The Cabal; the Weaponization of Government - deel V

quote:

Op dinsdag 5 maart 2019 13:44 schreef xpompompomx het volgende:
[..]

Je klinkt een beetje viesmad, maar, als Trump zo onschuldig is als een pasgeboren kind, zoals hij altijd zelf zegt te zijn, dan is er toch allemaal niks aan de hand voor Trump?

quote:

Op dinsdag 5 maart 2019 15:53 schreef dellipder het volgende:
Dit is tegenwoordig de journalistieke standaard van de anti-Trump media.
Niets wordt onderzocht en/of door meerdere bronnen bevestigd, maar als zogenaamde bombshell meteen gepubliceerd om maar roering te veroorzaken, zodat de collusion delusion adepten hun doping toegediend blijven krijgen.
George Conway is een fanatiek never-Trumper. Dat hij een negatief stuk laat optekenen IF TRUE is net zo voorspelbaar als Piet Paulusma afsluit met oant moarn.

[ afbeelding ]

Man, man, man, man...

quote:

Op dinsdag 5 maart 2019 13:35 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:

Michael Cohen Admits He's Working With Democrats To Trash President Trump

Dit is echt bizar - leugenaar Cohen heeft voorafgaand aan de getuigenis gesproken met oa Cummings, Schiff, en anderen van de DNC. Zijn advocaat is Lanny Davis, advocaat van de Clintons

quote:

Op dinsdag 5 maart 2019 15:53 schreef dellipder het volgende:
Dit is tegenwoordig de journalistieke standaard van de anti-Trump media.
Niets wordt onderzocht en/of door meerdere bronnen bevestigd, maar als zogenaamde bombshell meteen gepubliceerd om maar roering te veroorzaken, zodat de collusion delusion adepten hun doping toegediend blijven krijgen.
George Conway is een fanatiek never-Trumper. Dat hij een negatief stuk laat optekenen IF TRUE is net zo voorspelbaar als Piet Paulusma afsluit met oant moarn.

[ afbeelding ]

Man, man, man, man...

quote:

Op dinsdag 5 maart 2019 16:45 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:
[..]

Die ouwe reactionairen en neo-cons binnen de GOP verliezen natuurlijk steeds meer invloed binnen de partij. Er zullen er bij zijn die het liefst terug willen naar pre-Trump tijden.

Ik vind trouwens ook die metamorfose van Lindsay Graham ook heel merkwaardig; eerst het knechtje van de oorlogshitser en Trumphater McCain en nu pro-Trump.

En nu probeert men Ocasio-Cortez zwart te maken, er zouden rare dingen plaatsvinden met campagnegeld.

https://www.foxnews.com/p(...)ec-complaint-alleges

Nieuws op Fox en conservatieve websites. Maar waarom zouden zij Ocasio-Cortez zwart willen maken? De conservatieven zouden haar moeten koesteren omdat zij absoluut geen kans maakt tegen Trump in 2020.

quote:

Op dinsdag 5 maart 2019 16:45 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:
[..]

Die ouwe reactionairen en neo-cons binnen de GOP verliezen natuurlijk steeds meer invloed binnen de partij. Er zullen er bij zijn die het liefst terug willen naar pre-Trump tijden.

Ik vind trouwens ook die metamorfose van Lindsay Graham ook heel merkwaardig; eerst het knechtje van de oorlogshitser en Trumphater McCain en nu pro-Trump.

En nu probeert men Ocasio-Cortez zwart te maken, er zouden rare dingen plaatsvinden met campagnegeld.

https://www.foxnews.com/p(...)ec-complaint-alleges

Nieuws op Fox en conservatieve websites. Maar waarom zouden zij Ocasio-Cortez zwart willen maken? De conservatieven zouden haar moeten koesteren omdat zij absoluut geen kans maakt tegen Trump in 2020.

quote:

Op dinsdag 5 maart 2019 15:53 schreef dellipder het volgende:
Dit is tegenwoordig de journalistieke standaard van de anti-Trump media.
Niets wordt onderzocht en/of door meerdere bronnen bevestigd, maar als zogenaamde bombshell meteen gepubliceerd om maar roering te veroorzaken, zodat de collusion delusion adepten hun doping toegediend blijven krijgen.
George Conway is een fanatiek never-Trumper. Dat hij een negatief stuk laat optekenen IF TRUE is net zo voorspelbaar als Piet Paulusma afsluit met oant moarn.

