NWS Nieuws & Achtergronden
Discussieer hier diepgaander over de actualiteiten.
Vertel, heb je daar een bron voor?quote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:12 schreef Glasnosteraar het volgende:
Op zich is dat natuurlijk ook niets nieuws, die foto van russische soldaten op de Brandenburger Tor is ook in scene gezet.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
ja, israel is al begonnenquote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:21 schreef Isdatzo het volgende:
Kunnen we niet gewoon 1 grote muur om dat hele midden-oosten zetten..
al dat gezeik daar
Elk geschiedenisboekquote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:23 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:
[..]
Vertel, heb je daar een bron voor?
Er zijn destijds veel fotos in scene gezet, maar deze, afaik, niet, het bijzondere met deze foto was dat de soldaat die de vlag daar neer hangt om iedere pols een hele rits horloges heeft, MAW, hij heeft geplunderd.quote:
Dit is weggeretouceerd
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Kamerdebat crisis Midden-Oosten waarschijnlijk woensdag
DEN HAAG - De Tweede Kamer praat hoogstwaarschijnlijk donderdag met minister Ben Bot (Buitenlandse Zaken) over de situatie in het Midden-Oosten. Na GroenLinks en SP wil ook de PvdA dat de fractiewoordvoerders daarvoor van reces terugkeren.
Voorzitter Jozias van Aartsen van de Kamercommissie Buitenlandse Zaken moet nog een definitief besluit nemen. Voor het uitschrijven van een commissie-overleg is geen meerderheid nodig, de voorzitter besluit na consultatie. Uiterlijk woensdagochtend valt het definitieve besluit of er een debat komt.
De VVD is tegen een debat. De liberalen vinden dat de G8 en de Europese Unie een juiste positie hebben ingenomen en dat Nederland terecht die lijn steunt. VVD-Kamerlid Hans van Baalen vindt de wens van de linkse oppositie voor een debat „hetzij grenzeloze overschatting van het eigen kunnen, hetzij het ontijdig en op een verkeerd onderwerp openen van de Nederlandse verkiezingscampagne. Een Kamerdebat nu zal aan de ernstige situatie in het Midden-Oosten niets veranderen”, zegt Van Baalen.
DEN HAAG - De Tweede Kamer praat hoogstwaarschijnlijk donderdag met minister Ben Bot (Buitenlandse Zaken) over de situatie in het Midden-Oosten. Na GroenLinks en SP wil ook de PvdA dat de fractiewoordvoerders daarvoor van reces terugkeren.
Voorzitter Jozias van Aartsen van de Kamercommissie Buitenlandse Zaken moet nog een definitief besluit nemen. Voor het uitschrijven van een commissie-overleg is geen meerderheid nodig, de voorzitter besluit na consultatie. Uiterlijk woensdagochtend valt het definitieve besluit of er een debat komt.
De VVD is tegen een debat. De liberalen vinden dat de G8 en de Europese Unie een juiste positie hebben ingenomen en dat Nederland terecht die lijn steunt. VVD-Kamerlid Hans van Baalen vindt de wens van de linkse oppositie voor een debat „hetzij grenzeloze overschatting van het eigen kunnen, hetzij het ontijdig en op een verkeerd onderwerp openen van de Nederlandse verkiezingscampagne. Een Kamerdebat nu zal aan de ernstige situatie in het Midden-Oosten niets veranderen”, zegt Van Baalen.
If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions.
Laten we nou niet chavez nadoenquote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:29 schreef damian5700 het volgende:
Kamerdebat crisis Midden-Oosten waarschijnlijk woensdag
DEN HAAG - De Tweede Kamer praat hoogstwaarschijnlijk donderdag met minister Ben Bot (Buitenlandse Zaken) over de situatie in het Midden-Oosten. Na GroenLinks en SP wil ook de PvdA dat de fractiewoordvoerders daarvoor van reces terugkeren.
Voorzitter Jozias van Aartsen van de Kamercommissie Buitenlandse Zaken moet nog een definitief besluit nemen. Voor het uitschrijven van een commissie-overleg is geen meerderheid nodig, de voorzitter besluit na consultatie. Uiterlijk woensdagochtend valt het definitieve besluit of er een debat komt.
De VVD is tegen een debat. De liberalen vinden dat de G8 en de Europese Unie een juiste positie hebben ingenomen en dat Nederland terecht die lijn steunt. VVD-Kamerlid Hans van Baalen vindt de wens van de linkse oppositie voor een debat „hetzij grenzeloze overschatting van het eigen kunnen, hetzij het ontijdig en op een verkeerd onderwerp openen van de Nederlandse verkiezingscampagne. Een Kamerdebat nu zal aan de ernstige situatie in het Midden-Oosten niets veranderen”, zegt Van Baalen.
quote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:29 schreef damian5700 het volgende:
Kamerdebat crisis Midden-Oosten waarschijnlijk woensdag
Het horloge verhaal staat ook op Wiki + foto.quote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:27 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:
[..]
Er zijn destijds veel fotos in scene gezet, maar deze, afaik, niet, het bijzondere met deze foto was dat de soldaat die de vlag daar neer hangt om iedere pols een hele rits horloges heeft, MAW, hij heeft geplunderd.
Dit is weggeretouceerd
tevens staat erbij dat de foto naar alle waarschijnlijkheid pas 2 a 3 dagen daarna
genomen is.
quote:Also, this photo was most likely taken two to three days after the battle, not immediately after, as it might suggest. The smoke that can be seen in the background stems from manipulation done to the photo after it was taken. There were also other manipulation; the Sergeant who is seen helping to raise the flag originally had several "liberated" watches on his arm, but all but one of them were removed.
de foto is een dag na de verovering van Berlijn genomen. Verder weet ik alleen nog dat de fotograaf een Jood wasquote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:23 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:
[..]
Vertel, heb je daar een bron voor?
en vertrouw me nu maar, en anders zoek je hier http://www.google.nl ik ga in ieder geval naar bed.
This, however, is a passing nightmare; in time the earth will become again incapable of supporting life, and peace will return.
-- Bertrand Russell
Glasnosteraar=Godslasteraar
-- Bertrand Russell
Glasnosteraar=Godslasteraar
quote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:33 schreef Glasnosteraar het volgende:
[..]
ik ga in ieder geval naar bed.
nog even een ''good night story'' en dan ga ik slapen...
American good night story
Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?
A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction, son.
Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.
A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.
Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?
A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.
Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?
A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find something, probably right before the 2004 election.
Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?
A: To use them in a war, silly.
Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them?
A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.
Q: That doesn't make sense Daddy. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons to fight us back with?
A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.
Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons our government said they did.
A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.
Q: And what was that?
A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.
Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country?
A: Well!, f or one thing, he tortured his own people.
Q: Kind of like what they do in China?
A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S. corporations richer.
Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain, it's a good country, even if that country tortures people?
A: Right.
Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?
A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.
Q: Isn't that exactly what happens in China?
A: I told you, China is different.
Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq?
A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while China is Communist.
Q: Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?
A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.
Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad?
A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.
Q: Like in Iraq?
A: Exactly.
Q: And like in China, too?
A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand, is not.
Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?
A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists like us.
Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn't that help the Cubans become capitalist's?
A: Don't be a smart-ass.
Q: I didn't think I was being one.
A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba.
Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?
A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he's not really a legitimate leader anyway.
Q: What's a military coup?
A: That's when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States.
Q: Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?
A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our friend.
Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?
A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate .
Q: Didn't you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate leader?
A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us invade Afghanistan.
Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?
A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.
Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?
A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men. Fifteen of them Saudi Arabians hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings, killing over 3,000 Americans.
Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?
A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of the Taliban.
Q: Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people's heads and hands?!
A: Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people's heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.
Q: Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?
A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job fighting drugs.
Q: Fighting drugs?
A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium poppies.
Q: How did they do such a good job?
A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off.
Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's heads and hands off for other reasons?
A: Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people's hands for growing flowers, but it's cruel if they cut off people's hands for stealing bread.
Q: Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?
A: That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public, with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.
Q: Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?
A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.
Q: What's the difference?
A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and fingers.
Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.
A: Now, don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our friends.
Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from Saudi Arabia.
A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.
Q: Who trained them?
A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.
Q: Was he from Afghanistan?
A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad man.
Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.
A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s.
Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan talked about?
A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or thereabouts!, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call them Russians now.
Q: So the Soviets ? I mean, the Russians ? are now our friends?
A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our invasion of Iraq, so we're mad at them now. We're also mad at the French and the Germans because they didn't help us invade Iraq either.
Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?
A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.
Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn't do what we want them to do?
A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.
Q: But wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s! ?
A: Well, yeah. For a while.
Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?
A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our friend, temporarily.
Q: Why did that make him our friend?
A: Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.
Q: Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds?
A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the other way, to show him we were his friend.
Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our friend?
A: Most of the time, yes.
Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy?
A: Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American corporations can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.
Q: Why?
A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America. Also, since God is on America's side, anyone who opposes war is a godless un-American Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?
Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?
A: Yes.
Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?
A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what to do.
Q: So basically, what you're saying is that we attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in his head?
A. Yes! You finally understand how the real world works. Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.
Q: Good night, Daddy.
weltrusten
American good night story
Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?
A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction, son.
Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.
A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.
Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?
A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.
Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?
A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find something, probably right before the 2004 election.
Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?
A: To use them in a war, silly.
Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them?
A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.
Q: That doesn't make sense Daddy. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons to fight us back with?
A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.
Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons our government said they did.
A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.
Q: And what was that?
A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.
Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country?
A: Well!, f or one thing, he tortured his own people.
Q: Kind of like what they do in China?
A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S. corporations richer.
Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain, it's a good country, even if that country tortures people?
A: Right.
Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?
A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.
Q: Isn't that exactly what happens in China?
A: I told you, China is different.
Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq?
A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while China is Communist.
Q: Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?
A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.
Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad?
A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.
Q: Like in Iraq?
A: Exactly.
Q: And like in China, too?
A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand, is not.
Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?
A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists like us.
Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn't that help the Cubans become capitalist's?
A: Don't be a smart-ass.
Q: I didn't think I was being one.
A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba.
Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?
A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he's not really a legitimate leader anyway.
Q: What's a military coup?
A: That's when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States.
Q: Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?
A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our friend.
Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?
A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate .
Q: Didn't you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate leader?
A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us invade Afghanistan.
Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?
A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.
Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?
A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men. Fifteen of them Saudi Arabians hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings, killing over 3,000 Americans.
Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?
A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of the Taliban.
Q: Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people's heads and hands?!
A: Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people's heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.
Q: Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?
A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job fighting drugs.
Q: Fighting drugs?
A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium poppies.
Q: How did they do such a good job?
A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off.
Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's heads and hands off for other reasons?
A: Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people's hands for growing flowers, but it's cruel if they cut off people's hands for stealing bread.
Q: Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?
A: That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public, with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.
Q: Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?
A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.
Q: What's the difference?
A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and fingers.
Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.
A: Now, don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our friends.
Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from Saudi Arabia.
A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.
Q: Who trained them?
A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.
Q: Was he from Afghanistan?
A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad man.
Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.
A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s.
Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan talked about?
A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or thereabouts!, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call them Russians now.
Q: So the Soviets ? I mean, the Russians ? are now our friends?
A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our invasion of Iraq, so we're mad at them now. We're also mad at the French and the Germans because they didn't help us invade Iraq either.
Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?
A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.
Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn't do what we want them to do?
A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.
Q: But wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s! ?
A: Well, yeah. For a while.
Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?
A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our friend, temporarily.
Q: Why did that make him our friend?
A: Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.
Q: Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds?
A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the other way, to show him we were his friend.
Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our friend?
A: Most of the time, yes.
Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy?
A: Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American corporations can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.
Q: Why?
A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America. Also, since God is on America's side, anyone who opposes war is a godless un-American Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?
Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?
A: Yes.
Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?
A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what to do.
Q: So basically, what you're saying is that we attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in his head?
A. Yes! You finally understand how the real world works. Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.
Q: Good night, Daddy.
weltrusten
"Whatever the mind of man can conceive and believe, it can achieve" Napoleon Hill
het is wel zoquote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:23 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:
[..]
Vertel, heb je daar een bron voor?
02:28 Palestinian witnesses: IDF tanks move into central Gaza refugee camp (AP)
02:15 IAF warplanes attack targets near Beirut airport and south Lebanon (AP)
02:05 Foreign airlines could suspend operations if insurance premiums rise (Haaretz)
02:15 IAF warplanes attack targets near Beirut airport and south Lebanon (AP)
02:05 Foreign airlines could suspend operations if insurance premiums rise (Haaretz)
Ah, Bernard Bot en zijn collega's gaan in aktie komen, nu wordt het pas echt spannend
This, however, is a passing nightmare; in time the earth will become again incapable of supporting life, and peace will return.
-- Bertrand Russell
Glasnosteraar=Godslasteraar
-- Bertrand Russell
Glasnosteraar=Godslasteraar
zwaar geretoucheerd dus.quote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:32 schreef Incomplete het volgende:
[..]
Het horloge verhaal staat ook op Wiki + foto.
tevens staat erbij dat de foto naar alle waarschijnlijkheid pas 2 a 3 dagen daarna
genomen is.
[..]
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
waar is dit on topic?quote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:34 schreef venomsnake het volgende:
nog even een ''good night story'' en dan ga ik slapen...
hele hoop antiamerikaans gereutel
weltrusten
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Slaap ze. Tot morgenquote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:34 schreef venomsnake het volgende:
nog even een ''good night story'' en dan ga ik slapen...
Mensen willen dat soort zaken graag geloven.quote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:37 schreef Incomplete het volgende:
[..]
Je hoeft Russen niets over propaganda te leren.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
zoals de venezuelen graag willen geloven dat chavez een sterk leider is en de wereld kan veranderenquote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:39 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:
[..]
Mensen willen dat soort zaken graag geloven.
http://img291.imageshack.us/my.php?image=chavezry3.png
Vermoeiend sedert 1948.quote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:37 schreef Cart_man het volgende:
Vermoeiend al dat gedoe in het Midden-Oosten.
De Postcodeloterij helpt!........mensen de vernieling in.
Wat is het nut van het plaatsen van deze proza?quote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:34 schreef venomsnake het volgende:
nog even een ''good night story'' en dan ga ik slapen...
...
weltrusten
De overwinning van de Russen op de Duitsers in Berlijn heeft naar alle waarschijnlijkheid 's nachts plaatsgevonden en omdat de Russische bevolking na het terreur van de Duitsers weleens wat goed nieuws konden gebruiken is die scene opnieuw gespeeld.quote:Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 01:39 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:
[..]
Mensen willen dat soort zaken graag geloven.
Dat is weleens bij Discovery Civilizations geweest.
Ik geloof dat een foto met daarop kinderen die tekeningen op bommen maken ook een boodschap is van de desbetreffende journalist.
If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions.
Ja, het lijkt er op dat de buurlanden al sinds meer dan een halve eeuw niet willen accepteren dat Israël er is en ook nooit meer weggaat.quote:
