http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_currency_unionquote:North American currency union (Amero)
Currency union in the Americas is an idea based on the common European Union currency, the euro. The hypothetical American currency is sometimes referred to as the amero.
Region
As well as calls for a currency for the Americas as a whole, in Canada discussions of a more limited cross-border currency union are common. The C.D. Howe Institute, one of Canada's conservative economic and social think tanks, advocates the creation of a shared currency between Canada and the United States. The Fraser Institute, another conservative think tank, has also argued in favor of the amero. Herbert G. Grubel, a senior fellow of the Fraser Institute, came out with a book entitled The Case for the Amero in September 1999. Conversely, left of centre nationalist groups such as the Council of Canadians strongly oppose any move towards currency union, arguing that it would be harmful for the Canadian economy and for Canadian sovereignty.
Support
There are many lower levels of currency cooperation that have occurred in the Americas. A number of states – such as Argentina, Brazil and Canada – have at times tied their currency to the United States dollar, and in 2000, Ecuador adopted the U.S. dollar as its sole currency. In much of Central America and the Caribbean the U.S. dollar is already a de facto secondary currency.
It serves as parallel legal tender in both Panama (since independence in 1903) and El Salvador (since 2001), and unofficially in Cuba where the convertible peso is currently pegged at 1 peso equals US$1.08 (previously, it was until 24 March 2005, 1 peso = US$1 ). Some pundits thus argue that currency union is all but inevitable, whether it is desired or not.
Criticism
A major obstacle to the creation of a unified currency is the sheer dominance of the United States in any such union. Unlike any country in the EU, the USA has a larger economy than the rest of its respective continent/union combined. Differing cultural and social/economic objectives amongst the other western nations would be another point of contention[citation needed].
Bron: HumanEventsquote:North American Union to Replace USA?
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?
Misschien dat Amerika de hete adem van China (1,3 miljard inwoners) en de EU (490 miljoen inwoners) in zijn nek voelt, en daardoor toenadering gaat zoeken tot Canada en Mexico. Groot probleem van Amerika als behoud van supermacht is het relatief lage inwoneraantal. Met deze combo zal dat iets minder een probleem worden;quote:Jerome R. Corsi
Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians," and most recently, "Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America's Borders." He will soon author a book on the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and the prospect of the forthcoming North American Union.
Krijgt weinig aandacht in de reguliere media, maar dat zijn ze in Amerika wel gewend.quote:301,139,947 (July 2007 est.)
108,700,891 (July 2007 est.)
33,390,141 (July 2007 est.)
443 miljoen
Euro kunnen ze toch niet uitspreken in het Engels.quote:
Juro zeggen ze dan toch gewoon ?quote:Op dinsdag 7 augustus 2007 21:31 schreef pberends het volgende:
[..]
Euro kunnen ze toch niet uitspreken in het Engels.
Uitspraak: Jeuró (met een typische Engelse "R", de keelklank)quote:Op dinsdag 7 augustus 2007 21:31 schreef pberends het volgende:
[..]
Euro kunnen ze toch niet uitspreken in het Engels.
Hmm het gaat de engelsen toch vrij goed afquote:Op dinsdag 7 augustus 2007 21:31 schreef pberends het volgende:
[..]
Euro kunnen ze toch niet uitspreken in het Engels.
Bush heeft er weinig mee te maken.quote:Op zondag 12 augustus 2007 10:55 schreef Plotinus het volgende:
Ik zie het probleem niet echt áls dit waar is...overigens mag Bush wel opschieten dan gezien volgend jaar de verkiezingen beginnen.
Vreemd...quote:Op zondag 12 augustus 2007 12:31 schreef BaajGuardian het volgende:
[..]
Bush heeft er weinig mee te maken.
En zo kan ik nog wel even doorgaan....en allemaal quotes uit jouw OP....wat overigens van Wikipedia komt en dus verre van betrouwbaar gezien iedere idioot daar tekst aan kan passen.quote:President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to [...]
This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's [...]
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to [...]
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union [...]
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 [...]
U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. [...]
NIet dat ik je niet (wil) geloof, maar waar baseer je dat op (bron)? Ik kan ook wel roepen dat Sarkozy (Franse president) een marionet is, wil niet zeggen dat het ook waar is...quote:Op zondag 12 augustus 2007 17:22 schreef BaajGuardian het volgende:
Bush is een posterboy, die heeft geen fuck te zeggen.
Dat zal zijn omdat je geen praktijkkennis van de politiek hebt.quote:Op maandag 13 augustus 2007 09:12 schreef Plotinus het volgende:
Natuurlijk. Ik vind de verhalen dat hij één of andere marionet zou zijn dan ook gewoon onzin.
Ja ik heb die wel, maar de reden dat ik je alles niet volledig ga uitleggen inclusief alle bewijsvoering wil ik je wel vertellen.quote:Op maandag 13 augustus 2007 16:45 schreef Plotinus het volgende:
En jij hebt die wel? Waar blijft je onderbouwing trouwens, vooralsnog roep je gewoon maar dingen?!
Ik wil je best geloven hoor, begrijp me daar in niet verkeerd. Maar nogmaals, zomaar iets roepen en niet reageren als men om een onderbouwing (bron) vraagt komt niet bepaald geloofwaardig over...
Ik verwacht echt niet dat je aan mij en anderen je volledige geloofsovertuiging op tafel gooit. Het enige wat ik je vraag is een bronvermelding, gewoon een simpel linkje naar één of meerdere websites waar jouw mening wordt onderbouwd. Lijkt me niet moeilijk....quote:Op maandag 13 augustus 2007 18:01 schreef BaajGuardian het volgende:
[..]
Ja ik heb die wel, maar de reden dat ik je alles niet volledig ga uitleggen inclusief alle bewijsvoering wil ik je wel vertellen.
Ik ben tijden lang actief geweest mensen te educateren op deze onderwerpen en ik ben er wat moe van.
Ik ga niet meer mijn tijd in individuele mensen steken die compleet in het maatschappelijke wereldje leven, kost teveel moeite, duurt te lang.
En als je dat arrogant vindt is dat fijn, vraag maar iemand anders om het je uit te leggen ik ben er werkelijk klaar mee.
Kan je wel een tip geven naar welke mensen je zou kunnen zoeken als je meer wilt weten over de ware macht in de wereld, zoek maar eens op de naam OpenYourMind.
|
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |