BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
At least you can get reasonably reliable info rather than trusting certain forum entities.quote:
You could try a library...have you ever been to one?
It's usually quite a large building with lots of books stored inside.
[ Bericht 11% gewijzigd door Tingo op 27-03-2017 22:24:59 ]
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
So why you asking then?quote:Op maandag 27 maart 2017 13:18 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
Yes I know it, but I highly doubt that you know the correct answer to this question.
I highly doubt a lot of things you say - thats why I don't ask you.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
GSM gaat niet via satellieten, GPS wel.quote:
En dat kun je meten in de timing van de doppler shift van het signaal.
Groepsimmuniteit mag wel het resultaat zijn, maar niet het doel... - Vallon
But you haven't had anything to say about radio frequencies.quote:Op maandag 27 maart 2017 13:50 schreef ChrisCarter het volgende:
[..]
Ondertussen begrijp jij je eigen Engelstalige bronnen niet en kom je nooit met eigen antwoorden. Toppie hoor
Maybe you could be specific about my misunderstandings?
And then this from a mod.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Your statement is very wrong....quote:
[..]
Uhuh, en vervolgens zeggen dat ik het onderwerp niet snap
"Dat bouncen werkt alleen voor een zeer beperkte set vrij lage frequenties, waar je grote antennes voor nodig hebt, weinig bandbreedte hebt etc. Daar heb je wel degelijk meer voor nodig."
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
I was just pointing out that the follower of scientism is wrong.quote:
De enige die van de discussie afwijkt beschuldigt van op de man spelen?Ironisch. Hoe bewijst dit eigenlijk überhaupt chemtrails? Het begin-artikel gaat over grote wolken, niet over trails.
Het begin artikel van 60 jaar geleden is. Zeer waarschijnlijk nieuwe ontwikkelingen er in zijn.
En dat de 60jaar oud technologie iets te maken met chemtrails heeft. Dat had je ook door als je de thread verder gelezen had.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Because your understanding of it is clearly wrong. For one thing, I stated that it is relatively low for a reason, as I am well aware that it is actually called HF. Something like UHF is line of sight, which is precisely why we need satellites or lots of earth based repeaters for this, which seems to be the exact oposite of what you think it means.quote:
[..]
So why you asking then?
I highly doubt a lot of things you say - thats why I don't ask you.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
http://www.wakingtimes.co(...)-sun-climate-change/
It’s Official: Geoengineering “Experiment” to Block Sun for Climate Change
It’s Official: Geoengineering “Experiment” to Block Sun for Climate Change
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
Weinig officieels aan als ik het artikel zo lees.quote:
http://www.wakingtimes.co(...)-sun-climate-change/
It’s Official: Geoengineering “Experiment” to Block Sun for Climate Change
Small scale experiment.quote:
http://www.wakingtimes.co(...)-sun-climate-change/
It’s Official: Geoengineering “Experiment” to Block Sun for Climate Change
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
http://www.aircrap.org/20(...)es-about-chemtrails/
Het is allemaal zo kleinschalig experiment dat schoolboeken het alvast vermelden.
Het is allemaal zo kleinschalig experiment dat schoolboeken het alvast vermelden.
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
ah ja als NOS niet behandeld of behandeld heeft dan bestaat het niet. Logischquote:Op dinsdag 28 maart 2017 00:21 schreef ChrisCarter het volgende:
[..]
En geen officieel plan om de zon te blokkeren. Altijd fijn die zogenaamde kritische media.
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
Ja want dat is ook echt wat ik zeg...quote:
[..]
ah ja als NOS niet behandeld of behandeld heeft dan bestaat het niet. Logisch
Misschien als jij wat vaker naar een library was geweest dat je ondertussen de taal machtig was. Verder blijft het lelijk om "ik heb gelijk zoek maar op" als argument te gebruiken. Dat doen alleen verliezers.quote:
[..]
At least you can get reasonably reliable info rather than trusting certain forum entities.
You could try a library...have you ever been to one?
It's usually quite a large building with lots of books stored inside.
Conscience do cost.
OK – now you’ve changed the subject to line of sight which is very different from ionospheric propagation (which you wrongly claimed to be very limited to a set of low frequencies)quote:
[..]
Because your understanding of it is clearly wrong. For one thing, I stated that it is relatively low for a reason, as I am well aware that it is actually called HF. Something like UHF is line of sight, which is precisely why we need satellites or lots of earth based repeaters for this, which seems to be the exact oposite of what you think it means.
Anyway, it doesn’t matter.
UHF is used for TV, mobile phones,WiFi,GPS,high altitude balloons and planes.
Satellites are not needed.
Why even use such an unreliable, high-risk, terribly expensive technology when you have perfectly good systems already in place?
A powerful technology at the bottom of the ocean is why you can see this article
http://www.businessinside(...)les-carry-the-rest-1
"Contrary to popular belief, satellites carry less than 1% of human communications. Submarine cables carry the rest."
“The first telegraph cable across the English Channel was laid in 1850, and they have increased in number and sophistication ever since. “
[ Bericht 2% gewijzigd door ChrisCarter op 28-03-2017 13:26:04 (Zucht) ]
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Contrary to popular belief is deze statement een keiharde leugen.quote:"Contrary to popular belief, satellites carry less than 1% of human communications. Submarine cables carry the rest."
Zeikerige edits btw.
Conscience do cost.
But you also don't have anything to say about radio frequencies.quote:
[..]
Misschien als jij wat vaker naar een library was geweest dat je ondertussen de taal machtig was. Verder blijft het lelijk om "ik heb gelijk zoek maar op" als argument te gebruiken. Dat doen alleen verliezers.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Google het maar als je er iets over wilt wetenquote:
[..]
But you also don't have anything to say about radio frequencies.
Conscience do cost.
Maybe you could provide further info?quote:
[..]
Contrary to popular belief is deze statement een keiharde leugen.
Zeikerige edits btw.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
quote:
[..]
Google het maar als je er iets over wilt weten
Errr no, this is at the core of understanding ionospheric propagation, as when it doesn't for the higher frequencies, you almost immediately talk about line of sight propagation, barring some funky other phenomena.quote:
[..]
OK – now you’ve changed the subject to line of sight which is very different from ionospheric propagation (which you wrongly claimed to be very limited to a set of low frequencies)
Do you see lots of cell phone towers in the middle of the desert? Or maybe in the middle of the ocean? These good systems aren't in place everywhere. And that's only considering telephone/bi-directional communication. There is also the case of satellite TV for example, where you want to get the same signal to an entire continent.quote:Anyway, it doesn’t matter.
UHF is used for TV, mobile phones,WiFi,GPS,high altitude balloons and planes.
Satellites are not needed.
Why even use such an unreliable, high-risk, terribly expensive technology when you have perfectly good systems already in place?
And how does this prove for you that satellites aren't required?quote:A powerful technology at the bottom of the ocean is why you can see this article
http://www.businessinside(...)les-carry-the-rest-1
"Contrary to popular belief, satellites carry less than 1% of human communications. Submarine cables carry the rest."
“The first telegraph cable across the English Channel was laid in 1850, and they have increased in number and sophistication ever since. “
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
No.Do you see loads of people in the middle of the desert? There are ships in the ocean with antennae. There are high altitude balloons and aircraft that can relay radio signals.quote:
[..]
Do you see lots of cell phone towers in the middle of the desert? Or maybe in the middle of the ocean? These good systems aren't in place everywhere. And that's only considering telephone/bi-directional communication. There is also the case of satellite TV for example, where you want to get the same signal to an entire continent.
[
It's all good old ground based technology that has been around a long time. we don't need outrageously expensive, unreliable, high-risk technology such as satellites. But if people want to continue beleiving in sci-fi space adventures, fine by me.
Satellites are not needed.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
So you agree that this infrastructure does not exist in the desert, or in the middle of the ocean?quote:
[..]
No.Do you see loads of people in the middle of the desert? There are ships in the ocean with antennae. There are high altitude balloons and aircraft that can relay radio signals.
It's all good old ground based technology that has been around a long time. we don't need outrageously expensive, unreliable, high-risk technology such as satellites. But if people want to continue beleiving in sci-fi space adventures, fine by me.
Satellites are not needed.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
|
|
