America: Freedom To Fascism [2]

U.S. Constitution: Sixteenth Amendment
Sixteenth Amendment - Income Tax

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment16/

The income tax amendment was pushed through Congress in 1909 by Sen. Nelson Aldrich, father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr. and grandfather and namesake of Nelson A. Rockefeller, and would not have been ratified if Knox had not fraudulently proclaimed it so. (Philander Knox had for many years been the primary attorney for the richest men in America, including Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan and the Vanderbilts. He had created for them the largest cartel in the world, then was appointed, at their request, as Attorney General in the McKinley/Roosevelt administrations, where he refused to enforce the Sherman anti-trust laws against the cartel he had just created)

Example: Kentucky's legislature rejected the amendment, but Knox counted Kentucky as having approved it.

Example: Oklahoma's legislature changed the amendment's wording so that it meant just the opposite of what was submitted to the states by Congress, but Knox counted Oklahoma as approving the amendment.

Example: Minnesota did not submit any results or copy of their vote to Knox, yet he counted Minnesota as approving the amendment.

Legal scholars have agreed that if any state violated provisions of its own state constitution in the ratification process, its approval would be null and void. At least 20 states were guilty of serious violations of their constitutions. For example, Tennessee's constitution provided that the state legislature could not act upon any proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution submitted by Congress until after the next state legislative elections. Yet the Tennessee legislature acted on the proposed 16th amendment the same month it was received and before any elections http://www.givemeliberty.org/features/taxes/usatoday.htm

Chronology:

1909. Lord Milner's secretive Round Table Group was established. Professor Quigley exposed some of the evolving ties between the global banking fraternity and these evolving "semi-secret discussion and lobbying groups," which helped foment World War I as a means to raise public support for a League of Nations.

"By 1915, Round Table Groups existed in seven countries, including England...(and) the United States.... Since 1925, there have been substantial contributions from wealthy individuals, and from foundations and firms associated with the international banking fraternity, especially... organizations associated with J. P. Morgan, the Rockefeller and Whitney families...." Quigley, 950-951.

1909. Five years after his release from a primitive "insane asylum," Clifford Beers, formed the U.S. National Committee for Mental Hygiene" and called for a network of mental hygiene societies throughout the world."1

1917. In its report published in 1954, the Reece Committee (the Special House Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations) explained and quoted the official minutes of the Board of Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace [See also:Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution]

"These trustees in a meeting about 1917 had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom of their original decision because already the impact of war had indicated it... could alter life in this country. ... they even had the brashness to ... dispatch a telegram to Mr. Wilson, cautioning him to see that the war did not end too quickly....

"The concern became, as expressed by the trustees, seeing to it that there was no reversion to life in this country as it existed prior to 1914. And they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, they must control education. and then they approached the Rockefeller Foundation and they said, 'Will you take on the acquisition of control of education as it involves subjects that re domestic in their significance? We'll take on the basis of subjects that have an international significance..' And it was agreed.... They decided the key to is the teaching of American history, and they must change that." [The Tax-Exempt Foundations, p. 60-61]

1919. With funding from the Commonwealth Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation, Clifford Beers "formed the predecessor of WFMH [World Federation for Mental Health], the International Committee for Mental Hygiene (ICMH). Other supporters were Clarence Hincks, M.D., of the Canadian Medical Association, Adolph Meyer, M.D. of Johns Hopkins Hospital; and psychologist William James of Harvard. William James, John Dewey and other socialist visionaries spread the philosophy of pragmatism, which denies Biblical truth, sees truth as relative, and tests its validity by its practical and measurable effects.

Note: Remember, almost every public step in this social revolution won public sympathy and acceptance by focusing on a real crisis. But in the hands of socialist change agents, the nice-sounding "solution" became a stepping stone to an ever expanding web of control.1

William James (father of American Psychology) founded the National Committee for Mental Hygiene, and according to B. K. Eakman in CLONING OF THE AMERICAN MIND: ERADICATING MORALITY THROUGH EDUCATION, he 'persuaded Rockefeller to contribute millions to the National Committee for Mental Hygiene....The goal of the Committee was specifically to prevent mental illness, and its focus was elementary and secondary schools. The thrust of the Committee's philosophy was that mental illness hinged on faulty personality development in childhood and that, therefore, personality development should supersede all other educational objectives. Stress was seen as the chief culprit, and parents and other authority figures as the second." Cuddy, Mental Health, Education and Social Control, Part 8

1921. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was founded -- mainly through Col. House's influence. To build the needed network of globalist support groups, it would disperse tens of millions of dollars annually from the major tax-exempt foundations such as the Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations. Global Tyranny, page 54

The CFR would be the U.S. equivalent of the British RIIA, the Royal Institute of International Affairs. As Professor Quigley wrote, "...the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." Quigley, 952.

1925. The Rockefeller Foundation funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry in Munick, directed by Dr. Ernst Rudin. Additional funding was provided by the Harrimans, Warburg and the British Crown. It continued to sponsor the Institute and its Nazi leader throughout the devastating holocaust of World Ward II. 4?

1925. A Rockefeller Foundation's grant gives birth to the International Bureau of Education.2 Cuddy 15

1932. Rockefeller Foundation president Max Mason tells trustees that "The Social Sciences will concern themselves with the rationalization of social control... the control of human behavior." 2 Cuddy 18

1932. Dr. Ernst Rudin, the Nazi director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry (funded by the Rockefellers) was appointed president of the global Eugenics Federation.

1934 (February). A Rockefeller "progress report" (by one of the division heads) asks, "Can we develop so sound and extensive a genetics that we can hope to breed, in the future, superior men?"2 Cuddy, 18.

1930-33. Hitler came to power and delegated Rudin to direct the Racial Hygiene Society, which called for sterilization or death of people considered "racially impure." The Rockefeller Foundation funded an anthropological survey of the eugenically correct population by Nazi eugenicists Rudin and others. 4?

1939. Rockefeller Foundation helps launch the School-Health Coordinating Service.2 Cuddy 22

1940s. "Otmar Verschuer and his assistant Dr. Joseph Mengele together wrote reports for special courts, which enforced Rudin's racial purity law against the illegal cohabitation of Aryans and non-Aryans. In the early 1940s, a large factory was built "at Auschwitz... to utilize the Standard Oil IG Farbin patents with concentration camp slave labor to make gasoline from coal. The SS guarded the Jewish and other inmates and selected for killing those who were unfit for IG Farbin slave labor.... Standard Oil and German President Emil Heilfeck testified after the war at the Nuremberg Trial that Standard Oil funds [Rockefeller]helped pay for the SS guards at Auschwitz. The Rockefeller Foundation defends its record by claiming that its funding of Nazi Germany programs during World War II was limited to psychiatric research." 4

1943: The Rockefeller Foundation helped fund the Allen Memorial Institute at McGill University in Montreal. Working with the Canadian military and the Office of Strategic Services (The OSS became the CIA in 1947), Dr. Cameron conducted torturous experiments on human guinea pigs in order to perfect the various mind control techniques. These brainwashing tactics included coercive interrogation, psychosurgery, drugs, hypnosis and "between 30 to 60 electroshocks over a short period" along with powerful tranquilizers to control anxiety. Cameron's justification: his patients, "like prisoners of Communists, tended to resist and had to be broken down." This is described in the 1989 book, Journey Into Madness: The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse

1943. Joseph Mengele appointed medical commandant of the Auschwitz concentration camp.

1979. Supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Institute of Education and the U.S. Department of Education, Schooling for A Global Age is published. In the Preface, John Goodlad wrote: "Enlightened social engineering is required to face situations that demand global action now. Education is a long-term solution.... Parents and the general public must be reached also... Otherwise, children and youth enrolled in globally oriented programs may find themselves in conflict with values assumed in the home. And then the educational institution frequently comes under scrutiny and must pull back."2 Cuddy 65.

1987. Among the notable members of the Study Commission on Global Education were (then) Governor Bill Clinton, AFT president Albert Shanker, Professor John Goodlad, CFAT (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching) president Ernest Boyer, and Frank Newman, president of the Education Commission of the States. Together, they prepared a report titled The United States Prepares for Its Future: Global Perspectives in Education. The Rockefeller, Ford and Exxon Foundations helped fund this report. In the Foreword, New Ager Harlan Cleveland, author of The Third Try at World Order, wrote:

"A dozen years ago... teaching and learning 'in global perspective' was still exotic doctrine, threatening the orthodoxies of those who still thought of American citizenship as an amalgam of American history, American geography, American lifestyles and American ideas.... It now seems almost conventional to speak of American citizenship in the same breath with international interdependence and the planetary environment."13

1996 (December ). "A Symposium organized by The Peter F. Drucker Foundation for Nonprofit Management, sponsored by The Rockefeller Brothers Fund.... The Drucker Foundation believes that a healthy society requires three vital sectors: a public sector of effective governments; a private sector of effective businesses; and a social sector of effective community organizations [the focus is on large churches]. The mission of the social sector and its organizations is to change lives. It accomplishes this mission by addressing the needs of the spirit, the mind and the body--of individual, the community, and society....

"As government cuts back social spending, many people expect the social sector to absorb much of the anticipated need for services....

"The one million nonprofit organizations... that comprise the social sector have only one common characteristic--their tax exempt status. It is their diversity--in mission, philosophy, and community--that uniquely qualifies them to deliver effective services to the community. ... We are now talking about a true partnership to build community and produce people who are needed by healthy businesses and a healthy society." Emerging Partnerships: New Ways in a New World

Note: The large community oriented and purpose-driven churches fit right into the new communitarian model for organizing institutions and monitoring people. That's why the Rockefellers are involved.
BRON: http]http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/brainwashing/rockefeller-mind-control.htm]http://www.crossroad.to/Q(...)ler-mind-control.htm

Op dinsdag 7 november 2006 01:25 schreef pietje77 het volgende:

[..]

en nog wat van de meest schokkende quotes die je ooit gelezen hebt

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful!

"if you control the food, you control the people"
"if you control the energy, you control continents"
"if you control the money, you control the world"

Op dinsdag 7 november 2006 05:16 schreef pietje77 het volgende:
Je vergeet een niet onbelangrijk stukje uit 1 van de vele gruwelijke citaten van 'the prince of darkness" :

Dr. Henry Kissinger Speaking at Evian, France, May 21st, 1992, Bilderbergers meeting; Unbeknownst to Henry Kissinger, his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to the meeting

Op dinsdag 28 november 2006 00:12 schreef pietje77 het volgende:
Mijn mening is dat er idd. een minimum aantal mensen geinformeerd moeten zijn, wat al zeker het geval is.
Ik ben het ideologisch met je eens, maar ik heb praktische bezwaren/angsten.
Ieder land wat niet mee in de maat loopt word op 1 of andere manier tot de orde geroepen, vaak via false flag terrorisme, of economisch.
Ook is de invloed van Ned. op het grote probleem, IMF etc minimaal denk ik.
Het liefste zou ik mensen als Alex Jones, Aaron Russo en Ron Paul etc ongeloofelijk populair willen zien worden.
Dan word het grootste probleem van binnen aangepakt binnen de U.S.
daarom probber ik vooral hun te steunen op iedere manier mogelijk, al is het slechts door het verspreiden van de film/link.

With scarcely a mention in the mainstream media, President Bush has ordered up a plan for responding to a catastrophic attack.
In a new National Security Presidential Directive, Bush lays out his plans for dealing with a “catastrophic emergency.”

Under that plan, he entrusts himself with leading the entire federal government, not just the Executive Branch. And he gives himself the responsibility “for ensuring constitutional government.
http://www.progressive.org/mag_wx051807

Op vrijdag 15 juni 2007 17:33 schreef Resonancer het volgende:
En wwer n stapje dichterbij:
[..]

mhmm, ben benieuwd of die catastrophe nog voor de volgende verkiezingen plaatsvindt.

Op vrijdag 15 juni 2007 17:49 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:

[..]

Als ze bij dat JFK-plot al telkens omschrijvingen als "catastrophic attack" en "catastrophic explosion" ed gebruikten...

Gaat goed daar.

"Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency....This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens."
http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/1997/06/bonfire.html

. The great problem inherent is that no binding legal definition exists as to what constitutes a "national emergency". That definition lies entirely with the Chief Executive. When he declares a state of emergency, the aforementioned documents can be used to activate whatever federal agency is most suited to address the emergency. Those agencies include, but are not limited to, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (BATF), the FBI and the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA).

Op vrijdag 15 juni 2007 18:52 schreef Resonancer het volgende:

Je legt de plek precies op de zere vinger:

The great problem inherent is that no binding legal definition exists as to what constitutes a "national emergency".

Don't Trust Government - by R.T. Naylor.

by Charley Reese:
The funny thing is that the book is not about Hitler or Germany, but about the U.S. and the bogus war on terror. It is an outstanding book, carefully researched and footnoted, and written in a reasonable manner, though with delicious dollops of sarcasm.

It's the carefully detailed accounts of injustices committed by the U.S. government against American Muslims that gave me the insight about Hitler. In the early days of the Third Reich, if you weren't a criminal, a communist or a Jew, you never saw the dark side of the Nazi government. You saw an economy being revitalized, superhighways being built, Germans being put back to work, the disgraceful Versailles Treaty being scrapped. It must have looked a lot like morning in Germany to the people who had suffered through runaway inflation, economic depression and street riots.

Similarly, if you are not a Muslim or an Arab-American who has been a victim of the Patriot Act and other laws carelessly passed in the hysteria following the attacks in 2001, then the Bush administration probably looks perfectly normal. You probably even believe that it is really protecting you from terrorists, just as many Germans believed Hitler was protecting them from the "bad guys."

What Taylor's book demonstrates is how often this is pure nonsense, and at the same time what terrible damage is being done to the rule of law and America's traditional respect for human rights.

Typically, the government will swoop down and seize an organization's records and computers, while making public accusations of the people being "involved" with terrorists. The important point is that this is done before any determination of guilt or innocence has even begun. By the time a defendant gets to court, if he ever does, he's ruined. Quite often then, the fearless feds will say, "Well, never mind about this terrorist business, just plead guilty to a minor immigration violation." Often defendants are bullied into admitting guilt they don't deserve by threats of being declared an enemy combatant, which means indefinite imprisonment, probably for life.

You can see the process going on with the four men charged with planning to blow up the fuel lines to JFK International Airport in New York. In the first place, it is common knowledge that if you blow up a fuel line, you will get an explosion and fire at one point. The claim that the whole pipeline would blow up for miles is nonsense, and the government knows that, but it threw that out to claim the plot endangered "thousands" of lives.

The real question is, Did these guys actually plan it, or were they set up by the government's federal informant? The federal government has a terrible record of using informants to entrap people. The whole tragedy of Ruby Ridge, which cost the lives of Randy Weaver's wife and son, resulted from a federal informant who nagged Weaver into sawing off the barrels of a shotgun, something any kid can do with a vice and a hacksaw. The feds then arrested Weaver with the intention of forcing him to become an informant, and the tragic farce ensued.

So even though you haven't felt the arbitrary and unjust power of the government, you should read this book and find out just how much deception is involved in this war on terror. You'll discover how often oil, diamonds and big business play behind-the-scenes roles in this current so-called war.

As the German people discovered, once a government has unlimited power, it will eventually use that power against everyone.
http://www.amazon.com/Sat(...)3531505/lewrockwell/

At his trial in 1993, which occurred during the federal siege of the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas, Weaver faced an array of charges, including the original weapons violations as well as murder

Op zaterdag 25 augustus 2007 14:24 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:
Aaron Russo dies of cancer

Op zaterdag 25 augustus 2007 18:11 schreef TaLoN.NL het volgende:

[..]

Een goed man, jammer dat we hem nu al moeten missen.

Op maandag 12 november 2007 13:36 schreef Equinix het volgende:

Nu de grote vraag
Wat valt er tegen te doen ?

NorthernStar	zondag 5 november 2006 @ 02:44
	Tijdens een typische campagne speech op 28 oktober in Sellersberg, Indiana, lichtte Bush zijn kijk op zijn eigen historische erfenis toe: "Als mensen terugkijken op deze periode, zal men de vraag stellen, hebben we alles in onze macht gedaan om de Amerikaanse bevolking te beschermen en de War on Terror te winnen? En we zijn in oorlog. Het werd naar ons gebracht op 11 september 2001, en op die dag zwoor ik alle onderdelen van de nationale macht te gebruiken om de Amerikaanse bevolking te beschermen en de terroristen te verslaan." Bush zijn woorden werden beantwoord met gejuich en geroep van "USA! USA! USA!" [bron] Dat er in de afgelopen jaren aanzienlijke maatregelen in de VS, en in iets mindere mate in Europa, zijn genomen zal voor iedereen duidelijk zijn. De vraag of dit gigantisch controle-apparaat dat regering en overheden in leven hebben geroepen, in combinatie met uitbreiding en centralisatie van macht, inderdaad, zoals Bush hier beweert, bedoelt is ter bescherming van de burgers. Filmmaker Aaron Russo meent van niet. Zijn film "Freedom To Fascism" is een analyse van het proces dat vandaag de dag gaande is maar haar wortels in het verleden heeft. Hij schetst een beeld van Amerika dat langzaam maar zeker en stukje bij beetje door een kleine elite is overgenomen. Het naar macht hongerende gezelschap waar de gehele geschiedenis van de mensheid door keer op keer voor is gewaarschuwd, is hier. "Then a band of powerful bankers achieved their fathers' and great grandfathers' goal." Een geauthoriseerde versie van de film is op google te zien: America: Freedom To Fascism AMERICA: Freedom To Fascism. Aaron Russo Interview Enkele recente artikelen: Totalitarian threat looms Bush Moves Toward Martial Law Tangram: Son of Total Information Awareness U.S. Near The Bottom In Privacy Study Total Information Lives Again Homeland Security Tightens Grip on International Travel Olbermann Addresses the Military Commissions Act in a Special Comment vervolg op: America: Freedom To Fascism [film]
gorgg	zondag 5 november 2006 @ 14:34
	quote: U.S. Constitution: Sixteenth Amendment Sixteenth Amendment - Income Tax The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment16/ Een paar mensen die in de film komen vertellen dat er geen income tax betaald moet worden: Irwin Schiff is een van de bekendste tax protestors. Hij heeft al een heel aantal rechtzaken achter de rug waar hij telkens andere argumenten uitprobeerde. Alle rechtzaken verloor hij. In februari dit jaar werd hij veroordeeld tot 12 jaar gevangenis wegens tax fraude. Joe Banister schrijft tax protestor boeken. Hij werd aangeklaagd omdat hij een cliënt zou hebben geholpen met tax fraude. Hij werd vrijgesproken omdat de rechtbank dit niet bewezen achtte. Op dit proces kwam wel uit dat Banister altijd zijn income tax heeft betaald. Er zijn wel meerdere voorbeelden bekend waarbij tax protestors geld verdienen met boeken te schrijven waarin gezegd wordt dat het wettelijk gezien niet verplicht is income tax te betalen en dat dit in de rechtbank niet opgelegd kan worden, terwijl ze zelf wel braafjes hun income tax betalen. Vernice Kuglin werd vrijgesproken van tax fraude omdat ze kon aantonen dat ze brieven naar de IRS stuurde die niet beantwoord werden. Tegenwoordig zou die aanpak niet meer werken omdat de IRS online dit soort argumenten aankaart. Kuglin moest uiteraard wel al haar achterstallige income tax betalen + intrest + boetes + haar eigen gerechtskosten. Nogmaals: tot op heden is er geen enkele case bekend waarbij een income tax protestor is weggekomen met het niet betalen van income tax. Al hun argumenten zijn door de rechtbank verworpen. Een FAQ waarbij zowat al hun argumenten onderuit gehaald worden: http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html
pietje77	dinsdag 7 november 2006 @ 01:25
	quote: The income tax amendment was pushed through Congress in 1909 by Sen. Nelson Aldrich, father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr. and grandfather and namesake of Nelson A. Rockefeller, and would not have been ratified if Knox had not fraudulently proclaimed it so. (Philander Knox had for many years been the primary attorney for the richest men in America, including Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan and the Vanderbilts. He had created for them the largest cartel in the world, then was appointed, at their request, as Attorney General in the McKinley/Roosevelt administrations, where he refused to enforce the Sherman anti-trust laws against the cartel he had just created) Example: Kentucky's legislature rejected the amendment, but Knox counted Kentucky as having approved it. Example: Oklahoma's legislature changed the amendment's wording so that it meant just the opposite of what was submitted to the states by Congress, but Knox counted Oklahoma as approving the amendment. Example: Minnesota did not submit any results or copy of their vote to Knox, yet he counted Minnesota as approving the amendment. Legal scholars have agreed that if any state violated provisions of its own state constitution in the ratification process, its approval would be null and void. At least 20 states were guilty of serious violations of their constitutions. For example, Tennessee's constitution provided that the state legislature could not act upon any proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution submitted by Congress until after the next state legislative elections. Yet the Tennessee legislature acted on the proposed 16th amendment the same month it was received and before any elections http://www.givemeliberty.org/features/taxes/usatoday.htm Nog wat leesvoer : http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=21498 Maar de documentaire "Freedom to Fascism" is toch wel het duidelijkst, vooral die waarschuwing (lees ; bedreiging)van die IRS creep is treffend. Ook kunnen ze niks weerleggen, alleen zwartmaken en intimidatie praktijken zoals gewoonlijk. Die rechter die Hooggerechtshof uitspraken "irrelevant" noemt en zegt dat hij "de wet niet toestaat in zijn rechtszaal" is natuurlijk helemaal hilarisch. Verder is de bekentenis van Pres. Wilson ook heel treffend. Maar zodra mensen gewoon weten dat de federale reserve en IMF bv. gewoon prive banken zijn weten de meeste al genoeg. Alleen de gedachte al om het complete systeem van het produceren en distribueren van geld in prive handen te geven, ongecontroleerd Dus die hoeven niet eens achterliggende waarde te hebben, die kunnen dus letterlijk van papiertjes, geld maken. En daarna lenen ze dat aan "de regering / het volk" die dat met arbeid terug mogen betalen ++++ rente..... Terwijl dat natuurlijk terug in handen hoort te zijn van de regering / het volk, zoals dat ook oorspronkelijk en constitutioneel geregeld is. (rentevrij en MET achterliggende waarde waardoor je geen echte inflatie hebt, integendeel) Maarja, zoals Meyer Rothschild al zei lang geleden: "Give me the control over a nations money supply and i care not who makes the laws". logisch... het bewijs daarvan zie je bv. terug in de schuld gebaseerde en gestimuleerde maatschappij. Freedom to Fascism is de nieuwste voor het breedste publiek, maar mochten mensen echt op zoek zijn naar de feiten en niet naar quotes van de verdachten( lees; schuldigen), kijk dan ook: -"money, banking and the federal reserve" -"a view of international banking-ed.griffin" -"money masters 1+2+3" -"money changers" Er is nog veel meer.. het kan bijna niet duidelijker... helemaal het motief hier nog wat aanvullende feiten(zeer beperkt) waarin duidelijk word met wat voor mensen we te maken hebben: quote: Chronology: 1909. Lord Milner's secretive Round Table Group was established. Professor Quigley exposed some of the evolving ties between the global banking fraternity and these evolving "semi-secret discussion and lobbying groups," which helped foment World War I as a means to raise public support for a League of Nations. "By 1915, Round Table Groups existed in seven countries, including England...(and) the United States.... Since 1925, there have been substantial contributions from wealthy individuals, and from foundations and firms associated with the international banking fraternity, especially... organizations associated with J. P. Morgan, the Rockefeller and Whitney families...." Quigley, 950-951. 1909. Five years after his release from a primitive "insane asylum," Clifford Beers, formed the U.S. National Committee for Mental Hygiene" and called for a network of mental hygiene societies throughout the world."1 1917. In its report published in 1954, the Reece Committee (the Special House Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations) explained and quoted the official minutes of the Board of Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace [See also:Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution] "These trustees in a meeting about 1917 had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom of their original decision because already the impact of war had indicated it... could alter life in this country. ... they even had the brashness to ... dispatch a telegram to Mr. Wilson, cautioning him to see that the war did not end too quickly.... "The concern became, as expressed by the trustees, seeing to it that there was no reversion to life in this country as it existed prior to 1914. And they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, they must control education. and then they approached the Rockefeller Foundation and they said, 'Will you take on the acquisition of control of education as it involves subjects that re domestic in their significance? We'll take on the basis of subjects that have an international significance..' And it was agreed.... They decided the key to is the teaching of American history, and they must change that." [The Tax-Exempt Foundations, p. 60-61] 1919. With funding from the Commonwealth Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation, Clifford Beers "formed the predecessor of WFMH [World Federation for Mental Health], the International Committee for Mental Hygiene (ICMH). Other supporters were Clarence Hincks, M.D., of the Canadian Medical Association, Adolph Meyer, M.D. of Johns Hopkins Hospital; and psychologist William James of Harvard. William James, John Dewey and other socialist visionaries spread the philosophy of pragmatism, which denies Biblical truth, sees truth as relative, and tests its validity by its practical and measurable effects. Note: Remember, almost every public step in this social revolution won public sympathy and acceptance by focusing on a real crisis. But in the hands of socialist change agents, the nice-sounding "solution" became a stepping stone to an ever expanding web of control.1 William James (father of American Psychology) founded the National Committee for Mental Hygiene, and according to B. K. Eakman in CLONING OF THE AMERICAN MIND: ERADICATING MORALITY THROUGH EDUCATION, he 'persuaded Rockefeller to contribute millions to the National Committee for Mental Hygiene....The goal of the Committee was specifically to prevent mental illness, and its focus was elementary and secondary schools. The thrust of the Committee's philosophy was that mental illness hinged on faulty personality development in childhood and that, therefore, personality development should supersede all other educational objectives. Stress was seen as the chief culprit, and parents and other authority figures as the second." Cuddy, Mental Health, Education and Social Control, Part 8 1921. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was founded -- mainly through Col. House's influence. To build the needed network of globalist support groups, it would disperse tens of millions of dollars annually from the major tax-exempt foundations such as the Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations. Global Tyranny, page 54 The CFR would be the U.S. equivalent of the British RIIA, the Royal Institute of International Affairs. As Professor Quigley wrote, "...the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." Quigley, 952. 1925. The Rockefeller Foundation funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry in Munick, directed by Dr. Ernst Rudin. Additional funding was provided by the Harrimans, Warburg and the British Crown. It continued to sponsor the Institute and its Nazi leader throughout the devastating holocaust of World Ward II. 4? 1925. A Rockefeller Foundation's grant gives birth to the International Bureau of Education.2 Cuddy 15 1932. Rockefeller Foundation president Max Mason tells trustees that "The Social Sciences will concern themselves with the rationalization of social control... the control of human behavior." 2 Cuddy 18 1932. Dr. Ernst Rudin, the Nazi director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry (funded by the Rockefellers) was appointed president of the global Eugenics Federation. 1934 (February). A Rockefeller "progress report" (by one of the division heads) asks, "Can we develop so sound and extensive a genetics that we can hope to breed, in the future, superior men?"2 Cuddy, 18. 1930-33. Hitler came to power and delegated Rudin to direct the Racial Hygiene Society, which called for sterilization or death of people considered "racially impure." The Rockefeller Foundation funded an anthropological survey of the eugenically correct population by Nazi eugenicists Rudin and others. 4? 1939. Rockefeller Foundation helps launch the School-Health Coordinating Service.2 Cuddy 22 1940s. "Otmar Verschuer and his assistant Dr. Joseph Mengele together wrote reports for special courts, which enforced Rudin's racial purity law against the illegal cohabitation of Aryans and non-Aryans. In the early 1940s, a large factory was built "at Auschwitz... to utilize the Standard Oil IG Farbin patents with concentration camp slave labor to make gasoline from coal. The SS guarded the Jewish and other inmates and selected for killing those who were unfit for IG Farbin slave labor.... Standard Oil and German President Emil Heilfeck testified after the war at the Nuremberg Trial that Standard Oil funds [Rockefeller]helped pay for the SS guards at Auschwitz. The Rockefeller Foundation defends its record by claiming that its funding of Nazi Germany programs during World War II was limited to psychiatric research." 4 1943: The Rockefeller Foundation helped fund the Allen Memorial Institute at McGill University in Montreal. Working with the Canadian military and the Office of Strategic Services (The OSS became the CIA in 1947), Dr. Cameron conducted torturous experiments on human guinea pigs in order to perfect the various mind control techniques. These brainwashing tactics included coercive interrogation, psychosurgery, drugs, hypnosis and "between 30 to 60 electroshocks over a short period" along with powerful tranquilizers to control anxiety. Cameron's justification: his patients, "like prisoners of Communists, tended to resist and had to be broken down." This is described in the 1989 book, Journey Into Madness: The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse 1943. Joseph Mengele appointed medical commandant of the Auschwitz concentration camp. 1979. Supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Institute of Education and the U.S. Department of Education, Schooling for A Global Age is published. In the Preface, John Goodlad wrote: "Enlightened social engineering is required to face situations that demand global action now. Education is a long-term solution.... Parents and the general public must be reached also... Otherwise, children and youth enrolled in globally oriented programs may find themselves in conflict with values assumed in the home. And then the educational institution frequently comes under scrutiny and must pull back."2 Cuddy 65. 1987. Among the notable members of the Study Commission on Global Education were (then) Governor Bill Clinton, AFT president Albert Shanker, Professor John Goodlad, CFAT (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching) president Ernest Boyer, and Frank Newman, president of the Education Commission of the States. Together, they prepared a report titled The United States Prepares for Its Future: Global Perspectives in Education. The Rockefeller, Ford and Exxon Foundations helped fund this report. In the Foreword, New Ager Harlan Cleveland, author of The Third Try at World Order, wrote: "A dozen years ago... teaching and learning 'in global perspective' was still exotic doctrine, threatening the orthodoxies of those who still thought of American citizenship as an amalgam of American history, American geography, American lifestyles and American ideas.... It now seems almost conventional to speak of American citizenship in the same breath with international interdependence and the planetary environment."13 1996 (December ). "A Symposium organized by The Peter F. Drucker Foundation for Nonprofit Management, sponsored by The Rockefeller Brothers Fund.... The Drucker Foundation believes that a healthy society requires three vital sectors: a public sector of effective governments; a private sector of effective businesses; and a social sector of effective community organizations [the focus is on large churches]. The mission of the social sector and its organizations is to change lives. It accomplishes this mission by addressing the needs of the spirit, the mind and the body--of individual, the community, and society.... "As government cuts back social spending, many people expect the social sector to absorb much of the anticipated need for services.... "The one million nonprofit organizations... that comprise the social sector have only one common characteristic--their tax exempt status. It is their diversity--in mission, philosophy, and community--that uniquely qualifies them to deliver effective services to the community. ... We are now talking about a true partnership to build community and produce people who are needed by healthy businesses and a healthy society." Emerging Partnerships: New Ways in a New World Note: The large community oriented and purpose-driven churches fit right into the new communitarian model for organizing institutions and monitoring people. That's why the Rockefellers are involved. BRON: http]http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/brainwashing/rockefeller-mind-control.htm]http://www.crossroad.to/Q(...)ler-mind-control.htm en nog wat van de meest schokkende quotes die je ooit gelezen hebt, sporadisch afgewisseld met wijsheden/waarschuwingen van de "founding fathers" die ons de constitutie/vrijheid/rechten gegeven hebben: http://www.911kemet.co.uk/nwoquotes.html [ Bericht 2% gewijzigd door pietje77 op 07-11-2006 02:37:30 ]
NorthernStar	dinsdag 7 november 2006 @ 03:48
	quote: Op dinsdag 7 november 2006 01:25 schreef pietje77 het volgende: [..] en nog wat van de meest schokkende quotes die je ooit gelezen hebt Daar had ik nog een clipje van. Heb hem op putfile gezet. Take it from them - Quotations Vooral die van Kissinger over de overgang naar een wereldregering is treffend. "This would especially be true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by a World Government."
pietje77	dinsdag 7 november 2006 @ 05:16
	Je vergeet een niet onbelangrijk stukje uit 1 van de vele gruwelijke citaten van 'the prince of darkness" : Dr. Henry Kissinger Speaking at Evian, France, May 21st, 1992, Bilderbergers meeting; Unbeknownst to Henry Kissinger, his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to the meeting quote: "Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! daarop volgt NorthernStar zijn citaat. Ook zo'n leuke uit mijn hoofd: quote: "if you control the food, you control the people" "if you control the energy, you control continents" "if you control the money, you control the world" Wat een liefdevolle gedachten toch allemaal...
echt_gaar	donderdag 9 november 2006 @ 01:34
	quote: Op dinsdag 7 november 2006 05:16 schreef pietje77 het volgende: Je vergeet een niet onbelangrijk stukje uit 1 van de vele gruwelijke citaten van 'the prince of darkness" : Dr. Henry Kissinger Speaking at Evian, France, May 21st, 1992, Bilderbergers meeting; Unbeknownst to Henry Kissinger, his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to the meeting Ik had ook geen liefdevol citaat van Alfred Heinz Kissinger (alias Henry Kissinger) verwacht. Toch goed dat ze stiekem een stukje hebben kunnen opnemen, want die bijeenkomsten van die vrijmetselaars zijn zwaar geheim. De bezetting van Irak was ook besproken met deze Bilderberg bijeenkomsten.
G.Fawkes	zondag 26 november 2006 @ 00:54
	Dit verdient een TPV. Morgen kijk ik ernaar!
B-FliP	zondag 26 november 2006 @ 10:59
	Ik hoop echt dat de waarheid op dit vlak naar boven zal komen... Mensen die sceptisch zijn, kijk ipv te luisteren naar de ene naar de andere conspiracy eens naar bepaalde dingen: 1) Het kan gewoon niet dat er een federale wet bestaat die je niet kan laten zien... 2) Mensen opsluiten omdat ze een federale wet overtreden die je niet kan laten zien is behoorlijk vreemd te noemen... 3) Als de Federale bank niet federaal maar privaat schijnt te zijn, en deze de mogelijkheid hebben geld te drukken wanneer zij dat nodig achten, is dat stelen over de rug van de Amerikaanse bevolking... Inflatie bestaat doordat er nog steeds goud gewonnen wordt, maar als je geld blijft bijdrukken zonder dat er meer goud is, stort je je muntwaarde in een afgrond... 4) Aan het eind van het interview zegt die woordvoerder van de IRS, na het meerdere malen ontwijken van een antwoord, in het Joods/Jiddisch "Niemand zal je helpen"... Wat een rare manier om een interview te sluiten... 5) Wat is er op tegen dat dit heel diep onderzocht wordt? Er kloppen veel dingen in de wereld niet... En ik ben echt blij dat er mensen zijn die de waarheid naar boven proberen te halen... Probeer daarin wel genuanceerd te blijven, en laat je niet te veel leiden door angst en negativiteit, dat zijn juist de tools die gebruikt worden om ons te onderdrukken... Over illuminatie kan je weinig onafhankelijks naar boven halen, behalve dat sommige mensen op de lijst van vrijmetselaars staan... Ik heb gisteren een documentaire gezien over de Knights of Malta (hospitalars, daar komt het woord hospital van ziekenhuis vandaan)... Deze stamt uit dezelfde tijd als The Knight Templar, en is nog steeds onder hetzelfde symbool werkzaam... Ze hebben in 1999 het kasteel op Malta weer in handen gekregen... De Knights of Malta waren een hulpverlenende instantie die naast hun hulpverlening ook hele lucratieve zaken deed en zich in het verleden vaak gemengd hebben in oorlogen en kruistochten... We hebben de knights of Malta onder andere te danken dat Europa nu is zoals het is... Een rivaliteit aan het eind van de middeleeuwen zou gezorgd hebben voor een einde van de samenwerking van groepen Knights, en de Knights Templar zouden opgejaagd zijn... Welke op hun beurt via Napoleon de Knights of Malta weer op de knieen hebben gekregen... Wat veel mensen niet weten, is dat veel van deze genootschappen nog gewoon bestaan, en dus geen sprookje zijn... Het zijn altijd genootschappen geweest die zich met een eigen politieke agenda hebben voortbewogen... Lach daarom niet als je de naam illuminatie hoort... En hoe verlicht deze naam ook klinkt, hadden vroeger vrijwel alle van dit soort groepen een hele positieve naamgeving... Te vergelijken met Nazi's en Communisten en Dictators die zich vaak socialisten noemen... Een link gevonden waaruit bljikt dat de Knights of Malta zich ook nog steeds in de zakelijke en politieke wereld begeven en een link met vrijmetselaars gegeven wordt: http://www.voxfux.com/features/knights%20of%20malta2.html Hier is de Documentaire die ik gezien heb: http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=-4219410387467725964 [ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door B-FliP op 26-11-2006 11:50:55 ]
B-FliP	maandag 27 november 2006 @ 08:54
	Hier een link naar de knights Templar, en hun huidige (zeer machtige) rol na te zijn omgedoopt tot freemasons... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3753411785235077976
B-FliP	maandag 27 november 2006 @ 08:56
	En ik verzoek mensen die fascisme een "groot woord" vinden ook te googlen op FEMA camps en de martial law die Bush kan uitroepen waardoor hun grondwet vervalt...
B-FliP	maandag 27 november 2006 @ 14:07
	Mensen die denken dat dit alleen Amerika beinvloed hebben het mis... Er moet een internationale roep komen om de macht van de banken weer terug te geven aan de bevolking voordat ze de optie om dit te verwezenlijken voor altijd af zullen sluiten... Mocht de RFID chip ingevoerd worden hier op ID-kaarten, en/of implantaten, weet je waar het vandaan komt, en welke rechten en belangen er op het spel staan, die van jullie... Probeer deze film in het nieuws te krijgen, ook al is het in Nederland, er moet media aandacht voor komen...
pietje77	dinsdag 28 november 2006 @ 00:12
	Mijn mening is dat er idd. een minimum aantal mensen geinformeerd moeten zijn, wat al zeker het geval is. Ik ben het ideologisch met je eens, maar ik heb praktische bezwaren/angsten. Ieder land wat niet mee in de maat loopt word op 1 of andere manier tot de orde geroepen, vaak via false flag terrorisme, of economisch. Ook is de invloed van Ned. op het grote probleem, IMF etc minimaal denk ik. Het liefste zou ik mensen als Alex Jones, Aaron Russo en Ron Paul etc ongeloofelijk populair willen zien worden. Dan word het grootste probleem van binnen aangepakt binnen de U.S. daarom probber ik vooral hun te steunen op iedere manier mogelijk, al is het slechts door het verspreiden van de film/link.
B-FliP	dinsdag 28 november 2006 @ 02:04
	quote: Op dinsdag 28 november 2006 00:12 schreef pietje77 het volgende: Mijn mening is dat er idd. een minimum aantal mensen geinformeerd moeten zijn, wat al zeker het geval is. Ik ben het ideologisch met je eens, maar ik heb praktische bezwaren/angsten. Ieder land wat niet mee in de maat loopt word op 1 of andere manier tot de orde geroepen, vaak via false flag terrorisme, of economisch. Ook is de invloed van Ned. op het grote probleem, IMF etc minimaal denk ik. Het liefste zou ik mensen als Alex Jones, Aaron Russo en Ron Paul etc ongeloofelijk populair willen zien worden. Dan word het grootste probleem van binnen aangepakt binnen de U.S. daarom probber ik vooral hun te steunen op iedere manier mogelijk, al is het slechts door het verspreiden van de film/link. Ach hebben wij met z'n allen niet iets soortgelijks door onze strot geduwt gekregen als de Amerikanen in 1913? http://www.nrc.nl/W2/Lab/ECB/ecb6.html http://www.nrc.nl/W2/Lab/ECB/ecb3.html "De uitvoering blijft echter bij de nationale banken zelf"... Makkelijk he, als de directeurs in het bestuur zitten... De RFID chip gaat ook internationaal gebruikt worden... Als dat bij ons gebeurt, hoop ik dat genoeg mensen er nee op zullen zeggen... En we hebben allemaal wel nee gezegd tegen de Europeesche 'Grondwet', maar het overhevelen van verantwoordelijkheden en nationale regels naar brussel vind nog steeds plaats... Waar werkt dat naartoe? Al die kosten die gemaakt worden worden met een reden gemaakt... En over het kinderen weg halen bij de ouders: Iedereen staat te springen om gratis kinderopvang... Tja, als iedereen er dan toch voor betaald, dan kan je er net zo goed gebruik van maken toch? Verantwoording wegnemen bij de ouders om aan een bepaalde levensstandaard te voldoen vind ik niet echt een voorbeeld van een rationeel beleid...
pietje77	donderdag 14 juni 2007 @ 17:40
	Bij deze wil ik jullie nog even mee laten genieten van een discussie die ik op internet gevolgd heb. Het discussie gedeelte is al enigszins voorbij en de ignorante tegenpartij krijgt alleen nog repliek van de founding fathers zelf zeg maar enjoy the facts: What about the federal reserve that never pays taxes after the billions if not trillions of dollars it has made in profit form the US government? What about all the aid money given to foreign countries as bribes that the american people never wanted? You are a fucken clueless slave. The government was hijacked by these world bankers. The federal reserve act was passed when congressmen were back home during the holiday. Woodrow Wilson even admit it when he said. "A great industrial nation is controlled by it's system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world--no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men." --President Woodrow Wilson And here are others on the subject: Thomas Jefferson "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs."--Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President. Andrew Jackson "If Congress has the right [it doesn't] to issue paper money [currency], it was given to them to be used by...[the government] and not to be delegated to individuals or corporations" -- President Andrew Jackson, Vetoed Bank Bill of 1836 James Madison "History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and it's issuance". -- James Madison "Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce." -- James A. Garfield, President of the United States "When you or I write a check there must be sufficient funds in out account to cover the check, but when the Federal Reserve writes a check there is no bank deposit on which that check is drawn. When the Federal Reserve writes a check, it is creating money." -- Putting it simply, Boston Federal Reserve Bank "Neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities, intrinsically, a 'dollar' bill is just a piece of paper. Deposits are merely book entries." -- Modern Money Mechanics Workbook, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 1975 "The Federal Reserve system pays the U.S. Treasury 020.60 per thousand notes --a little over 2 cents each-- without regard to the face value of the note. Federal Reserve Notes, incidently, are the only type of currency now produced for circulation. They are printed exclusively by the Treasury's Bureau of Engraving and Printing, and the $20.60 per thousand price reflects the Bureau's full cost of production. Federal Reserve Notes are printed in 01, 02, 05, 10, 20, 50, and 100 dollar denominations only; notes of 500, 1000, 5000, and 10,000 denominations were last printed in 1945." --Donald J. Winn, Assistant to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve system "We are completely dependant on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system.... It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon. It is so important that our present civilization may collapse unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon." --Robert H. Hamphill, Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank "Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States" -- Sen. Barry Goldwater (Rep. AR) "This [Federal Reserve Act] establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President [Wilson} signs this bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized....the worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill." -- Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. , 1913 "From now on, depressions will be scientifically created." -- Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. , 1913 "The financial system has been turned over to the Federal Reserve Board. That Board asministers the finance system by authority of a purely profiteering group. The system is Private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people's money" -- Charles A. Lindbergh Sr., 1923 "The Federal Reserve bank buys government bonds without one penny..." -- Congressman Wright Patman, Congressional Record, Sept 30, 1941 "We have, in this country, one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board. This evil institution has impoverished the people of the United States and has practically bankrupted our government. It has done this through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it". -- Congressman Louis T. McFadden in 1932 (Rep. Pa) "The Federal Reserve banks are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this nation is run by the International bankers -- Congressman Louis T. McFadden (Rep. Pa) "Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are the United States government's institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign swindlers" -- Congressional Record 12595-12603 -- Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency (12 years) June 10, 1932 "I have never seen more Senators express discontent with their jobs....I think the major cause is that, deep down in our hearts, we have been accomplices in doing something terrible and unforgiveable to our wonderful country. Deep down in our heart, we know that we have given our children a legacy of bankruptcy. We have defrauded our country to get ourselves elected." -- John Danforth (R-Mo) "These 12 corporations together cover the whole country and monopolize and use for private gain every dollar of the public currency..." -- Mr. Crozier of Cincinnati, before Senate Banking and Currency Committee - 1913 "The [Federal Reserve Act] as it stands seems to me to open the way to a vast inflation of the currency... I do not like to think that any law can be passed that will make it possible to submerge the gold standard in a flood of irredeemable paper currency." -- Henry Cabot Lodge Sr., 1913 "The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it's profits or so dependant on it's favors, that there will be no opposition from that class." -- Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863 "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" -- Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild You are a dumb fuck of a citizen and a good example of why this nation is in such deep shit!!! amen!
jogy	donderdag 14 juni 2007 @ 17:58
	Even een klein duwtje naar zijn nieuwe stek .
Resonancer	vrijdag 15 juni 2007 @ 17:33
	En wwer n stapje dichterbij: quote: With scarcely a mention in the mainstream media, President Bush has ordered up a plan for responding to a catastrophic attack. In a new National Security Presidential Directive, Bush lays out his plans for dealing with a “catastrophic emergency.” Under that plan, he entrusts himself with leading the entire federal government, not just the Executive Branch. And he gives himself the responsibility “for ensuring constitutional government. http://www.progressive.org/mag_wx051807 mhmm, ben benieuwd of die catastrophe nog voor de volgende verkiezingen plaatsvindt.
NorthernStar	vrijdag 15 juni 2007 @ 17:49
	quote: Op vrijdag 15 juni 2007 17:33 schreef Resonancer het volgende: En wwer n stapje dichterbij: [..] mhmm, ben benieuwd of die catastrophe nog voor de volgende verkiezingen plaatsvindt. Als ze bij dat JFK-plot al telkens omschrijvingen als "catastrophic attack" en "catastrophic explosion" ed gebruikten... Gaat goed daar.
pietje77	vrijdag 15 juni 2007 @ 17:49
	ik denk dat Bush super-dictatoriale macht, zoals Hitler en zoals hier omschreven, wel verdiend heeft nu hij al zovaak bewezen heeft uitstekend met rampen om te kunnen gaan. 911, WMD, Irak, katrina etc. George W. Bush: “Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”" Lijkt me niet meer dan logisch dat onze christelijke leider, Bush, dat "goddamned piece of paper" (de constitutie) helemaaal alleen gaat verdedigen bij de volgende "ramp". of inside job. hahaha, je moet echt extreem ongeinformeerd of in super-denial zijn als je het niet doorziet.
Resonancer	vrijdag 15 juni 2007 @ 18:52
	quote: Op vrijdag 15 juni 2007 17:49 schreef NorthernStar het volgende: [..] Als ze bij dat JFK-plot al telkens omschrijvingen als "catastrophic attack" en "catastrophic explosion" ed gebruikten... Gaat goed daar. Eigenlijk gaat het al best lang "goed". Nadrukkelijk tussen aanhalingstekens. quote: "Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency....This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens." http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/1997/06/bonfire.html Je legt de plek precies op de zere vinger: quote: . The great problem inherent is that no binding legal definition exists as to what constitutes a "national emergency". That definition lies entirely with the Chief Executive. When he declares a state of emergency, the aforementioned documents can be used to activate whatever federal agency is most suited to address the emergency. Those agencies include, but are not limited to, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (BATF), the FBI and the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA).
NorthernStar	zaterdag 16 juni 2007 @ 06:43
	quote: Op vrijdag 15 juni 2007 18:52 schreef Resonancer het volgende: Je legt de plek precies op de zere vinger: The great problem inherent is that no binding legal definition exists as to what constitutes a "national emergency". Het zal wel niet toeval zijn dat ze vage termen gebruiken die niet duidelijk gedefinieerd zijn. Er staat een heleboel in de nieuwe wetten wat een overheid allemaal mag doen om een "terrorist" op te sporen en aan te houden cq. uit te schakelen, maar een definitie van een "terrorist" ontbreekt. Idem met "enemy combatant". Dat gaat zelfs zo ver dat ze van hun burger- en mensenrechten gestript mogen (waarmee Amerika afscheid heeft genomen van de internationale verdragen hierover) worden terwijl iedereen als "enemy combatant" kan worden aangewezen. De meeste Amerikanen nemen bovendien automatisch aan dat het om buitenlanders gaat. Hebben geen weet dat zij net zo eenvoudig tot "enemy combatant" bestempeld kunnen worden. Americans may be held as 'enemy combatants' (CNN) De president heeft de volledige macht iedereen, wie hij maar wil, tot "enemy combatant" te benoemen. Kortom, alle wetten zijn in gereedheid gebracht, het is alleen nog wachten op de volgende 9/11, waarvan de Bush-neoconkliek keer op keer heeft gezegd dat het slechts een kwestie van tijd is. Kwam nog een linkje tegen van een video over de FED Fiat Empire "A Closer look at the Federal Reserve"
dat_dan_weer_wel	zaterdag 16 juni 2007 @ 13:10
	Zal er ook nog maar een filmpje tegenaan gooien, het is van dezelfde makers als 'the money masters' en zeer informatief http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279&q=money+as+debt&total=743&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
k3vil	zaterdag 16 juni 2007 @ 14:56
	Hopelijk blijft die topic een beetje op dit niveau, zonder dat het teveel TRU wordt _{tevens tvp}
Resonancer	zaterdag 16 juni 2007 @ 17:36
	quote: Don't Trust Government - by R.T. Naylor. by Charley Reese: The funny thing is that the book is not about Hitler or Germany, but about the U.S. and the bogus war on terror. It is an outstanding book, carefully researched and footnoted, and written in a reasonable manner, though with delicious dollops of sarcasm. It's the carefully detailed accounts of injustices committed by the U.S. government against American Muslims that gave me the insight about Hitler. In the early days of the Third Reich, if you weren't a criminal, a communist or a Jew, you never saw the dark side of the Nazi government. You saw an economy being revitalized, superhighways being built, Germans being put back to work, the disgraceful Versailles Treaty being scrapped. It must have looked a lot like morning in Germany to the people who had suffered through runaway inflation, economic depression and street riots. Similarly, if you are not a Muslim or an Arab-American who has been a victim of the Patriot Act and other laws carelessly passed in the hysteria following the attacks in 2001, then the Bush administration probably looks perfectly normal. You probably even believe that it is really protecting you from terrorists, just as many Germans believed Hitler was protecting them from the "bad guys." What Taylor's book demonstrates is how often this is pure nonsense, and at the same time what terrible damage is being done to the rule of law and America's traditional respect for human rights. Typically, the government will swoop down and seize an organization's records and computers, while making public accusations of the people being "involved" with terrorists. The important point is that this is done before any determination of guilt or innocence has even begun. By the time a defendant gets to court, if he ever does, he's ruined. Quite often then, the fearless feds will say, "Well, never mind about this terrorist business, just plead guilty to a minor immigration violation." Often defendants are bullied into admitting guilt they don't deserve by threats of being declared an enemy combatant, which means indefinite imprisonment, probably for life. You can see the process going on with the four men charged with planning to blow up the fuel lines to JFK International Airport in New York. In the first place, it is common knowledge that if you blow up a fuel line, you will get an explosion and fire at one point. The claim that the whole pipeline would blow up for miles is nonsense, and the government knows that, but it threw that out to claim the plot endangered "thousands" of lives. The real question is, Did these guys actually plan it, or were they set up by the government's federal informant? The federal government has a terrible record of using informants to entrap people. The whole tragedy of Ruby Ridge, which cost the lives of Randy Weaver's wife and son, resulted from a federal informant who nagged Weaver into sawing off the barrels of a shotgun, something any kid can do with a vice and a hacksaw. The feds then arrested Weaver with the intention of forcing him to become an informant, and the tragic farce ensued. So even though you haven't felt the arbitrary and unjust power of the government, you should read this book and find out just how much deception is involved in this war on terror. You'll discover how often oil, diamonds and big business play behind-the-scenes roles in this current so-called war. As the German people discovered, once a government has unlimited power, it will eventually use that power against everyone. http://www.amazon.com/Sat(...)3531505/lewrockwell/ Ruby Ridge.. Ik had er nog nooit van gehoord... Off topic, of is dit n symptoom ? http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-lynch082102.asp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge quote: At his trial in 1993, which occurred during the federal siege of the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas, Weaver faced an array of charges, including the original weapons violations as well as murder Waco , ook zo'n symptoom ? [ Bericht 10% gewijzigd door Resonancer op 16-06-2007 17:43:00 ]
NorthernStar	zaterdag 25 augustus 2007 @ 14:24
	Aaron Russo dies of cancer Unconfirmed reports on the internet suggest that filmmaker and political activist Aaron Russo died on 24th August 2007 after a struggle with cancer. He will be perhaps most remembered for his outspoken work, America: From Freedom to Fascism. Although a filmmaker, famous for producing films as Trading Places and The Rose as well as managing Bette Midler, Aaron Russo became politically active when he produced the film Mad As Hell - which took its name from the phrase ranted by Peter Finch in the film Network - in which he was critical of NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement), the introduction of identity cards, the so-called war on drugs and proposed regulations on alternative medicine. He made numerous attempts to seek elected office including his 2004 campaign for nomination as the Libertarian Party candidate for US president in which he was only defeated in the final ballot by a modest majority. He had been acquainted with some of the most powerful people in the world with some of whom he fell foul - including Nicholas Rockefeller about whom he said: ‘Here’s what I do know first hand - I know that about eleven months to a year before 9/11 ever happened I was talking to my Rockefeller friend (Nicholas Rockefeller) and he said to me ‘Aaron there’s gonna be an event’ and he never told me what the event was going to be - I’m not sure he knew what the event was going to be I don’t know that he knew that,’‘He just said there’s gonna be an event and out of that event we’re gonna invade Afghanistan so we can run pipelines through the Caspian sea, we can go into Iraq to take the oil and establish bases in the middle east and to make the middle east part of the new world order and we’re going to go after Venezuela - that’s what’s going to come out of this event.’‘Eleven months to a year later that’s what happened….he certainly knew that something was going to happen.’‘In my relationships with some of these people I can tell you that it’s as evil as it really gets - this is it - this is the game.’ ‘People know that 9/11 was an inside job, look what they did here in America, look at 9/11, look what they did - they killed thousands of Americans - people jumping out of windows from a hundred floors up - they don’t care.’ In the end he couldn’t afford the treatment he required to help him fight his cancer and a fund was established to help him pay for it. Sadly, it has been too late.
ihugster	zaterdag 25 augustus 2007 @ 17:30
	Ik moet zeggen de overeenkomst met het begin van nazi-Duitsland mij wel aanspreekt.(los van de latere kampen/joden vervolgingen e.d.)
TaLoN.NL	zaterdag 25 augustus 2007 @ 18:11
	quote: Op zaterdag 25 augustus 2007 14:24 schreef NorthernStar het volgende: Aaron Russo dies of cancer Een goed man, jammer dat we hem nu al moeten missen.
NorthernStar	zaterdag 25 augustus 2007 @ 22:28
	quote: Op zaterdag 25 augustus 2007 18:11 schreef TaLoN.NL het volgende: [..] Een goed man, jammer dat we hem nu al moeten missen. Ja zonde. Hij heeft zich de laatste jaren erg ingezet om het bewustzijn van mensen te verhogen. En wie weet wat hij nog had kunnen doen. "Only the good die (too) young" AARON RUSSO 1943-2007
Aurora025	zondag 26 augustus 2007 @ 02:17
	"Aaron Russo was a controlled opposition lackie for the SOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OF MALTA. His links into the SMOM and Mafiosi controlled Hollywood should have rung alarm bells as it does with Antony Hilder. I have no sympathy for this cretin and he deserved the terrible time he had towards the end for aiding Rome like a coward. Whats he done exactly? Told people what was being spread around a long time prior to him coming out with it. What has it done for people? It actually makes them loose their properties far quicker and this is why the SMOM allow the information out so they can get you quicker. The average person just simply cannot win against the Maritime system unless their serious clued up for all the pitfalls set to protect it. It's not as easy as these people claim. Did Aaron Russo speak of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta control over the banking system? NO! All you get from these controlled cretins is Rothschilds this, Rothschild that. Rest in hell Russo" http://z13.invisionfree.c(...).php?showtopic=31409 http://z13.invisionfree.c(...).php?showtopic=28566
Orwell	zondag 26 augustus 2007 @ 02:33
	fok is die man dood?? May he rest in Peace... waar hij helaas gestopt is, zullen we verder moeten gaan... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd9McZFN6bg
Pr0-n00b	zondag 26 augustus 2007 @ 23:36
	En weer een klein stapje dichterbij om iedereen lekker makkelijk te controleren. rtl nieuws En je hoort er natuurlijk verder helemaal niks over, we slapen lekker verder EDIT: En na even wat doorzoeken naar waar de amerikaanse regering allemaal mee bezig is. http://www.nujij.nl//natt(...)locaust.837887.lynkx 'originele bericht' http://www.vrijheids.net/?p=423 Ben ik nou gek offuh ... ? [ Bericht 38% gewijzigd door Pr0-n00b op 26-08-2007 23:43:14 ]
Equinix	maandag 12 november 2007 @ 13:36
	Een aantal jaar na 11 september was ik geschokt dat het verhaal van 11 september niet op de waarheid beruste door het zien van een aantal documentaires en het officiële verhaal van de 911 commission. Destijds dacht ik dat het alleen om de olie te doen was. Maar nadat ik me een aantal maanden terug in de dollar ging verdiepen en de neergang van die munt stuiten ik op Zeitgeist. Daaropvolgend Endgame en een paar weken terug op Freedom to facism. Nu dacht ik dat Loose change en In plane site eyeopeners waren ( Niet alles uit die documentaires zal kloppen maar het officiële verhaal van de 911 commision klopt niet of is niet compleet ) . Maar het is een klein stukje van een groter geheel. Nu de grote vraag Wat valt er tegen te doen ? We kunnen er wel lekker over schrijven op het forum maar wat valt er concreet te doen tegen de plannen van de NWO ? Ron Paul zou er wat tegen doen maar de NWO ziet toch ook dat hij dat van plan is, nu ze zo dichtbij zijn lijkt het me niet dat ze zonder slag of stoot gaan opgeven.
jogy	maandag 12 november 2007 @ 14:03
	quote: Op maandag 12 november 2007 13:36 schreef Equinix het volgende: Nu de grote vraag Wat valt er tegen te doen ? Wat valt er tegen te doen als de overgrote meerderheid van de mensheid of te arm is om zich daar ook zorgen om te maken of gewoon niet eens ziet dat er smerige dingen gaande zijn? Ik denk dat het enige wat er tegen te doen is dat je ontwikkelingen blijft volgen en weet wat er aan de hand is, misschien komt er ooit een moment dat er genoeg mensen gefrustreerd genoeg zijn om openlijke tegenwicht te brengen maar zo niet dan is het aan jezelf om niet in de legio van opgezette vallen te trappen en scherp te blijven.
NorthernStar	maandag 12 november 2007 @ 14:43
	quote: Op maandag 12 november 2007 13:36 schreef Equinix het volgende: Nu de grote vraag Wat valt er tegen te doen ? Ik ben het met Jogy eens. Leg jezelf geen onmogelijke opdrachten op en pas je verwachtingen aan de realiteit aan. Informeer jezelf zo goed mogelijk. Dat op zich is al een permanent proces. Op een bepaald moment heb je wel een ruw beeld van de dingen maar ook een deel zul je soms over twijfelen en weer bijstellen. Blijf altijd kritisch. Al met al is dat imo de grootste opdracht die je jezelf kunt opleggen en tegelijk de enige die iedereen aan zichzelf verplicht is. Door je denkbeelden te veranderen doe je al, of je wilt of niet. Gedrag vloeit immers voort uit wat je denkt en gelooft.
Moonlith	donderdag 29 november 2007 @ 04:04
	Deze zou ik graag aanhalen: http://www.guba.com/watch/3000054108 Nu weet ik dat David Icke misschien niet het meest betrouwbaar is, maar het sluit wel aan bij de posts hier over Templars. David Icke gaat iets verder door te stellen dat de huidige machthebbers (voornamelijk bankiers) directe afstammelingen zijn van die gasten die het vroeger ook allemaal voor het zeggen hadden. Ik hoop niet dat ik hiermee de geloofwaardigheid van dit topic omlaag haal Want dit is een grandioos topic! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjALf12PAWc Deze herinnerde ik me toen hier gesproken werd over het afstreven op fascisme, de Hitler - Bush vergelijking. Ik ben er vrijwel heilig van overtuigd dat je nog VOOR de verkiezingen daar een machtsgreep kunt verwachten. [ Bericht 33% gewijzigd door Moonlith op 29-11-2007 05:55:04 ]