[ afbeelding ]

Man, man, man, man...

quote:

Op dinsdag 5 maart 2019 16:45 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:
[..]

Die ouwe reactionairen en neo-cons binnen de GOP verliezen natuurlijk steeds meer invloed binnen de partij. Er zullen er bij zijn die het liefst terug willen naar pre-Trump tijden.

Ik vind trouwens ook die metamorfose van Lindsay Graham ook heel merkwaardig; eerst het knechtje van de oorlogshitser en Trumphater McCain en nu pro-Trump.

En nu probeert men Ocasio-Cortez zwart te maken, er zouden rare dingen plaatsvinden met campagnegeld.

https://www.foxnews.com/p(...)ec-complaint-alleges

Nieuws op Fox en conservatieve websites. Maar waarom zouden zij Ocasio-Cortez zwart willen maken? De conservatieven zouden haar moeten koesteren omdat zij absoluut geen kans maakt tegen Trump in 2020.

quote:

Op woensdag 6 maart 2019 12:52 schreef xpompompomx het volgende:
[..]

Hier de link naar het stuk uit the New Yorker waar Conway het over had:
https://www.newyorker.com(...)fox-news-white-house

quote:

Op woensdag 6 maart 2019 12:16 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]

Jaja, maar dat hij dan 10 jaar advocaat was van Trump, maar even vergeten.

quote:

Op woensdag 6 maart 2019 12:20 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]

Zo werkt nieuws dus niet. En terecht dat men even campaigngeld checkt. Ik vind eigenlijk dat elke president(skandidaat) onderzocht moet worden.

quote:

Op woensdag 6 maart 2019 12:37 schreef xpompompomx het volgende:
En over AOC; of ze schijten aan Gop-zijde in hun broek voor haar, of ze zijn strontjaloers dat ze niet zoals haar zijn.

quote:

Op donderdag 7 maart 2019 10:46 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:
[..]

Welnee, die hysterische linksers met hun idiote wereldvreemde plannen zijn juist een geschenk voor de GOP. Die krijgen alleen stemmen in New York en Californie en de 'oude' achterban van de DNC zal niet voor zulke mensen stemmen. Het is mijns inziens een grote fout van de DNC geweest om die dwaze identity politics, milieuluchtfietserij en het socialisme te omarmen want dit zal de DNC doen splijten. De conservatieve DNC-leiding created a monster. De leiding, oude achterban en de kapitalische geldschieters (waaronder bedrijven uit de fossiele brandstoffensector!) zullen de linkse plannen verwerpen en er zal voorlopig geen echt linkse kandidaat kans maken, zie hoe men in 2016 Sanders een hak heeft gezet ten gunste van Clinton.

quote:

Op donderdag 7 maart 2019 23:15 schreef zomerindebol het volgende:
[..]

Idd van AOC worden ze niet bang , als je ziet hoe vrij dommig dat ze is en mede de amazon deal heeft opgeblazen
creepy joe heeft denk ik de meeste kans al is hij ook vrij kansloos als zn youtube filmpjes wat breder in beeld komen.

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 maart 2019 09:40 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:
[..]

Creepy Joe heeft vast allerlei lijken in de kast. Datgene waar beelden van zijn, zal hij vast elders ook doen, waar geen camera's bij zijn. Een van zijn interne tegenstanders of Trump zal dan een Kavanaughtje doen en allerlei meisjes en vrouwen uit zijn verleden opduikelen die vervolgens hele leugens en halve waarheden zullen verkondigen waardoor Joe in een nog slechter daglicht komt te staan. Bovendien verwacht ik dat de linkervleugel van de DNC een gekleurde vrouw (ding* ding* 2x minderheidspunten) als kandidaat wil, die ook voor de corporate democrats acceptabel is; links lullen rechts vullen. Kamala Harris dus.

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 maart 2019 11:27 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]

De zittende president is natuurlijk kastlijken vrij. 'Creepy Joe', dat soort bijnamen komen vaak niet uit mensen die serieus met politiek bezig zijn.

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 maart 2019 12:19 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:
[..]

Google maar eens op Creepy Joe. Je zult aardig wat momenten tegenkomen waarbij Biden vrouwen en kinderen betast.

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 maart 2019 12:34 schreef xpompompomx het volgende:
[..]

Kortom, de ideale conservatieve kandidaat. Bill Clinton adept

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 maart 2019 12:40 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:
[..]

Kleine correctie

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 maart 2019 13:01 schreef xpompompomx het volgende:
[..]

Grab 'm by the pussy en neuk pornosterren als je vrouw ligt te baren

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 maart 2019 13:04 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:
[..]

Of vlieg met pedo Jeffrey Epstein naar Orgy Island.

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 maart 2019 12:40 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:
[..]

Kleine correctie

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 maart 2019 13:34 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]

Heb je hier een bron van?

quote:

Op donderdag 7 maart 2019 10:54 schreef OuwePers het volgende:
Ik lees hier over de FBI en DoJ. Over dat andere onderzoek dat hier parallel aan loopt:

Weet iemand hoe sterk de GOP nog is verweven met de bestuurslagen van de CIA?

quote:

https://www.theepochtimes(...)hacking_2825871.html

Dit gaat over de vermeende Russische inmenging met de verkiezingen.

quote:

Op zondag 10 maart 2019 13:07 schreef dellipder het volgende:

Assange tells Hannity: Russia was not our source

quote:

Op zondag 10 maart 2019 13:10 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]

Holleder zei: "ik heb het niet gedaan"

Rechter: "Oh dan is het waar"

quote:

Op zondag 10 maart 2019 13:10 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]

Holleder zei: "ik heb het niet gedaan"

Rechter: "Oh dan is het waar"

quote:

The judge, T.S. Ellis III, did not actually state that there was no evidence of collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia, merely instead telling prosecutors and other assembled onlookers at Manafort's hearing Thursday that the businessman did not face any charges related to collusion.

“He is not before the court for anything having to do with colluding with the Russian government to influence the election,” Ellis told the court.

That sentiment was reiterated by Manafort's attorneys following the hearing, who told reporters that the former Trump associate was innocent of such claims.

“I think most importantly what you saw today is the same thing we had said from day one: There is absolutely no evidence that Paul Manafort was involved with any collusion with any government official from Russia,” said lead defense attorney Kevin Downing.

quote:

11 Key Things Inside The House Interview With Spygate Figure Bruce Ohr

The 268-page Bruce Ohr interview transcript provides some clarity, some comfort, but also more concerns over the handling of the Russia investigation.

On Friday, Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, released the transcript of the House’s August 2018 interview of Department of Justice lawyer Bruce Ohr.

Ohr’s name is familiar to those following the Spygate scandal: His wife, Nellie Ohr, worked for opposition research and dissemination firm Fusion GPS. The couple also met with former British spy Christopher Steele the day before the FBI launched the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into the Donald Trump presidential campaign. After the FBI fired Steele and instructed him to no longer “operate to obtain any intelligence whatsoever on behalf of the FBI,” Ohr served as a conduit to keep passing Steele’s “intel” to the FBI.

The 268-page Ohr transcript provides some clarity, some comfort, but also more concerns over the handling of the Russia investigation. Here’s what we have learned from Ohr’s testimony.

1. Steele and Simpson Didn’t Conspire with Ohr, They Played Him

On their face, the simple facts put Ohr dead center in the deep state’s efforts to undo Trump’s election. But the transcript tells a different story. Rather than Ohr teaming with Steele and Simpson and the disgraced or fired FBI crew of Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page, Ohr’s testimony convincingly casts him as the stooge.

As Ohr testified, he knew Steele professionally from Steele’s time as an MI6 agent, having first met the former spy in 2007 at a meeting in London on Russian organized crime. Ohr was also acquainted with Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson and others who “from time to time” would give him “information about Russian oligarchs and other Russian organized crime figures, and then [Ohr] would pass that to the FBI, or introduce people to the FBI.”

So when Steele asked to meet with Ohr while in DC in late July 2016, and Simpson wanted to meet the following month, Ohr agreed. Ohr took the “intel” seriously, even though the former spy was desperate to keep Trump out of the White House, because, as Ohr put it, Steele “had a good track record,” and “his information has generally been pretty good.” Steele and Simpson knew this and used Ohr to feed the Democratic-funded opposition research to the FBI.

