Fok! Movie Trivia - Juni 2006 XVIII

quote:

Op zondag 25 juni 2006 11:54 schreef Sokolsky het volgende:
Maar het probleem is dan dat als er een nieuw Slowchattopic komt ofzo wij dat niet kunnen wijzigen. Da's het voordeel van wiki.

quote:

While this is certainly not one of 's finest, it is admittedly a damn funny effort. As a warning, don't expect any real substance to this film. It's ridiculous and trivial, but there are laughs throughout. fills the gap for those who get a kick out of 70's porn plots, but get bored during the sex scenes. This being said, know that it can easily offend. Expect a movie that will get giggles out of a rape scene.

It is a valiant attempt to create a surreal sexual comedy. For most films, the lack of any depth to the characters will turn away even the most devoted viewer; but creates entertaining caricatures that bobble and bump into one another, with surprisingly charming results. It is difficult to say whether this is a good film or not, albeit it is shot beautifully, and leaves the viewer with many a chortle, but compared to the brilliance of his other films it seems a bit empty.

quote:

Op zondag 25 juni 2006 12:26 schreef cwk het volgende:
Boogie nights?

quote:

The parallel between the story of and "Alice in Wonderland" is very interesting, and maybe this film is the most precise adaptation of Caroll's crazy story, precisely because it really shows all the sexual content of Alice's dream trip. The movie construction reminds the "passage" of Alice "behind the mirror": she escapes the cruel world (the rapists) when she goes down to the "loonies house". character reminds of the Mad Hatter, because he keeps asking if she wants to have tea with him around five o'clock.
is very funny as a nervous "little guy" with a splendid mustache! At the same time he was shooting in Italy, Andy Warhol and Paul Morrissey shot "Flesh for Dracula" nearby, and that explains 's apparition with mustache in a scene of this film.

quote:

is one of those few movies to play on the obvious notion that 99% of all pornography is just plain silly - hence unwatchable to any viewer with even an elementary sense of the ridiculous. Its 'parody porn' screenplay reads like an LSD-fueled collaboration between Escher, Borges and Lewis Carroll.

quote:

A miserable sex "comedy." It's plot-less, endless, and painfully dated -- though it's hard to believe it was remotely funny even in 1972. "What?" is a pathetic soft-porn version of "Alice in Wonderland" that fails as both parody and comedy.

quote:

The main character is a young woman hitchhiking across Europe. After a violent encounter with what has to be the most inept rapists that Europe has ever produced, she escapes via cable-car. Suddenly, she is in a house that is filled with loonies.

This movie is strange. It treats as normal the oddest situations; however, it gets strangest when the situations are at their most normal: A piano duet, a middle-aged couple unpacking...

quote:

Op zondag 25 juni 2006 14:00 schreef cwk het volgende:
What? :p

Nieuwe vraag maar Ranja, je hebt teveel gezegd.

quote:

Op zondag 25 juni 2006 14:00 schreef cwk het volgende:
What? :p

Nieuwe vraag maar Ranja, je hebt teveel gezegd.

quote:

Op zondag 25 juni 2006 16:39 schreef Sokolsky het volgende:
Opgezocht en nog nooit van gehoord. _{Nouja, wel van gehoord, maar daar houdt het dan ook meteen mee op}