[POLL] Was 9/11 een Inside Job?

Ik heb ergens gelezen dat de objecten die te zien waren onderdeel waren van een hologram technologie die bij de aanslagen gebruikt zouden zijn. Ik heb al veel gelezen over hologram technologie bij 911 en er zijn toch wel enkele punten die daarop duiden kunnen dat het misschien toch niet zo onwaarschijnlijk is als de meeste zouden denken.

INFORMATION WARFARE
AND HOLO-TECHNOLOGY

On 31 March 1997, the magazine Defense Weekly ran a feature entitled, "Air Force Organises For Offensive Info War". According to the article, the U.S. Air Force has created the position of Deputy Director for Information Operations.

An Offensive Information Warfare division will be created under the new deputy director. The division has an organisational code - AF/XOIOW - and is to be headed by Lt. Col. Jimmy Miyamoto.

Offensive information warfare is among the least discussed aspect of the Air Force's move to organise, train and equip the service for information dominance.

The new information operations office will co-ordinate with the Pentagon's Joint Chiefs of Staff, National Security Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, National Reconnaissance Office, Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency.

Information dominance covers the two following known areas:


The USAF Office of Scientific Research is working on developing a small affordable laser and high-powered microwave for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) - such as the ones probably being tested at the Groom Lake/Area 51 installation in Nevada and other sensitive locations.
The UAVs will undertake a wide variety of missions, including disabling enemy communications and computer systems through software viruses beamed into enemy weapons and information links. These virsues remain dormant until activated by satellite, aircraft radar, or jamming equipment. When activated, the virus can render equipment useless, or better still, introduce a "very subtle change for a finite period of time".


Holographic projection. The Defense Weekly article describes a quasi-information warfare/psychological operations program that was first discussed by the Air Force after Operation Desert Storm in the Gulf War.
This involves projection of a three-dimensional holographic image to act as a decoy. The Pentagon spoke openly about its use of holographic projections during discussions of its non-lethal weapons program back in 1994. Since then, the program disappeared, most likely becoming a black project.

The article concluded by stating that the U.S. Army's JFK Special Warfare Center and School disclosed back in 1991 that it was looking to develop a 'PSYOPS Hologram System' with the capability to "project persuasive messages and three-dimensional pictures of cloud, smoke, rain droplets, buildings, flying saucers and religious figures.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/holotech.html

Hier wat meer info over de hologram technologie.
Sorry voor de lap tekst, maar het is een interressante alternatieve theorie.


Proof that holography can be filemd and fotographed ( watch Bill Clinton wave his hand though a holograph. and therea are about 5 examples to view examples of comercial holography filmed live.

video section link

http://www.zebraimaging.com/clients/ford/menu.ford.htm

main site : http://www.zebraimaging.com

b). analysing the 911 "aircraft" ghosts
(http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane/index.htm


c) discussing the blue ribbon project ( sorta out there... but there)
http://www.aoreport.com/news6.htm


Project Blue Beam - God in the clouds
http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/religion/bluebeam.htm

5.6 Airborne Holographic Projector
Het bestaat echt!
http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/volume4/chap03/b5_6.htm


-11 Mystery Unravelled
Stefan Grossmann On Cloakanddagger Radio Show
http://www.gallerize.com/Gallerize.News.htm

How Military Hightech Was Used On 9-11-2001

The author of this website, Dr. Stefan Grossmann, was on Lenny
Bloom\'s Cloakanddagger Radio Show last night (www.cloakanddagger.ca).
For one hour, he informed listeners in Canada and the northern U.S.A.
how military hightech was used on 9-11-2001 in order to simulate
realistic-looking holographic projections of airplanes into the World
Trade Center. While he was looking at engineering graphics of the
event on his computer screen, he verbally informed the listeners:

Watch this CNN video of the second impact
http://www.gallerize.com/Gallerize.News-Dateien/ABC.News.1.wmv
(WTC south tower) in slow motion – the ENTIRE plane including the
wing tips etc. \"glide\" unobstructed (despite steel walls!) into the
building – they do not interact with the solid steel frame that
surrounds the building – no jolt, no wobble – the explosion is
delayed after the impact despite the fact that the wing tanks of the
alleged Boeing 767-200 are full of explosive kerosene and \"fly
through\" that what is functionally a solid steel wall. (A note aside:
a single brick falling on a wing let the space shuttle crash!)

Premise a: The hole in the WTC south tower is considerably smaller
than the alleged Boeing 767-200.

Premise b: The CNN video (and other videos by ABC, Spiegel TV etc.)
show that the ENTIRE plane \"glided\" into the building.

Conclusion: Before the eyes of millions of people, the outer wings
(at least a total of 30 feet), the tail rudder and the tail winglets
of the alleged \"airplane\" flew through the steel perimeter wall of
the WTC2 tower WITHOUT LEAVING A HOLE! Physics mandates us to
believe: the alleged \"airplane\" was no solid object. It was a
hologram! The Pentagon has \"airborne holographic projector\"
technology mounted on a cruise missile,
http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/volume4/chap03/b5_6.htm (details were
declared a military secret in 1994, more about this in my writings).
The hole lets in a cruise missile which was flying inside a much
bigger hologram, disguising it as a \"hijacked passenger plane\".

Further, the video shows us the \"lightning beep\" flashing up just
before the plane\'s nose glides into the wall of steel perimeter
columns. This is a scalar weapon (see Col. Thomas E. Bearden at
http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm and elsewhere on
his huge web site) like it was used in Bagdhad 2003 out of a U.S.
tank to melt cars and buses (see report at
http://www.rense.com/general40/secret.htm ). This \"scalar weapon\" is
an advanced laser-analogous weapon that can melt steel in an instant.
It created the \"hole\" to let a disguised cruise missile in the
building. The hole was not created by a solid object. (The real
hijacked planes were exchanged against the flying objects long before
coming close to the buildings, see
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/plissken.htm and
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/operation_pearl.htm.

The laser-analogous scalar flash can also be seen on the (uncensored
version of the) amateur video (Naudet video) of the first crash
(north tower), http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa11.htm (explaining the
flash as the firing of a missile, which it was not – it was a scalar
flash with about the same effect).

The \"flying objects\" that \"hit\" WTC tower 1 and the Pentagon were
also such holographically disguised cruise missiles. At the Pentagon,
Corporal Jason Ingersoll of the Marine Corps photo lab actually
photographed the initial impact hole before the wall sagged and fell –
again, the hole is only 15-20 feet big, much too small for a Boeing
757-200 to pass through, but big enough for a cruise missile – was
the cigar-shaped object draped in a blue foil that a team of soldiers
carried away from the Pentagon crash site on their shoulders the
smoking gun/cruise missile?

The actual barrel-shaped projector pod of the military\'s \"airborne
holographic projector\" was found to be shown in the video footage,
http://www.rense.com/Datapages/wtcobj.htm.

The whole thing is: use of military hightech in order to trick the
people into seeing \"hijacked airplanes\" – subsequently, the buildings
fell due to explosives in controlled demolitions, as seen by firemen,
recorded on video and documented by U.S. government seismic
measurement stations.


Update On 9-11 Hologram Theory:

The author of this website, Dr. Stefan Grossmann, was on Lenny Bloom’s Cloakanddagger Radio Show last night (www.cloakanddagger.ca). In his second radio appearance, Grossmann followed up on his theory that on 9-11-2001, the World Trade Center was not hit by hijacked planes but was penetrated by military hightech holograms. Holograms are movie-like projections that look 98% real. The U.S. military developed hologram technology since the 1970s for PsyOps/military deception. Prominent in the newly found evidence is a photo by Carmen Taylor (AP) that shows us the hidden clues why the so-called “hijacked plane” was not real:


Check deze PDF over het gebruik van Holographic technology bij 911
www.gallerize.com/media/0. %20Frequently%20Asked%20Questions.pdf


12. Hologram Missiles:

I keep getting asked: „What is a hologram missile?”
Hologram missiles were used in the cold war to shoot down airplanes.

In his book „Gravitobiology” (1991), the retired Pentagon weapons analyst Col. Thomas E. Bearden gives a graphic account of an example of a hologram missile (downing of the Arrow DC 8 with 248 U.S. soldiers on board and 8 civilian crew members at Gander, Newfoundland, December 12, 1985; see online excerpts from the book at Bearden’s web site, www.cheniere.org):


„Once the weapon was focused, Soviets fired an electromagnetic missile directly at the aircraft, using distance-independent holography, employing the internal Whittaker EM wave structures of the scalar potential beams. The interfering sky beams flared as an electromagnetic missile formed and shot to the aircraft. (The EM missile strike was seen by the witness as just a ball or beam of light that streaked from the glowing beams in the clouds, down to the aircraft.) The EM missile struck the aircraft in the right side of its fuselage ahead of the engines and blasted a hole right through the fuselage. This anomalous hole was noted. It was tested and found to have no chemical residues, proving that it was not due to a chemical explosion or a terrorist bomb. However, it was due to the strike of the EM missile!

The fierce ball of EM energy penetrated the fuselage and struck the aircraft’s interior plastics, explosively igniting them instantly - all just at liftoff. Multiple independent witnesses saw the aircraft glowing with an orange light, from the fierce firelight shining out the windows and the radiant energy of the locked-on interferometry beams. Interestingly, the witness that saw the beams form in the sky, and the beam shoot down and strike the aircraft, was not allowed to present her testimony to the official board of investigation.“

This technology is a spin-off of Nazi radar science from alleged Gray Alien sources. Today it has been refined to look extremely life-like, colorful, life-size, moving (secret U.S. government program „Ghost Gun”, reportedly in cooperation with the Walt Disney Corp. since their input to the Apollo moon landing hoax that cost the U.S. taxpayer $30 billion). I find in my book that such holographic camouflage was used around a real (hard, physical) cruise missile because a pure hologram such as in the example mentioned above would have emitted far too much light to look realistic.


If one compares the mainstream media’s videos (such as the Evan Fairbanks video, the diverse CNN videos etc.) then one finds that the right wing of the plane lit up bright white shortly before entry (possibly due to the fact that the flying object partly rolled-over to the left) but that upon entry into the shadow wedge the light did not stop shining:

This supports the theory that the flying object was no real Boeing but was a military missile camouflaged to look like a Boeing, the camouflage consisting of a holographic cover made of light.

Before entry time, the flying object was unable to reflect the bright morning sunlight; and this lack of glistening reflection is equally telling since hologram camouflage is non-reflective and in this respect optically different than metal (note that the plane in the following stills was flying in the bright morning sunlight where planes normally glisten and shine) :

http://thewebfairy.com/whatzit/plane/

[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door Aurora025 op 01-09-2004 15:46:43 ]

quote:

Op woensdag 1 september 2004 02:01 schreef BaajGuardian het volgende:
omfg Aurora..............................................

*speechless*

waar.....heb je dat gevonden!??

Het meeste had ik nog op mijn pc staan, had het een hele tijd terug al eens opgezocht.
Veel schrijven deze theorie af, maar ik heb het gevoel dat deze technologie wel eens een grote rol gespeeld zou kunnen hebben bij 911

Ik heb trouwens ook al vaker bericht over deze technologie op fok.
WTC ingestort dmv THEL Tactical High-Energy Laser

"The answer here is that we were looking at a hologram.
The black-ops government has had the technology to create 3D holograms for at least 20 years.
hologram technology is far above what they want us to believe."

Yet just today I received another e-mail talking about the advanced holography of the military that could disguise a missile as a jetliner. But that will be tomorrow’s story.
http://www.rense.com/general52/shad.htm


Check deze site, interessant!
http://photoshop911.batcave.net/

m02.jpg, JPG image, 582x472
This is absolute undeniable proof that the plane hitting the WTC was a hologram. In the frame on the right side, you see an explosion. But where is the plane? Planes just don't disappear. And why wasn't there an explosion in the image on the left? The plane is there. Explosions don't simply disappear.
These images don't match, and my fists are clenched with seething rage over the Government destroying a building using a hologram, which has no mass or weight and occupies no physical space.


Als je kijkt wat er aan de andere kant weer uitkomt ga je toch twijfelen of het een boeing was, niet?


Ik weet wat er in het wtc gevlogen is. Het was deze missile maar dan met een holografisch schild



http://www.themedianews.c(...)n_of_all_mankind.htm
http://www.defense-update.com/directory/THEL.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/782696.stm
http://www.jinsa.org/arti(...)story/3,646,152,1511

[ Bericht 2% gewijzigd door Aurora025 op 01-09-2004 03:11:35 ]

quote:

Op woensdag 1 september 2004 02:17 schreef BaajGuardian het volgende:
Aurora , ik heb er een Pagina voor gemaakt op mijn site.
http://www.chatarea.com/CARPATHUM.m2520179

ik had daar nooit aan gedacht , maar nu ik het lees....
het kan inderdaad , en ... ik denk dat er iets in zit.
dus heb ik het op mijn site gezet.

Thanx Niet lang na 911 had ik deze theorie al in mijn hoofd. Toen ik namelijk weken bezig was de beelden te analyseren op mijn pc kwam ik tot de conclusie dat er hier iets raars aan de hand was met die vliegtuigen. Vooral wat er aan de andere kant weer uitkwam, dat kon geen boeing zijn. Als je dat in slowmotion bekijkt ziet je dat het gedeelte wat er uitschiet explodeert als een bom. Je ziet dan ook een witte explosie, en dat krijg je niet door exploderent kerosine.
Als je je dan bedenkt dat een missile er uit kwam hoef je niet lang na te denken dat het vliegtuig dat erin vloog een hologram oig iets dergelijks moest zijn.


Kijk goed naar de exploderende neus. Ook al was het een Boeing dat zou de neus niet op deze manier exploderen.
Je kunt me veel wijs maken, maar dit niet de neus van een Boeing.

[ Bericht 2% gewijzigd door Aurora025 op 01-09-2004 03:23:36 ]