Steele also used his acquaintance with Ohr to push for a visa for Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch banned from the United States for suspicion of ties to organized crime. Over the years, Steele and Ohr had discussed Deripaska, and Ohr identified Deripaska—not Trump—as the unnamed “favorite business tycoon” Steele referenced in a July 2016 email.

Earlier that year, Steele had emailed Ohr to tell him Deripaska had been granted a visa, adding “as far as I’m concerned, this is good news all round although as before, it would be helpful if you could monitor it and let me know if any complications arise,” he wrote. Ohr responded that “to the extent I can I will keep an eye on the situation.” However, in his testimony Ohr claimed he did want Deripaska to come to the United States.

Steele, though, played off his relationship with Ohr and suggested that the United States might have an opportunity to interview Deripaska. And at Steele’s July 30, 2016 meeting with Ohr, Steele claimed that Paul Manafort, then Trump’s campaign manager, “had entered into some kind of business deal with Oleg Deripaska, had stolen a larger amount of money from Oleg Deripaska.”

Given their past professional relationship, Ohr thought Steele had told him about Deripaska, “in case we wanted to do something,” and to let him “know that there might be an opportunity to interview Oleg Deripaska” about Russia. But text messages released last month raise a more concerning possibility: That Steele worked for Deripaska.

As Lee Smith reported at Tablet Magazine, recently released text messages showed that DC lobbyist Adam Waldman, whose clients include Deripaska, engaged in several back-and-forths with Sen. Mark Warner, the ranking Democratic member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. In a March 16, 2017, text, Waldman told Warner that “Chris Steele asked me to call you.”

Waldman’s history lobbying on behalf of Deripaska, Waldman’s connection to Steele, and Steele’s communications with Ohr led Sen. Chuck Grassley to send a letter last month to Deripaska’s London-based attorney, inquiring whether Steele has worked for or on behalf of Deripaska or businesses associated with him.

Notwithstanding Steele’s apparent attempts to use his relationship with Ohr to the benefit of Deripaska, Ohr’s testimony indicates that the DOJ lawyer had nothing to do with these lobbying efforts. In fact, when asked whether he knew that “the FBI actually helped Mr. Deripaska figure out how to get here officially” by traveling as a business delegate to the United Nations, Ohr merely stated he was aware “the FBI spoke with Mr. Deripaska on other occasions.” But Ohr denied knowing the FBI had interviewed Deripaska in September 2016.

2. Ohr May Not Have Been Complicit, But He Should Have Spoken Up and Stepped Aside

While Ohr’s recently released testimony seemingly places the DOJ lawyer on the side of unwittingly aiding Steele and Simpson’s efforts to feed the FBI salacious and false information about Trump, Ohr still holds some blame. Ohr knew at some point—when, exactly, is another question—that people connected to Hillary Clinton were funding Steele’s research.

Ohr also knew Fusion GPS was paying his wife, Nellie, to conduct related research. Yet Ohr fed Steele and Simpson’s “intel” to the FBI, including a thumb drive of information provided by Simpson. He also gave the FBI a thumb drive of his wife’s research.

Even if Ohr had previously shared intel from Steele or others with the FBI, under these extraordinary circumstances, he should have spoken up and stepped aside. Ohr definitely should not have continued to serve as a conduit to the FBI after the FBI terminated Steele on November 1, 2016, and directed Steele not “to obtain any intelligence whatsoever on behalf of the FBI.” Yet from early November 2016 until November 2017, Ohr received and passed on more than a dozen communiques from Steele.

Ohr, however, failed to inform his superiors that he was receiving information from Steele. In fact, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein did not know until October 2017 that Ohr’s wife Nellie worked for Fusion GPS. Two months later, Ohr lost his title as associate deputy attorney because “he had not given them timely notice of [his] conversations with Chris Steele.”

Ohr explained that he understood that to mean that he hadn’t told Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates or other officials in the Office of Deputy Attorney General that he was receiving information from Steele and passing it on to the FBI. Then in January 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Rosenstein removed Ohr from his position as director of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) because they did not want him having contact with the White House.

3. Ohr Wasn’t The Only One Who Kept Quiet Who Shouldn’t Have

While Ohr did not inform his superiors at the DOJ that he was serving as a conduit between Steele and the FBI, many knew of Ohr’s role as an intermediary for Steele and Simpson, including the FBI deputy director McCabe. Ohr also relayed Steele and Simpson’s “intel” to Andrew Weissmann, then the head of the Fraud Section of the DOJ, and now a member of Robert Mueller’s special counsel team, and Bruce Swartz and Zainab Ahmad, of the DOJ’s International Affairs in the Criminal Division.

Then, after the FBI terminated Steele, Strzok and Lisa Page introduced Ohr to FBI Agent Joe Pientka, because, as Ohr put it, “the FBI knew I was continuing to get contacted by Chris Steele and they had given me an agent . . . to forward the information.” Ohr also testified that in May 2017, the FBI directed Ohr to see if Steele would be willing to meet with the agents again.

This May 2017 request came right before Rosenstein appointed Mueller special counsel, which, as former FBI director James Comey’s testimony made clear, was anticipated. Although Ohr did not know whether the effort to reengage Steele came from the FBI or Mueller, Steele apparently believed he would be working with Mueller’s team, as demonstrated by a June text to Ohr expressing frustration at how “long this re-engagement with Mueller and the investigation is taking.” It does not appear that the FBI ever re-upped Steele as a confidential human source, but Ohr’s testimony established that sometime in 2017, Steele met with somebody from the FBI.

4. Steele Continued to Feed Ohr Information until November 2017

Steele also continued to feed Ohr information on Trump and Russia. It has long been known that Steele fed Ohr intel on at least 12 occasions since his November 2016 firing, until May 2017. Ohr’s testimony, however, revealed for the first time that Steele continued to provide Ohr with information until November 2017, which Ohr relayed to the FBI. Yet the FBI did not provide the Senate with any FBI 302 interview summary forms for any of those interviews with Ohr.

Whether the FBI created 302 interview summaries for those interviews is unclear, but either way it is troubling because, through May 2017, the FBI created 302 summaries every time agents spoke with Ohr. What changed?

The most obvious answer: In May 2017, Mueller was appointed special counsel. Further, in these later interviews, Ohr spoke with another agent—not Pientka, although Ohr testified that the agents he talked to were not connected to Mueller’s team.
5. Ohr’s Testimony Adds to the Case of FISA Abuse

Ohr’s testimony further cemented the case of FISA abuse. Throughout his testimony, Ohr stressed that the intel from Steele and Simpson was raw and needed to be vetted. Ohr added that he didn’t know the identity of Steele’s sources and tried to be clear when he provided the information to the FBI that he didn’t know how reliable it was. Ohr also testified one has “to be careful about all information relating to Russia,” and explained that the information would need to be corroborated before seeking a FISA warrant.

Ohr noted that he conveyed to the FBI Steele’s bias and desperation to keep Trump out of the Oval Office because, as Ohr explained, that was important for the agents to know. Yet the DOJ and FBI did not include information concerning Steele’s anti-Trump bias in the applications they filed with the FISA court seeking a court order to surveil former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page.

The FISA abuse may have extended much farther, too. The questioning of Ohr hints to this possibility, with one congressman asking whether Ohr was “involved in any of the FISA applications—were you involved in any of the other FISA applications related to the Trump-Russia collusion investigation?” Ohr responded no, but the query presumes the DOJ sought more than one FISA warrant.

6. A Stunning Lack of Interest in Ohr

Friday’s transcript also revealed that, as of August 2018, no one from the special counsel team had interviewed Ohr. Ohr also testified that he had not spoken with U.S. Attorney John Huber, who was charged with investigating potential irregularities in the handling of the Russia investigation.

The inspector general’s office of the Department of Justice did, however, approach Ohr in July 2018 concerning his contact with Steele. Ohr noted that he is fully cooperating with the request for information and expects to talk to the IG, but hasn’t been interviewed yet.

7. When Did Ohr Tell The FBI Who Hired Fusion GPS?

Ohr’s testimony cleared up several questions, but raised others. For instance, in one line of questioning, Ohr stated “my understanding is that Fusion GPS was hired by private individuals to look into possible contacts between the Russian Government and the Trump campaign.”

Rep. Trey Gowdy then asked Ohr who had hired Fusion GPS. Ohr responded: “I did not know at the time,” but added that since then “it sounds like, from the paper, that there were a couple of different people that were paying Fusion GPS to do this at different times. My understanding is that some of these people were connected to the Clinton campaign in some way. I don’t know the—I don’t recall the names.”

Later during Ohr’s testimony, however, Ohr added that when he provided the information from Steele to the FBI, he made clear “These guys were hired by somebody relating to—who’s related to the Clinton campaign.” Ohr stressed that he told the bureau of that fact because he wanted the FBI to be aware of any possible bias as they evaluated the information.

But how could Ohr have told the FBI that the Clinton campaign was funding Steele’s research if he only learned that fact later from the newspapers?

8. Ohr’s Testimony Contradicted Simpson’s

Another conflicted created from Ohr’s testimony concerned his meetings with Fusion GPS’s Simpson. Ohr testified that “Simpson and I spoke in August of 2016. I met with him, and he provided some information on possible intermediaries between the Russian Government and the Trump campaign.” Ohr later added that that meeting occurred on August 22, 2016.

Ohr also stated that he met again with Simpson in December 2016, at which time Simpson provided him a memory stick of additional information regarding the contacts between the Russians and the Trump campaign. During that December meeting, Ohr reported that Simpson said he had urged Steele to contact the media about the dossier contents and Ohr relayed that information to the FBI. (Yet the FBI wanted to reengage Steele!)

But Simpson testified under oath before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on November 14, 2017, that he had not spoken with anyone from either the FBI or the Department of Justice until after the election. Simpson stated that sometime after Thanksgiving of 2016, at Steele’s suggestion, he spoke with Ohr.

It is difficult to fathom that Simpson misremembered the timing of his first meeting with Ohr, given that Simpson claimed that “the context of this is that it was after the election,” and that “a very surprising thing had happened, which is that Donald Trump had won.”

9. Were Steele and Simpson Also Peddling Info about George Papadopoulos?

Ohr’s testimony concerning conversations with Steele and Simpson about “possible intermediaries between the Russian Government and the Trump campaign” raised additional questions. When pushed on whom exactly Steele and Simpson mentioned, Ohr noted that “there were many names mentioned over a period of time,” but that Sergei Millian, Michael Cohen, and Manafort were definitely some of the individuals whose names came up.

Ohr then added that “one of the things—again, I don’t remember if it was Glenn Simpson or Chris Steele that mentioned this—talked about—I’m going to get the names wrong, but somebody associated with the Trump campaign having advance knowledge of when information about the Clinton campaign that had been stolen and hacked, when it was going to be leaked.”

While Ohr did not recall the name of the individual, this description fits Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos’ supposed role in the launch of Crossfire Hurricane. Yet the FBI has maintained that it learned of Papadopoulos’ supposed pre-knowledge of the hack from Australian diplomat Alexander Downer. Ohr’s testimony is the first to connect Steele or Simpson to a tip about Papadoupolos.

10. The FBI had Portions of the Steele Dossier Before Launching the Probe

Another significant revelation from Ohr’s testimony concerns the timing of the FBI’s receipt of the Steele dossier. Ranking intelligence committee Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff has long maintained that “Steele’s reporting did not reach the counterintelligence team investigating Russia at FBI headquarters until mid-September 2016,” but Ohr told the Senate committee that, during his July 30, 2016 meeting with Steele, Steele stated that he had provided two reports to the FBI. Steele informed Ohr he had provided those reports to FBI Agent Mike Gaeta.

While Ohr testified that Steele did not provide him a copy of his early memorandums, shortly after meeting with Steele, Ohr informed McCabe of the details of his first meeting with Steele, including Steele’s claim that “he had information that a former head of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, the SVR, had stated to someone—I didn’t know who—that they had Donald Trump over a barrel.”

Ohr further testified that Steele “mentioned that Carter Page had met with certain high-level Russian officials when he was in Moscow.” “And the third item he mentioned,” according to Ohr, “was that Paul Hauser, who was an attorney working for Oleg Depriaska, had information about Paul Manafort, that Paul Manafort had entered into some kind of business deal with Oleg Deripaska, had stolen a larger amount of money from Oleg Deripaska.”

Thus, contrary to Schiff’s claim, the FBI knew of Steele’s reporting long before mid-September 2016. Schiff was likely dissembling by speaking of the knowledge of the “counterintelligence team investigating Russia at FBI headquarters.” But others clearly knew.

Further, from Ohr’s testimony it appears that Steele’s FBI handler was not located at the FBI headquarters in DC. Specifically, Ohr testified that he did not “know who was officially his handler,” but that “one of the people he was talking with who may have been his handler was Special Agent Mike Gaeta.” Then, when a congressman noted that he was under the impression that one of the handlers for Steele was a New York assigned agent, Ohr responded that Gaeta was from the New York office, even though Gaeta worked as an attaché out of Rome.

This testimony connected up with Ohr’s other testimony concerning when the FBI opened Steele as an FBI source. Ohr noted that he didn’t recall the specific year Steele was opened as a source, but that he thought it was following a meeting that Ohr attended with Steele and Gaeta some years ago.

11. Devin Nunes Spoke the Truth about Bruce Ohr. Adam Schiff, Not So Much

Last year, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence issued dueling memos about the Russia investigation. The release of Ohr’s testimony backs up then-chair Devin Nunes’ memo. Nunes’ memo explained that, after the FBI fired Steele as a source, he continued to feed Ohr intel, with the FBI interviewing Ohr to document the communications with Steele. Ohr confirmed that that is exactly what occurred.



Ohr’s testimony also refuted Schiff’s Democrat’s response memo. In that memo, Schiff called Nunes’ “reference to Bruce Ohr misleading,” stating that the Republican “misleads about the timeframe of Ohr’s communications with the FBI.” Schiff then claimed Ohr informed the FBI of the information Steele had shared with him in late November 2016—weeks after the election, and more than a month after the court approved the initial FISA application.

But as his just-released testimony made clear, Ohr contacted McCabe shortly after his July 30, 2016, meeting with Steele, and conveyed the details of that tête-à-tête to McCabe. Steele continued to provide Ohr with information on Trump. Ohr then passed those details on to Strzok and Lisa Page. The occurred well before Steele’s firing and the first FISA court order.



Ohr’s testimony has helped to clear up this dispute and others, but unfortunately there are many more questions left unanswered.

Tom Fitton on Bruce Ohr’s closed-door testimony

quote:

Ohr Repeatedly Thanked Steele for ‘Updates’ and Assures Steele he will ‘Pass this [Information] along to my Colleagues’

(March 7, Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received 339 pages of heavily redacted records from the U.S. Department of Justice which reveal that former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr remained in regular contact with former British spy and Fusion GPS contractor Christopher Steele after Steele was terminated by the FBI in November 2016 for revealing to the media his position as an FBI confidential informant.

The records show that Ohr served as a go-between for Steele by passing along information to “his colleagues” on matters relating to Steele’s activities. Ohr also set up meetings with Steele, regularly talked to him on the telephone and provided him assistance in dealing with situations Steele was confronting with the media.

Judicial Watch obtained the records through a March 2018 Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed after the Justice Department failed to respond a December 2017 request Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00490)). The lawsuit seeks:

• All records of contact or communication, including but not limited to emails, text messages, and instant chats between Bruce Ohr and any of the following individuals/entities: former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele; owner of Fusion GPS Glenn Simpson; and any other employees or representatives of Fusion GPS.
• All travel requests, authorizations and expense reports for Bruce Ohr.
• All calendar entries for Bruce Ohr.

The timeframe for the requested records is January 1, 2015, to December 7, 2017.

The emails between Bruce Ohr and Steele were heavily redacted, including some of the dates they were sent and received.

quote:

Page Testified that FBI Couldn't Prove Trump-Russia Collusion; Texts Show They Were Ready to Pounce After Comey's Firing

More than nine months after the FBI launched "Crossfire Hurricane" to spy on the Trump campaign (based on opposition research financed by the Clinton campaign), the FBI still had no case connecting Trump or his campaign to Russia’s election meddling, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page reportedly told House investigators during her July 13 closed-door deposition.

[...]

quote:

Transcripts from Lisa Page Testimony Suggest Brennan Knew about Steele Dossier Before FBI

[...]

One key finding from Page's testimony indicates that former CIA Director John Brennan was involved with the Steele dossier before the FBI was.

Lisa Page insisted that the FBI investigative unit didn't know about the Steele dossier until mid-September 2016. However, Brennan was aware of the dirty dossier in early August 2016, and used the unverified information to brief former Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.). On August 29, Reid asked the FBI to "investigate evidence suggesting that Russia may try to manipulate voting results in November."

[...]