quote:Oil, gas prices continue to skyrocket
[..]
The predictions for just how high oil can reach this year, just like 2008, continue to creep upward just five months removed from crude priced around $32 per barrel.
Benchmark crude for July delivery rose $1.23 to settle at $66.31 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Crude prices have spiked 30 percent this month, enough to give anyone vertigo. But the pain is relative.
At this time last year, crude prices were brushing up against $130.
While crude has risen fast through May, we're still around $66.
For gas prices to hit $3, crude would need to go to about $100 a barrel, well above even the highest projections this year of $70 to $75, said Tom Kloza, publisher and chief oil analyst at Oil Price Information service.
[..]
$130 per vat olie in 2030 zou ik voor tekenen.quote:EIA: World Energy Use Projected to Grow 44 Percent Between 2006 and 2030
World marketed energy consumption is projected to grow by 44 percent between 2006 and 2030, driven by strong long-term economic growth in the developing nations of the world, according to the reference case projection from the International Energy Outlook 2009 (IEO2009) released today by the Energy Information Administration (EIA).
The current global economic downturn will dampen world energy demand in the near term, as manufacturing and consumer demand for goods and services slows. However, with economic recovery anticipated to begin within the next 12 to 24 months, most nations are expected to see energy consumption growth at rates anticipated prior to the recession. Total world energy use rises from 472 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu) in 2006 to 552 quadrillion Btu in 2015 and then to 678 quadrillion Btu in 2030.
World oil prices have fallen sharply from their July 2008 high mark. As the world’s economies recover, higher world oil prices are assumed to return and to persist through 2030. In the IEO2009 reference case, world oil prices rise to $110 per barrel in 2015 (in real 2007 dollars) and $130 per barrel in 2030. Total liquid fuels and other petroleum consumption in 2030 is projected to be 22 million barrels per day higher than the 2006 level of 85 million barrels per day. In the reference case, conventional oil supplies from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) contribute 8.2 million barrels per day to the total increase in world liquid fuels production, and conventional supplies from non-OPEC countries add another 3.4 million barrels per day.
In addition, unconventional resources (including biofuels, oil sands, extra-heavy oil, coal-to-liquids, and gas-to-liquids) from both non-OPEC and OPEC sources are expected to become increasingly competitive in the reference case. World production of unconventional resources, which totaled 3.1 million barrels per day in 2006, increases to 13.4 million barrels per day in 2030 in the reference case, accounting for 13 percent of total world liquids supply in 2030.
Recent experience demonstrates that world oil prices can be extremely volatile and, as a result, the IEO2009 includes three world oil price cases that span a very broad range in 2030, from $50 (in 2007 dollars) per barrel in the low price case to $200 per barrel in the high price case. These price paths translate to a fairly broad range of potential supply outlooks in 2030, ranging from 90 million barrels per day in the high price case to 120 million barrels per day in the low price case (compared to 107 million barrels per day in the reference case)
Dat is bijna een verdubbeling in een paar maanden! Dus 'skyrocket' is niets teveel gezegd.quote:Op zaterdag 30 mei 2009 15:02 schreef waht het volgende:
D'r zit eindelijk weer wat beweging in de olieprijs. Gesloten op 66,31 dollar.
Bij MSNBC noemen ze het 'skyrocketten', dat vind ik wat overdreven.
Ik denk dat een vat olie in 2030 juist veel minder is dan 130. Simpelweg omdat zonnecellen tegen die tijd zeer efficient en goedkoop zijn.quote:Op zaterdag 30 mei 2009 15:02 schreef waht het volgende:
D'r zit eindelijk weer wat beweging in de olieprijs. Gesloten op 66,31 dollar.
Bij MSNBC noemen ze het 'skyrocketten', dat vind ik wat overdreven.
[..]
[..]
$130 per vat olie in 2030 zou ik voor tekenen.
Mhoaw, de olievoorraden nemen atm scherp af. Vandaar dat olie behoorlijk gestegen is. En als olievoorraden nu al afnemen, hoe moet dat wel niet zijn als de economie weer wat aantrekt?quote:Op zondag 31 mei 2009 10:49 schreef SeLang het volgende:
[..]
Dat is bijna een verdubbeling in een paar maanden! Dus 'skyrocket' is niets teveel gezegd.
De kans op een bubble in commodities is weer behoorlijk aanwezig door de crash op de obligatiemarkt. De 30-year Treasury is dit jaar al 30% (!) gezakt. Het gevolg (en oorzaak) is dat beleggers in kortere maturities gaan (dus bijvoorbeeld 1-year of korter), maar de yield daarop is bijna nul. Een alternatief is dan commodities, zelfs als de fundamentals voor fysieke vraag niet sterk zijn.
Op zich is die stijging wel gunstig want de Treasury crash, de hernieuwde daling van de US$ en de explosieve olieprijs stijging zijn een sterke indicator dat de FED geen controle meer heeft en hopelijk zet dat een rem op de 'quantitative easing', bailouts en stimuleringsplannen en kan de economie eindelijk corrigeren.
Daar heb je eigenlijk wel gelijk in ja. Ik zat te denken aan het record van vorig jaar maar dat is nu niet echt relevant meer.quote:Op zondag 31 mei 2009 10:49 schreef SeLang het volgende:
[..]
