Een paar mensen die in de film komen vertellen dat er geen income tax betaald moet worden:quote:U.S. Constitution: Sixteenth Amendment
Sixteenth Amendment - Income Tax
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment16/
Nog wat leesvoer : http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=21498quote:The income tax amendment was pushed through Congress in 1909 by Sen. Nelson Aldrich, father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr. and grandfather and namesake of Nelson A. Rockefeller, and would not have been ratified if Knox had not fraudulently proclaimed it so. (Philander Knox had for many years been the primary attorney for the richest men in America, including Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan and the Vanderbilts. He had created for them the largest cartel in the world, then was appointed, at their request, as Attorney General in the McKinley/Roosevelt administrations, where he refused to enforce the Sherman anti-trust laws against the cartel he had just created)
Example: Kentucky's legislature rejected the amendment, but Knox counted Kentucky as having approved it.
Example: Oklahoma's legislature changed the amendment's wording so that it meant just the opposite of what was submitted to the states by Congress, but Knox counted Oklahoma as approving the amendment.
Example: Minnesota did not submit any results or copy of their vote to Knox, yet he counted Minnesota as approving the amendment.
Legal scholars have agreed that if any state violated provisions of its own state constitution in the ratification process, its approval would be null and void. At least 20 states were guilty of serious violations of their constitutions. For example, Tennessee's constitution provided that the state legislature could not act upon any proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution submitted by Congress until after the next state legislative elections. Yet the Tennessee legislature acted on the proposed 16th amendment the same month it was received and before any elections http://www.givemeliberty.org/features/taxes/usatoday.htm
en nog wat van de meest schokkende quotes die je ooit gelezen hebt, sporadisch afgewisseld met wijsheden/waarschuwingen van de "founding fathers" die ons de constitutie/vrijheid/rechten gegeven hebben: http://www.911kemet.co.uk/nwoquotes.htmlquote:Chronology:
1909. Lord Milner's secretive Round Table Group was established. Professor Quigley exposed some of the evolving ties between the global banking fraternity and these evolving "semi-secret discussion and lobbying groups," which helped foment World War I as a means to raise public support for a League of Nations.
"By 1915, Round Table Groups existed in seven countries, including England...(and) the United States.... Since 1925, there have been substantial contributions from wealthy individuals, and from foundations and firms associated with the international banking fraternity, especially... organizations associated with J. P. Morgan, the Rockefeller and Whitney families...." Quigley, 950-951.
1909. Five years after his release from a primitive "insane asylum," Clifford Beers, formed the U.S. National Committee for Mental Hygiene" and called for a network of mental hygiene societies throughout the world."1
1917. In its report published in 1954, the Reece Committee (the Special House Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations) explained and quoted the official minutes of the Board of Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace [See also:Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution]
"These trustees in a meeting about 1917 had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom of their original decision because already the impact of war had indicated it... could alter life in this country. ... they even had the brashness to ... dispatch a telegram to Mr. Wilson, cautioning him to see that the war did not end too quickly....
"The concern became, as expressed by the trustees, seeing to it that there was no reversion to life in this country as it existed prior to 1914. And they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, they must control education. and then they approached the Rockefeller Foundation and they said, 'Will you take on the acquisition of control of education as it involves subjects that re domestic in their significance? We'll take on the basis of subjects that have an international significance..' And it was agreed.... They decided the key to is the teaching of American history, and they must change that." [The Tax-Exempt Foundations, p. 60-61]
1919. With funding from the Commonwealth Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation, Clifford Beers "formed the predecessor of WFMH [World Federation for Mental Health], the International Committee for Mental Hygiene (ICMH). Other supporters were Clarence Hincks, M.D., of the Canadian Medical Association, Adolph Meyer, M.D. of Johns Hopkins Hospital; and psychologist William James of Harvard. William James, John Dewey and other socialist visionaries spread the philosophy of pragmatism, which denies Biblical truth, sees truth as relative, and tests its validity by its practical and measurable effects.
Note: Remember, almost every public step in this social revolution won public sympathy and acceptance by focusing on a real crisis. But in the hands of socialist change agents, the nice-sounding "solution" became a stepping stone to an ever expanding web of control.1
William James (father of American Psychology) founded the National Committee for Mental Hygiene, and according to B. K. Eakman in CLONING OF THE AMERICAN MIND: ERADICATING MORALITY THROUGH EDUCATION, he 'persuaded Rockefeller to contribute millions to the National Committee for Mental Hygiene....The goal of the Committee was specifically to prevent mental illness, and its focus was elementary and secondary schools. The thrust of the Committee's philosophy was that mental illness hinged on faulty personality development in childhood and that, therefore, personality development should supersede all other educational objectives. Stress was seen as the chief culprit, and parents and other authority figures as the second." Cuddy, Mental Health, Education and Social Control, Part 8
1921. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was founded -- mainly through Col. House's influence. To build the needed network of globalist support groups, it would disperse tens of millions of dollars annually from the major tax-exempt foundations such as the Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations. Global Tyranny, page 54
The CFR would be the U.S. equivalent of the British RIIA, the Royal Institute of International Affairs. As Professor Quigley wrote, "...the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." Quigley, 952.
1925. The Rockefeller Foundation funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry in Munick, directed by Dr. Ernst Rudin. Additional funding was provided by the Harrimans, Warburg and the British Crown. It continued to sponsor the Institute and its Nazi leader throughout the devastating holocaust of World Ward II. 4?
1925. A Rockefeller Foundation's grant gives birth to the International Bureau of Education.2 Cuddy 15
1932. Rockefeller Foundation president Max Mason tells trustees that "The Social Sciences will concern themselves with the rationalization of social control... the control of human behavior." 2 Cuddy 18
1932. Dr. Ernst Rudin, the Nazi director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry (funded by the Rockefellers) was appointed president of the global Eugenics Federation.
1934 (February). A Rockefeller "progress report" (by one of the division heads) asks, "Can we develop so sound and extensive a genetics that we can hope to breed, in the future, superior men?"2 Cuddy, 18.
1930-33. Hitler came to power and delegated Rudin to direct the Racial Hygiene Society, which called for sterilization or death of people considered "racially impure." The Rockefeller Foundation funded an anthropological survey of the eugenically correct population by Nazi eugenicists Rudin and others. 4?
1939. Rockefeller Foundation helps launch the School-Health Coordinating Service.2 Cuddy 22
1940s. "Otmar Verschuer and his assistant Dr. Joseph Mengele together wrote reports for special courts, which enforced Rudin's racial purity law against the illegal cohabitation of Aryans and non-Aryans. In the early 1940s, a large factory was built "at Auschwitz... to utilize the Standard Oil IG Farbin patents with concentration camp slave labor to make gasoline from coal. The SS guarded the Jewish and other inmates and selected for killing those who were unfit for IG Farbin slave labor.... Standard Oil and German President Emil Heilfeck testified after the war at the Nuremberg Trial that Standard Oil funds [Rockefeller]helped pay for the SS guards at Auschwitz. The Rockefeller Foundation defends its record by claiming that its funding of Nazi Germany programs during World War II was limited to psychiatric research." 4
1943: The Rockefeller Foundation helped fund the Allen Memorial Institute at McGill University in Montreal. Working with the Canadian military and the Office of Strategic Services (The OSS became the CIA in 1947), Dr. Cameron conducted torturous experiments on human guinea pigs in order to perfect the various mind control techniques. These brainwashing tactics included coercive interrogation, psychosurgery, drugs, hypnosis and "between 30 to 60 electroshocks over a short period" along with powerful tranquilizers to control anxiety. Cameron's justification: his patients, "like prisoners of Communists, tended to resist and had to be broken down." This is described in the 1989 book, Journey Into Madness: The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse
1943. Joseph Mengele appointed medical commandant of the Auschwitz concentration camp.
1979. Supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Institute of Education and the U.S. Department of Education, Schooling for A Global Age is published. In the Preface, John Goodlad wrote: "Enlightened social engineering is required to face situations that demand global action now. Education is a long-term solution.... Parents and the general public must be reached also... Otherwise, children and youth enrolled in globally oriented programs may find themselves in conflict with values assumed in the home. And then the educational institution frequently comes under scrutiny and must pull back."2 Cuddy 65.
1987. Among the notable members of the Study Commission on Global Education were (then) Governor Bill Clinton, AFT president Albert Shanker, Professor John Goodlad, CFAT (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching) president Ernest Boyer, and Frank Newman, president of the Education Commission of the States. Together, they prepared a report titled The United States Prepares for Its Future: Global Perspectives in Education. The Rockefeller, Ford and Exxon Foundations helped fund this report. In the Foreword, New Ager Harlan Cleveland, author of The Third Try at World Order, wrote:
"A dozen years ago... teaching and learning 'in global perspective' was still exotic doctrine, threatening the orthodoxies of those who still thought of American citizenship as an amalgam of American history, American geography, American lifestyles and American ideas.... It now seems almost conventional to speak of American citizenship in the same breath with international interdependence and the planetary environment."13
1996 (December ). "A Symposium organized by The Peter F. Drucker Foundation for Nonprofit Management, sponsored by The Rockefeller Brothers Fund.... The Drucker Foundation believes that a healthy society requires three vital sectors: a public sector of effective governments; a private sector of effective businesses; and a social sector of effective community organizations [the focus is on large churches]. The mission of the social sector and its organizations is to change lives. It accomplishes this mission by addressing the needs of the spirit, the mind and the body--of individual, the community, and society....
"As government cuts back social spending, many people expect the social sector to absorb much of the anticipated need for services....
"The one million nonprofit organizations... that comprise the social sector have only one common characteristic--their tax exempt status. It is their diversity--in mission, philosophy, and community--that uniquely qualifies them to deliver effective services to the community. ... We are now talking about a true partnership to build community and produce people who are needed by healthy businesses and a healthy society." Emerging Partnerships: New Ways in a New World
Note: The large community oriented and purpose-driven churches fit right into the new communitarian model for organizing institutions and monitoring people. That's why the Rockefellers are involved.
BRON: http]http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/brainwashing/rockefeller-mind-control.htm]http://www.crossroad.to/Q(...)ler-mind-control.htm
Daar had ik nog een clipje van. Heb hem op putfile gezet.quote:Op dinsdag 7 november 2006 01:25 schreef pietje77 het volgende:
[..]
en nog wat van de meest schokkende quotes die je ooit gelezen hebt
quote:"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful!
Wat een liefdevolle gedachten toch allemaal...quote:"if you control the food, you control the people"
"if you control the energy, you control continents"
"if you control the money, you control the world"
Ik had ook geen liefdevol citaat van Alfred Heinz Kissinger (alias Henry Kissinger) verwacht. Toch goed dat ze stiekem een stukje hebben kunnen opnemen, want die bijeenkomsten van die vrijmetselaars zijn zwaar geheim. De bezetting van Irak was ook besproken met deze Bilderberg bijeenkomsten.quote:Op dinsdag 7 november 2006 05:16 schreef pietje77 het volgende:
Je vergeet een niet onbelangrijk stukje uit 1 van de vele gruwelijke citaten van 'the prince of darkness" :
Dr. Henry Kissinger Speaking at Evian, France, May 21st, 1992, Bilderbergers meeting; Unbeknownst to Henry Kissinger, his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to the meeting
Ach hebben wij met z'n allen niet iets soortgelijks door onze strot geduwt gekregenquote:Op dinsdag 28 november 2006 00:12 schreef pietje77 het volgende:
Mijn mening is dat er idd. een minimum aantal mensen geinformeerd moeten zijn, wat al zeker het geval is.
Ik ben het ideologisch met je eens, maar ik heb praktische bezwaren/angsten.
Ieder land wat niet mee in de maat loopt word op 1 of andere manier tot de orde geroepen, vaak via false flag terrorisme, of economisch.
Ook is de invloed van Ned. op het grote probleem, IMF etc minimaal denk ik.
Het liefste zou ik mensen als Alex Jones, Aaron Russo en Ron Paul etc ongeloofelijk populair willen zien worden.
Dan word het grootste probleem van binnen aangepakt binnen de U.S.
daarom probber ik vooral hun te steunen op iedere manier mogelijk, al is het slechts door het verspreiden van de film/link.
mhmm, ben benieuwd of die catastrophe nog voor de volgende verkiezingen plaatsvindt.quote:With scarcely a mention in the mainstream media, President Bush has ordered up a plan for responding to a catastrophic attack.
In a new National Security Presidential Directive, Bush lays out his plans for dealing with a “catastrophic emergency.”
Under that plan, he entrusts himself with leading the entire federal government, not just the Executive Branch. And he gives himself the responsibility “for ensuring constitutional government.
http://www.progressive.org/mag_wx051807
Als ze bij dat JFK-plot al telkens omschrijvingen als "catastrophic attack" en "catastrophic explosion" ed gebruikten...quote:Op vrijdag 15 juni 2007 17:33 schreef Resonancer het volgende:
En wwer n stapje dichterbij:
[..]
mhmm, ben benieuwd of die catastrophe nog voor de volgende verkiezingen plaatsvindt.
Eigenlijk gaat het al best lang "goed". Nadrukkelijk tussen aanhalingstekens.quote:Op vrijdag 15 juni 2007 17:49 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:
[..]
Als ze bij dat JFK-plot al telkens omschrijvingen als "catastrophic attack" en "catastrophic explosion" ed gebruikten...
Gaat goed daar.
Je legt de plek precies op de zere vinger:quote:"Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency....This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens."
http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/1997/06/bonfire.html
quote:. The great problem inherent is that no binding legal definition exists as to what constitutes a "national emergency". That definition lies entirely with the Chief Executive. When he declares a state of emergency, the aforementioned documents can be used to activate whatever federal agency is most suited to address the emergency. Those agencies include, but are not limited to, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (BATF), the FBI and the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA).
Het zal wel niet toeval zijn dat ze vage termen gebruiken die niet duidelijk gedefinieerd zijn. Er staat een heleboel in de nieuwe wetten wat een overheid allemaal mag doen om een "terrorist" op te sporen en aan te houden cq. uit te schakelen, maar een definitie van een "terrorist" ontbreekt.quote:Op vrijdag 15 juni 2007 18:52 schreef Resonancer het volgende:
Je legt de plek precies op de zere vinger:
The great problem inherent is that no binding legal definition exists as to what constitutes a "national emergency".
Ruby Ridge..quote:Don't Trust Government - by R.T. Naylor.
by Charley Reese:
The funny thing is that the book is not about Hitler or Germany, but about the U.S. and the bogus war on terror. It is an outstanding book, carefully researched and footnoted, and written in a reasonable manner, though with delicious dollops of sarcasm.
It's the carefully detailed accounts of injustices committed by the U.S. government against American Muslims that gave me the insight about Hitler. In the early days of the Third Reich, if you weren't a criminal, a communist or a Jew, you never saw the dark side of the Nazi government. You saw an economy being revitalized, superhighways being built, Germans being put back to work, the disgraceful Versailles Treaty being scrapped. It must have looked a lot like morning in Germany to the people who had suffered through runaway inflation, economic depression and street riots.
Similarly, if you are not a Muslim or an Arab-American who has been a victim of the Patriot Act and other laws carelessly passed in the hysteria following the attacks in 2001, then the Bush administration probably looks perfectly normal. You probably even believe that it is really protecting you from terrorists, just as many Germans believed Hitler was protecting them from the "bad guys."
What Taylor's book demonstrates is how often this is pure nonsense, and at the same time what terrible damage is being done to the rule of law and America's traditional respect for human rights.
Typically, the government will swoop down and seize an organization's records and computers, while making public accusations of the people being "involved" with terrorists. The important point is that this is done before any determination of guilt or innocence has even begun. By the time a defendant gets to court, if he ever does, he's ruined. Quite often then, the fearless feds will say, "Well, never mind about this terrorist business, just plead guilty to a minor immigration violation." Often defendants are bullied into admitting guilt they don't deserve by threats of being declared an enemy combatant, which means indefinite imprisonment, probably for life.
You can see the process going on with the four men charged with planning to blow up the fuel lines to JFK International Airport in New York. In the first place, it is common knowledge that if you blow up a fuel line, you will get an explosion and fire at one point. The claim that the whole pipeline would blow up for miles is nonsense, and the government knows that, but it threw that out to claim the plot endangered "thousands" of lives.
The real question is, Did these guys actually plan it, or were they set up by the government's federal informant? The federal government has a terrible record of using informants to entrap people. The whole tragedy of Ruby Ridge, which cost the lives of Randy Weaver's wife and son, resulted from a federal informant who nagged Weaver into sawing off the barrels of a shotgun, something any kid can do with a vice and a hacksaw. The feds then arrested Weaver with the intention of forcing him to become an informant, and the tragic farce ensued.
So even though you haven't felt the arbitrary and unjust power of the government, you should read this book and find out just how much deception is involved in this war on terror. You'll discover how often oil, diamonds and big business play behind-the-scenes roles in this current so-called war.
As the German people discovered, once a government has unlimited power, it will eventually use that power against everyone.
http://www.amazon.com/Sat(...)3531505/lewrockwell/
Waco , ook zo'n symptoom ?quote:At his trial in 1993, which occurred during the federal siege of the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas, Weaver faced an array of charges, including the original weapons violations as well as murder
Een goed man, jammer dat we hem nu al moeten missen.quote:
Ja zonde. Hij heeft zich de laatste jaren erg ingezet om het bewustzijn van mensen te verhogen. En wie weet wat hij nog had kunnen doen.quote:Op zaterdag 25 augustus 2007 18:11 schreef TaLoN.NL het volgende:
[..]
Een goed man, jammer dat we hem nu al moeten missen.![]()
Wat valt er tegen te doen als de overgrote meerderheid van de mensheid of te arm is om zich daar ook zorgen om te maken of gewoon niet eens ziet dat er smerige dingen gaande zijn? Ik denk dat het enige wat er tegen te doen is dat je ontwikkelingen blijft volgen en weet wat er aan de hand is, misschien komt er ooit een moment dat er genoeg mensen gefrustreerd genoeg zijn om openlijke tegenwicht te brengen maar zo niet dan is het aan jezelf om niet in de legio van opgezette vallen te trappen en scherp te blijven.quote:Op maandag 12 november 2007 13:36 schreef Equinix het volgende:
Nu de grote vraag
Wat valt er tegen te doen ?
Ik ben het met Jogy eens. Leg jezelf geen onmogelijke opdrachten op en pas je verwachtingen aan de realiteit aan. Informeer jezelf zo goed mogelijk. Dat op zich is al een permanent proces. Op een bepaald moment heb je wel een ruw beeld van de dingen maar ook een deel zul je soms over twijfelen en weer bijstellen. Blijf altijd kritisch. Al met al is dat imo de grootste opdracht die je jezelf kunt opleggen en tegelijk de enige die iedereen aan zichzelf verplicht is.quote:Op maandag 12 november 2007 13:36 schreef Equinix het volgende:
Nu de grote vraag
Wat valt er tegen te doen ?
|
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |