Doping #64 Nu met OP on roids!

quote:

Op dinsdag 29 januari 2013 15:09 schreef TargaFlorio het volgende:

twitter:

mrconde twitterde op dinsdag 29-01-2013 om 15:01:18 Years ago Fuentes said he wouldn't talk about football. "I've already got three life threats, not gonna make it four" ... reageer retweet

twitter:

Sky_Gernot twitterde op dinsdag 29-01-2013 om 15:36:13 #Fuentes Schon @J_Klinsmann beschreibt Mitte der 90er in seiner Autobiographie einen Medizinschrank mit besonderen Inhalten bei Real Madrid. reageer retweet

quote:

Op dinsdag 29 januari 2013 14:48 schreef Mani89 het volgende:

[..]

Vroem vroem Vroemen!

[..]

En Cecchini stuurde hem weer door naar Fuentes.

twitter:

EuroHoody twitterde op dinsdag 29-01-2013 om 15:38:32 Asking about Alberto Leon's medical background. Fuentes: "Very little ..." He later worked as trash collector reageer retweet

quote:

Op dinsdag 29 januari 2013 14:58 schreef marcodej het volgende:

[..]

Andere sporters hoeft hij niet te noemen. Het proces draait om de wielrenners.

quote:

Op dinsdag 29 januari 2013 16:12 schreef kl1172 het volgende:

[..]

Die bedreigingen bedoel ik, in voetbal is zoveel geld gemoeid, het zou me niet verbazen.

quote:

Press Release – 29 January 2013

The Independent Commission notes the UCI’s unilateral decision to disband the Commission with effect from 28 January 2013.

If the legacy of this Commission is the establishment of an independent Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) that includes, as part of its mandate, a thorough and expeditious investigation of the UCI’s role in the Lance Armstrong/USPS doping affair, then that is to be welcomed. Any TRC will represent a chance once and for all to break the code of silence that has allowed the use of performance enhancing drugs to be hidden and perpetuated.

However, the Commission remains concerned as to WADA’s and the UCI’s ability to agree the scope, timing and structure of the TRC and also whether the T&R process is sufficiently advanced to justify the UCI’s termination of this Inquiry.

When this Commission was announced, Pat McQuaid stated that the UCI “will co-operate fully with the Commission and provide them with whatever they need to conduct their inquiry” and urged “all other interested stakeholders to do the same”. Neither the UCI nor interested stakeholders have provided sufficient co-operation to enable the Commission to do its job. This failure to cooperate makes our task impossible. Therefore, the proposed hearing on 31 January 2013 will not take place.

The evidence which has been gathered by the Commission will be retained by Macfarlanes for use by the TRC once established.

As the Commission has repeatedly stated, there is an immense public interest in determining why and how Lance Armstrong/USPS Team were able to engage, as recently publicly admitted, in systematic doping without detection or sanction.

The Commission urges all those who have an interest in cycling to make sure that an independent TRC is established and remains willing to offer assistance in the process if required.

quote:

WADA is dismayed by the press release issued by UCI yesterday, both in terms of its content and its deceit.

The Independent Commission established by UCI was intended to review the allegations of complicity of UCI in the Lance Armstrong doping conspiracy as raised by USADA in its thorough decision. Instead UCI has again chosen to ignore its responsibility to the sport of cycling in completing such an inquiry and has determined to apparently deflect responsibility for the doping problem in its sport to others.

It has decided to terminate its own Commission on the grounds that others refuse to participate, and not for any reason that the Commission was precluded from operating transparently and without fear.

WADA was not part of the decision to establish such a Commission, it was not even consulted. When asked to participate, WADA was at pains to point out the inadequacies of the terms of reference and the timelines. The Commission’s lawyers agreed to point those out in order to remedy them. These were not addressed by UCI or the Commission so WADA declined to participate.

The matters raised by WADA were:

1. The Armstrong case was decided and could not be re-litigated
2.The timelines for the evidence were not realistic
3.The process for hearing witnesses and receiving evidence had to be such that no witness feared retribution
4.The findings of the Commission were to be made public immediately and not subject to any prior scrutiny and editing by UCI
These were all rejected by UCI without discussion.

They were raised again by WADA’s President on Saturday (Jan. 26), and referred to in subsequent correspondence, but seemingly rejected without any reply in the expected fashion. The suggestion was raised by WADA that UCI puts a proposal to address these concerns.

However, instead of any continuing professional dialogue with WADA’s President, UCI has publicly announced by way of a press statement that WADA has agreed to work with it on some form of truth and reconciliation. This is not only wrong in content and process, but again deceitful. The fact is that WADA was awaiting a reply to the correspondence when the UCI release was delivered.

WADA has not and will not consider partaking in any venture with UCI while this unilateral and arrogant attitude continues. There has been no suggestion made by WADA that it will pay for or contribute to any collaborative effort with UCI into investigating UCI’s long-standing problems with doping in its sport and its alleged complicity.

Presuming the Independent Commission will reconvene on Thursday, as arranged, WADA intends to seek an appearance and table correspondence corroborating the facts stated here.

Finally, WADA wants to clarify that contrary to what is stated in the UCI press release WADA has never questioned the integrity and independence of the members of the Commission, but solely the ability of the Commission to work properly under the contract given by UCI to the Commission.

quote:

Op dinsdag 29 januari 2013 17:02 schreef Zelva het volgende:
Want WADA is zo ontzettend fantastisch en hebben de waarheid in pacht?

quote:

Op dinsdag 29 januari 2013 15:12 schreef nabroer het volgende:

Ik zal het netjes houden, potverjandorrie wat een amateur.

Nu lees ik dat hij getroffen is geweest door zware ziektes. Maar dat neemt niet weg dat hij duidelijk zeeeeeeeeeet slecht is geïnformeerd m.b.t. de dopingmaterie!! Ik heb het eerder gelezen maar ik hoor hem nu spreken over aannames: Sorry maat hij is GEEN WETENSCHAPPER.

quote:

Op dinsdag 29 januari 2013 17:06 schreef Wombcat het volgende:

[..]

Ik heb idd veel meer vertrouwen in het WADA.
Sowieso is het natuurlijk dubieus als een sportorganisatie de eigen sport moet controleren. Ze hebben er alle belang bij niet teveel in de negatieve publiciteit te komen, dus ze zullen het minimale doen om nog geloofwaardig over te komen.

quote:

Op dinsdag 29 januari 2013 17:10 schreef Wombcat het volgende:

[..]

Hoe hebben die het dan geregeld?