Dat is bijna een verdubbeling in een paar maanden! Dus 'skyrocket' is niets teveel gezegd.
Dat is één van de scenario's idd. Eigenlijk moet ik gewoon ophouden met het voorspellen van olieprijzen aangezien ik nooit goed zit.quote:Op zondag 31 mei 2009 11:12 schreef pberends het volgende:
[..]
Ik denk dat een vat olie in 2030 juist veel minder is dan 130. Simpelweg omdat zonnecellen tegen die tijd zeer efficient en goedkoop zijn.
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/twip/twip.aspquote:Op zondag 31 mei 2009 11:15 schreef pberends het volgende:
[..]
Mhoaw, de olievoorraden nemen atm scherp af. Vandaar dat olie behoorlijk gestegen is. En als olievoorraden nu al afnemen, hoe moet dat wel niet zijn als de economie weer wat aantrekt?
Iedereen zou daarmee moeten ophouden (prijzen 20 jaar vooruit voorspellen). Want kijk eens naar de fout van historische voorspellingen slechts een paar maanden vooruit...quote:Op zondag 31 mei 2009 13:03 schreef waht het volgende:
Eigenlijk moet ik gewoon ophouden met het voorspellen van olieprijzen aangezien ik nooit goed zit.
Idd, ik denk wel dat je voorspellingen kan maken in de trant van, "als de economie weer aantrekt zal de prijs van olie weer stijgen". Uiteraard wel met een hele lijst mits'en en maar'en. Of zoals jij net zei dat de crash op de obligatiemarkt beleggers richting commodities trekken en zodoende de prijs opdrijven of vice versa.quote:Op zondag 31 mei 2009 13:11 schreef SeLang het volgende:
[..]
Iedereen zou daarmee moeten ophouden (prijzen 20 jaar vooruit voorspellen). Want kijk eens naar de fout van historische voorspellingen slechts een paar maanden vooruit...
Op een prijs van $100 voorspelden sommigen $120 of $140, anderen misschien $80. De realiteit: Zes maanden later stonden we op $35. Wat voor zin heeft het dan om een prijs te voorspellen voor 2030
quote:"Die nächste Ölkrise kommt"
Engelse vertaling
A shortage of oil could trigger another global recession around 2013 – says the IEA. By 2010 the price will reach new highs.
The IEA in Paris is warning of a new, much more severe global economic crisis around 2013. The reason is that investments in oil from new projects are being cancelled by large oil companies. If demand starts increasing in 2010, the oil price could explode, fire up inflation and put global growth at risk.
"We are concerned, that oil companies are reducing their investment levels. When demand returns a supply shortage could appear. We are even predicting that this shortage could occur in 2013." Said Nobuo Tanaka, head of the IEA in an interview with Sueddeutsche Zeitung.
[..]
The investment levels are already down 25% from a year ago. The OPEC countries are reducing production, because they do not see sufficient demand. Of 130 large oil projects, 35 have been frozen by February, said OPEC general secretary Abdullah al-Badri.
The investments however, are necessary to meet demand when it starts picking up again. This is not a matter of oil running out, but IEA studies prove that the oil produced from 580 of the largest 800 fields is declining.
[..]
Unfortunately, he has found that because of the global economic crisis, investments in renewable energy and nuclear power are declining. If additional measures are not undertaken however against global warming, and the CO2 emissions continue their step upward trajectory, this will lead to warming of six degrees centigrade by the end of the century. "This would be a disaster", said Tanaka. Then the northern German city of Hanover would be a warm as Marrakech today.
[..]
quote:Oil demand to post sharpest fall since 1981 -IEA
LONDON, May 14 (Reuters) - World oil demand this year will post the sharpest annual decline since 1981 as the economy struggles to bounce back, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Thursday.
Demand will contract by 2.56 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2009, the IEA, which advises 28 industrialised countries, said in a monthly report. It previously forecast demand would fall by 2.4 million bpd this year.
Oil market fundamentals remained weak and a rise in oil prices, which hit $60 a barrel for the first time in six months on Tuesday, was due to sentiment rather than evidence of higher consumption, the agency said.
"The oil price seems to have moved a bit higher in the past month largely on the basis of equity markets and sentiment about potential economic recovery," David Fyfe, head of the IEA's Oil Industry and Markets Division, told Reuters.
"But we're not seeing it in terms of the preliminary demand data for early 2009."
[..]
quote:Non-OPEC oil production is about to decline
The group of countries outside the OPEC cartel currently still produces 60% of
world oil production. But this situation will not last much longer as non-OPEC
production is to fall off its plateau in 2010. A plateau that began at the end of
2003 between a production level of 49 to 51 million barrels per day. Caused
by declining production in most of the producing countries in non-OPEC
including Norway, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Australia, Mexico, the
United States and Indonesia. Their decline has until now been compensated
by increasing production mainly in Russia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, China,
Brazil and Canada. But Russian production has been on a plateau since end
2007 and is expected to begin declining soon.
Of even more importance is the overall decline in investments due to the
economic crisis. There was a surge in investment in peaked non-OPEC
countries as the oil price rose since 2006 which turned around into a large
suspension of projects and an even bigger postponement. Ranging from
projects such as an extension to the Forties field in the UK that would start
producing in 2009 adding 25.000 b/d of capacity but has now been cancelled,
to the production of 300.000 b/d from the offshore field of Jidong Kanpu in
China, which has been postponed from early 2010 to the end of 2011. The
extent of cancellation and postponement of project has been presented to
the G8 by the International Energy Agency last May, and sums up to several
million barrels in non-OPEC countries that will not come onto the market in
the 2009-2011 period. This end to the investment boom is going to lead to
deeper declines in already peaked countries, and hence declining production
in overall non-OPEC. More light on the extent of the decline in non-OPEC is
going to come forth from the medium term oil market outlook from the IEA
to be published on 29 June. A report which could prove to be a shocker to
many. As its conclusion will undoubtedly be that OPEC countries will be the
main producers left to prevent an oil crisis from happening in the next five
years. The spare capacity that OPEC currently has, is far from sufficient to
provide the world with the oil it needs for sustained economic growth on
the midterm.
The consequence of this market change will be large as OPEC gains increasing
control and considerable influence on the world’s economy, because it will
be the main block left that can increase oil exports in a couple of years. It
could very well mean beginning of the end of the free oil market, as large
consuming countries such as the USA and China increasingly seek to gain
influence over OPEC her oil flows. Be it through political or military channels.
Hopefully, the countries of the OPEC cartel will be able to significantly
increase their production in the next five to ten years, giving the world some
breathing room to build large scale alternatives to oil. But this remains a dim
prospect given the difficulties that the cartel is already facing with expanding
production due to mainly political problems.
Rembrandt Koppelaar
President ASPO Netherlands
Min of meer. ASPO Nederland voorspelt een piek in 2012. ( Rapport uit 2005 )quote:Op maandag 15 juni 2009 13:08 schreef Q. het volgende:
Samenvatting: we hebben de piek gehad en flikkeren zometeen keihard de duisternis in...
quote:http://omrpublic.iea.org/currentissues/high.pdf
Forecast global oil demand is adjusted up 120 kb/d for 2009
following stronger‐than‐expected 1Q09 OECD data. Global oil
demand is projected at 83.3 mb/d, ‐2.9% or ‐2.5 mb/d compared
with 2008. These revisions do not necessarily imply economic
recovery, but may reflect a slowing in previously sharp decline.
Door de huidige crisis zal die piek wat verschuiven, het zou zelfs kunnen zijn dat door deze crisis de piek niet zo erg meer zichtbaar gaat worden maar we langere tijd op een productieplafond gaan blijven en dan pas zakken.quote:Op maandag 15 juni 2009 13:23 schreef waht het volgende:
[..]
Min of meer. ASPO Nederland voorspelt een piek in 2012. ( Rapport uit 2005 )
We zien wel wat er gebeurd. Voorlopig wordt er nog genoeg geproduceerd.
De vruchten...quote:First Iraq Oil Bidding Round to Be Held June 29
Iraq will hold its first bidding round for prized oil and gas fields as shceduled on June 29, a government spokesman said Wednesday.
[..]
Some 32 international companies, including oil majors such as Royal Dutch Shell PLC (RDSB.LN), Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM), Chevron Corp. (CVX), BP PLC (BP) and Total SA (TOT), are expected to take part in the bidding process, planned to be held in Baghdad. The Oil Ministry had pre-qualified 35 international companies for the first bidding round which was announced a year ago.
The ministry is planning to award 20-year long service contracts, which mean that winning companies would receive remuneration in kind for each barrel produced as well as costs. Oil majors prefer deals that give them a share of profits and allow them to book reserves.
The oil fields in questions are Kirkuk and Bai Hassan in northern Iraq, West Qurna-1, North and South Rumaila, Zubair and Missan in southern Iraq. The two non-producing gas fields are Akkas in western Iraq and Mansouriya in the center.
[..]
andere bron (Rigzone)
Wat is de wisselkoers van de dollar? En weet je wel dat wij veel accijnsen op brandstoffen betalen waardoor de stijging van de olieprijs minder hard aankomt.quote:Op woensdag 17 juni 2009 18:09 schreef kunstfiets het volgende:
een vat olie is slechts 70 dollar terwijl die een jaar geleden het dubbele was.
de prijs voor de benzine tikt nu de 1,50 aan terwijl die een jaar geleden 1,70 was...
er klopt iets niet
snif snif ik ruik een kartel. Maar da's ook geen nieuws natuurlijk. Het viel me ook al op aan de pomp.quote:Op woensdag 17 juni 2009 18:09 schreef kunstfiets het volgende:
een vat olie is slechts 70 dollar terwijl die een jaar geleden het dubbele was.
de prijs voor de benzine tikt nu de 1,50 aan terwijl die een jaar geleden 1,70 was...
er klopt iets niet
Mijn fout. Ik had 160 dollar per vat in mijn hoofd i.c.m 1,60 per liter. Wellicht omdat dat zo makkelijk te onthouden is.quote:Oh en de olieprijs was op z'n hoogst 147 dollar, de benzineprijs was op z'n hoogst bijna 1,70. Als je het allemaal wat preciezer berekent komt het veel beter uit dan je denkt.
quote:Oil futures rally after attack on oil platform in Nigeria
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Oil futures ended above $71 a barrel on Monday, rallying after an attack on an oil platform in Nigeria rekindled supply worries.
Light, sweet crude for August delivery rose $2.33, or 3.3%, to end at $71.49 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Earlier, the contract soared to an intraday high of $72.40 a barrel.
(..)
Oil futures rise above $73 a barrel in Asia
quote:BP wins bid to develop Iraq's biggest oilfield
Iraq’s Oil Ministry announced a consortium led by the UK’s BP has accepted a contract to develop the country’s biggest oilfield – the 17-billion barrel Rumaila field in the south.
The consortium, which includes China's CNPC, accepted the deal after Exxon Mobil rejected the government’s $2 a barrel limit.
Most of the world’s major oil companies are taking part in an auction for six Iraqi oil fields and two gas fields on Tuesday. The contracts on offer are worth a total of $16bn.
(..)
Full list of Iraq oil contract bidders
BHP Billiton, Eni, LUKoil, Occidental Petroleum, Sinochem, BP, ExxonMobil, Maersk Oil, ONGC, Sinopec, Chevron, Hess Corp., Marathon, PT Pertamina, StatoilHydro, CNOOC, INPEX Corp., Mitsubishi, Petronas, Total, CNPC, JAPEX, Nexen, Repsol-YPF, Turkish Petroleum Corp. (TPAO), ConocoPhillips, Gazprom Neft, Nippon Oil, Shell, Woodside Petroleum, Edison, Korea Gas Corp. (KOGAS)
quote:Iraqi oil licensing round runs into trouble as foreign firms only bid for 1 of 3 fields
BAGHDAD (AP) -- Iraq opened up some of its massive oil and gas fields to foreign firms on Tuesday but only one deal was struck by midmorning in a troubling sign for the country's hopes of reconstruction.
(..)
En uiteraard zitten we weer in het hurricane seizoen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Atlantic_hurricane_seasonquote:China raises gasoline, diesel prices
BEIJING, June 29 (Xinhua) -- China raised gasoline and diesel prices by 600 yuan (about 87.8 U.S. dollars) per tonne, starting zero o'clock Tuesday.
The increase raised the price for gasoline by about 0.45 yuan per liter, or 8.6 percent, and the price of diesel by about 0.51 yuan per liter, or 9.6 percent, said the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) in a statement on its Web site.
It was the third oil price adjustment this year. On May 31, the NDRC raised the pump prices of gasoline and diesel by 400 yuan per tonne, or 7 percent and 8 percent, respectively.
The adjustment was in response to "recent international oil price fluctuation" under the country's new fuel pricing mechanism, as international crude prices kept rising, said the statement.
According to the new mechanism, China's domestic prices are to be "indirectly linked" to global crude prices "in a controlled manner."
(..)
quote:Oliehandelaar kost baas miljoenen
Uitgegeven: 3 juli 2009 15:15
Laatst gewijzigd: 3 juli 2009 15:14
AMSTERDAM - Een handelaar bij een Londense oliemakelaar heeft zijn baas dinsdag met 10 miljoen dollar verlies opgezadeld. Daarbij heeft hij en passant ook eigenhandig de olieprijs flink opgedreven.
Tegenover de Britse krant The Guardian stelde PVM Oil Futures, een bedrijf dat handelt in olie-opties, het slachtoffer te zijn geworden van "ongeautoriseerd handelen". De onderneming heeft een onderzoek in gang gezet.
De medewerker handelde op eigen houtje in oliefutures, oftewel termijncontracten. Dinsdag steeg de prijs van een vat Brentolie door zijn grootscheepse inkoop opeens naar 73,50 dollar. Tegelijkertijd namen de handelsvolumes 32 keer hun normale omvang aan. Een uur later was de prijs alweer gezakt.
Onderzoek
PVM heeft de werknemer meteen de laan uitgestuurd en autoriteiten op de hoogte gesteld. Zij voeren een onderzoek uit en op basis hiervan wordt besloten of er ook een strafrechtelijk onderzoek naar de medewerker zal worden ingesteld.
Vorig jaar kwam een geval van ongeauthoriseerd handelen bij de Franse zakenbank Société Générale aan het licht. Dankzij ongeoorloofde transacties van handelaar Jerome Kerviel moest de bank een miljardenverlies in de boeken zetten
Omdat de meeste bedrijven in principe hun werknemers wel vertrouwen en hen dus (impliciet) de mogelijkheid geven om fouten te maken?quote:Op maandag 6 juli 2009 16:42 schreef RemcoDelft het volgende:
Als het "ongeauthoriseerd" is, waarom heeft zo'n medewerker daar dan de mogelijkheid toe?!
Wellicht is het bij beleggen anders, maar ik kan me weinig bedrijven voorstellen waar een willekeurig personeelslid voor miljoenen schade kan veroorzaken.quote:Op maandag 6 juli 2009 16:49 schreef waht het volgende:
[..]
Omdat de meeste bedrijven in principe hun werknemers wel vertrouwen en hen dus (impliciet) de mogelijkheid geven om fouten te maken?
Dan zijn er geen dollars meer.quote:Op zaterdag 30 mei 2009 15:02 schreef waht het volgende:
D'r zit eindelijk weer wat beweging in de olieprijs. Gesloten op 66,31 dollar.
Bij MSNBC noemen ze het 'skyrocketten', dat vind ik wat overdreven.
[..]
[..]
$130 per vat olie in 2030 zou ik voor tekenen.
30? Een daling van de olie is inderdaad wel goed, maar voordat we op de 30 zitten duurt het nog wel even. We zullen wsch, snel een tiental dollars zakken om weer een lange poos zijwaarts in de olie prijs te hangen. Zolang er genoeg vragen blijven omtrent of het economisch herstel nu wel zo gaat als gewenst kan de olie nog wat verder zakken. Overigens heb ik ook shorts op de olie.quote:
Blijkt dat uit technische analyse?quote:
Ik zou olie nooit shorten om geopolitieke redenen. Als Iran wordt aangevallen ben je al je geld kwijt.quote:Op dinsdag 7 juli 2009 01:23 schreef sitting_elfling het volgende:
[..]
30? Een daling van de olie is inderdaad wel goed, maar voordat we op de 30 zitten duurt het nog wel even. We zullen wsch, snel een tiental dollars zakken om weer een lange poos zijwaarts in de olie prijs te hangen. Zolang er genoeg vragen blijven omtrent of het economisch herstel nu wel zo gaat als gewenst kan de olie nog wat verder zakken. Overigens heb ik ook shorts op de olie.
Ja zeg, d'r is geen lol meer aan dit topic als we de komende 5 jaar een stabiele olieprijs krijgen.quote:IEA sees global oil supply crunch risk recede
The world may escape an oil supply crisis for the next five years because a slow recovery from the economic downturn would hold down growth of demand, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Monday.
The IEA slashed its mid-term estimate for world oil demand, which it said may rise by an average 0,6% a year from 2008 to 2014, down sharply from its forecast of 1,6% growth made last year.
(..)
"Whether we end up facing a supply crunch again by mid-decade, or with a more comfortable buffer of supply flexibility, depends largely on the pace of economic recovery and government action on efficiency," the IEA's director, Nobuo Tanaka, said in a statement.
(..)
In Monday's report it sharply lowered its oil supply estimates and cautioned that tighter supply forecasts for 2013 and 2014 raised the prospect of an "increasingly volatile" market in that period.
(..)
"Oil demand growth will be driven by non-OECD countries, while oil consumption in the OECD will decline," it said, referring to the grouping of 30 rich states. It stressed strong potential growth in China, Asia and the Middle East.
Ik denk dat elke grootmacht wel weet dat dit een zeer onverstandige beslissing zou zijn.quote:Op dinsdag 7 juli 2009 09:12 schreef pberends het volgende:
[..]
Ik zou olie nooit shorten om geopolitieke redenen. Als Iran wordt aangevallen ben je al je geld kwijt.
Soms vind ik het hele politieke 'gelul' omtrent olie wat verdacht. Tuurlijk als je in een tijdschaal van de jaren 60 tot nu de productie / prijs van olie naast elkaar zou zetten zie je dat grote politieke situaties in de wereld behoorlijk invloed hebben gehad maar mijn inziens wordt het soms ook te makkelijk als excuus gebruikt. Enige redenen om short te zitten voor olie op dit moment is dat de olieprijs onevenredig is gestegen en de economie niet gebaat is bij hoge olieprijzen. En tot dusver van iets boven de 70 tot bijna bij de 60 is alweer een leuke daling, vandaag overigens ook weerquote:Op dinsdag 7 juli 2009 23:34 schreef tony_clifton- het volgende:
[..]
Ik denk dat elke grootmacht wel weet dat dit een zeer onverstandige beslissing zou zijn.
Israel doet niks zonder backup van de US, de Amerikanen hebben hun handen nu al vol met Afghanistan, Irak en Noord Korea.
Dan kan je je beter zorgen maken over Nigeria imo.
http://www.nrc.nl/economi(...)ieproducten_beperkenquote:VS wil speculatie op olieproducten beperken
Gepubliceerd: 8 juli 2009 13:33 | Gewijzigd: 8 juli 2009 13:33
Door een onzer redacteuren
Rotterdam, 8 juli. De belangrijkste Amerikaanse toezichthouder op de handel in grondstoffen, de Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), wil strenger optreden tegen de mogelijke invloed van speculatieve beleggers op de termijnhandel in olieproducten.
„We zullen op agressieve wijze al ons invloed gebruiken om een faire, open en efficiënte marktwerking te verzekeren", zei Gary Gensler, de nieuwe voorzitter van de CFTC, gisteren.
Inperken speculatieve beleggers
De Amerikaanse beurswaakhond wil in de loop van juli en augustus een aantal hoorzittingen houden met vertegenwoordigers van consumenten- en bedrijfsorganisaties. Tijdens die sessies zal nagegaan worden hoe de invloed van speculatieve beleggers, zoals hedgefondsen en investeringsbanken, verder kan ingeperkt worden. Er wordt ondermeer gedacht aan het opleggen van een bovengrens voor de hoeveelheid geld die één individuele handelaar in één bepaalde grondstof kan investeren.
Het initiatief van de CFTC komt nadat een medewerker van één van de grootste handelaars in olie, PVM Oil Associates, afgelopen week de prijs van een vat ruwe Brent opdreef tot 73,50 dollar – de hoogste piek dit jaar – door zonder toelating massale beursorders te plaatsen. Dit zadelde PVM in één uur op met een verlies van 10 miljoen dollar (7 miljoen euro). Gisteren viel de prijs voor een vat ruwe Brent op de Londense termijnmarkt alweer terug tot 62,85 dollar, een daling met bijna 15 procent in een week tijd.
Gevaarlijke volatiliteit
In een opiniebijdrage in The Wall Street Journal deden de Franse president Nicolas Sarkozy en de Britse premier Gordon Brown een oproep om de „gevaarlijk volatiele" olieprijs die „het vertrouwen in een economisch herstel ondermijnt" beter in bedwang te houden. Door de recessie in Europa en de VS zijn de prijzen voor ruwe olie, na een piek van 145 dollar in de zomer van 2008, begin dit jaar in elkaar gestort tot circa 34 dollar. Sinds enkele maanden is de grondstof weer aan een opmars bezig op de Londense en Amerikaanse termijnmarkten.
Een deel van de handel op de termijnmarkt wordt veroorzaakt door olieconcerns, energie- en luchtvaartbedrijven die zich met zogeheten futures of termijnorders indekken tegen al te heftige prijsschommelingen. Een ander deel door financiële beleggers die zich op die manier proberen in te dekken tegen inflatie en de zwakke dollar. Speculanten zorgen voor de nodige liquiditeit in de markt.
Daarnaast wordt het nogal lastig om te bepalen wat een 'evil' speculatie is en wat een legitieme hedge. Zelfs iemand die puur long is in crude kan dit toch altijd verdedigen als zijnde een inflatie hedge? (om maar iets te noemen)quote:Position Accountability Levels and Limits
Any one month - 10,000 net futures; all months - 20,000 net futures; but not to exceed 3,000 contracts in the last three days of trading in the spot month.
En dat bepalen gaat dus denk ik niet gebeuren. Gewoon per wet iets regelen wat voor iedereen geldt, evil of legitiem. Lekker makkelijkquote:Op woensdag 8 juli 2009 16:40 schreef SeLang het volgende:
Wat een onzinverhaal.
Overigens zijn er al positielimieten
Uit de Nymex contract specificatie:
[..]
Daarnaast wordt het nogal lastig om te bepalen wat een 'evil' speculatie is en wat een legitieme hedge. Zelfs iemand die puur long is in crude kan dit toch altijd verdedigen als zijnde een inflatie hedge? (om maar iets te noemen)
Idd, zoals een engelstalige comment daarover ook goed verwoord:quote:Op woensdag 8 juli 2009 16:40 schreef SeLang het volgende:
Wat een onzinverhaal.
Overigens zijn er al positielimieten
Uit de Nymex contract specificatie:
[..]
Daarnaast wordt het nogal lastig om te bepalen wat een 'evil' speculatie is en wat een legitieme hedge. Zelfs iemand die puur long is in crude kan dit toch altijd verdedigen als zijnde een inflatie hedge? (om maar iets te noemen)
quote:It's going to be hard for the CFTC to distinguish 'Bad' speculators and 'Good' speculators. Good speculators are needed to take the opposite positions of physical trades - they provide the all important liquidity. The bad speculators simply buy the market and and use their size and transaction velocity to push up prices.
The problem is that one of the 'Bad' speculators is Goldman- Sachs, the fourth branch of the US government.
OUCH!
Another 'Bad' speculator is China, buying oil with some of its dollar reserves. Here, China would be 'screwing' America in the morning again ... but, what's new? I imagine all the producers are buying long- dated crude contracts - and some call it hedging! This would make the producers bad speculators. Why wouldn't producers manipulate the market? Easier to make cash on oil you DON'T have to deliver ... and if for some ungodly reason delivery is required ... they actually have crude oil to deliver!
Yeaaaay!
Also, shippers and refiners are selling crude back and forth to each other outside of the reach of CFTC. A tanker load of crude is represented by a receipt. How many times will that receipt change hands between the Gulf of Arabia and the Gulf of Mexico? Between the terminal and the the refinery?
I say, good luck CFTC!
quote:Der Spiegel: VISIONS OF EUROPE IN 2030
The past thirty years have been a period of perceived resource abundance, particularly with regard to oil as the main resource of the global economy. It is oil that has greased capitalist expansion. By contrast, the coming thirty years -- an uncertain transitional phase away from the oil economy -- will be marked by a deficit of resources and a logic of scarcity. This will apply not only to oil and gas but also to more elementary resources such as food and, in particular, water. The ominous, globally shared perception of scarcity will allow an economic logic of protection to appear rational. Together, greater spatial distance and no smaller temporal distance will lead to a partial reversal of globalization.
quote:Forbes: The End Of Fossil Fuel
Oil production is expected to go into terminal decline around 2012. The principal reason is that the largest and most productive fields are becoming depleted while new discoveries have been progressively smaller and of lesser quality. Discovery of new oil peaked over 40 years ago and has been declining ever since despite furious drilling and unprecedentedly high prices.
When it begins to decline, rate of crude production is projected to fall at 5%, or over four mbpd, per year--roughly equivalent to losing the entire production of Latin America or Europe every year. The decline rate will likely accelerate to over 10% per year by 2030.
Uiteindelijk zijn oliebedrijven inderdaad gedoemd. Daarom noemen ze zichzelf liever energiebedrijven.quote:Greenpeace study finds oil companies may be doomed
Environmental activist network argues that the oil industry might be approaching a tipping point from fall in the price, advances in technology and policies on climate change
A long-term decline in the demand for oil could undermine the huge investments in Canadian tar sands, which have been heavily opposed by environmentalists, according to a report published today.
The report, by Greenpeace, will make uncomfortable reading for the companies that are investing tens of billions of pounds to exploit the hard-to-extract oil in the belief that demand and the price would climb inexorably as countries such as China and India industrialise.
Citing projections from the oil producers' cartel Opec and the International Energy Agency, as well as various oil experts, the report casts doubt on the conventional assumption that consumption and prices will begin gathering pace once the world pulls itself out of recession.
It argues that alongside the cyclical fall in the oil price there are more fundamental structural changes taking place. These are driven by advances in energy efficiency and alternative energy, cleaner vehicles, government policies on climate change and concerns over energy security. Greenpeace has posted the report to 200 shareholders in Shell and BP, including pension funds, in an effort to put pressure on the companies to think again. BP reports quarterly results tomorrow and Shell on Thursday.
Lorne Stockman, the author of the report, said: "A peak in oil demand was barely discussed even a year ago, but now it is a viable idea. When it happens, I wouldn't want to guess, but it will happen sooner than we thought. There has been lots of talk about a supply peak, but it is good to start talking about a demand peak, and that has huge implications for these companies.
"All of the international oil companies as you look beyond 2020 need a high oil price to be profitable, because they are increasingly being pushed to develop expensive resources in not just the tar sands, but in deep water and offshore Arctic sites.
"But there is something more structural going on," he added. "Governments are beginning to act, and not just the Obama administration. In the EU, the policy driver is climate change, and in China and the US, it is about energy security and the vulnerability of the economy to volatility in the oil price."
The rush to exploit the tar sands in Canada has been described as a modern day gold rush that has led to a huge boom in once sleepy towns in the province of Alberta. The oil was once considered too difficult and expensive to extract as it is a mixture of clay, water and bitumen.
Many of the projects have been mothballed until the oil price recovers. It has fallen from a peak of $147 a barrel and is currently at about $68. Merrill Lynch estimates that the price would need to settle at about $80 to make further investment viable. Critics argue that tar sands extraction is disastrous to the environment, causing deforestation, requiring huge amounts of water and greenhouse emissions three to five times greater than conventional crude.
The report notes that Opec and the IEA have been revising projections for oil demand downwards since 2006, with by far the sharpest revision this year. Opec has revised its 2025 oil forecast down by 12% within the past four years.
Peter Hughes, who spent much of his career at BP and BG, and is now director for global energy at consultancy firm Arthur D Little, recently wrote a report titled 'The Beginning of the End for Oil?' He supports the Greenpeace view and said the correlation between oil demand and GDP growth has been weakened. "It is widely accepted that demand in OECD countries has plateaued and is going into decline but it has also been thought that would be massively outweighed by growth in China. But the Chinese think long-term and identified some time ago that the biggest threat to their economic growth was an increasing dependency on imported energy, which is anathema to them. The conclusion is clear – to reduce the reliance on hydrocarbons through energy efficiency and fundamental technology change. I think we will reach peak oil demand in the middle of the next decade."
About 50% of oil demand in the US fuels cars and the report takes hope from the Obama administration having tied recent bailouts for the industry to the development of cleaner vehicles. But it notes the US is far behind China, where government mandates mean new Chinese cars are 56% more fuel-efficient than those built in Detroit. Fuel-efficient cars in China attract 1% sales tax and sports utility vehicles, 40%.
Greenpeace also contends that a high oil price is simply unsustainable. It cites research from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, which suggests that economies become constrained when the price moves into a band between $100 and $120 a barrel, causing the price to fall back. Another report from energy business analysts Douglas Westwood puts the "recession threshold" even lower, at $80 a barrel.
Shell, which has delayed a number of tar sands projects, argues that energy supply will struggle to keep up with the demands of a growing global population and that in the long term there will be upward pressures on energy prices that justify investing in the Canadian tar sands. "Our first oil sands operation, the Athabasca Oil Sands Project (60% Shell share) was built between 1999 and 2003, when the oil price was considerably lower," a spokeswoman said. Shell has the highest exposure of the majors to the tar sands and is most at risk from a decline in demand.
There are contrary views. The Saudi oil minister warned in May that the world could be facing another oil shock, with prices above $150 within two to three years through a lack of investment in new capacity. The International Monetary Fund has expressed similar concerns. Even Greenpeace does not suggest that there will not be temporary squeezes on demand and price spikes. But it believes that the world might fast be approaching a tipping pointthat could have profound implications.
quote:Warning: Oil supplies are running out fast
In a stark warning to Britain and the other Western powers, Dr Birol said that the market power of the very few oil-producing countries that hold substantial reserves of oil – mostly in the Middle East – would increase rapidly as the oil crisis begins to grip after 2010.
"One day we will run out of oil, it is not today or tomorrow, but one day we will run out of oil and we have to leave oil before oil leaves us, and we have to prepare ourselves for that day," Dr Birol said. "The earlier we start, the better, because all of our economic and social system is based on oil, so to change from that will take a lot of time and a lot of money and we should take this issue very seriously," he said.
"The market power of the very few oil-producing countries, mainly in the Middle East, will increase very quickly. They already have about 40 per cent share of the oil market and this will increase much more strongly in the future," he said.
There is now a real risk of a crunch in the oil supply after next year when demand picks up because not enough is being done to build up new supplies of oil to compensate for the rapid decline in existing fields.
quote:Economist.com: How long till the lights go out?
North Sea gas has served Britain well, but supply peaked in 1999. Since then the flow has fallen by half; by 2015 it will have dropped by two-thirds. By 2015 four of Britain’s ten nuclear stations will have shut and no new ones could be ready for years after that. As for coal, it is fiendishly dirty: Britain will be breaking just about every green promise it has ever made if it is using anything like as much as it does today. Renewable energy sources will help, but even if the wind and waves can be harnessed (and Britain has plenty of both), these on-off forces cannot easily replace more predictable gas, nuclear and coal power. There will be a shortfall—perhaps of as much as 20GW—which, if nothing radical is done, will have to be met from imported gas. A large chunk of it may come from Vladimir Putin’s deeply unreliable and corrupt Russia.
Click here to find out more!
Many of Britain’s neighbours may find this rather amusing. Britain, the only big west European country that could have joined the oil producers’ club OPEC, the country that used to lecture the world about energy liberalisation, is heading towards South African-style power cuts, with homes and factories plunged intermittently into third-world darkness.
In terms of energy policy, this is almost criminal—as bad as any other planning failure in New Labour’s 12-year reign (though the opposition Tories are hardly brimming with ideas). British politicians, after all, have had 30 years to prepare for the day when the hydrocarbons beneath the North Sea run out; it is hardly a national secret that the country’s nuclear plants are old and its coal-power stations filthy. Recession has only delayed the looming energy crunch (see article). How did Britain end up in this mess?
quote:Richard Heinberg: Temporary Recession or the End of Growth?
This essay, composed by a mere journalist, in many ways represents the thinking of thousands of physical scientists working over the past several decades on issues having to do with population, resources, pollution, and biodiversity. Ignoring the diagnosis itself—whether as articulated here or as implied in tens of thousands of scientific papers—may waste our last chance to avert a complete collapse, not just of the economy, but of civility and organized human existence. It may risk a historic discontinuity with qualitative antecedents in the fall of the Roman and Mayan civilizations. (37) But there is no true precedent for what may be in store, because those earlier examples of collapse affected geographically bounded societies whose influence on their environments was also bounded. Today’s civilization is global, and its fate, Earth’s fate, and humanity’s fate are inextricably tied.
But even if policy makers continue to ignore warnings such as this, individuals and communities can take heed and begin the process of building resilience, and of detaching themselves from reliance on fossil fuels and institutions that are inextricably tied to the perpetual growth machine. We cannot sit passively by as world leaders squander opportunities to awaken and adapt to growth limits. We can make changes in our own lives, and we can join with our neighbors. And we can let policy makers know we disapprove of their allegiance to the status quo, but that there are other options
Is it too late to begin a managed transition to a post-fossil fuel society? Perhaps. But we will not know unless we try. And if we are to make that effort, we must begin by acknowledging one simple, stark reality: growth as we have known it can no longer be our goal.
quote:Elektriciteitsverbruik NL 5% gedaald
Volgens cijfers van Tennet was het Nederlandse elektriciteitsverbruik afgelopen juni 5% lager dan een jaar daarvoor. De daling van 109 TWh naar 103 TWh wordt veroorzaakt door de economische krimp. De bodem van de daling lijkt nog niet in zicht maar door de daling worden wel de kyoto doelstellingen voor CO2 vermindering in 2012 beter haalbaar.
[..]
quote:Russian army drills to defend oil, gas exports
MOSCOW (Reuters) - The Russian army is holding its first major training exercises to protect against what Moscow sees as possible terrorist attacks on its vital oil and gas export routes, the military and media said Wednesday.
Sweeping drills in the Siberian Military district, covering a theater of operations spanning hundreds of miles (km) from Irkutsk to Buryatia near Lake Baikal, started Monday and entered their main phase Wednesday.
"The main focus of the drills is training for effective and preventative measures to counter terrorism and deal with the aftermath of emergencies, as well as with abnormal situations linked to transporting hydrocarbons," the Defense Ministry said on its Website www.mil.ru.
Russia, the world's No. 2 oil exporter, is building a pipeline to carry oil from huge new fields in eastern Siberia to energy-hungry Asian markets, including China, a move that will diversify Moscow's energy reach beyond its traditional European markets.
[..]
quote:What is the status of the U.S. nuclear industry?
There are currently 104 commercial nuclear reactors at 65 nuclear power plants in 31 States. Since 1990, the share of the Nation’s total electricity supply provided by nuclear power generation has averaged about 20%, with the level of nuclear generation growing at roughly the same rate as overall electricity use. Between 1985 and 1996, 34 new reactors were placed in service. In addition, nuclear generation has increased as a result of higher utilization of existing capacity and from technical modifications to increase nuclear plant capacity (expressed in megawatts). In response to incentives provided by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, nuclear power output is expected to grow, but at a slightly lower rate than total electricity generation.
quote:Lessons Learned from 2008
One answer should not surprise most oil professionals. The industry discovered
that it had been operating at a production capacity plateau for several years and
no longer can provide the supply elasticity required by global oil demand given
the cost and complexity of the oil-supply chain.
The existence of this ultimate supply ceiling will not recede under the current
prospect for reduced upstream investments. In fact, there are good reasons
to believe that this production plateau will become even more restrictive in the
coming years.
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |