GC General Chat
Hier kun je praten over van alles en nog wat. Eigenlijk alles wat niet in een van de andere rubrieken thuishoort.
Deze telt idd ook!quote:Op vrijdag 25 maart 2005 20:28 schreef coz het volgende:
telefoonketen activeren vond mijn conrector ook geen geslaagde 1-april grap
2 uur vrij vond ik wel een goeie grap
oh en dit is geen grap
[afbeelding]
Deze telt idd ook!en check je topic
Op maandag 9 november 2009 12:25 schreef Whiskey_Tango het volgende:
Dat interesseert GroenLinks voor geen meter, ze zien je als een wandelende zak euro's waar ze handig een tap in kunnen drukken voor hun socialistische hobbies.
Dat interesseert GroenLinks voor geen meter, ze zien je als een wandelende zak euro's waar ze handig een tap in kunnen drukken voor hun socialistische hobbies.
gespot ..plus 2 andere van je ...
maar mail toch maar voor de zekerheid
maar mail toch maar voor de zekerheid
Leesen verrry carefully, I weel zay zis only once
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
lijkt me nou typisch iets voor kasta
Leesen verrry carefully, I weel zay zis only once
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
Is gmail van googlequote:Op dinsdag 22 maart 2005 02:12 schreef Murray het volgende:
Dat 'G' mail van google is wel zo overduidelijk nep, vooral geen account nemen.
Er gaat een wereld voor me open
gmail = gratis email met 1000 mb (hotmail standaard = 2mb)
ze zijn nog 'beta' en in beta is aanmelden alleen via uitnodiging (invite)
ik heb nog 100 invites in de aanbieding
[1337.coz @ gmail metdaarachter .com]
(ondanks de spamprotectie toch just to be sure )
en niet te vergeten ..er staan er nog een paar duizend in
Gmail van Google [Deel 55]
ze zijn nog 'beta' en in beta is aanmelden alleen via uitnodiging (invite)
ik heb nog 100 invites in de aanbieding
[1337.coz @ gmail metdaarachter .com]
(ondanks de spamprotectie toch just to be sure )
)en niet te vergeten ..er staan er nog een paar duizend in
Gmail van Google [Deel 55]
Leesen verrry carefully, I weel zay zis only once
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
mijn ouders zijn op 1 april getrouwd.quote:Op dinsdag 22 maart 2005 08:50 schreef PM-girl het volgende:
Ken iemand die gaat trouwen op 1 april.....
Neem jij, tot je wettige echtgenoot....
Ja!!
(o, nee 1 april!)
voordeel is wel dat 't geen dag is die je snel vergeet, ofzo...
en dit is geen tvp, ofzo...
Bestiality sure is a fun thing to do. But I have to say this as a warning to you:
With almost all animals you can have a ball, but the hedgehog can never be buggered at all.
With almost all animals you can have a ball, but the hedgehog can never be buggered at all.
alvast gefeli dan
Leesen verrry carefully, I weel zay zis only once
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQpSGa8Z-VQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJ2UROhv-PI
MPS, iedere dag van de week een ander profiel,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiJft-VnxEg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJ2UROhv-PI
MPS, iedere dag van de week een ander profiel,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiJft-VnxEg
ik las het idd laatst en toen dacht ik al ... en iedereen zeker lopen vanuit de stadrand naar het centrum
Leesen verrry carefully, I weel zay zis only once
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
From: Security Experts, Liability Limited <throwaway@dione.ids.pl>
To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM
Subject: serious vulnerability present. all doomed. over.
Message-ID: <sell-e129e843fdfbe41cb63e766cd6b69a7f@sell.com>
.--------------------------------------------------.
| S.E.L.L. -- ADVISORY NUMBER 4F4E45 -- .L.L.E.S
| ------------------------------------------------
| 1 April , 2004
|
| We totally deny the allegations, and we're
| trying to identify the allegators.
|
`--------------------------------------------------
S.E.L.L disclosure timeline:
----------------------------
01/02/05: vulnerability identified and tested by S.E.L.L.
12/02/05: S.E.L.L. customers notified
25/03/05: oh, and I told my wife, she said it's silly
26/03/05: we got our tester out on bail
27/03/05: still don't get any respect from wife
28/03/05: vendors notified
01/04/05: public disclosure
Synopsis and impact:
--------------------
A distributed denial of service condition is present in the election system
in many polypartisan democratic countries. A group of determined but
unskilled and not equipped low-income individuals, usually between 0.05%
and 2% of overall population of the country, can cause serious disruptions
or even a complete downfall of the democratic system and its institutions,
and wreak havoc and destruction without using any force.
This is considerably less than the majority of voters required in more
conventional attacks, at least in this social group.
The attack is generally difficult to prevent once occurs, since it is not
possible to make immediate changes to election ordinances, especially once
the process have started. Changes are often required to be passed at least
one year before taking any effect. As such, patching the bug might take a
considerable amount of time, perhaps also sufficient for the country to
fall into chaos and oblivion, and for things of unspeakable horror to
happen to all people like you and me.
Our company supports and takes pride in responsible and accurate
vulnerability reporting.
Not vulnerable:
---------------
- United States (but to be evaluated)
- Monarchies and dictatorships (until overthrown)
- International waters (until claimed)
Attack details:
---------------
The attack relies on the fact that numerous election ordinances require
a certain number of voter signatures to be collected in order for a
candidate or a party to enter elections and be placed on a national
election list.
This approach is generally non-discriminatory, and it is impossible to
deny the right to be included on such a list for an otherwise eligible
individual who collected a given number of verifiable signatures. Most
countries do not implement a regulation that requires all votes on all
lists to be unique - so a single person can change his or her mind
and support two candidates. This is because of the difficulty of
cross-verification - most election procedures must still rely on manual
checking - and the possibility of malicious action of a hostile voter,
of course.
Depending on the election level - local, parliament or presidential -
a different number of signatures has to be collected. The number is usually
everywhere from 0.05% to 2% of the total population - typical figures are
1000-10000 (common for parliament), or 100000-1000000 (presidential) for
a medium to large country of 10-50 million citizens.
In our example, we use parliament elections where the minimum is set at
10000. In order for the attack to be successful, the attacker would have to
find that many co-conspirators - usually not impossible, since many voters
are dissatisfied with the system or life in general, or can be bribed
or tricked into signing a list. A careful attacker might choose a larger
number of co-conspirators to decrease the chances of the attack being
detected in routine signature validation phase. This could lead to all
conspirators being charged on the grounds of conspiracy to overthrow the
government - although charging all 10001+ conspirators might be an
effective DDoS on the judiciary and penitentiary system of a mid-size
country, so this measure might have very undesirable results anyway.
Every co-conspirator would have to make a small investment, buy a few
pens and several sheets of paper, and put their name on only a single page
of this stack. He would then have to bring his sheets to the central site.
Considering that one sheet of paper can hold approximately 300 names
(use three columns of 50 and both sides of a sheet), the number of
sheets required to collect all signatures would not exceed 33 per person.
This might be slightly unrealistic, but even buying 100-200 pages is a minor
expense.
We assume that a single person can take up to three hours of his everyday
life on a daily basis to sign other people's lists, and that three hours
are enough to place approximately 500 signatures. A single person can
travel once every five days to the conspiracy HQ.
Of all 10001 pages that are signed, each person gets a set of 2500, which
is 5 days worth of work, and also gets the stack of blank pages brought
along with the signed one. Five days later, all persons stop by the
central location, and pass their finished first pages, with signatures,
to the next person, who passed his pages to the next person, etc. The last
person passes to the first person, and, at this point, all people have
2500 new pages to put their names on.
This process continues. When a person gets a page that is full, he or
she reaches to his blank page stack and staples it to the document, then
puts his or her name on the list on this page.
Within approximately one month, all 10001 lists are full and cross-signed
by all candidates (except by the candidate himself, this is why we need
this one extra co-conspirator). With personal expenses of few bucks per
conspirator, and with just weeks of mildly time-consuming work, this
method can be hardly called time- or resource-consuming.
At this point, all conspirators can apply for being listed as a candidate,
and cannot be denied this right. The outcome, should elections proceed -
and there might be no grounds for cancellation - will be a logistic disaster.
Completely unexpected, gigantic printing and distribution costs for phone
book size ballots, utter confusion of many voters, troubles with storing and
counting ballots - all pages of this book-ballot would have to be reviewed
to make sure the vote is valid and only one candidate is checked...
The inability to proceed with elections due to lack of funds or resources
for printing and distribution, or the inability to count ballots for weeks
and months to come, might cause serious impact on the country and the
democratic system (might not apply to Florida).
Fix:
----
Vendor parliaments can prevent this attack by establishing a convenient
dictatorship or a monarchy, or becoming the 51th state. In the States,
candidates outside the bipartisan system are usually listed just as
a harmless prank, and would not be missed.
Fixes that implement cross-verification of signature uniqueness across
lists are susceptible to another DoS condition and are generally not
recommended.
Note: some countries impose serious penalties for a conspiracy to overthrow
the political system. THIS DOES NOT FIX THE VULNERABILITY.
Security-by-stringent-consequences model is considered to be broken by
design. Besides, there's another DDoS possibility if an attempt to jail all
conspirators is being made, per our discussion above.
Our recommendation is for all countries to implement the first solution
proposed. Note: subsequent implementators of the last option of the "state"
option might find the number 51 already taken; please increase the number
until a unused number is found. Be sure to avoid integer overflows - do not
use 'char' for computations.
About S.E.L.L.:
---------------
S.E.L.L. is a number one provider of deep-insight security strategies
for maximizing ROI with state-of-the-art TCO management customer-facing
security philosophy. As a successful company in a competitive market,
we strive to provide the complete solution for enhancing your B2B
experience.
Founded in a garage in Latvia, we soon become the realization of the
American Dream, growing to an extended family of 300. Then down to 15.
Our customers include many.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe now for our future alerts - it's free. Sort of. Don't blink.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM
Subject: serious vulnerability present. all doomed. over.
Message-ID: <sell-e129e843fdfbe41cb63e766cd6b69a7f@sell.com>
.--------------------------------------------------.
| S.E.L.L. -- ADVISORY NUMBER 4F4E45 -- .L.L.E.S
| ------------------------------------------------
| 1 April , 2004
|
| We totally deny the allegations, and we're
| trying to identify the allegators.
|
`--------------------------------------------------
S.E.L.L disclosure timeline:
----------------------------
01/02/05: vulnerability identified and tested by S.E.L.L.
12/02/05: S.E.L.L. customers notified
25/03/05: oh, and I told my wife, she said it's silly
26/03/05: we got our tester out on bail
27/03/05: still don't get any respect from wife
28/03/05: vendors notified
01/04/05: public disclosure
Synopsis and impact:
--------------------
A distributed denial of service condition is present in the election system
in many polypartisan democratic countries. A group of determined but
unskilled and not equipped low-income individuals, usually between 0.05%
and 2% of overall population of the country, can cause serious disruptions
or even a complete downfall of the democratic system and its institutions,
and wreak havoc and destruction without using any force.
This is considerably less than the majority of voters required in more
conventional attacks, at least in this social group.
The attack is generally difficult to prevent once occurs, since it is not
possible to make immediate changes to election ordinances, especially once
the process have started. Changes are often required to be passed at least
one year before taking any effect. As such, patching the bug might take a
considerable amount of time, perhaps also sufficient for the country to
fall into chaos and oblivion, and for things of unspeakable horror to
happen to all people like you and me.
Our company supports and takes pride in responsible and accurate
vulnerability reporting.
Not vulnerable:
---------------
- United States (but to be evaluated)
- Monarchies and dictatorships (until overthrown)
- International waters (until claimed)
Attack details:
---------------
The attack relies on the fact that numerous election ordinances require
a certain number of voter signatures to be collected in order for a
candidate or a party to enter elections and be placed on a national
election list.
This approach is generally non-discriminatory, and it is impossible to
deny the right to be included on such a list for an otherwise eligible
individual who collected a given number of verifiable signatures. Most
countries do not implement a regulation that requires all votes on all
lists to be unique - so a single person can change his or her mind
and support two candidates. This is because of the difficulty of
cross-verification - most election procedures must still rely on manual
checking - and the possibility of malicious action of a hostile voter,
of course.
Depending on the election level - local, parliament or presidential -
a different number of signatures has to be collected. The number is usually
everywhere from 0.05% to 2% of the total population - typical figures are
1000-10000 (common for parliament), or 100000-1000000 (presidential) for
a medium to large country of 10-50 million citizens.
In our example, we use parliament elections where the minimum is set at
10000. In order for the attack to be successful, the attacker would have to
find that many co-conspirators - usually not impossible, since many voters
are dissatisfied with the system or life in general, or can be bribed
or tricked into signing a list. A careful attacker might choose a larger
number of co-conspirators to decrease the chances of the attack being
detected in routine signature validation phase. This could lead to all
conspirators being charged on the grounds of conspiracy to overthrow the
government - although charging all 10001+ conspirators might be an
effective DDoS on the judiciary and penitentiary system of a mid-size
country, so this measure might have very undesirable results anyway.
Every co-conspirator would have to make a small investment, buy a few
pens and several sheets of paper, and put their name on only a single page
of this stack. He would then have to bring his sheets to the central site.
Considering that one sheet of paper can hold approximately 300 names
(use three columns of 50 and both sides of a sheet), the number of
sheets required to collect all signatures would not exceed 33 per person.
This might be slightly unrealistic, but even buying 100-200 pages is a minor
expense.
We assume that a single person can take up to three hours of his everyday
life on a daily basis to sign other people's lists, and that three hours
are enough to place approximately 500 signatures. A single person can
travel once every five days to the conspiracy HQ.
Of all 10001 pages that are signed, each person gets a set of 2500, which
is 5 days worth of work, and also gets the stack of blank pages brought
along with the signed one. Five days later, all persons stop by the
central location, and pass their finished first pages, with signatures,
to the next person, who passed his pages to the next person, etc. The last
person passes to the first person, and, at this point, all people have
2500 new pages to put their names on.
This process continues. When a person gets a page that is full, he or
she reaches to his blank page stack and staples it to the document, then
puts his or her name on the list on this page.
Within approximately one month, all 10001 lists are full and cross-signed
by all candidates (except by the candidate himself, this is why we need
this one extra co-conspirator). With personal expenses of few bucks per
conspirator, and with just weeks of mildly time-consuming work, this
method can be hardly called time- or resource-consuming.
At this point, all conspirators can apply for being listed as a candidate,
and cannot be denied this right. The outcome, should elections proceed -
and there might be no grounds for cancellation - will be a logistic disaster.
Completely unexpected, gigantic printing and distribution costs for phone
book size ballots, utter confusion of many voters, troubles with storing and
counting ballots - all pages of this book-ballot would have to be reviewed
to make sure the vote is valid and only one candidate is checked...
The inability to proceed with elections due to lack of funds or resources
for printing and distribution, or the inability to count ballots for weeks
and months to come, might cause serious impact on the country and the
democratic system (might not apply to Florida).
Fix:
----
Vendor parliaments can prevent this attack by establishing a convenient
dictatorship or a monarchy, or becoming the 51th state. In the States,
candidates outside the bipartisan system are usually listed just as
a harmless prank, and would not be missed.
Fixes that implement cross-verification of signature uniqueness across
lists are susceptible to another DoS condition and are generally not
recommended.
Note: some countries impose serious penalties for a conspiracy to overthrow
the political system. THIS DOES NOT FIX THE VULNERABILITY.
Security-by-stringent-consequences model is considered to be broken by
design. Besides, there's another DDoS possibility if an attempt to jail all
conspirators is being made, per our discussion above.
Our recommendation is for all countries to implement the first solution
proposed. Note: subsequent implementators of the last option of the "state"
option might find the number 51 already taken; please increase the number
until a unused number is found. Be sure to avoid integer overflows - do not
use 'char' for computations.
About S.E.L.L.:
---------------
S.E.L.L. is a number one provider of deep-insight security strategies
for maximizing ROI with state-of-the-art TCO management customer-facing
security philosophy. As a successful company in a competitive market,
we strive to provide the complete solution for enhancing your B2B
experience.
Founded in a garage in Latvia, we soon become the realization of the
American Dream, growing to an extended family of 300. Then down to 15.
Our customers include many.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe now for our future alerts - it's free. Sort of. Don't blink.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
◢◤
Ik kreeg gister van Nuon een brief, dat de ze de stroom gaan afsluiten op 1 april van 08.00 t/m 16.00 ofzo....
Geloven of niet ??
Geloven of niet ??
quote:Zwak signaal Huygens opvangen met mobieltjes
Uitgegeven: 30 maart 2005 18:28
Laatst gewijzigd: 30 maart 2005 18:33
AMSTERDAM - Sterrenkundigen gaan de hulp van Nederlanders en Belgen inschakelen om een extreem zwak radiosignaal op te vangen van de Europese ruimtesonde Huygens. Huygens staat sinds 14 januari op de Saturnus-maan Titan. Hoewel men dacht dat Huygens na zijn afdaling aan parachutes maar een paar minuten zou overleven zijn er aanwijzingen dat de ruimtesonde nog steeds actief is.
Astronomen over de hele wereld willen Huygens' radiosignaal dan ook zo snel mogelijk opvangen, omdat elke dag de laatste kan zijn dat de sonde nog energie heeft. Om het zwakke radiosignaal op te vangen roepen sterrenkundigen de hulp van de bevolking in. Met behulp van mobiele telefoons kan er gemeten worden, omdat mobiele telefoons gevoelig zijn voor radiosignalen.
Via straalzenders communiceren ze met telecommunicatiesatellieten. Omdat deze satellieten het signaal weer terugkaatsen naar het aardoppervlak, kunnen grondstations voor satellietcommunicatie maar óók radiosterrenwachten, die vaak nog grotere schotelantennes gebruiken, het opvangen. Door alle mobiele telefoons te laten samenwerken, kunnen Nederland en België een gigantische radiotelescoop vormen.
Als mensen tussen 12.30 en 13.00 uur de straat op gaan en hun mobieltje richten naar het oosten, werken die tienduizenden mobieltjes samen als één grote radiospiegel. Het zwakke Huygenssignaal kaatst dan via de ruimte terug naar het oosten van ons land, waar het terecht komt bij de Drentse syntheseradiotelescoop. De verhoogde opbrengst zorgt ervoor dat deze telescopen het Huygens-signaal luid en duidelijk ontvangen. Hopelijk kunnen sterrenkundigen er door deze versterking achter komen wat Huygens de laatste maanden is overkomen.
okee poepoog had hem al gezien
Ik wou hem net posten Dit is natuurlijk een 100% 1 april grap
Ik wou hem net posten Dit is natuurlijk een 100% 1 april grap
Dit is natuurlijk een 100% 1 april grap
Salivili hipput tupput tapput äppyt tipput hilijalleen
echt niet ...dit is echt hoorquote:Op woensdag 30 maart 2005 20:11 schreef Dr_Flash het volgende:
okee poepoog had hem al gezien
Ik wou hem net posten Dit is natuurlijk een 100% 1 april grap
quote:Huygens staat sinds 14 januari op de Saturnus-maan Titan. Hoewel men dacht dat Huygens na zijn afdaling aan parachutes maar een paar minuten zou overleven zijn er aanwijzingen dat de ruimtesonde nog steeds actief is.
[snip]
Als mensen tussen 12.30 en 13.00 uur de straat op gaan en hun mobieltje richten naar het oosten, werken die tienduizenden mobieltjes samen als één grote radiospiegel. Het zwakke Huygenssignaal kaatst dan via de ruimte terug naar het oosten van ons land, waar het terecht komt bij de Drentse syntheseradiotelescoop
Leesen verrry carefully, I weel zay zis only once
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
Ill quit thinking w my dick when u quit fucking with my head
Dat is echt wel een 1 april grap.
TMF schijnt ook een grap uit te halen onder hun ID members.
TMF schijnt ook een grap uit te halen onder hun ID members.
Tja... je ziet maar wat je er mee doetquote:>> 100 TMF AWARDS kaarten verstopt in Nederland!
100 kaarten voor de AWARDS verstopt ergens in Nederland!
Omdat op 1 april de 10e AWARDS plaats vinden heeft besloten om 100 kaarten voor de AWARDS weg te geven.
Op 4 verschillende plaatsen in Nederland ligt op dit moment een envelop met daar in 25 toegangskaarten voor de AWARDS op 1 april.
Iedereen maakt dus kans om met al zijn vrienden alsnog naar de uitverkochte AWARDS te gaan.
Het enige wat men hier voor moet doen is de envelop als eerste vinden doormiddel van tips die via bekend worden gemaakt.
De eerste tip zal donderdag 31 maart rond 15:00 op www.tmf.nl staan.
De laatste tip, de juiste locatie, zal tijdens A-day door een bekende Nederlander bekend worden gemaakt.
A-Day komt live vanuit Ahoy' tussen 15:00 en 19:00
Tip 1: Donderdag 31 maart om 15:00 op.nl
Tip 2: Vrijdag 1 april om 07:00 op tmf.nl
Tip 3: Vrijdag 1 april om 15:00 aan het begin van de live show A-Day uit Ahoy'
Tip 4: Vrijdag 1 april om 16:00 zal de precieze locatie bekend worden gemaakt als de enveloppen nog niet gevonden zijn.
je ziet maar wat je er mee doet
Ik zag vanochtend in de Metro of Spits, geen idee meer welke het was, een artikel staan wat vermoedelijk een 1 april grap is. Er stond ongeveer het volgende in:
Ik hoop iig dat dit een 1 april grap is.quote:Binnenkort is het mogelijk om via een website mensen te traceren dmv mobiele telefoon. Dit kan tot op 30 meter nauwkeurig. Daarachter nog wat gebagger over At&T enzo en dat ze het daar ok hadden.
..cuz if you go platinum, it's got nothing to do with luck
it just means that a million people are stupid as fuck
it just means that a million people are stupid as fuck
Dat zou zelfs nog als een vroege en grove 1 aprilgrap bedoeld kunnen zijn. Een wekker is immers heel erg stereotiep.quote:Op woensdag 30 maart 2005 23:43 schreef HPoi het volgende:
Die kookwekker was iets te vroeg..
Vampire Romance O+
het bericht over de huygens satelliet en de mobieltjes staat nog steeds op nu.nl, maar ook op kennisnet...
You don't have to know why you do something to stop doing it. All you have to do is to take a close look at what you are actually doing and decide to stop doing it for that moment!"
Het ebricht is weer terug... wel bewerkt zo te zien.quote:Op donderdag 31 maart 2005 07:52 schreef teigan het volgende:
het bericht over de huygens satelliet en de mobieltjes staat nog steeds op nu.nl, maar ook op kennisnet...
Nouja... veel plezier met wijzen naar de hemel
wel grappig, berichten die ik eerst maar vaag en apart vond worden nu genoemd als 1 april grap
nu nog ff wachten op het verhaaltje van cda/vvd/d66 dat het paasakkoord uiteraard een grap was
nu nog ff wachten op het verhaaltje van cda/vvd/d66 dat het paasakkoord uiteraard een grap was
http://www.nu.nl/news/504(...)_met_mobieltjes.html
De straat op dus vrijdag met je mobieltje in de hand
De straat op dus vrijdag met je mobieltje in de hand
Ik heb lekker geen plaatje.
die hadden we alquote:Op donderdag 31 maart 2005 12:23 schreef ShilkA het volgende:
http://www.nu.nl/news/504(...)_met_mobieltjes.html
De straat op dus vrijdag met je mobieltje in de hand
Zou dat gedoe met de publieke omroep ook geen 1 april grap zijn? Geen amusement meer op de publieke buis... zou op zich wel een 1 april grap kunnen zijn.
Alleen is het totaal niet grappigquote:Op donderdag 31 maart 2005 13:10 schreef Rizzz het volgende:
Zou dat gedoe met de publieke omroep ook geen 1 april grap zijn? Geen amusement meer op de publieke buis... zou op zich wel een 1 april grap kunnen zijn.
Ja je zal ze er vast wel bij hebbenquote:Op donderdag 31 maart 2005 12:23 schreef ShilkA het volgende:
http://www.nu.nl/news/504(...)_met_mobieltjes.html
De straat op dus vrijdag met je mobieltje in de hand
But maybe I'm crazy?
Maybe you're crazy?
Maybe we're crazy?
Probably!
Maybe you're crazy?
Maybe we're crazy?
Probably!
weet ik niet,jij wel??quote:
Geeft de leugen je geen vleugels
Raakt de waarheid in de war
Dan zijn de keizers slechts helpers en huilt de oude nar.
(Hans teeuwen)
Raakt de waarheid in de war
Dan zijn de keizers slechts helpers en huilt de oude nar.
(Hans teeuwen)
http://www.hideandseek2005.com/
Gisteren ook bij Vara live.
Maar ik geloof er eerlijk gezegt geen zak van, vooral dat plaatje van Rome lijkt wel erg gesoept.
Gisteren ook bij Vara live.
Maar ik geloof er eerlijk gezegt geen zak van, vooral dat plaatje van Rome lijkt wel erg gesoept.
Misschien plaatste ik hem daarom ook hierquote:Op woensdag 30 maart 2005 22:44 schreef Dichterbijer het volgende:
[..]
Het bericht is alweer van nu.nl verdwenen. Dus een 1 april grap
Nee, als de Russen in je tuin staan heb je gewonnen. Dat is ook altijd zo bij RISK.quote:Op dinsdag 22 maart 2005 01:39 schreef PaLPiTaTioN het volgende:
[..]
. En dan een bericht dat je nauwelijks kon geloven in die tijd.
Trap er verder vooral niet in, ook dit jaar wordt NIET het jaar van Dinand Woesthoff.
|
|
