Ga nu alsjeblieft niet net als joran er mensen bij halen die er waarschijnlijk helemaal niets mee te maken hebben.quote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 10:35 schreef johan555 het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]
deze is boat owner en is iets ouder
GEERMAN, Marciano – Boat owner
GEERMAN MARCIANO L.G. SMITH BLVD. 544
http://www.morningstararuba.com/crew/crew.htm
Don't know how clever he is though.quote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 11:08 schreef deedeetee het volgende:
[..]
I know, that's what made me laugh![]()
He 's a clever enough to make good use of his * disorder *
Like Steve Croes, I presume.quote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 11:14 schreef johan555 het volgende:
er is een lijst van " mogelijke" verdachten en daar staat hij wel op
Have you even seen the broadcast in detail?quote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 10:36 schreef Scorpie het volgende:
[..]
He is telling the outlines of a particular story, in which facts are true and some facts are not true.
This makes the 'confession' that much harder; every statement Joran makes has to be backed up by proof, otherwise there is no telling if its the truth.
[..]
I disagree; its a well known fact Joran is a competent lyer and cheat. He has even been admitted for psych-care for his compulsive lying. This makes it very hard to just go with his statement and treat it as 'the truth'.
1. Misschien...quote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 11:08 schreef Ryan3 het volgende:
[..]
1. Why should they do that service? Because Joran's father was a judge trainee?
2 There is no compelling reeason to suggest that that was the case imho. Of course people are trying to smear the reputation of Paul van der Sloot, or so I read. But is there really any ground to think that this Dutch judge trainee is in reality someone who, when he learns that a girlfriend of his son had died, would loose her body in the sea? That's so improbable.
Yes, I have seen it.quote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 11:18 schreef Ticker het volgende:
[..]
Have you even seen the broadcast in detail?
Why are you so determined that he "spilled his guts" ? He has been telling lies to everybody for the past 2 years, and now, all of a sudden, he would tell the truth that is so convenient for everybody?quote:A person that spills his guts the first time he can talk about in, in such a rapid way is not lying.
Disinformation is the key to Joran`s case; he is telling things that are either not true, very hard to proof or cannot be verified at this time. Don`t make a mistake and believe his statement he so dramatically makes in this car. As it is what I said earlier; Joran story is very hard to check up on...quote:It was the second day that Patrick brought it up again, and started asking for he name of the person.
The first day Joran talked about this person or people he named them 'higher powers" and a name 'he would take to the gave'.
The day after he migth have had a night sleep about it, thinkig that telling patrick the story in details isn't necessary and thus changing some names and people in this story.
He was calm, and had to think before he would give a reaction to P&W. This means either one of two things;quote:You also seem to forget the way Joran reacted to Pauw&Witteman, the day the world got story about the hidden camera tapes, and asked him about it on phone.
He was stuttering, not knowing in what way this could inflict him, still believing Patrick is his friend.
I am not? What a person says is still not the same as the actual deed itself.quote:I mean he told everyone he knew this girl is dead. Why act as a attorney for him by making stuff up that would only make the story more complicated then it is.
O but I agree on that, Joran isn't telling the whole truth about how Natalee died.quote:
Finally, a topic we agree onquote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 11:36 schreef Ticker het volgende:
[..]
O but I agree on that, Joran isn't telling the whole truth about how Natalee died.
My positoin is that it is not even close to subtility what their counterparts are doing. Paul is supposedly a womanizer and he drinks a lot, and so he must have knowledge of the drugs related underground on Aruba, and so he's apt to help his son in such a hot spot.quote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 11:21 schreef ZoneKill het volgende:
[..]
1. Misschien...
2. Zoals ik al in een vorige post schreef lijkt het mij ook niet zeer waarschijnlijk dat die vader dat zelf heeft gedaan. Hij zou er eventueel wel bij betrokken geweest kunnen zijn, maar zoals ik ook weer eerder schreef moet de recherche onderzoek doen of de vader theoretisch de tijd had om te helpen of op een andere manier weet had van wat er afspeelde die nacht.
Nope, ik luister niet naar de ouders van natalee of joran zei zullen nooit en te nimmer objectief over de zaak praten ze beschermen hun kinderen. Beth zal niks zeggen over dat natalee veel te veel had gedronken net zo min als de ouders van joran iets gaan zeggen over dat ie pokerverslaafd is en regelmatig zonder hun weten weer op stap was. Ik hoor die moeder van joran nog zeggen "ik heb hem goed opgevoed" of iets in die trant...tja. Volgens haar wel ja.quote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 12:36 schreef Ryan3 het volgende:
[..]
My positoin is that it is not even close to subtility what their counterparts are doing. Paul is supposedly a womanizer and he drinks a lot, and so he must have knowledge of the drugs related underground on Aruba, and so he's apt to help his son in such a hot spot.
Probably this sort of assumption is created by Mrs.Twitty, the hard boiled christian. Not even only Joran is a bad peron, also his father must be (hey and he is suppossed to be a womanizer hey, and he drinks a lot hey), and hell even the whole of Holland must be.
Ja, leuk. Maar ik zie nergens een duidelijk stukje van wat hij denkt dat er gebeurt is. Dus je punt ontgaat mij enigzins.quote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 17:45 schreef johan555 het volgende:
here Natalee Holloway (in the rebound).
Zenk joe.quote:Op dinsdag 5 februari 2008 18:02 schreef Harajuku. het volgende:
Omdat die observer een Canadees is ofzo
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |