[F1] F1 nieuwtjes topic deel 54; Waar Fisi z'n kans krijgt

quote:

Mosley: WMSC won't go easy on Renault to keep them in F1

Outgoing FIA President Max Mosley has hinted that he expects possibly 'another one or two car manufacturers' and 'one or two of the private teams' to walk away before the 2010 Formula 1 World Championship campaign gets underway next March – as he insisted that the governing body would not be inclined to look favourably upon Renault in the World Motor Sport Council (WMSC) hearing on Monday (21 September) in an effort to prevent the Régie from leaving the sport.

Following Honda's bombshell late last year that it would be departing the fray with immediate effect, BMW became the latest F1 casualty when it announced in July that it too would be pulling the plug at the end of the current season in the top flight. That prompted the FIA to open up a bidding procedure for three new slots on the starting grid, with talk now of even extending that to four, thereby raising grid numbers to 28, a level not seen since 1995.

Despite peace having finally seemingly broken out in the bitter FIA/FOTA (Formula One Teams' Association) war, Mosley admits that he is prepared for the loss of more competitors in the coming months – with a number of hopefuls knocking at the door waiting for their chance to graduate should the opportunity present itself.

“I think we may lose another one, might even lose two car manufacturers,” the Englishman is quoted as having said by Reuters, “and there are also one or two of the private teams who will find it difficult to survive. I think it's possible. Put it around another way – if someone said 'will you stake your entire worldly goods on all of the current manufacturers being in Melbourne in 2010?' I would be very reluctant to do that. I'd stake my worldly goods on Ferrari being there, but not on all the manufacturers – but I may be wrong.”

Of the remaining manufacturers, Mercedes-Benz has repeatedly pledged its long-term commitment to F1 and may supply as many as four teams with engines next season should a purported deal with title-challengers Red Bull Racing come to fruition – leaving Toyota and Renault the companies apparently closest to the exit door.

The big-spending Japanese car maker has confessed that there may not be a firm decision regarding next year's budget until November, whilst its French rival has been rocked by the 'Singapore-gate' scandal from which it has plunged of late – and which many believe will drive Renault out of the sport altogether, be it through a ban or else global embarrassment and loss of reputation. Mosley is adamant that the potential loss of the Enstone-based concern must not influence the WMSC's decision when it meets in Paris early next week.

“We have a certain job to do which we must do correctly and fairly,” stressed the 69-year-old, “and what they do is a business decision for them. Otherwise, in a football match if one of the players says to the referee 'I'm the great star and if you give a penalty against me I'm going to walk off the pitch', what would the referee say? You've only got one possible answer.”

Piquet crash details [PDF]

quote:

Today The Times can reveal extracts from the radio conversations between key Renault personnel during last year’s controversial Singapore Grand Prix leading up to, and including, the moment when Nelson Piquet Jr crashed on lap 14.

This radio traffic between the Renault pitwall and Piquet, as well as among members of the pitwall, is a fascinating insight into the minutes leading up to the crash and the chaotic moments after it.

The transcript will form part of the FIA’s World Motor Sport Council’s deliberations on Monday when it decides whether Piquet was told to crash his car, an allegation Renault and Flavio Briatore, the team principal, deny.

The Renault group on the wall at races includes two race engineers, plus Briatore and Pat Symonds, the director of engineering who runs the management of the race.

Symonds has been offered immunity from prosecution by the FIA in return for full disclosure about the alleged scheme to have Piquet crash on purpose.

The aim of the conspiracy alleged by the FIA was for Renault to cause a safety car interruption immediately after Fernando Alonso, who has said he was not party to any scheme to cheat, had made an unscheduled and early pitstop. Alonso pitted on lap 12 of the race, four laps earlier than originally intended, and Piquet’s car hit the wall two laps later.

The safety car duly appeared and circulated for six laps. During that time almost all of Alonso’s rivals pitted, enabling the Spaniard to climb steadily through the field and win the race from fifteenth on the grid.

In the early part of the race, there were several exchanges between Symonds and the engineers about Alonso’s race strategy, with Symonds preparing the ground to drop the original three-stop approach and change it to a two-stop strategy that would better fit with any plan for Piquet to crash.

“I can tell you now we are not three-stopping,” Symonds is heard to say on the transcript made by the FIA as part of its evidence in the case, a copy of which has been seen by The Times.

Later Symonds adds to an unnamed engineer: “Don’t worry about fuel because I’m going to get him [Alonso] out of this traffic earlier than that.”

Not long afterwards comes an unusual intervention from Piquet, who was running towards the back of the field in the early stages of Formula One’s first night race. But the novelty factor for him was not the floodlights. It has now been suggested that he was worried about which lap he was on because he knew he had special instructions for lap 14.

Piquet says: “What lap are we in, what lap are we in?”

A few seconds later an engineer tells the others on the wall: “He just asked: ‘What lap are we in?’ ”

Symonds intervenes: “Yeah, tell him that he’s about to complete lap 8.”

Symonds insists Piquet is then told something he should know from his pitboard, which is shown to him at the end of every lap. “No, just tell him, he is about, he’s just completing, he’s about to complete lap eight.”

After Piquet is given the information, the discussion returns to the timing of Alonso’s first stop and Symonds makes his decision. “Right, I’m going to . . . I think we’re going to stop him just before we catch him [a reference to the Williams driver, Kazuki Nakajima, who was ahead of Alonso] and get him out of it, the reason being we’ve still got this worry on the fuel pump. It’s only a couple of laps short. We’re going to be stopping him early and we’re going to go to lap 40.”

This decision prompts an engineer, who wants assurance from Symonds that a tactical option that would drop Alonso to last is the right thing to do. “Pat, do you still not think that this is a bit too early?” he asks a few minutes later. “We only did six tenths that lap.”

Symonds replies: “No, no it’s going to be all right.”

“OK, OK, understood,” the engineer responds.

Once Alonso has made his stop, Symonds tells everybody that it is time to “concentrate on” Piquet. After assessing the Brazilian’s position, he and Briatore decide Piquet has to quicken up as the fateful lap draws near.

Symonds to the engineer: “OK right, you’ve got to push him really bloody hard now. If he doesn’t get past Barrichello, he’s going nowhere, he’s got to get past Barrichello this lap.”

“Tell him, push . . .,” Briatore says.

Piquet’s race engineer gives him the hurry-up: “Nelson, no excuses now, you’ve got to get past Barrichello. You’ve got four clicks straight-line advantage. Come on, you’ve got to push now, you must get past him.”

Moments later Piquet crashes at turn 17, where there are no cranes to lift the wreckage, making a safety car inevitable, and at the point at which he alleges Symonds told him to do the deed during a meeting before the race.

Multiple voices: “Nelson’s off. F***ing hell. Nelson’s had a crash. I would say that would be a red flag. It’s huge [all speaking at the same time] .

Piquet: “Sorry guys. I had a little outing.”

Engineer: “Is he all right, Is he all right?”

Symonds: “Ask him if he’s all right.”

Engineer: “Are you OK? Are you OK?”

Engineer: “Fernando’s just gone past it.”

Engineer: “OK, yellow flag.”

Piquet: “Yeah, I hit my head in the back. I think I’m OK.”

Engineer: “OK, understood.”

Symonds: “Right [inaudible], stop him.”

Engineer: “Safety car, safety car, safety car, safety car. Fernando, safety car, mixture three.”

Symonds: “Tell him to be careful, turn 17 I think it is.”

After several exchanges about Alonso, an engineer expresses concern, presumably after seeing the crash on the television monitor, but Briatore seems unconcerned and is angry with Piquet.

Engineer: “F***ing hell that was a big shunt.”

Briatore: “F***ing hell . . . my every f***ing disgrace, f***ing, he’s not a driver.”

Then Symonds asks about Alonso’s suddenly improving prospects.

Symonds: “What position is Fernando in?”

Engineer: “Well, we were 20, and we’re first guy to pick the safety car up.”

Symonds: “Yeah, we’re not . . .”

Engineer: “He will get away past it but he’s got to wait.”

Later Briatore and Symonds discuss Alonso’s chances. “What position we are now in all this?” asks Briatore.

Symonds replies: “To be honest, I don’t know Flavio. It’s got to have been good for Fernando. But I honestly don’t know where he is.”

In the final part of the transcript, several minutes after the crash, the Renault team return to the subject of Piquet and his condition and at this stage Briatore adds his own concern for the young Brazilian driver’s welfare.

Engineer: “Where is Nelson? Have you seen him?”

Briatore: “Is he OK, Nelson? Is he OK?”

Alonso: “The pitlane is closed until we arrive?”

Engineer: “He climbed out, mate, and ran across the track.”

Engineer: “Yeah, the pitlane is still closed.”

Taken as a whole the transcript does not provide a killer-blow against Symonds or Briatore and could be read either way.

The FIA, the sport’s governing body, is known to be particularly concerned that the alleged conspiracy not only amounted to cheating but also involved a reckless act that could have resulted in injury or loss of life.

The pitwall recording shows that, on this score, the Renault team were also extremely concerned about Piquet’s safety.

quote:

Op dinsdag 15 september 2009 19:11 schreef nils7 het volgende:

[..]

Als ik dat lees heeft Renault helemaal niks gepland... althans er niks te merken over op de radio!

quote:

Op dinsdag 15 september 2009 21:32 schreef voyeur het volgende:

[..]

Niet nodig. Piquet blijft op het gas zelfs na dat zijn achterwielen al geslipt zijn. Sterker nog hij houdt dat vol tot hij de muur raakt. Geen coureur ter wereld zou dit doen.
Ik ben ervan overtuigd dat hij dit gedaan heeft omdat daardoor op de telemetrie te zien was dat dit geen crash was, maar moedwillig. Hij wilde zijn bewijs en wist hoe hij het moest doen.