Bron: Sunday Timesquote:The Sphinx and the curious case of the Iron Lady's H-bomb
François Mitterrand took many secrets with him when he died 10 years ago, but now his most startling claim is revealed. John Follain reports
It is May 7, 1982, shortly after 3.30pm. Ali Magoudi, a Parisian psychoanalyst, paces back and forth awaiting the secret arrival of his next patient — whose identity, if revealed, would set off an earthquake in French politics.
The figure who enters, 45 minutes late, is François Mitterrand, no less — the president of France. Magoudi discovers that his patient does not want to talk about his childhood or his dreams, but about Margaret Thatcher and the crisis over the Argentine invasion of the Falkland Islands.
“Excuse me,” Mitterrand begins, apologising for his late arrival. “I had a difference of opinion to settle with the Iron Lady. What an impossible woman, that Thatcher! “With her four nuclear submarines on mission in the southern Atlantic, she threatens to launch the atomic weapon against Argentina — unless I supply her with the secret codes that render deaf and blind the missiles we have sold to the Argentinians. Margaret has given me very precise instructions on the telephone.”
The scene is the most striking in Magoudi’s book, Rendez-vous: The psychoanalysis of François Mitterrand, which is to be published in France on Friday. An account of their meetings, which spanned 11 years from 1982 to 1993, it is by far the most revealing of a flurry of books preceding the 10th anniversary of Mitterrand’s death on January 8, 1996.
The psychoanalyst has assured his publisher that all the quotes attributed to Mitterrand are genuine, although he cannot vouch for the truth of what the president said.
Magoudi never fathoms Mitterrand out enough to draw up a psychological profile. But in notes taken after their meetings, he writes of his patient’s near-mystical enjoyment of power, his paranoid tendencies, his “massive anxiety” and the way morbid images frequently crop up in his speech.
The French are still fascinated by the socialist leader who ruled France for 14 years, and who so cultivated an aura of mystery he was nicknamed “le Sphinx”. Although he claimed to have brought morality into French politics, his legacy has been clouded by corruption scandals. Last month, seven of his former associates were convicted of invasion of privacy for their role in a phone-tapping operation that he orchestrated on spurious national security grounds.
Imagine a Tony Blair, a George W Bush or a Vladimir Putin confiding to a psychoanalyst long-buried childhood memories; glimpses of his private life involving an estranged wife, a mistress and an illegitimate daughter; fears of illness and death; and the occasional state secret or state lie.
Magoudi says his book was ordered by Mitterrand himself, who knew he would not live to see it published. It is a bizarre, intimate and haunting testament. Above all, it throws a new light on the help Mitterrand gave to Thatcher — who, he famously said, “had the eyes of Caligula and the mouth of Marilyn Monroe”.
IT WAS in early May 1982, after a year in power, that Mitterrand contacted Magoudi to ask him to become his therapist. The psychoanalyst accepted with reluctance: he didn’t relish the prospect of the secret service searching his study in the Marais district or curious courtiers bugging his telephone.
The next day, on May 4, two French-manufactured Super Etendard planes of the Argentine airforce attacked HMS Sheffield, a destroyer in the British taskforce steaming to the Falkland islands.
A wave-skimming Exocet missile hit the Sheffield amidships, killing 20 crew and injuring 24. The destroyer was scuttled and British naval commanders swiftly concluded that this French-made weapon was so effective that the entire operation to throw the Argentine occupiers out of the islands was at risk.
Mitterrand had already pledged co-operation to Thatcher. Jacques Attali, his former aide, wrote that the president called her on the day after the invasion and told her: “I am with you.”
According to Attali, who acted as his interpreter, “she was stunned and did not expect it”. Mitterrand had come to her aid while her friend Ronald Reagan dithered.
Now Magoudi adds a nuclear twist to this apparently selfless entente. He writes that the death toll on the stricken Sheffield did not appear to impress Mitterrand unduly.
“In war, when there is one death, it is already a lot,” the president said as their therapy session got under way three days later. “But, after all, these soldiers were professionals. If they were serving on this destroyer, it’s because they were volunteers. When you do this kind of job, you don’t invoke the gods every time there is a small hitch.”
Mitterrand added: “I express myself freely in telling you this. I won’t say it in public, of course.”
In full flow, he told Magoudi that he had ordered the Exocet’s secrets to be handed over to the British at Thatcher’s insistence.
“She is furious,” he said. “She blames me personally for this new Trafalgar . . . I have been forced to yield. She has them now, the codes. If our customers find out that the French wreck the weapons they sell, it’s not going to reflect well on our exports.
“I ask you to keep that to yourself. I’ve been told that psychoanalysts don’t know how to keep mum in town! Is that true?” Magoudi did not reply. Instead he asked: “How do you react to such an intransigent woman?” Mitterrand replied: “What do you expect? You can’t win a struggle against the insular syndrome of an unbridled Englishwoman. To provoke a nuclear war for small islands inhabited by three sheep who are as hairy as they are frozen! Fortunately I yielded to her. Otherwise, I assure you, the metallic index finger of the lady would press the button.”
Magoudi wanted to know how his patient felt about being “symbolically emasculated”, as the psychoanalyst put it. “You mean that in the face of such aggressiveness you remain passive?” he asked.
“I will have the last word,” Mitterrand replied. “Her island, it’s me who will destroy it. Her island, I swear that soon it will no longer be one. I will take my revenge. I will tie England to Europe, despite its natural tendency for isolation. How? I will build a tunnel under the Channel. Yes. I will succeed where Napoleon III failed.”
Clearly delighted with his vision, Mitterrand had no doubt he would persuade Thatcher to accept the tunnel. “I will flatter her shopkeeper spirit. I will tell her that the welding to the Continent will not cost the crown one kopeck. She will not resist this resonant argument.”
What are we to make of this account? What we do know is that there were British nuclear weapons in the Falklands conflict zone. According to Sir Lawrence Freedman, professor of war studies at King’s College London, the British taskforce carried nuclear depth charges. But he said there was no intention to use them.
A number of ships that had been on exercises off Gibraltar had been ordered to steam south with nuclear depth charges on board rather than use up precious time unloading them.
“The government was desperate to get them away from the taskforce but the delays this would have caused at a time when they were trying to make the biggest diplomatic impact meant they decided they had better take them,” Freedman said. “They put them in the safest places possible. There was no intention to use them, but they certainly went.”
There have been no credible reports of Polaris nuclear-armed submarines in the area. But, two years after the war, the Labour party demanded an official inquiry into a report that Britain had sent a Polaris to Ascension Island, the staging post for the taskforce, to be on stand-by for a nuclear attack on the Argentine city of Cordoba if the war went badly.
Ja en ?quote:Op woensdag 23 november 2005 13:41 schreef Dagonet het volgende:
Bron: Sunday Times
Uhm, wtf?
Nee, echt, what the fuck?
De oorlog was al een nutteloos wedstrijdje verpissen maar kom op zeg...
Zeg het dan goed: in het boek wordt onthuld.quote:Op woensdag 23 november 2005 13:51 schreef thefunny het volgende:
TT: boek onthult.
Het boek onthult zelf niet.
Het boek IS onthuld.
Past niet.quote:Op woensdag 23 november 2005 13:54 schreef Lienekien het volgende:
[..]
Zeg het dan goed: in het boek wordt onthuld.![]()
Tja, wat heb je aan een dure snelle computer als je ook overweg kan met een goedkope tragere?quote:Op woensdag 23 november 2005 13:53 schreef longinus het volgende:
Wat heb je aan die dure wapens als je ze niet gebruikt, dan zoek je toch een reden om ze te gooien.
als het aan bush had gelegen was nu het hele middenoosten plat, gelukkig zijn er nog personen die hem stoppen.
Als de territoriale soevereiniteit in het geding is, is er veel geoorloofd en wordt er veel door de vingers gezien...quote:Op woensdag 23 november 2005 13:59 schreef RM-rf het volgende:
Maar het afvuren van nucleaire wapens, sterker nog, op een tegenstander die geen nucleair arsenaal heeft, is een zware zonde en engeland zou daardoor de risée zijn geworden ....
Volgens mij ook. Al jaren...quote:Op woensdag 23 november 2005 14:02 schreef Takkesteeg het volgende:
Volgens mij was dit al een 'tijdje' bekend...
Nee, het allerbelangrijkste verdrag omtrend Kernwapens, het non-proliferatie-verdrag uit 1968 bevat als een van de weinig zeer effectieve clausules een verbod om nucleaire wapens in te zetten tegen een tegenstander die hier niet over beschikt.., sterker nog, oorspronkelijk was een nuclaire direkte bedreiging hoogstnoodzakelijk, later uitgebreid ook na een bedreifging met biologische of chemische wapens... maar in het geval van de Falkland oorlog was dat geenszins iets dat speeldequote:Op woensdag 23 november 2005 17:39 schreef JimmyJames het volgende:
[..]
Als de territoriale soevereiniteit in het geding is, is er veel geoorloofd en wordt er veel door de vingers gezien...
Onderschat het belang van territoriale integriteit voor staten niet. Al is het maar om een onbenullig stuk land alles wijkt ervoor.quote:Op donderdag 24 november 2005 16:44 schreef RM-rf het volgende:
[..]
sowieso waren de falklands eigenlijk een nietszeggende stip op de kaart en het wekte al verwondering dat tatcher er zo enorm op terugveroveren hamerde (voornamelijk uit emotionele en publicitaire aspecten) ...
het zou mij niet verbazen als ze er zijn.quote:Op woensdag 23 november 2005 21:25 schreef Doderok het volgende:
De Britten zouden dus de codes gekregen hebben om de exocet raketten uit te schakelen?
Het was wel vreemd dat exocets tot in machinekamers belandden zonder te ontploffen. De officiële verklaring was altijd dat de Argentijnen een vergissing gemaakt hadden bij de instelling van de raketten (een schroef niet ver genoeg los gedraaid of iets dergelijks)
klopt en het was ook om te laten zien dat de UK hun mannetje nog kunnen staan als het moet.quote:Op donderdag 24 november 2005 17:00 schreef JimmyJames het volgende:
[..]
Onderschat het belang van territoriale integriteit voor staten niet. Al is het maar om een onbenullig stuk land alles wijkt ervoor.
dat zal heus wel ... maar internationale politiek is altijd een kwestie van zaken afwegen ... en ook tatcher, hoe keihard ze ook Blufpoker kon spelen, zal dat gedaan hebben en een grote waarde hechten aan de amerikanen .....quote:Op donderdag 24 november 2005 17:00 schreef JimmyJames het volgende:
[..]
Onderschat het belang van territoriale integriteit voor staten niet. Al is het maar om een onbenullig stuk land alles wijkt ervoor.
Reagan en Thatcher waren dikke vrienden, hebben de Amerikanen toentertijd werkelijk geopperd dat Argentinie de Falklands wel mocht houden?quote:Op donderdag 24 november 2005 17:13 schreef RM-rf het volgende:
[..]
dat zal heus wel ... maar internationale politiek is altijd een kwestie van zaken afwegen ... en ook tatcher, hoe keihard ze ook Blufpoker kon spelen, zal dat gedaan hebben en een grote waarde hechten aan de amerikanen .....
Ze zal verdomd goed geweten hebben dat ze, als ze een kernbom zou gooien in de 'achtertuin' van de VS, ze de amerikanen verdomd goed en zwaar tegen zich zou krijgen en dan niks te winnen had ... de VSstonden sowieso al zeer ambivalent tegen dat neo-koloniale gedrag mbt de Falklands en hadden al ingezet dat Argentinie die mocht behouden....
Ja, Reagan heeft er bij Thatcher direkt en sterk op aangedrongen de troepen terug te trekken en geen oorlog aan te gaan, maar de zaak over te dragen aan een onafhankelijk derde land, welke zou bemiddelen (wat hoogstwaarschijnlijk uiteindelijk overgave van de Falklans aan Argentinie had betekent, met hooguit een afkoopsom oid):quote:Op donderdag 24 november 2005 17:16 schreef JimmyJames het volgende:
[..]
Reagan en Thatcher waren dikke vrienden, hebben de Amerikanen toentertijd werkelijk geopperd dat Argentinie de Falklands wel mocht houden?
quote:Spy mission
With a range of over 20 miles, Exocets were seen as the main Argentine threat to the task force and every effort was made to take out the remaining missiles during the war.
The SAS were instructed to attack the Argentine air base where the Exocet-carying planes were kept - but the plan was abandoned at the 11th hour because it was deemed to be too dangerous.
The documentary also reveals a number of attempts by the Navy to prevent Argentina from procuring any more Exocet missiles during the war.
A mission by former Royal Marine, arms dealer and MI6 spy Anthony Divall was one of the schemes which succeeded in preventing more of the weapons reaching enemy hands.
|
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |