quote:The woman President Bush appointed this week as White House counsel, Harriet Miers, is hardly known in Washington but has a history in Texas of handling years of scandal at the state's lottery commission. The president, who once retained her as his personal lawyer, described her in 1996 as ''a pit bull in Size 6 shoes.''
Those attributes should help her in a new job that requires her to advise Mr. Bush not only on national security and military law -- a large part of the counsel's responsibilities since Sept. 11, 2001 -- but also on continuing legal investigations, including an inquiry into who in the administration leaked the name of a C.I.A. undercover officer.
''She's the kind of person you want in your corner when all the chips are being played,'' said one friend, Joseph M. Allbaugh, former director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. ''She will give the president advice unvarnished, and that's exactly what he wants.''
Ms. Miers, 59, currently serves as deputy chief of staff for policy and assistant to the president. She has rarely, if ever, talked to reporters since arriving in Washington in 2001, and she declined a request for an interview on Friday.
But her history, and comments from friends, suggest that she is the kind of woman, like Karen P. Hughes and Condoleezza Rice, whom Mr. Bush likes on his staff: tough, direct and intensely loyal. Her appointment reflects the president's determination to promote longtime members of his inner circle to critical positions for his second term.
''Harriet Miers is a trusted adviser on whom I have relied for straightforward advice,'' Mr. Bush said in a statement released this week. ''Harriet has the keen judgment and discerning intellect necessary to be an outstanding counsel.'' In 1995, Mr. Bush, then in his first months as governor of Texas, appointed Ms. Miers to a six-year term as chairwoman of the Texas Lottery Commission. Ms. Miers unexpectedly resigned after five years that were marked by controversy and the dismissal of two executive directors of the commission. The first executive director, Nora Linares, was fired in 1997 when it became public that her boyfriend had worked for the company that held the contract to operate the lottery. Ms. Linares's successor was dismissed after only five months when he began reviewing campaign contributions of state legislators without the commission's knowledge. Despite the problems, as well as the lottery's declining sales, The Dallas Morning News praised Ms. Miers when she resigned in 2000 for ''preserving the operations' integrity.'' Ms. Miers, who is unmarried, was born and raised in Dallas, one of five children whose father was in the real estate business. She graduated from Southern Methodist University and its law school, then went to work in Dallas for Locke Purnell Rain Harrell. In 1985 she became the first woman to be president of the Dallas Bar Association, and in 1992 the first woman to be president of the Texas State Bar. She became the president of Locke Purnell in 1996, the first woman to lead a major Texas law firm. In 1998, she presided over the merger of Locke Purnell with another big Texas firm, Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Hill & LaBoon, and became co-managing partner of the resulting megafirm, Locke Liddell & Sapp.
In 2001, Mr. Bush brought Ms. Miers to Washington with him as his staff secretary, a little known but powerful job in which she handled much of the paper flow to the president. Ms. Miers is a regular guest at Camp David and is often the only woman who accompanies Mr. Bush and male staff members in long brush-cutting and cedar-clearing sessions at the president's ranch.
Ms. Miers has an extremely low profile in Washington. She was better known in Texas, where Governor Bush introduced her when she received the Anti-Defamation League's Jurisprudence Award in 1996.
''When it comes to cross-examination,'' Mr. Bush said then, ''she can fillet better than Mrs. Paul.''
Kijk gewoon even op http://news.google.com. Vind je bronnen genoeg.quote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 14:05 schreef DrMarten het volgende:
Dit is wel redelijk bizar idd. Ik mag toch hopen dat er een regel is dat iemand een bepaalde periode rechter is geweest
Wat is je bron overigens?
Inderdaad:quote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 14:15 schreef Mork_Van_Ork het volgende:
Bush kijkt geloof ik nooit zo naar de kwaliteiten van personen. Het zal wel een politiek vriendinnetje zijn.
[..]
quote:Pete Shane, a law professor at The Ohio State University, predicted that "it's going to be a long drawn-out exercise."
Noting criticism of Bush's choice of Michael Brown to head the Federal Emergency Management Agency, a man who was later demoted and then resigned after a sluggish governmental response to Hurricane Katrina, Shane said of Bush: "He's going to pick his best friend in the White House counsel's office to be on the Supreme Court? It seems like a flat-footed thing to do."
quote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 14:31 schreef Finder_elf_towns het volgende:
CNN meldde dat er ook democraten zijn die haar benoeming steunen. Aan het waarheidsgehalte dat de vrouw een politiek maatje is kan dus ernstig getwijfeld worden. Democratische steun is overigens niet nodig voor haar benoeming.
Het Witte Huis kan zo veel beweren...quote:Both Democratic and Republican senators recommended Miers as a possible nominee, White House officials said.
Er is wel een verschil tussen rechten studeren of rechter wordenquote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 14:50 schreef NightH4wk het volgende:
John Jay, John Marshall, Salmon Chase, Clarence Darrow, etc. hebben ook nooit law gestudeerd, puur het feit dat iemand geen rechter is geweest boeit niet echt denk ik.
[..]
Ontken ik een verschil dan?quote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 15:09 schreef Doderok het volgende:
[..]
Er is wel een verschil tussen rechten studeren of rechter worden![]()
De meeste advocaten hebben wel degelijk enige opleiding genoten..
De tegenstanders zijn ook niet vrij van ernstige leugens.quote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 14:35 schreef Doderok het volgende:
[..]
[..]
Het Witte Huis kan zo veel beweren...
quote:
Niemand beweerde dat Miers geen 'law' gestudeerd had.quote:John Jay, John Marshall, Salmon Chase, Clarence Darrow, etc. hebben ook nooit law gestudeerd
Als de Democraten in de Senaat aan het filibusteren slaan, dan kon dat nog wel eens een probleem voor de benoeming opleveren. Niet dat ik dat verwacht, maar Democratische steun die groot genoeg is om een filibuster tegen te houden is toch echt welkom.quote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 14:31 schreef Finder_elf_towns het volgende:
CNN meldde dat er ook democraten zijn die haar benoeming steunen. Aan het waarheidsgehalte dat de vrouw een politiek maatje is kan dus ernstig getwijfeld worden. Democratische steun is overigens niet nodig voor haar benoeming.
In principe is John Roberts de opvolger van Sandra Day O'Connor en Miers de opvolgster van William Rehnquist. Roberts heeft daar dan het opperrechterschap van Rehnquist bij gekregen.quote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 13:46 schreef Doderok het volgende:
Bush heeft een kandidaat gekozen om Sandra Day O'Connor te vervangen bij het opperste gerechtshof in de VS.
[...]
Dat was de planning, maar Rehnquist stierf op het verkeerde momentquote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 16:16 schreef Potus het volgende:
[..]
In principe is John Roberts de opvolger van Sandra Day O'Connor en Miers de opvolgster van William Rehnquist. Roberts heeft daar dan het opperrechterschap van Rehnquist bij gekregen.
quote:Complicating matters for the term is the uncertain status of O'Connor, who had expected to be off the court by now so she would have more time to care for her ill husband. She announced her retirement July 1, but the chief justice's death delayed the plans.
Her retirement starts the day her successor is confirmed, which is expected to take at least two months, if not longer if the president's pick is contested.
Je hebt helemaal gelijk. Stomme Rehnquist.quote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 16:29 schreef Doderok het volgende:
[..]
Dat was de planning, maar Rehnquist stierf op het verkeerde moment![]()
Roberts kan niet de opvolger van O'Connor zijn aangezien ze momenteel beiden in het gerechtshof zetelen.
[..]
Ouwe pik(Dude, n00b, Leet, doetje, whatever) wordt er een keer een vrouw op een hoge positie gezet is het weer niet goedquote:Op maandag 3 oktober 2005 13:46 schreef Doderok het volgende:
Bush heeft een kandidaat gekozen om Sandra Day O'Connor te vervangen bij het opperste gerechtshof in de VS. Het gaat om Harriet Miers, adviseur van het Witte Huis en vertrouwelinge van George Bush.
Zij leidde de zoektocht van het Witte Huis naar nieuwe kandidaten voor het hooggerechtshof en is het nu blijkbaar zelf geworden.
Met vier 'progressieve' en vier 'conservatieve' rechters zou zij de beslissende stem kunnen hebben in zaken betreffende abortus, euthanasie, de doodstraf, vrije meningsuiting etc.
wanneer een nieuwe nominee bekend raakt duikt men gewoonlijk in zijn/haar verleden om te voorspellen hoe hij/zij in belangrijke zaken zou stemmen. Ditt is in Meirs geval moeilijker aangezien zij nooit rechter is geweest.
Ben ik de enige die dit bijzonder vreemd vindt? Voor zo'n positie zou je toch iemand met enige ervaring verwachten. Als senator heb je niet veel om je op te baseren als je voor of tegen haar moet stemmen...
[afbeelding]
Edit: oeps verkeerd posticon geklikt, en kan het blijkbaar niet aanpassen...
Bron: http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/10/100405miers.htmquote:Miers Opposed Repeal Of Anti-Gay Texas Sodomy Law
(Washington) A document signed by Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers when she was a candidate for Dallas City Council in 1989 surfaced Monday night and is raising concerns among LGBT civil rights advocates.
In it Miers says she believes that gay men and lesbians should have the same civil rights as non gay men and women but would oppose repeal of the Texas sodomy law. The law was later struck down by the US supreme Court (story) The sixth vote in the split ruling was by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the judge Bush has nominated Miers to succeed.
Miers statements were made in response to a series of questions posed to all candidates for council by the Lesbian/Gay Coalition of Dallas. The coalition is no longer in existence. A copy of the questionnaire was provided to 365Gay.com Monday night by the Human Rights Campaign.
On HIV/AIDS issues Miers was asked if she believes the city has a responsibility to fund AIDS education and patient support services. She answered yes. Asked if she would support raising the ceiling on the amount the city spends she also said yes, adding a caveat that it would depend on the available money in the city budget.
When asked if she would support a nondiscrimination ordinance to protect minorities including gays Miers hedged, replying that she believed it was an issue for the Texas legislature.
The form also asked if she sought the group's endorsement and checked off a box indicating no, although she agreed to attend a candidate screening session. The form was signed by Miers on March 28, 1989.
At the time Miers, like most Texans was a Democrat. In 1988 she was a contributor to Al Gore's first presidential campaign but later became a Republican and staunch Bush supporter.
Louise Young, a founding member of the Lesbian/Gay Coalition said she thought it odd that someone who was not seeking the group's endorsement would bother coming to a screening session.
"Usually, if you bothered to come, you wanted our endorsement," Young said Monday night. "She came to talk to us anyway. I thought that was very odd."
Although the document is 16 years old it does provide an indication of Miers' mindset on LGBT issues.
"The questionnaire raises a lot of questions," Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese told 365Gay.com. "It heightens the need for Senators to be thorough and comprehensive in their questioning. This provides a road map of questioning for Senators."
"Its a very troubling document," Michael Adams, director of Education and Public Affairs at Lambda Legal told 365Gay.com.
"The fact is that Lambda Legal spent years trying to get rid of the Texas law so to see a statement from Harriet Miers supporting the law is troubling even if the statement is 16 years old. This certainly raises some specific questions and is going to add to the importance of her confirmation hearings."
On Monday, shortly after Bush announced Miers' nomination Lambda, HRC and other LGBT civil rights groups called for a full investigation of her positions as White House Counsel on gay issues, (story) including what advice she gave to the President on the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment that would ban same-sex marriage.
The mixed signals contained in the old questionnaire are more insightful than anything presented during John Roberts' nomination process for Chief Justice. Miers has never sat on the bench and does not have a judicial paper trail, but, Roberts who has been a judge has never ruled in an LGBT rights case.
Although Roberts provided pro bono legal advice on behalf of a gay group he has stated that as a lawyer it was his duty to advocate for a client whether or not he agreed with the client's position.
The White House refused to provide documents on what advice Roberts gave as a White House aide to either the first or second president Bush. It is expected the administration will refuse a similar request for documents concerning Miers.
Miers is 60 and has never married. If confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate she would join Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as the second woman on the nation's highest court and the third to serve there. Miers was the first woman to serve as president of the Texas State Bar and the Dallas Bar.
As president of the Texas State Bar in 1993, she was a leader in an effort to persuade the American Bar Association - the nation's largest lawyers' group - to reconsider its pro-abortion-rights stance.
oftewel een bush zuigertjequote:Op dinsdag 4 oktober 2005 12:44 schreef Tarak het volgende:
[..]
Bron: http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/10/100405miers.htm
Tegenstander van het recht op abortus, qua visie op homorechten een beetje dubbel. Enerzijds voor gelijke rechten tussen homoseksuelen en heteroseksuelen anderszijds was ze niet tegen de "Texas sodomy law" die pas recent door Lawrence vs Texas neergesabeld werd door de Supreme Court (6-3). Met de vermelding dat de vragenlijst over gelijke rechten voor homoseksuelen al 16 jaar oud is, en mensen in zestien jaar van mening kunnen veranderen.
Dat doet geen recht aan haar staat van dienst.quote:
semi-romantisch... zou ze op haar zestigste nog steeds in het handjes vasthouden stadium zitten?quote:She hasn't said a lot, but you don't go to a church for 25 years if you're not comfortable with what they think," said Texas Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht of Austin, Texas, a church member who says he's shared a "semi-romantic" friendship with Miers for more than 30 years. "I'm sure she's consistent with the church's position."
Zo'n berichten doen me altijd denken aan Jim Jones of David Koreshquote:Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers is among a group of congregants of a Dallas evangelical church who recently broke away due to differences over church rules and worship styles.
The group of about 200, led by former Valley View Christian Church pastor Ron Key, formed their own church about a month ago and have been meeting on Sundays at a hotel in Dallas.
quote:Roberts, 50, was presiding over his first major oral argument and thrust himself in the middle of the debate. Over and over he raised concerns that states could undermine federal regulation of addictive drugs. He interrupted Oregon Senior Assistant Attorney General Robert Atkinson in his first minute, then asked more than a dozen more tough questions
"I was wondering if the new chief would hold back and wouldn't ruffle other people's feathers. It appears clear he's not waiting for anything or anyone," said Neil Siegel, a law professor at Duke University and a former Supreme Court clerk.
Kerkscheuringen zijn onder protestanten doodnormaal, en ze kunnen om de meest onbenullige redenen optreden. In de Nederlandse bible belt zijn er ook genoeg kerkgenootschappen die ergens in een achterafzaaltje samenkomen. Dan heeft er zich weer een groepje afgescheiden omdat de dominee naar hun mening een bijbelvers verkeerd interpreteerde.quote:Op woensdag 5 oktober 2005 22:56 schreef Doderok het volgende:
Zo'n berichten doen me altijd denken aan Jim Jones of David Koresh![]()
Miers Gets Criticisms Rare for Nominees to Courtquote:in just three weeks, her nomination has provoked a range of opposition that some scholars say may have no modern precedent.
"I would be very hard pressed to think of a good historical analogy," Richard Baker, the Senate historian, said. "I don't think there is one."
Though past nominees have faced swift opposition, what makes Ms. Miers's nomination extraordinary, historians say, is the combination of doubts about her philosophy from within the president's own party and attacks on her legal qualifications from both sides of the aisle.
Intussen zijn conservatieve groepen met een website tegen Miers gestart:quote:Last week, Mr. Specter joined Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, in criticizing Ms. Miers as failing to answer adequately a Senate questionnaire - a move Mr. Leahy later called "unprecedented." The two senators sent her a letter demanding that by Wednesday of this week she provide documents from her White House work as well as information about what her friends and colleagues have told conservatives on her behalf.
Two other Republicans on the committee, Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas and Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, are also supporting the request. "We need to have that full picture before we can vote," Mr. Brownback said on "Fox News Sunday." Being asked to provide this type of information "is almost a risk they assume when you nominate a candidate that's from inside the White House," he said.
www.withdrawmiers.orgquote:Conservative groups like the Third Branch Conference, Eagle Forum, and Center for Military Readiness are now organizing efforts to force Miers' withdrawal, including starting a Web site: http://www.withdrawmiers.org.
quote:White House senior staff are starting to ask outside people, saying, 'We're not discussing pulling out her nomination, but if we were to, do you have any advice as to how we should do it?' " a conservative Republican with ties to the White House told The Washington Times yesterday.
Lijkt me ook, mar er gebeurt daar zoveel dat men deze flater alweer vlug vergeten is, het is gelukkig goed afgelopen.quote:Op donderdag 27 oktober 2005 19:54 schreef Ulx het volgende:
En logisch, dit soort vriendjespolitiek kon zelfs volgens veel republikeinen niet door de beugel.
Wat een afgang voor Bush.
Bron?quote:Op donderdag 27 oktober 2005 16:22 schreef Doderok het volgende:
Ze heeft haar kandidatuur ingetrokken.
Bv CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2005/P(...)minations/index.htmlquote:
|
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |