[Het grote FALLOUT-topic] #5 Patrolling the Mojave...

quote:

Op donderdag 6 november 2014 17:03 schreef jogy het volgende:

[..]

.

[..]

Nope, alle add ons dus dat lijkt me geen goede optie . Ben nu even wat verder aan het tweaken met instellingen, misschien komt het nog goed en anders draai ik wel een virtual box met windows XP voor dat kutspel .

quote:

Op donderdag 6 november 2014 17:16 schreef Vault-Boy het volgende:

[..]

Bedoelde met vanilla dat je zonder mods speelt. Als je Fallout 3 + DLC's hebt en Fallout New Vegas + DLC's, dan kan je Tale of Two Wastelands proberen. Die mod was eerst nog niet helemaal super, maar tegenwoordig is het echt stabiel en speelt het echt super.

Tja het is gewoon jammer dat Fallout 3 niet goed draait op Windows 7. Zelfs met een boel fixes blijft die games vaak crashen. Zeker als je verder in de game komt.

quote:

Op donderdag 6 november 2014 17:35 schreef jogy het volgende:

[..]

Ooohh, oké. Dan doe ik dat inderdaad wel. Heb beide spellen en zonder mods spelen boeit me niet . Thanks.

Ik ben wel wat verder gekomen trouwens. Door een zooi tweaks bevriezen mijn keyboard en muis input niet meer maar nu is het gewoon helemaal vast gelopen, alleen duurde het wel langer . Ik gooi tale of two wastelands er wel op .

quote:

Op donderdag 6 november 2014 17:44 schreef Vault-Boy het volgende:

[..]

Als je helemaal niet met mods gaat spelen dan is Tale of Two Wasteland juist perfect. Als je echt veel mods gebruikte en dan ook nog die Tale of Two Wastelands mod wilde gebruiken. Ja dan werd het wel wat lastiger om alles goed en lekker te laten lopen.

Download na afloop nog wel deze mods:

4GB Fallout New Vegas Updated
http://www.nexusmods.com/newvegas/mods/55061/?

NVAC - New Vegas Anti Crash
http://www.nexusmods.com/newvegas/mods/53635/?

NVSE wordt al samen met Tale of Two Wastelands geinstalleerd.

Heb je bovenstaande gedaan dan moet het spel echt super lopen. Ik heb bijna maar dan echt bijna geen crashes of freezes meer gehad. Bij mij loopt die echt super nu.

Daarom ben ik ook gestopt met Fallout 3 vanilla op de pc te spelen. Ik ergerde me echt kapot dat ik die game niet eens normaal meer kon spelen. Fallout New Vegas loopt echt met bovenstaande mods voor mij bijna perfect

quote:

Op donderdag 6 november 2014 22:08 schreef jogy het volgende:

[..]

U bent mijn held. Alles werkt perfect .

quote:

Op donderdag 6 november 2014 22:37 schreef Vault-Boy het volgende:

[..]



Was niet moeilijk toch om het te installeren?

quote:

Op donderdag 6 november 2014 22:50 schreef jogy het volgende:

[..]

Beetje aankloten maar niets extreem nee .

quote:

Currently, the only game bethesda has announced that will probably be released in 2015 is the console version of ESO. But how much hype and profit will there be from a game that's been out on PC for some time with a lukewarm reception?

Doom will have a beta in 2015 along with Battle cry, the Marketing push for the evil within is already ending and will be old news by VGX. Doom will more than likely get a trailer at VGX, but why would they need to be "planning" this so far in advance? A trailer for an already announced game with a teaser trailer and gameplay shown to a select few isn't really that huge of a deal. Fo4 has at least been in full development for a good 20 months by December, much more than skyrim (hypothetically speaking) was. The bgs team moved on from skyrim 4 months after the last expansion, dragonborn, was first released. If they followed a similar schedule after the release of the last fallout 3 dlc mothership zeta, moving on 4 months after the last dlc, they only had a year or so of "full development" on skyrim before they announced it, making a Fallout 4 reveal past due, barring some major setback. There's no reason given this long development time that bgs wouldn't be ready to show off a trailer of the game.

It's the perfect time: Above notwithstanding, the VGX is the most logical time for multiple reasons. There aren't any places in between the VGX and E3 with the type of mass publicity, and awareness in the video game world. Sure there is PAX East, but how many people actually know about pax east or when it is or how to watch it. Most with an interest in gaming know of the VGX and e3 and know when both are and that they both (usually) are broadcast on spike tv or their website. Bethesda has stated in the past that they don't like to reveal anything at e3, simply because it's too big, and other big announcements, could possibly overshadow their announcement. And without a shadow (of Boston) of a doubt, if Fallout 4 were announced at VGX, considering the lackluster past couple of years, it would own the show and internet.

Bethesda can't just release 1 previously released game and expect to generate any considerable amount of hype or profit. Since Prey 2 is now out of the picture, the only 2 games that could have a shot of being released next year, are Fallout 4 or Dishonored 2 (Unless they have another new IP in the works which is unlikely) And a dishonored 2 reveal is probably even less likely than a Fallout 4 one. Unless Bethesda are run by retarded monkeys, they must know how huge Fallout 4 will be. Any PR or marketing person worth their salt would see a fake fallout 4 trademark as the #1 trend on twitter and realize this. Bethesda currently have in their pocket, the single most hyped unnannounced game out there (half life 3 notwithstanding). No developer out there could announce anything that would generate the amount of hype and anticipation among the masses that Fallout 4 could. Skyrim wasn't just a game, it was an event, transforming bethesda into a powerhouse if they weren't already, and Fallout 4 will undoubedtly as evidenced, be a bigger deal than Skyrim. Rockstar could, but they already released their main event, and won't be talking about another for at least another year for two, so right now, bethesda is in a big position of power, why wait for something else to come along to take away from Fallout 4's thunder?

All the other clues: Why would bethesda dismiss the shadow of Boston trademark so quickly? Partly because yes, after the survivor they don't want another PR disaster, but it could also be to clear the air for a real announcement. If they let this fake trademark hang in the air too long un-debunked, and they actually planned to announce it at VGX, people 1) would not be very surprised, since they would've already assumed the trademark as confirmation of Fallout 4's existence, this dampening bethesdas big "surprise" reveal and

2) lead to mass confusion among the common fans who assumed shadow of Boston is real, and are left confused with the reveal of something different.

I'm no marketing expert but this is all basic business logic. Don't let others define your product. Also take note of the difference in wording from them simply saying during the survivor hoax "PSA: if you didn't hear it through an official channel, assume all rumors to be false." See they never actually mentioned the survivor hoax by name. In the swift denial of the shadow of Boston trademark, they didn't just reissue that PSA. They said "the German patent making the rounds is false" as to not leave any doubt what exactly they were talking about. Pretty much everything bethesda does is from a business standpoint, so it's reasonable to assume this was too. After all, bethesda isn't all about fan service, otherwise they'd be more open about their games development. They had no reason to be concerned during the survivor hoax initially, since they knew they wouldn't be talking about fo4 for a long time so they just let it go, until it started to negatively impact them. They probably would have let the shadow of Boston hoax live too if they had no business interest being affected by it.

Obviously Geoff keighely (host of VGX) and Bethesda have a good relationship, having revealed skyrim there and having interviewed Pete hines multiple times. And with his tweet my speculations were given even more weight. As already stated, I don't think just showing off a doom trailer would require much planning, (does he have "planning" sessions with everyone who shows a trailer at VGX?) but a fallout 4 reveal is of a higher magnitude and would need some planning, especially if they want to top skyrims reveal. They definetley could show a doom trailer and have a fallout 4 reveal, other companies have shown multiple games off at VGX before without issue. Some may point to Pete Hines saying a few weeks ago that bgs wouldn't be talking about Fallout 4 "any time soon" as reason enough that Fallout 4 won't be announced at the VGX. But I think that's more proof that it will, considering he about said the same thing a few months before Skyrim's VGX reveal. Lower everyone's expectations, then shock them when they least expect it. Another logical marketing tactic. Overall, a fallout 4 reveal would be a win win for the flailing VGX, Geoff keighely, and bethesda.

(Geoff Keighleys tweet: https://mobile.twitter.co(...)s/525847243765448704)

We've all seen the little subliminal hints thrown in in recently published bethesda games wolfenstein and the evil within. Whether they mean anything is questionable at best, but look at it this way. If a developer working on the evil within has lunch with a developer from bgs, (assuming they're friendly with each other) they'll probably share info on what they're working on. I highly doubt they would be so secretive around each other. Then what other way to show your excitement and tease players as to what's coming next in the Bethesda arm then a little reference or Easter egg? Bungie did a similar thing with halo 3 and destiny years before.

So to all the naysayers out there who say there's no chance of a VGX reveal of Fallout 4, I feel I have given a decent argument to the contrary and would love to hear any argument debating my points above. Overall I feel a VGX reveal is very possible, and if I had to bet on a date or place it would be announced, I would bet on this. Besides, there's no date any fallout fan can say with certainty that's when fallout 4 will be announced, you just never know with bethesda. There strategy could be unfolding right now before our eyes with no one expecting an announcement "any time soon", then hit us with the earthshaking surprise. Or I could be wrong and it really won't be announced any time soon.

SPOILER: disclaimer

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

quote:

Op dinsdag 11 november 2014 13:28 schreef Vault-Boy het volgende:
Fallout 3 is nou niet bepaald stabiel op de pc, en ik denk dat veel mensen daarom Fallout 3 een slechte review hebben gegeven of helemaal niet hebben gespeeld en dat Fallout New Vegas hoger scoort. Kan er best mee te maken hebben

quote:

Op dinsdag 11 november 2014 13:19 schreef Vault-Boy het volgende:
Van mij mogen ze ook hoor

Fallout 3 was echt super, maar ze mogen echt wel kijken naar Fallout New Vegas.

Companions waren echt zo saai in Fallout 3, terwijl ze in Falllout New Vegas veel beter uitgewerkt waren en altijd een verhaaltje hadden met een quest. Levelcap omhoog schroeven. Doe iets soortgelijks als in Skyrim of in ieder geval niet zo laag (20 of 30 met Broken Steel DLC).

Kan nog wel doorgaan, maar het was ook wel hun eerste Fallout game toch? Denk dat ze nu wel geleerd hebben van bepaalde fouten/tekortkomingen en gekeken hebben naar Fallout New Vegas en de grote mod community. Laat ze ook kijken naar Skyrim want die game heeft het toch wel erg goed gedaan voor ze.

quote:

Op woensdag 3 december 2014 23:19 schreef Notorious_Roy het volgende:
Fallout nieuws!

https://mobile.twitter.com/bethblog_nl/status/540178480600985600

quote:

Op woensdag 3 december 2014 23:19 schreef Notorious_Roy het volgende:
Fallout nieuws!

https://mobile.twitter.com/bethblog_nl/status/540178480600985600

quote:

Op woensdag 3 december 2014 23:19 schreef Notorious_Roy het volgende:
Fallout nieuws!

https://mobile.twitter.com/bethblog_nl/status/540178480600985600

quote:

Op woensdag 3 december 2014 23:19 schreef Notorious_Roy het volgende:
Fallout nieuws!

https://mobile.twitter.com/bethblog_nl/status/540178480600985600

quote:

Op donderdag 4 december 2014 00:05 schreef 2dope het volgende:

[..]



Sowieso een picca met je nieuwe shirt posten nu

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.