BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
Maar vooral niet ingaan op inhoudelijke serieuze vragen. Lekker elkaars complotpsychose blijven versterkenquote:Op maandag 30 november 2020 13:02 schreef Summers het volgende:
[..]
Kijken teveel naar weapons of mass deception , tell lie vision
Dat ligt aan heel wat factoren, de persoon zelf, zijn thuis situatie, werk situatie ga maar even door.quote:
[..]
Die zullen zich dan ook niet laten testen neem ik aan
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Jup dumpen hun opa's, oma's en ouders die op leeftijd zijn, die zijn niet meer welkom thuis .. treurig.quote:
[..]
Kijken teveel naar weapons of mass deception , tell lie vision
Als je in discussie gaat met een trol, wint hij. Als je een trol beledigt, wint hij. Als je tekeer gaat tegen een trol, wint hij. Het enige waar trollen niet tegen kunnen, is te worden genegeerd.
lekker de overheids-krankzinnigheid nablaten..quote:
[..]
Maar vooral niet ingaan op inhoudelijke serieuze vragen. Lekker elkaars complotpsychose blijven versterken
Huig
Laat ik het anders stellen. Als je geen klachten hebt, waarom zou je je dan laten testen als je ook niet in contact bent geweest met een coronalijerquote:
[..]
Dat ligt aan heel wat factoren, de persoon zelf, zijn thuis situatie, werk situatie ga maar even door.
Zolang het niet de msm fear porn psychose is I'm goodquote:
[..]
Maar vooral niet ingaan op inhoudelijke serieuze vragen. Lekker elkaars complotpsychose blijven versterken
THE GREAT AWAKENING ! CHANGING OF THE GUARD GLOBALLY . MSM IS FAKE NEWS
YouTube?quote:
[..]
Kijken teveel naar weapons of mass deception , tell lie vision
Want daar kijk ik naar!
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Dus wat zou jij willen dat er zou gebeuren. Wat zou de overheid moeten beslissen volgens jou?quote:
[..]
Zolang het niet de msm fear porn psychose is I'm good
Als je ziet hoe druk het gister in sommige centra was, ben je denk ik wel heel naief als je denkt dat mensen zich hier allemaal keurig aan gaan houden. Ja, zeker zal er een groep zijn die dat doet, maar ik vraag me oprecht af hoe groot die groep nog is. Zelfs mijn meest 'streng in de leer' kennissen/vrienden laten het vieren met de feestdagen.quote:
[..]
Ja joh in jouw wereld.. sta je natuurlijk ook hierachter
[ afbeelding ]
Laatst moest hier een hele afdeling zich laten testen, omdat er 1 besmet was die alleen parttime (op een zondag) werkt.quote:
[..]
Laat ik het anders stellen. Als je geen klachten hebt, waarom zou je je dan laten testen als je ook niet in contact bent geweest met een coronalijer
Maar er waren 3 anderen ook aan werk die ook door de weeks werkten.
En die gene die besmet was was pas een week na zijn laatste werkdag besmet.
Maar zekere dus voor onzekere en de hele afdeling is getest, ondanks dat er maar 3 met hem in contact waren geweest.
Het had maar zo kunnen zijn dat de hele afdeling besmet was, nu maar 1 anders kon bedrijf wel dicht.
Na 10 dagen word die persoon weer getest met of zonder klachten.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Moest van wie? klinkt als een vrij nutteloze actiequote:
[..]
Laatst moest hier een hele afdeling zich laten testen, omdat er 1 besmet was die alleen parttime (op een zondag) werkt.
Maar er waren 3 anderen ook aan werk die ook door de weeks werkten.
En die gene die besmet was was pas een week na zijn laatste werkdag besmet.
Maar zekere dus voor onzekere en de hele afdeling is getest, ondanks dat er maar 3 met hem in contact waren geweest.
Het had maar zo kunnen zijn dat de hele afdeling besmet was, nu maar 1 anders kon bedrijf wel dicht.
Dat is toch niet normaal alsof volwassenen kleutertjes zijn of robots die je kan programeren , ze zijn compleet losgeslagen in hun gedrags experiment .quote:Op maandag 30 november 2020 13:11 schreef F.Sinatra het volgende:
[..]
Als je ziet hoe druk het gister in sommige centra was, ben je denk ik wel heel naief als je denkt dat mensen zich hier allemaal keurig aan gaan houden. Ja, zeker zal er een groep zijn die dat doet, maar ik vraag me oprecht af hoe groot die groep nog is. Zelfs mijn meest 'streng in de leer' kennissen/vrienden laten het vieren met de feestdagen.
THE GREAT AWAKENING ! CHANGING OF THE GUARD GLOBALLY . MSM IS FAKE NEWS
De directeur want... heel gek.. hij wil graag draaiende blijven...quote:
[..]
Moest van wie? klinkt als een vrij nutteloze actie
nutteloos?
liever testen dan bedrijf dicht gooien..
hmmmm juist
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Ja, ik vind het vooral naief.quote:
[..]
Dat is toch niet normaal alsof volwassenen kleutertjes zijn of robots die je kan programeren , ze zijn compleet losgeslagen in hun gedrags experiment .
"Black friday.. moet naar de winkel " programmering bedoel je? Van die Ikea zombies op paas maandag enzo.quote:
[..]
Dat is toch niet normaal alsof volwassenen kleutertjes zijn of robots die je kan programeren , ze zijn compleet losgeslagen in hun gedrags experiment .
Moest? En als je dat niet zou doen?quote:
[..]
Laatst moest hier een hele afdeling zich laten testen, omdat er 1 besmet was die alleen parttime (op een zondag) werkt.
Maar er waren 3 anderen ook aan werk die ook door de weeks werkten.
En die gene die besmet was was pas een week na zijn laatste werkdag besmet.
Maar zekere dus voor onzekere en de hele afdeling is getest, ondanks dat er maar 3 met hem in contact waren geweest.
Het had maar zo kunnen zijn dat de hele afdeling besmet was, nu maar 1 anders kon bedrijf wel dicht.
Na 10 dagen word die persoon weer getest met of zonder klachten.
Nutteloos omdat de uitslag discutabel isquote:
[..]
nutteloos?
liever testen dan bedrijf dicht gooien..
hmmmm juist
Aftreden , stoppen met fear porn en toegeven dat ze ons in de maling hebben genomen .quote:
[..]
Dus wat zou jij willen dat er zou gebeuren. Wat zou de overheid moeten beslissen volgens jou?
THE GREAT AWAKENING ! CHANGING OF THE GUARD GLOBALLY . MSM IS FAKE NEWS
Even los daarvan. Een test verplichten als werkgever lijkt me niet helemaal de bedoeling.quote:
[..]
De directeur want... heel gek.. hij wil graag draaiende blijven...
nutteloos?
liever testen dan bedrijf dicht gooien..
hmmmm juist
Wat waren de consequenties als je het niet deed?
[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 30-11-2020 13:19:42 ]
Alle overheden over de hele wereld hebben samengewerkt om ons voor de gek te houden?quote:
[..]
Aftreden , stoppen met fear porn en toegeven dat ze ons in de maling hebben genomen .
En dan vooral, met welk doel?
In de USA hebben ze vrijwel niks gedaan, is dat ook fake al die doden?
Nu zit er 1 persoon thuis en bedrijf gaat gewoon door..quote:
[..]
Nutteloos omdat de uitslag discutabel is
Nou een familie lid is nu dood ... dus vertel hem dat maar, zie eerdere post pagina of wat terug!
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Naar huis..quote:
[..]
Even los daarvan. Een test verplichten als werkgever lijkt me niet helemaal de bedoeling.
Wat waren de consequenties als je het niet deed?
het is een bedrijf waar veel mensen tegenwoordig werken.
en een directeur wil graag draaiende blijven..
Als iedereen ziek is .. is je bedrijf op slot, ook als er veel besmettingen zijn kan men het bedrijf op slot gooien..
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Dat geloof ik allemaal wel, maar dat iedereen negatief getest is nu wil nog niet zoveel zeggen daar ze nog in de incubatietijd zitten. Of zie ik dat verkeerd?quote:
[..]
Nu zit er 1 persoon thuis en bedrijf gaat gewoon door..
Nou een familie lid is nu dood ... dus vertel hem dat maar, zie eerdere post pagina of wat terug!
Wat een onzin weer. De meeste mensen blijven er nuchter maar realistisch onder. De angst-pandemie slaat dan ook vooral op een aantal users in dit topic die menen in een orwelliaanse wereld te leven omdat je in bepaalde situaties een lapje stof moet dragen. Dat zijn dezelfde mensen die een schimmenstrijd tegen de cabal voeren door... u raadt het nooit... Amerikaanse propaganda-spotprenten te plaatsen. Tja.quote:
[..]
Jup dumpen hun opa's, oma's en ouders die op leeftijd zijn, die zijn niet meer welkom thuis .. treurig.
[ afbeelding ]
Huilen dan.
Ja, snap ik wel. Maar ik vind het verplicht testen wel erg ver gaan.quote:
[..]
Naar huis..
het is een bedrijf waar veel mensen tegenwoordig werken.
en een directeur wil graag draaiende blijven..
Als iedereen ziek is .. is je bedrijf op slot, ook als er veel besmettingen zijn kan men het bedrijf op slot gooien..
Ik heb ook liever dat mijn mensen werken dan ziek zijn. Maar liever ziek thuis dan verplicht testen.
[ Bericht 6% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 30-11-2020 13:29:10 ]
Trump die halsoverkop het ziekenhuis in werd gevlogen nadat hij flink te grazen werd genomen door een een democratische hoax is natuurlijk wel het toppunt van ironie.quote:
[..]
Alle overheden over de hele wereld hebben samengewerkt om ons voor de gek te houden?
En dan vooral, met welk doel?
In de USA hebben ze vrijwel niks gedaan, is dat ook fake al die doden?
Huilen dan.
Nee dan zou je gewoon positief moeten zijn getest, er zat ook een week tussen he..quote:
[..]
Dat geloof ik allemaal wel, maar dat iedereen negatief getest is nu wil nog niet zoveel zeggen daar ze nog in de incubatietijd zitten. Of zie ik dat verkeerd?
Maar goed op afdelingen waar men redelijk dicht naast elkaar moet werken houd men de regels beetje afstand houden en als je wel even mee moet kijken bij collega mondkapje op en zo..
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
fake newsquote:Op maandag 30 november 2020 13:30 schreef Isdatzo het volgende:
[..]
Trump die halsoverkop het ziekenhuis in werd gevlogen nadat hij flink te grazen werd genomen door een een democratische hoax is natuurlijk wel het toppunt van ironie.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Wat voor test was dat precies? Hoeveel werknemers waren getest?quote:
[..]
Laatst moest hier een hele afdeling zich laten testen, omdat er 1 besmet was die alleen parttime (op een zondag) werkt.
Maar er waren 3 anderen ook aan werk die ook door de weeks werkten.
En die gene die besmet was was pas een week na zijn laatste werkdag besmet.
Maar zekere dus voor onzekere en de hele afdeling is getest, ondanks dat er maar 3 met hem in contact waren geweest.
Het had maar zo kunnen zijn dat de hele afdeling besmet was, nu maar 1 anders kon bedrijf wel dicht.
Na 10 dagen word die persoon weer getest met of zonder klachten.
Wie heeft de test uitgevoerd? Is er iemand langs geweest ? Of zijn jullie allemaal gezellig samen naar zo'n test straat of zo geweest? Of gewoon allemaal zelf gedaan?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Van waar krijg je die 40k te kort?quote:Op zondag 29 november 2020 22:36 schreef devlinmr het volgende:
[..]
Niet echt efficiënt als je al 40k personeel tekort komt
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Gelijk voor de duidelijkheid, ik was er niet bij, andere afdeling. (+- 25 man)quote:
[..]
Wat voor test was dat precies? Hoeveel werknemers waren getest?
Wie heeft de test uitgevoerd? Is er iemand langs geweest ? Of zijn jullie allemaal gezellig samen naar zo'n test straat of zo geweest? Of gewoon allemaal zelf gedaan?
Ze werken met een uitstrijkje vanuit de neus (welke test weet ik niet) niemand over gehoord en niemand die het boeide, ze kregen wel binnen no-time een uitslag, dus ik gok een Antigeentest.
1 voor 1 apart naar een aangegeven locatie, als negatief was mochten ze gewoon weer aan het werk.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Prachtig....Mutual Maskerbation
'Let me ask people of colour something...are you getting tired of listening to rich white kids telling you how disadvantaged you are?'
Why I Wear My Mask | Welcome to the Masquerade
"I was wearing my mask because I've just got back from a full day of being a good person"
Met dank aan Theobalt @ Off-Guardian.... https://off-guardian.org/(...)about-the-lockdowns/
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Vacatures voor wat precies?quote:
[..]
Dat is het aantal vacatures dat open staat
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Zorgmedewerkers in het algemeen en gespecialiseerde zorgmedewerkers met BIG registratie in het bijzonderquote:
Wees maar blij als je straks nog met een mondkap naar buiten mag waar en wanneer je wilt. We gaan namelijk richting een avondklok/ lockdown met de huidige cijfers.quote:
Gaat niet om het drama ervan maken gaat erom dat de overheid belachelijke regels oplegt die geen nut hebben. Nog even en je moet die lap om zodra je buiten komt. Buiten dit, mensen die zo'n mondkapje niet verdragen om welke gezondheidsreden dan ook moeten het daarom dan maar ontgelden? Of zich elke keer moeten gaan verantwoorden met hun medische gegevens? Je zal maar een treinreis van een paar uur moeten maken dan is het afzien.
quote:Deskundigen: strengere maatregelen nodig na drukte in steden
Deskundigen willen per direct nieuwe regels voor winkelstraten. Het kortingenfestijn Black Friday heeft het afgelopen weekend in veel steden tot grote drukte geleid. "Als dit de opmaat was voor de rest van december, dan hebben we echt een groot probleem", zegt viroloog en OMT-lid Menno de Jong. En hij staat daar niet alleen in, blijkt uit een rondgang door RTL Nieuws.
https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/(...)n-maatregelen-corona
Steun het Kiva Fok! team!
http://www.kiva.org/team/fok
http://www.kiva.org/team/fok
Zo die gooit even alle allang bewezen onzin in 4 minuten eruit. Maar goed hier zal iedereen het inderdaad wel weer prachtig vinden want het bevestigd alles wat men denkt zonder ook maar 1 toon van kritiek.quote:
Mutual Maskerbation
'Let me ask people of colour something...are you getting tired of listening to rich white kids telling you how disadvantaged you are?'
Why I Wear My Mask | Welcome to the Masquerade
"I was wearing my mask because I've just got back from a full day of being a good person"
Met dank aan Theobalt @ Off-Guardian.... https://off-guardian.org/(...)about-the-lockdowns/
Zoiets vroeg ik in het vorige topic ook al. Wat wint de overheid of een andere club naar keuze bij deze maatregelen? Het bleek een niet te beantwoorden vraag voor de wakkere mensen hier.quote:
[..]
Alle overheden over de hele wereld hebben samengewerkt om ons voor de gek te houden?
En dan vooral, met welk doel?
In de USA hebben ze vrijwel niks gedaan, is dat ook fake al die doden?
Fluitbekzeenaalden zijn verwant aan de zeenaalden, de zeepaardjes en de trompetzeenaalden.
Van die laatste groep onderscheiden ze zich door de draadvormige verlenging van de middelste staartvinstralen (die bij de trompetzeenaalden ontbreken).
Van die laatste groep onderscheiden ze zich door de draadvormige verlenging van de middelste staartvinstralen (die bij de trompetzeenaalden ontbreken).
Hoogstens krijg je een kul antwoord over "big reset" oidquote:Op maandag 30 november 2020 18:54 schreef fluitbekzeenaald2.0 het volgende:
[..]
Zoiets vroeg ik in het vorige topic ook al. Wat wint de overheid of een andere club naar keuze bij deze maatregelen? Het bleek een niet te beantwoorden vraag voor de wakkere mensen hier.
Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic – Forbes
Note: This article, published on 5 February 2010, originally appeared in Forbes. It was removed sometime in mid October 2020 with no explanation.
While you can find a capture at archive.org, we have saved a copy here to protect against censorship and for easy sharing.
The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying “The sky is falling!” like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. “The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible,” the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this “description,” but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO’s motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the “false pandemic” is “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.”
Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany, Dr. Ulrich Kiel, has essentially labeled the pandemic a hoax. “We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of resources [$18 billion so far] in terms of public health,” he said.
They’re right. This wasn’t merely overcautiousness or simple misjudgment. The pandemic declaration and all the Klaxon-ringing since reflect sheer dishonesty motivated not by medical concerns but political ones.
Artikel gaat verder:
https://evidencenotfear.com/why-the-who-faked-a-pandemic-forbes/
Note: This article, published on 5 February 2010, originally appeared in Forbes. It was removed sometime in mid October 2020 with no explanation.
While you can find a capture at archive.org, we have saved a copy here to protect against censorship and for easy sharing.
The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying “The sky is falling!” like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. “The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible,” the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this “description,” but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO’s motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the “false pandemic” is “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.”
Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany, Dr. Ulrich Kiel, has essentially labeled the pandemic a hoax. “We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of resources [$18 billion so far] in terms of public health,” he said.
They’re right. This wasn’t merely overcautiousness or simple misjudgment. The pandemic declaration and all the Klaxon-ringing since reflect sheer dishonesty motivated not by medical concerns but political ones.
Artikel gaat verder:
https://evidencenotfear.com/why-the-who-faked-a-pandemic-forbes/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Hier een samenvatting van onderzoek dat is gedaan naar mondkapjes. De links naar de verschillende onderzoeken staan in het document onderaan deze post.
Masks are neither effective nor safe:
A summary of the science
Colleen Huber, NMD
First published as pre-print July 6, 2020
Peer review completed November 19, 2020
In 2020 there is a surge in use of facemasks in public places, including for extended periods of time, in
the United States as well as in other countries. The public has been instructed by media and their
governments that one’s use of masks, even if not sick, may prevent others from being infected with
SARS-CoV-2, the infectious agent of COVID-19.
A review of the peer-reviewed medical literature examines impacts of masks on human health, both
immunological, as well as physiological. The purpose of this paper is to examine data regarding the
effectiveness of facemasks, as well as safety data. The reason that both are examined in one paper is
that for the general public as a whole, as well as for each individual, a risk-benefit analysis is necessary
to guide decisions on if and when to wear a mask.
Are masks effective at preventing transmission of respiratory pathogens?
A 2020 meta-analysis found that face masks have no detectable effect against transmission of viral
infections.
It found: “Compared to no masks, there was no reduction of influenza-like illness cases or
influenza for masks in the general population, nor in healthcare workers.”
Another 2020 meta-analysis, published by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), found that evidence
from randomized controlled trials of face masks did not support a substantial effect on transmission of
laboratory-confirmed influenza, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in
the general community to reduce their susceptibility.
Yet another 2020 analysis, found that masks had no effect specifically against Covid-19, although
facemask use seemed linked to, in 3 of 31 studies, “very slightly reduced” odds of developing influenzalike illness.
The remainder of the 31 studies did not verify that finding.
A 2019 study of 2862 participants showed that both N95 respirators and surgical masks “resulted in no
significant difference in the incidence of laboratory confirmed influenza.”
A 2016 meta-analysis found that both randomized controlled trials and observational studies of N95
respirators and surgical masks used by healthcare workers did not show benefit against transmission of
acute respiratory infections. It was also found that acute respiratory infection transmission “may have
occurred via contamination of provided respiratory protective equipment during storage and reuse of
masks and respirators throughout the workday.”
A 2011 meta-analysis of 17 studies regarding masks and effect on transmission of influenza found that
“none of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection
against influenza infection.”
However, authors speculated that effectiveness of masks may be linked to
early, consistent and correct usage.
Face mask use was likewise found to be not protective against the common cold, compared to controls
without face masks among healthcare workers.
Airflow around masks
Masks have been assumed to be effective in obstructing forward travel of viral particles. Considering
those positioned next to or behind a mask wearer, there have been farther transmission of virus-laden
fluid particles from masked individuals than from unmasked individuals, by means of “several leakage
jets, including intense backward and downwards jets that may present major hazards,” and a
“potentially dangerous leakage jet of up to several meters.”
All masks were thought to reduce forward airflow by 90% or more over wearing no mask. However, Schlieren imaging showed that both surgical masks and cloth masks had farther brow jets (upward airflow past eyebrows) than not wearing any mask at all, 182 mm and 203 mm respectively, vs none discernible with no mask. Backward airflow was found to be strong with all masks compared to not masking.
For both N95 and surgical masks, it was found that expelled particles from 0.03 to 1 micron were
deflected around the edges of each mask, and that there was measurable penetration of particles
through the filter of each mask.
Penetration through masks
A study of 44 mask brands found mean 35.6% penetration (+ 34.7%). Most medical masks had over 20%
penetration, while “general masks and handkerchiefs had no protective function in terms of the aerosol
filtration efficiency.” The study found that “Medical masks, general masks, and handkerchiefs were
found to provide little protection against respiratory aerosols.”
It may be helpful to remember that an aerosol is a colloidal suspension of liquid or solid particles in a
gas. In respiration, the relevant aerosol is the suspension of bacterial or viral particles in inhaled or
exhaled breath.
In another study, penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.
N95 respirators
Honeywell is a manufacturer of N95 respirators. These are made with a 0.3 micron filter.
N95 respirators are so named, because 95% of particles having a diameter of 0.3 microns are filtered by the
mask forward of the wearer, by use of an electrostatic mechanism. Coronaviruses are approximately
0.125 microns in diameter.
A meta-analysis found that N95 respirators did not provide superior protection to facemasks against
viral infections or influenza-like infections.
Another study did find superior protection by N95 respirators when they were fit-tested compared to surgical masks.
Another study found that 624 out of 714 people wearing N95 masks left visible gaps when putting on
their own masks.
Surgical masks
A 2010 study found that surgical masks offered no protection at all against influenza.
Another study found that surgical masks had about 85% penetration ratio of aerosolized inactivated influenza particles and about 90% of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, although S aureus particles were about 6 times the
diameter of influenza particles.
Use of masks in surgery were found to slightly increase incidence of infection over not masking in a
study of 3,088 surgeries.
The surgeons’ masks were found to give no protective effect to the patients.
Other studies found no difference in wound infection rates with and without surgical mask use during
surgery.
A 2015 study found that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect
either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.”21
A 2020 study found that medical masks have a wide range of filtration efficiency, with most showing a
30% to 50% efficiency.
Specifically, are surgical masks effective in stopping human transmission of coronaviruses? Both
experimental and control groups, masked and unmasked respectively, were found to “not shed
detectable virus in respiratory droplets or aerosols.”
In that study, they “did not confirm the infectivity of coronavirus” as found in exhaled breath. A study of aerosol penetration showed that two of the five surgical masks studied had 51% to 89% penetration of polydisperse aerosols.
In another study, that observed subjects while coughing, “neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively
filtered SARS-CoV-2 during coughs by infected patients.” And more viral particles were found on the
outside than on the inside of masks tested.
Cloth masks
Cloth masks were found to have low efficiency for blocking particles of 0.3 microns and smaller. Aerosol
penetration through a variety of cloth masks examined was found to be between 74 and 90%. The
filtration efficiency of fabric materials was 3% to 33%
Healthcare workers wearing cloth masks were found to have 13 times the risk of influenza-like illness
than those wearing medical masks.
This 1920 analysis of cloth mask use during the 1918 pandemic examines the failure of masks to impede
or stop flu transmission at that time, and concluded that the number of layers of fabric required to
prevent pathogen penetration would have required a suffocating number of layers, and could not be
used for that reason, as well as the problem of leakage vents around the edges of cloth masks.
A 2020 Duke University study found that a likely reason for the poor effect of cloth masks is that the
mesh of the mask dispersed larger expired respiratory droplets “into a multitude of smaller droplets . . .
which explains the apparent increase in droplet count relative to no mask in that case.” It was also
noted that those smaller particles are likely to stay airborne longer than larger droplets, which resulted
in “counterproductive” use of these cloth masks.
Masks against Covid-19
The New England Journal of Medicine editorial on the topic of mask use versus Covid-19 assesses the
matter as follows:
“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from
infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face
contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a
few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 20 minutes). The chance of catching
Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the
desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”
Are masks safe?
During walking or other exercise Surgical mask wearers had significantly increased dyspnea after a 6-minute walk than non-mask wearers.
Researchers are concerned about possible burden of facemasks during physical activity on pulmonary,
circulatory and immune systems, due to oxygen reduction and air trapping reducing substantial carbon
dioxide exchange. As a result of hypercapnia, there may be cardiac overload, renal overload, and a shift
to metabolic acidosis.
Risks of N95 respirators
Pregnant healthcare workers were found to have a loss in volume of oxygen consumption by 13.8%
compared to controls when wearing N95 respirators. 17.7% less carbon dioxide was expired.
Patients with end-stage renal disease were studied during use of N95 respirators. Their partial pressure of
oxygen (PaO2) decreased significantly compared to controls and increased respiratory adverse effects.
19% of the patients developed various degrees of hypoxemia while wearing the masks. Healthcare workers’ N95 respirators were considered as personal bioaerosol samplers, for collecting influenza virus.
And 25% of healthcare workers’ facepiece respirators were found to contain influenza
in an emergency department during the 2015 flu season.
Risks of surgical masks
Healthcare workers’ surgical masks were considered as “personal bioaerosol samplers” and were found
to collect and to harbor influenza virus.
Various respiratory pathogens were found on the outer surface of used medical masks, which could
result in self-contamination. The risk was found to be higher with longer duration of mask use.38
Surgical masks were also found to be a repository of bacterial contamination. The source of the bacteria
was determined to be the body surface of the surgeons, rather than the operating room environment.39
Given that surgeons are gowned from head to foot for surgery, this finding should be especially
concerning for laypeople who wear masks. Without the protective garb of surgeons, laypeople
generally have even more exposed body surface to serve as a source for bacteria to collect on their
masks.
Risks of cloth masks
Healthcare workers wearing cloth masks had significantly higher rates of influenza-like illness after four
weeks of continuous on-the-job use, when compared to controls.
The increased rate of infection in mask-wearers may be due to a weakening of immune function during
mask use. Surgeons have been found to have lower oxygen saturation after surgeries even as short as
30 minutes.
Low oxygen induces hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1). This in turn down-regulates
CD4+ T-cells.42 CD4+ T-cells, in turn, are necessary for viral immunity.
Weighing risk versus benefit of mask use
In 2020 the United States is seeing an unprecedented surge of mask use by the public. Homemade and
store-bought cloth masks and surgical masks or N95 masks are being used by the public especially when
entering stores and other publicly accessible buildings. Sometimes bandanas or scarves are used. The
use of face masks, whether cloth, surgical or N95, creates a poor obstacle to aerosolized pathogens as
we can see from the meta-analyses and other studies in this paper, allowing both transmission of
aerosolized pathogens to others in various directions, as well as self-contamination.
Forward projectionof exhaled material may be partly replaced by lateral, backward, downward and upward projection, and to greater distances, with longer time airborne, from a masked person than from an unmasked person.
It must also be considered that masks impede the necessary volume of air intake required for adequate
oxygen / carbon dioxide exchange, which results in observed physiological effects that may be
undesirable. Even 6-minute walks, let alone more strenuous activity, resulted in dyspnea. The volume
of unobstructed oxygen in a typical breath is about 100 ml, used for normal physiological processes. 100
ml O2 greatly exceeds the volume of a pathogen required for transmission.
The foregoing data show that masks serve more as instruments of obstruction of normal breathing,
rather than as effective barriers to pathogens. Therefore, masks should not be used by the general
public, either by adults or children, and their limitations as prophylaxis against pathogens should also be
considered in medical settings. The clinical studies and meta-analyses that are referenced, cited and
Links naar bronnen staan in dit document:
https://pdmj.org/Mask_Risks_Part4.pdf
Masks are neither effective nor safe:
A summary of the science
Colleen Huber, NMD
First published as pre-print July 6, 2020
Peer review completed November 19, 2020
In 2020 there is a surge in use of facemasks in public places, including for extended periods of time, in
the United States as well as in other countries. The public has been instructed by media and their
governments that one’s use of masks, even if not sick, may prevent others from being infected with
SARS-CoV-2, the infectious agent of COVID-19.
A review of the peer-reviewed medical literature examines impacts of masks on human health, both
immunological, as well as physiological. The purpose of this paper is to examine data regarding the
effectiveness of facemasks, as well as safety data. The reason that both are examined in one paper is
that for the general public as a whole, as well as for each individual, a risk-benefit analysis is necessary
to guide decisions on if and when to wear a mask.
Are masks effective at preventing transmission of respiratory pathogens?
A 2020 meta-analysis found that face masks have no detectable effect against transmission of viral
infections.
It found: “Compared to no masks, there was no reduction of influenza-like illness cases or
influenza for masks in the general population, nor in healthcare workers.”
Another 2020 meta-analysis, published by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), found that evidence
from randomized controlled trials of face masks did not support a substantial effect on transmission of
laboratory-confirmed influenza, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in
the general community to reduce their susceptibility.
Yet another 2020 analysis, found that masks had no effect specifically against Covid-19, although
facemask use seemed linked to, in 3 of 31 studies, “very slightly reduced” odds of developing influenzalike illness.
The remainder of the 31 studies did not verify that finding.
A 2019 study of 2862 participants showed that both N95 respirators and surgical masks “resulted in no
significant difference in the incidence of laboratory confirmed influenza.”
A 2016 meta-analysis found that both randomized controlled trials and observational studies of N95
respirators and surgical masks used by healthcare workers did not show benefit against transmission of
acute respiratory infections. It was also found that acute respiratory infection transmission “may have
occurred via contamination of provided respiratory protective equipment during storage and reuse of
masks and respirators throughout the workday.”
A 2011 meta-analysis of 17 studies regarding masks and effect on transmission of influenza found that
“none of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection
against influenza infection.”
However, authors speculated that effectiveness of masks may be linked to
early, consistent and correct usage.
Face mask use was likewise found to be not protective against the common cold, compared to controls
without face masks among healthcare workers.
Airflow around masks
Masks have been assumed to be effective in obstructing forward travel of viral particles. Considering
those positioned next to or behind a mask wearer, there have been farther transmission of virus-laden
fluid particles from masked individuals than from unmasked individuals, by means of “several leakage
jets, including intense backward and downwards jets that may present major hazards,” and a
“potentially dangerous leakage jet of up to several meters.”
All masks were thought to reduce forward airflow by 90% or more over wearing no mask. However, Schlieren imaging showed that both surgical masks and cloth masks had farther brow jets (upward airflow past eyebrows) than not wearing any mask at all, 182 mm and 203 mm respectively, vs none discernible with no mask. Backward airflow was found to be strong with all masks compared to not masking.
For both N95 and surgical masks, it was found that expelled particles from 0.03 to 1 micron were
deflected around the edges of each mask, and that there was measurable penetration of particles
through the filter of each mask.
Penetration through masks
A study of 44 mask brands found mean 35.6% penetration (+ 34.7%). Most medical masks had over 20%
penetration, while “general masks and handkerchiefs had no protective function in terms of the aerosol
filtration efficiency.” The study found that “Medical masks, general masks, and handkerchiefs were
found to provide little protection against respiratory aerosols.”
It may be helpful to remember that an aerosol is a colloidal suspension of liquid or solid particles in a
gas. In respiration, the relevant aerosol is the suspension of bacterial or viral particles in inhaled or
exhaled breath.
In another study, penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.
N95 respirators
Honeywell is a manufacturer of N95 respirators. These are made with a 0.3 micron filter.
N95 respirators are so named, because 95% of particles having a diameter of 0.3 microns are filtered by the
mask forward of the wearer, by use of an electrostatic mechanism. Coronaviruses are approximately
0.125 microns in diameter.
A meta-analysis found that N95 respirators did not provide superior protection to facemasks against
viral infections or influenza-like infections.
Another study did find superior protection by N95 respirators when they were fit-tested compared to surgical masks.
Another study found that 624 out of 714 people wearing N95 masks left visible gaps when putting on
their own masks.
Surgical masks
A 2010 study found that surgical masks offered no protection at all against influenza.
Another study found that surgical masks had about 85% penetration ratio of aerosolized inactivated influenza particles and about 90% of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, although S aureus particles were about 6 times the
diameter of influenza particles.
Use of masks in surgery were found to slightly increase incidence of infection over not masking in a
study of 3,088 surgeries.
The surgeons’ masks were found to give no protective effect to the patients.
Other studies found no difference in wound infection rates with and without surgical mask use during
surgery.
A 2015 study found that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect
either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.”21
A 2020 study found that medical masks have a wide range of filtration efficiency, with most showing a
30% to 50% efficiency.
Specifically, are surgical masks effective in stopping human transmission of coronaviruses? Both
experimental and control groups, masked and unmasked respectively, were found to “not shed
detectable virus in respiratory droplets or aerosols.”
In that study, they “did not confirm the infectivity of coronavirus” as found in exhaled breath. A study of aerosol penetration showed that two of the five surgical masks studied had 51% to 89% penetration of polydisperse aerosols.
In another study, that observed subjects while coughing, “neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively
filtered SARS-CoV-2 during coughs by infected patients.” And more viral particles were found on the
outside than on the inside of masks tested.
Cloth masks
Cloth masks were found to have low efficiency for blocking particles of 0.3 microns and smaller. Aerosol
penetration through a variety of cloth masks examined was found to be between 74 and 90%. The
filtration efficiency of fabric materials was 3% to 33%
Healthcare workers wearing cloth masks were found to have 13 times the risk of influenza-like illness
than those wearing medical masks.
This 1920 analysis of cloth mask use during the 1918 pandemic examines the failure of masks to impede
or stop flu transmission at that time, and concluded that the number of layers of fabric required to
prevent pathogen penetration would have required a suffocating number of layers, and could not be
used for that reason, as well as the problem of leakage vents around the edges of cloth masks.
A 2020 Duke University study found that a likely reason for the poor effect of cloth masks is that the
mesh of the mask dispersed larger expired respiratory droplets “into a multitude of smaller droplets . . .
which explains the apparent increase in droplet count relative to no mask in that case.” It was also
noted that those smaller particles are likely to stay airborne longer than larger droplets, which resulted
in “counterproductive” use of these cloth masks.
Masks against Covid-19
The New England Journal of Medicine editorial on the topic of mask use versus Covid-19 assesses the
matter as follows:
“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from
infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face
contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a
few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 20 minutes). The chance of catching
Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the
desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”
Are masks safe?
During walking or other exercise Surgical mask wearers had significantly increased dyspnea after a 6-minute walk than non-mask wearers.
Researchers are concerned about possible burden of facemasks during physical activity on pulmonary,
circulatory and immune systems, due to oxygen reduction and air trapping reducing substantial carbon
dioxide exchange. As a result of hypercapnia, there may be cardiac overload, renal overload, and a shift
to metabolic acidosis.
Risks of N95 respirators
Pregnant healthcare workers were found to have a loss in volume of oxygen consumption by 13.8%
compared to controls when wearing N95 respirators. 17.7% less carbon dioxide was expired.
Patients with end-stage renal disease were studied during use of N95 respirators. Their partial pressure of
oxygen (PaO2) decreased significantly compared to controls and increased respiratory adverse effects.
19% of the patients developed various degrees of hypoxemia while wearing the masks. Healthcare workers’ N95 respirators were considered as personal bioaerosol samplers, for collecting influenza virus.
And 25% of healthcare workers’ facepiece respirators were found to contain influenza
in an emergency department during the 2015 flu season.
Risks of surgical masks
Healthcare workers’ surgical masks were considered as “personal bioaerosol samplers” and were found
to collect and to harbor influenza virus.
Various respiratory pathogens were found on the outer surface of used medical masks, which could
result in self-contamination. The risk was found to be higher with longer duration of mask use.38
Surgical masks were also found to be a repository of bacterial contamination. The source of the bacteria
was determined to be the body surface of the surgeons, rather than the operating room environment.39
Given that surgeons are gowned from head to foot for surgery, this finding should be especially
concerning for laypeople who wear masks. Without the protective garb of surgeons, laypeople
generally have even more exposed body surface to serve as a source for bacteria to collect on their
masks.
Risks of cloth masks
Healthcare workers wearing cloth masks had significantly higher rates of influenza-like illness after four
weeks of continuous on-the-job use, when compared to controls.
The increased rate of infection in mask-wearers may be due to a weakening of immune function during
mask use. Surgeons have been found to have lower oxygen saturation after surgeries even as short as
30 minutes.
Low oxygen induces hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1). This in turn down-regulates
CD4+ T-cells.42 CD4+ T-cells, in turn, are necessary for viral immunity.
Weighing risk versus benefit of mask use
In 2020 the United States is seeing an unprecedented surge of mask use by the public. Homemade and
store-bought cloth masks and surgical masks or N95 masks are being used by the public especially when
entering stores and other publicly accessible buildings. Sometimes bandanas or scarves are used. The
use of face masks, whether cloth, surgical or N95, creates a poor obstacle to aerosolized pathogens as
we can see from the meta-analyses and other studies in this paper, allowing both transmission of
aerosolized pathogens to others in various directions, as well as self-contamination.
Forward projectionof exhaled material may be partly replaced by lateral, backward, downward and upward projection, and to greater distances, with longer time airborne, from a masked person than from an unmasked person.
It must also be considered that masks impede the necessary volume of air intake required for adequate
oxygen / carbon dioxide exchange, which results in observed physiological effects that may be
undesirable. Even 6-minute walks, let alone more strenuous activity, resulted in dyspnea. The volume
of unobstructed oxygen in a typical breath is about 100 ml, used for normal physiological processes. 100
ml O2 greatly exceeds the volume of a pathogen required for transmission.
The foregoing data show that masks serve more as instruments of obstruction of normal breathing,
rather than as effective barriers to pathogens. Therefore, masks should not be used by the general
public, either by adults or children, and their limitations as prophylaxis against pathogens should also be
considered in medical settings. The clinical studies and meta-analyses that are referenced, cited and
Links naar bronnen staan in dit document:
https://pdmj.org/Mask_Risks_Part4.pdf
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Ontario death count includes people who didn't die of COVID-19, but exactly how many is unknown
The daily pandemic death counts in Ontario include people who have tested positive for COVID-19 but have not necessarily died from the virus.
The exact number of people who fit into this category is unknown by the government and not even being counted.
https://torontosun.com/ne(...)-how-many-is-unknown
The daily pandemic death counts in Ontario include people who have tested positive for COVID-19 but have not necessarily died from the virus.
The exact number of people who fit into this category is unknown by the government and not even being counted.
https://torontosun.com/ne(...)-how-many-is-unknown
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Top Pathologist Claims Coronavirus is “The Greatest Hoax Ever Perpetrated on an Unsuspecting Public”
Top pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson told government officials in Alberta during a zoom conference call that the current coronavirus crisis is “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public.”
Hodkinson’s comments were made during a discussion involving the Community and Public Services Committee and the clip was subsequently uploaded to YouTube.
Noting that he was also an expert in virology, Hodkinson pointed out that his role as CEO of a biotech company that manufactures COVID tests means, “I might know a little bit about all this.”
“There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians, it’s outrageous, this is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public,” said Hodkinson.
The doctor said that nothing could be done to stop the spread of the virus besides protecting older more vulnerable people and that the whole situation represented “politics playing medicine, and that’s a very dangerous game.”
Artikel gaat verder:
https://summit.news/2020/(...)unsuspecting-public/
Top pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson told government officials in Alberta during a zoom conference call that the current coronavirus crisis is “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public.”
Hodkinson’s comments were made during a discussion involving the Community and Public Services Committee and the clip was subsequently uploaded to YouTube.
Noting that he was also an expert in virology, Hodkinson pointed out that his role as CEO of a biotech company that manufactures COVID tests means, “I might know a little bit about all this.”
“There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians, it’s outrageous, this is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public,” said Hodkinson.
The doctor said that nothing could be done to stop the spread of the virus besides protecting older more vulnerable people and that the whole situation represented “politics playing medicine, and that’s a very dangerous game.”
Artikel gaat verder:
https://summit.news/2020/(...)unsuspecting-public/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Mooi, kun je dan ook even uitleggen waarom en hoe ze alle regeringen inclusief Kim Jung Un zover hebben gekregen hieraan mee te doen. Vergeet ook niet uit te leggen hoe ze alleen in Nederland al ruim 1 miljoen zorgmedewerkers zo ver hebben gekregen dit geheim te bewarenquote:
Top Pathologist Claims Coronavirus is “The Greatest Hoax Ever Perpetrated on an Unsuspecting Public”
Top pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson told government officials in Alberta during a zoom conference call that the current coronavirus crisis is “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public.”
Hodkinson’s comments were made during a discussion involving the Community and Public Services Committee and the clip was subsequently uploaded to YouTube.
Noting that he was also an expert in virology, Hodkinson pointed out that his role as CEO of a biotech company that manufactures COVID tests means, “I might know a little bit about all this.”
“There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians, it’s outrageous, this is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public,” said Hodkinson.
The doctor said that nothing could be done to stop the spread of the virus besides protecting older more vulnerable people and that the whole situation represented “politics playing medicine, and that’s a very dangerous game.”
Artikel gaat verder:
https://summit.news/2020/(...)unsuspecting-public/
Maar dat mensen doodgaan aan covid klopt dus wel. Hoe kan het dan een hoax zijn zoals je in je volgende post beweert?quote:
Ontario death count includes people who didn't die of COVID-19, but exactly how many is unknown
The daily pandemic death counts in Ontario include people who have tested positive for COVID-19 but have not necessarily died from the virus.
The exact number of people who fit into this category is unknown by the government and not even being counted.
https://torontosun.com/ne(...)-how-many-is-unknown
Heb ik iets beweerd in mijn vorige post? Jij denkt dat ik Dr. Roger Hodkinson ben?quote:
[..]
Maar dat mensen doodgaan aan covid klopt dus wel. Hoe kan het dan een hoax zijn zoals je in je volgende post beweert?
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Ik post deze info hier. Wat mensen daar verder mee doen moeten ze zelf weten. Daarbij snap jij blijkbaar niet wat "unsuspecting" betekent.quote:
[..]
Mooi, kun je dan ook even uitleggen waarom en hoe ze alle regeringen inclusief Kim Jung Un zover hebben gekregen hieraan mee te doen. Vergeet ook niet uit te leggen hoe ze alleen in Nederland al ruim 1 miljoen zorgmedewerkers zo ver hebben gekregen dit geheim te bewaren
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Artikel van Reuters over een klokkenluider die bij Pfizer werkte:
https://www.reuters.com/a(...)idUSN021592920090903
Uit het artikel:
Kopchinski, appalled by Pfizer’s tactics in selling the pain drug Bextra, filed a “qui tam” lawsuit in 2003, sparking federal and state probes that led to Wednesday’s agreement by the company to pay $2.3 billion in civil and criminal penalties and plead guilty to a felony charge for promoting Bextra and 12 other drugs for unapproved uses and doses.
“In the Army I was expected to protect people at all costs,” Kopchinski said in a statement. “At Pfizer I was expected to increase profits at all costs, even when sales meant endangering lives.
“I couldn’t do that,” added Kopchinski, 45, who was fired by Pfizer in March of 2003, two years before the company pulled Bextra from the market over concerns it raised the risk of heart attacks and strokes.
Klinkt als een top bedrijf dat Pfizer!
https://www.reuters.com/a(...)idUSN021592920090903
Uit het artikel:
Kopchinski, appalled by Pfizer’s tactics in selling the pain drug Bextra, filed a “qui tam” lawsuit in 2003, sparking federal and state probes that led to Wednesday’s agreement by the company to pay $2.3 billion in civil and criminal penalties and plead guilty to a felony charge for promoting Bextra and 12 other drugs for unapproved uses and doses.
“In the Army I was expected to protect people at all costs,” Kopchinski said in a statement. “At Pfizer I was expected to increase profits at all costs, even when sales meant endangering lives.
“I couldn’t do that,” added Kopchinski, 45, who was fired by Pfizer in March of 2003, two years before the company pulled Bextra from the market over concerns it raised the risk of heart attacks and strokes.
Klinkt als een top bedrijf dat Pfizer!
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
