Om het topic weer even te focussen:
Het begon met Israel die mogelijk in de dagen, uren en minuten informatie zou hebben doorgespeeld aan Scotland Yard. Inhoud onbekend. Meteen ontkend door topfunctionarissen uit Israel en andere officials uit Israel kregen een gag order, zodat ze de London aanslagen niet zouden aangrijpen om hun eigen (zelf toegebrachte) ellende te promoten. Werd ook gedaan om nog meer "geruchten" te voorkomen. Nieuwsberichten te vinden in de eerste 2 of 3 paginas van deel 1.
Andere berichten:
Investigative Report: “Odd” Financial Activity Preceded UK Bombing quote:
By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director
8 July 2005; 5:30 AM ET: Just a few short hours before the first explosion ripped through London, there was a significant sell-off or “selling short” of the British Pound in the financial market. This activity took place absent of any economic news or other known market-driven factors that would sufficiently explain the sell off. This activity also occurred without the normal corresponding pricing action in the other major currency pairs. In summary, a large amount of GBP was sold to liquidate a “long position” and secure profits, or to take a “short position” to profit from an anticipated drop in the value of the British Pound. In either case, the market activity warrants further investigation.
Many thanks to an alert subscriber to the HQ INTEL-ALERT for his expert analysis which served as the basis for this report.
North-East Intelligence Network (misschien nog beschikbaar via google cache)
Voordat 9/11 gebeurde waren er zoveel aanwijzingen van voorkennis dat het zelfs de mainstream haalde. Het alternatieve nieuws bood wel meer details. Deze originele berichten kun je
hier vinden. (onderste 2 punten onder paragraaf 1.3)
C2C interview waarin Hagmann dit kort voorzichtig bespreekt (en ook, voorzichtig, 9/11 aanhaalt):
Luister interview extractdownload interview extract (als dit werkt)
In dit interview wordt tussen neus en lippen genoemd dat er iets anders gebeurde 2 dagen voor de aanslag dat mogelijk interessant is. NorthernStar postte in het vorige topic daar een update van:
- Jul 5 2005 3:20PM -
quote:
Anyone know why the Fed needed 20 billion in repos today, with none expiring? It's not like rates are even at the target; they are well below around 3.18. So why the burst or money?
Usually, such a pump would be the direct result of "something bad" like a terrible employment report. And the delayed the announcement too, probably to see just how much they needed to add in after the conference call with the other players.
clearstationPosted reader email:
quote:
It's OK, paranoia isn't all bad - in point of fact, it's a survival skill. If I had any sway in CONgress, I would sure be asking the Fed all kinds of questions about the $20-billion in "easy money" out this week - in advance of the London attack... more grist for the LIHOP/MIHOP crowd. And I won't even mention the banging on Gold and Silver over the preceding week! Here's hoping a federal grand jury will look at some of the big plays in advanced of events.
Urban Survival Economic and Financial News UpdateVoorkennis is iets wat makkelijk kan op de markten. Vele figuren uit speciale militaire (inlichtingen - commando) eenheden die met illegale zaken zijn bezig geweest halen hun MBA en komen terecht bij hun partners in het bestuur van grote banken, chemische- & defensiebedrijven. Das logisch, want je kunt je illegale handel alleen beschermen door een leger van financiële tovenaars. Het hoeft geeneens te zijn dat mensen met voorkennis handelden. Als er genoeg geruchten zijn in 'inside' netwerken, zou ik er ook op reageren.
Oefening op het moment van de aanslagen:BBC Radio five
The evening of July 7, 2005
Peter Power: Managing Director of Visor Consultants ('crisis management' advice company). Former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch.
quote:
POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.
HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?
POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.
interview - audioander interview - videoAls je Visor Consultants nu vraagt om meer informatie krijg je devolgende informatie:
quote:
"Thank you for your message. Given the volume of emails about events on 7 July and a commonly expressed misguided belief that our exercise revealed prescient behaviour, or was somehow a conspiracy (noting that several websites interpreted our work that day in an inaccurate / naive / ignorant / hostile manner) it has been decided to issue a single email response as follows.
It is confirmed that a short number of 'walk through' scenarios planned well in advance had commenced that morning for a private company in London (as part of a wider project that remains confidential) and that two scenarios related directly to terrorist bombs at the same time as the ones that actually detonated with such tragic results. One scenario in particular, was very similar to real time events.
However, anyone with knowledge about such ongoing threats to our capital city will be aware that (a) the emergency services have already practiced several of their own exercises based on bombs in the underground system (also reported by the main news channels) and (b) a few months ago the BBC broadcast a similar documentary on the same theme, although with much worse consequences. It is hardly surprising therefore, that we chose a feasible scenario - but the timing and script was nonetheless, a little disconcerting.
"In short, our exercise (which involved just a few people as crisis managers actually responding to a simulated series of activities involving, on paper, 1000 staff) quickly became the real thing and the players that morning responded very well indeed to the sudden reality of events.
"Beyond this no further comment will be made and based on the extraordinary number of messages from ill informed people, no replies will henceforth be given to anyone unable to demonstrate a bona fide reason for asking (e.g. accredited journalist / academic).
Peter Power
Dus verdere info kunnen we wel vergeten want gewoon vragen om de details is verboten. Zij gaan kiezen wie de info naar buiten mag brengen, dus Discovery zal er ooit wel eens een prachtige docu over maken. Zo gek is vragen stellen ook niet lijkt me want het was Power die zei, "so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now". Dat hebben normaal denkende mensen ook die over die oefening horen. Btw, heeft iemand er al wat van gelezen in de normale pers, buiten live interviews met Powers? Ik volg het nieuws amper de afgelopen dagen.
Veel nuttige info staat op Prisonplanet.com (howel ik dat dat Douglas Hagmann verhaal niet heb gezien). Houdt er wel rekening mee dat ze zijn ervan houden woorden te verdraaien, dus check originele bronnen en interpreteer het zelf maar.
Zoals ik al zei. Voorlopig zijn het niet veel vragen, maar wel belangrijke. Niet dat ik er ooit een normaal antwoord op verwacht, maargoed. Dat maakt me geeneens zoveel uit.
[ Bericht 5% gewijzigd door Merovingian. op 14-07-2005 15:29:29 ]
“One should never argue with a fool or a liar because people might not be able to tell the difference.”