Methuselahquote:Op zondag 9 september 2012 01:07 schreef Kees22 het volgende:
En ik wist niet dat er joden waren die al eeuwen oud zijn.
Ik had ook ooit zoiets gehoord. Maar dat was ergens in de jaren 60/70 gezegd en niet door Netanyahu. Maar zoals ik het al zei, ik heb het gehoord. Dus het kan een fabeltje zijn.quote:Op dinsdag 11 september 2012 12:02 schreef paddy het volgende:
[..]
Waar en wanneer was die? Ben aan het zieken maar kan nergens vinden waar Netanyahu dit heeft geroepen, dus ben nieuwsgierig naar die bron
quote:Op dinsdag 11 september 2012 12:02 schreef paddy het volgende:
[..]
Waar en wanneer was die? Ben aan het zieken maar kan nergens vinden waar Netanyahu dit heeft geroepen, dus ben nieuwsgierig naar die bron
"Our armed forces are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before Israel goes under."quote:Op dinsdag 11 september 2012 15:10 schreef C_S het volgende:
[..]
hen jij hier een bron van kees 66.
of is het weer een van jou uit de lucht gegrepen opmerkingen .
Een of andere idioot zei dat ja maar niet iemand van de Israelische regering.quote:Op dinsdag 11 september 2012 17:59 schreef CaptainObvious39 het volgende:
[..]
[..]
"Our armed forces are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before Israel goes under."
"We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets of our air force."
Google de citaten maar.
quote:Netanyahu: With every day Iran comes closer to a nuclear bomb
source: DEBKAfile September 11, 2012, 3:20 PM (GMT+02:00)
With every passing day, Iran comes closer to a nuclear bomb, heedless of sanctions and diplomacy, said Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu at a news conference in Jerusalem Tuesday. The world tells Israel 'wait, there's still time'. And I say, 'Wait for what? Wait until when?' Those in the
international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran
don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel," said Netanyahu on a note of frustration against the Obama administration.
quote:Panetta: The US will have more than a year to stop an Iranian nuke
DEBKAfile September 11, 2012, 6:06 PM (GMT+02:00)
The US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta shot back at Israels prime ministers rhetorical question: Wait for what? by saying: If Iran decides to make a nuclear weapon, the US would have a little more than a year to stop it." He added that the United States has pretty good intelligence on Iran. DEBKAfile: If the US can afford to wait until Iran starts building a bomb, Israels leaders dont feel they share that luxury. As for the quality of US intelligence on Iran, it may be recalled that in 2007 the US Intelligence Estimate concluded that Iran had given up its nuclear bomb program.
Dank!!quote:Op dinsdag 11 september 2012 17:59 schreef CaptainObvious39 het volgende:
[..]
[..]
"Our armed forces are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before Israel goes under."
"We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets of our air force."
Google de citaten maar.
Ja OK. En wanneer verkondigde de VSvA ook alweer dat Irak massavernietigingswapens had?quote:
quote:Op woensdag 12 september 2012 00:18 schreef Kees22 het volgende:
[..]
Ja OK. En wanneer verkondigde de VSvA ook alweer dat Irak massavernietigingswapens had?
Irak was een drama ,maar dit keer is het IAEA het er ook mee eens dat Iran een kernwapen capaciteit wilt.quote:The nuclear watchdog reports new evidence of Iranian work on a nuclear warhead
DEBKAfile September 11, 2012, 3:26 PM (GMT+02:00)
Diplomatic sources in Vienna say the IAEA has received new intelligence from Israel, the US and two other Western countries that Iran had moved forward on work for calculating the destructive power of a nuclear warhead.
Het eerste en tweede citaat dus hier: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1154.htmquote:Op woensdag 12 september 2012 00:16 schreef Kees22 het volgende:
[..]
Dank!!![]()
Ik had het gelezen, maar wist niet meer waar.
lol een of andere debiel die niets met de regering te maken heeft serieus nemen.quote:Op woensdag 12 september 2012 00:38 schreef Lagrinta het volgende:
Toch een fijne gedachte om te weten dat Israel laat weten dat als Israel ten onder gaat wij ook meegaan? Klinkt vrij Islamitisch in mijn oren. Dat tuig is geen haar beter en het zou mooi zijn als wij in de Westerse wereld verlost zouden zijn van dit kutvolk.
quote:Professor Martin van Creveld, an internationally known and controversial professor of military history at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, foresees only extreme developments for the appreciable future. The methods by which Israel is currently combating the Intifada are doomed to failure. The chances for peace and the founding of a Palestinian state are visibly diminishing. A conversation with a pessimist, who, as he himself says, is reviled in his own country.
Heb je zelf wel gelezen: received new intelligence from Israel, the US and two other Western countriesquote:Op woensdag 12 september 2012 00:24 schreef fp7igx het volgende:
[..]
[..]
Irak was een drama ,maar dit keer is het IAEA het er ook mee eens dat Iran een kernwapen capaciteit wilt.
Daar heb je een punt.quote:Op woensdag 12 september 2012 00:49 schreef fp7igx het volgende:
[..]
lol een of andere debiel die niets met de regering te maken heeft serieus nemen.
Ik snap dat ie niks met de regering te maken heeft maar Israel is ook een behoorlijk rancuneus land heb ik het idee. Ze zijn helemaal niet zo Westers en koel als wij zouden moeten geloven.quote:Op woensdag 12 september 2012 00:51 schreef Kees22 het volgende:
[..]
Daar heb je een punt.
Maar hoe betrouwbaar is dat punt?
En na aanpassen van je post: zijn woorden zouden wel een terug kunnen slaan op Israel zelf.
Als ze dat officieel zouden uitspreken zou het inderdaad volkomen belachelijk zijn.. Dan zijn ze hun beetje krediet ook wel kwijt.quote:Op woensdag 12 september 2012 00:38 schreef Lagrinta het volgende:
Toch een fijne gedachte om te weten dat Israel laat weten dat als Israel ten onder gaat wij ook meegaan? Klinkt vrij Islamitisch in mijn oren. Dat tuig is geen haar beter en het zou mooi zijn als wij in de Westerse wereld verlost zouden zijn van dit kutvolk.
Dat zijn bepaalde groepen christenen. Joden geloven niet in Jezus als de messias.quote:Op woensdag 12 september 2012 09:25 schreef Lagrinta het volgende:
Net als Iran verweten wordt dat ze geloven in de terugkeer van de Mahdi en omdat te laten gebeuren eerst de hele wereld in de fik moet. Zo geloven Joden dat Jeruzalem bezet moet worden omdat anders Jezus niet terug kan keren of iets in die strekking. Ze zijn niks beter dan Moslims
quote:Iran to unveil new cruise missile which can strike every Israeli city
Iran is set to unveil a “domestically produced” cruise missile capable of reaching Israel and being launched “from land, sea, and air,” according to Iranian media reports.
Dubbed “Meshkat,” the existence of the long range Iranian missile was made public over the weekend by Iranian Deputy Defense Minister Mehdi Farahi, according to the Mehr News Agency.
With a range of 2,000 kilometers, or 1,242 miles, the missile could easily reach Israeli cities, including Jerusalem.
The report quotes Farahi as telling Iran’s Press TV that the weapon will serve as “the upper hand of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran. … [The] Meshkat cruise missile, which God willing will be unveiled soon, has a range of more than 2,000 kilometers.”
Meanwhile, Iran held high-level talks with Chinese officials Sunday, and released a statement praising Chinese support for embattled Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Mehr reported.
The meetings were held between Chinese Deputy Foreign Minister Zhang Zhijun and Iranian deputy foreign minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian, according to the report.
Zhang praised Iran’s efforts to bolster Syria’s Assad regime, which has murdered hundreds of its own citizens since pro-democracy protests erupted in the Arab country. Iran has publicly and privately sought to prop up Assad’s regime in direct opposition to the U.S. and Western positions on the conflict.
Iranian official Abdollahian was quoted as praising China’s “political support” for Assad and Syria. He also maintained that, “Syria is going strong on the path to fight terrorists,” according to the report.
Zal me benieuwen wat deze hele kwestie nog voor onrust in de verkiezingscampagne gaat brengenquote:Netanyahu: US has no rights to block Israel on Iran
(Reuters) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday said the United States had forfeited its moral right to stop Israel taking action against Iran's nuclear program because it had refused to be firm with Tehran itself.
In comments which appeared to bring the possibility of an Israeli attack on Iran closer, Netanyahu took the Obama administration to task after Washington rebuffed his own call to set a red line for Tehran's nuclear drive.
"The world tells Israel 'wait, there's still time'. And I say, 'Wait for what? Wait until when?'" said Netanyahu, speaking in English.
"Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel," he added, addressing a news conference with Bulgaria's prime minister.
Netanyahu has been pushing Obama to adopt a tougher line against Iran, arguing that setting a clear boundary for Iran's uranium enrichment activities and imposing stronger economic sanctions could deter Tehran from developing nuclear weapons and mitigate the need for military action.
But on Monday U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would not set a deadline in further talks with Iran, saying there was still time for diplomacy to work.
Netanyahu's comments came as diplomats said six world powers - including the United States - were poised to voice "serious concern" about Iran's uranium enrichment program and to urge Tehran to open up access to suspected nuclear sites.
U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said on Tuesday that Washington would have little more than a year to act to stop Tehran if it decided to produce a nuclear weapon.
Netanyahu has had a strained relationship with President Barak Obama over Iran and other issues, such as Jewish settlement building in the occupied West Bank.
But he has never put differences with Obama - who has pledged he will "always have Israel's back" and is deep in a re-election campaign - in the context of morality.
The website of Israel's Haaretz daily newspaper said Netanyahu had carried out "an unprecedented verbal attack on the U.S. government".
Iran, which denies it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons, has threatened to retaliate against Israel and U.S. interests in the Gulf if it attacked, and Obama's re-election bid could be thrown off course by a new war.
Republican challenger Mitt Romney has accused him of throwing Israel "under the bus".
DEADLINE
Without mentioning Clinton by name but pointedly parroting her use of the word "deadline", Netanyahu said not setting a clear boundary for Iran would only encourage Iran to continue its quest for nuclear arms.
"If Iran knows that there is no deadline, what will it do? Exactly what it's doing. It's continuing, without any interference, towards obtaining a nuclear weapons capability and from there, nuclear bombs," he said.
"So far we can say with certainty that diplomacy and sanctions haven't worked. The sanctions have hurt the Iranian economy but they haven't stopped the Iranian nuclear program. That's a fact. And the fact is that every day that passes, Iran gets closer and closer to nuclear bombs," he added.
Widely thought to be the Middle East's only nuclear power, Israel says a nuclear-armed Iran would be a threat to its existence.
Recent tougher Israeli rhetoric on the issue has stoked speculation that Israel might attack Iran before the U.S. ballot in November, believing that Obama would give it military help and not risk alienating pro-Israeli voters.
But over the past week, Netanyahu, in calling for a "red line", had appeared to be backing away from military action and preparing the ground for a possible meeting with Obama this month, when both address the U.N. General Assembly in New York.
"The line is the president is committed to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, and he will use every tool in the arsenal of American power to achieve that goal," Jay Carney, a White House spokesman, said on Monday.
Netanyahu has faced opposition at home to the idea that Israel might attack Iran on its own. Opinion polls show a majority of Israelis do not want their military to strike Iran without U.S. support.
An Israeli cabinet minister on Tuesday invoked his country's ostensibly secret 2007 air raid on an alleged Syrian nuclear reactor to suggest Israel could successfully strike Iran without U.S. support
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |