dec. 15, 2020,-Aug. 9, 2021, for the vaccinated population). The adjusted population of vaccinated people comes to 83 million and 295 million for the vaccinated population, since the entire U.S. population was unvaccinated -- except a small number of participants in clinical trials --up until December of 2020.
Using these adjusted figures, we calculate that the hospitalization rate for the vaccinated population is 0.01% (or 1 in 10,914), and the rate for unvaccinated adults is 0.89% (or 1 case in 112 people). In both cases, therefore, the correct answer is less than one percent, but the implied efficacy rate of vaccination is 99% at preventing hospitalizations. This is calculated as the hospitalization rate for the unvaccinated minus the hospitalization rate for the vaccinated, divided by the unvaccinated rate. In other words, it is the percentage decrease in hospitalization risk. This high rate of protection -- even against Delta -- is consistent with a recent article published in the Lancet, which reviewed large-scale empirical data from the United States and around the world.
Some may argue that patients may have been hospitalized as a result of COVID but not diagnosed as such. We think this is highly unlikely to result in significant downward bias in the rates of hospitalization risk since testing at hospitals became widespread after only a few weeks at the start of the pandemic, and the vast majority of hospitalizations would have occurred since May of 2020, given data on deaths, which are more comprehensively documented. Nonetheless, using various modeling assumptions, CDC epidemiologists estimate that the actual number of hospitalizations may be 1.8 times higher than the reported number. If these estimates are accurate, the true rate of hospitalization risk for the unvaccinated population is 1.6% and as high as 0.2% for the vaccinated population. In either case, the public's misunderstanding of risk is roughly just as inaccurate. One criticism of these inflated estimates is that they assume that many people were hospitalized while asymptomatically carrying the SARS-CoV-2 virus, leading to an undetected case. The problem with this reasoning is that it would count people admitted to the hospital for non-COVID reasons who coincidentally had an asymptomatic infection. These cases were correctly omitted from official statistics since the absence of symptoms cannot cause hospitalization.
A more serious limitation is that we count each admission from COVID-19 into a hospital as a unique person. In fact, we know from scholarly research that some patients are readmitted multiple times. One paper estimates that 9% of COVID-19 patients were readmitted to the hospital. This implies that, at minimum, our hospitalization estimates should be multiplied by 0.91 to capture only hospitalizations of unique individuals. Doing so would shrink both hospitalization risk estimates, and they would still both be well below 1%.
Bron
Covid gaat in golven, daardoor is het lastig om te beoordelen of Florida er nu volledig doorheen is.quote:Op donderdag 21 oktober 2021 21:40 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
De VS hebben een probleem is de titel van dit topic. Misschien moeten ze meer luisteren naar DeSantis?
De critici van DeSantis zwijgen als de COVID-19-gevallen in Florida dalen
[ afbeelding ]
De COVID-19-reactie van Florida is beschreven als roekeloos, gevaarlijk en anti-wetenschappelijk.
De Republikeinse gouverneur doorstond maanden van minachting voor het versoepelen van pandemiebeperkingen. Men probeerde te zeggen, wanneer het virus in opkomst was, dat dit bewijs was dat de hele Republikeinse aanpak van het beheersen van het virus heeft gefaald.
Maar dalingen in Florida's case counts krijgen maar een fractie van de aandacht.
Het aantal nieuwe besmettingen per 100.000 inwoners is de afgelopen week gedaald naar 12, aldus de coronavirustracker van de New York Times. In de afgelopen 14 dagen daalde het aantal gevallen met 48%.
Andere staten met veel uitgebreidere pandemiebeperkingen zien covid-19 zich sneller verspreiden dan Florida.
In New York is het aantal nieuwe gevallen bijvoorbeeld meer dan het dubbele van dat van Florida met 25 per 100.000 inwoners in de afgelopen week.
In de staat Washington lag het aantal nieuwe besmettingen per 100.000 inwoners de afgelopen week op 31.
Gaat verder:
https://news.yahoo.com/de(...)ridas-110000651.html
Komt hij weer met zijn leugens. Florida is de Staat met de meeste coronadoden van Amerika. Het beleid van De Santis heeft rampzalige gevolgen voor zijn inwoners. En jij loopt dat gewoon aan te moedigen alsof het iets fantastisch is wat daar gebeurd.,quote:Op donderdag 21 oktober 2021 21:40 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
De VS hebben een probleem is de titel van dit topic. Misschien moeten ze meer luisteren naar DeSantis?
De critici van DeSantis zwijgen als de COVID-19-gevallen in Florida dalen
[ afbeelding ]
De COVID-19-reactie van Florida is beschreven als roekeloos, gevaarlijk en anti-wetenschappelijk.
De Republikeinse gouverneur doorstond maanden van minachting voor het versoepelen van pandemiebeperkingen. Men probeerde te zeggen, wanneer het virus in opkomst was, dat dit bewijs was dat de hele Republikeinse aanpak van het beheersen van het virus heeft gefaald.
Maar dalingen in Florida's case counts krijgen maar een fractie van de aandacht.
Het aantal nieuwe besmettingen per 100.000 inwoners is de afgelopen week gedaald naar 12, aldus de coronavirustracker van de New York Times. In de afgelopen 14 dagen daalde het aantal gevallen met 48%.
Andere staten met veel uitgebreidere pandemiebeperkingen zien covid-19 zich sneller verspreiden dan Florida.
In New York is het aantal nieuwe gevallen bijvoorbeeld meer dan het dubbele van dat van Florida met 25 per 100.000 inwoners in de afgelopen week.
In de staat Washington lag het aantal nieuwe besmettingen per 100.000 inwoners de afgelopen week op 31.
Gaat verder:
https://news.yahoo.com/de(...)ridas-110000651.html
Waarom heeft Florida nu de laagste besmettingscijfers volgens jou?quote:Op vrijdag 22 oktober 2021 20:13 schreef voetbalmanager2 het volgende:
[..]
Komt hij weer met zijn leugens. Florida is de Staat met de meeste coronadoden van Amerika. Het beleid van De Santis heeft rampzalige gevolgen voor zijn inwoners. En jij loopt dat gewoon aan te moedigen alsof het iets fantastisch is wat daar gebeurd.,![]()
[ twitter ]
In elk geval niet vanwege De Santis. Die liegt, bedriegt, manipuleert, houdt actief zo'n beetje elke maatregel tegen dat verspreiding van het virus tegen gaat. Als je beleid van zo'n man toejuicht dan ben je niet goed in je hoofd.quote:Op vrijdag 22 oktober 2021 20:14 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
[..]
Waarom heeft Florida nu de laagste besmettingscijfers volgens jou?
Doe eens een bron die aangeeft dat Florida de laagste besmettingscijfers over langere tijd heeft.quote:Op vrijdag 22 oktober 2021 20:14 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
[..]
Waarom heeft Florida nu de laagste besmettingscijfers volgens jou?
https://www.washingtonpos(...)hs/?itid=hp_pandemicquote:Op vrijdag 22 oktober 2021 20:19 schreef voetbalmanager2 het volgende:
[..]
Doe eens een bron die aangeeft dat Florida de laagste besmettingscijfers over langere tijd heeft.
Dat is in een week tijd inderdaad. En alleen voor het aantal positief geteste personen per 100.000 inwoners . Als je kijkt naar hoeveel testen er in Florida afgenomen worden per 100.000 inwoners, dan zitten ze ook ver onder het landelijke gemiddelde. Dat zou al een belangrijke oorzaak kunnen zijn.quote:Op vrijdag 22 oktober 2021 21:01 schreef Montov het volgende:
[..]
https://www.washingtonpos(...)hs/?itid=hp_pandemic
Florida op dit moment idd de laagste (uitgezonderd Hawaii en Puerto Rico)
Qua dodental en ziekenhuisbezetting nog wel bovengemiddeld, maar dat zal wrs nog dalen.
quote:Een derde New Yorkse agenten dag voor deadline niet gevaccineerd
Bijna een derde van de geüniformeerde agenten van de politie van New York is niet ingeënt tegen corona, blijkt uit door het stadsbestuur gepubliceerde cijfers. Vandaag is de deadline voor alle stadsmedewerkers van New York, dus ook voor politieagenten, om minstens eenmaal te zijn geprikt. Wie weigert krijgt onbetaald verlof.
Burgemeester Bill de Blasio had gisteren gezegd dat het politiekorps van New York (NYPD) voor 74 procent was gevaccineerd, maar had daarbij geen onderscheid gemaakt tussen geüniformeerde agenten en ander personeel. De NYPD heeft in totaal ongeveer 55.000 werknemers, waarvan zo'n 35.000 geüniformeerd zijn.
De Police Benevolent Association, de machtige politievakbond die 24.000 geüniformeerde agenten in de stad vertegenwoordigt, vecht de vaccinatieplicht voor de rechtbank aan. Die weigert echter om haar te blokkeren. Ook in grote steden als Chicago en Los Angeles verzetten politievakbonden zich tegen de vaccinatieplichten in hun stad.
Het coronavirus is dit jaar tot nu toe de belangrijkste doodsoorzaak voor agenten, net als in 2020. Volgens de Officer Down Memorial Page, een non-profitorganisatie die de dood van agenten bijhoudt, zijn in 2021 tot dusver 250 agenten overleden aan het virus. Dat is vijf keer zoveel als het aantal doden onder agenten door vuurwapengeweld.
https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/(...)-rtl-nieuws-pandemie
Alsnog vrij hoor.quote:
Ga je daar toch lekker wonen, arrevedeci.quote:Op vrijdag 29 oktober 2021 08:42 schreef bianconeri het volgende:
[..]
Alsnog vrij hoor.
Ben wel blij dat ze in de VS een goed duidelijk standpunt durven in te nemen.
Zouden ze in NL eens moeten doen met dat softe gedoe hier.
|
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |