BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
iemand die dit kan fact checken?
God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;
vaticanclan van nep-jodenquote:
Zou het?quote:
Toevallig heeft het wef logo een omlijning van een hemellichaam.
[ Bericht 6% gewijzigd door Alarmonoff op 12-09-2022 19:00:35 ]
God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;
?quote:Op maandag 12 september 2022 18:51 schreef Alarmonoff het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]
iemand die dit kan fact checken?
En Allah weet het het beste
God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;
quote:
[ afbeelding ]
iemand die dit kan fact checken?
THE GREAT AWAKENING ! CHANGING OF THE GUARD GLOBALLY . MSM IS FAKE NEWS
https://eu.rrstar.com/sto(...)-public/67438927007/quote:
[ afbeelding ]
iemand die dit kan fact checken?
Het lijkt er wel op ja
"While there are numerous issues with the new law, perhaps most problematic is that it only allows for even the possibility of pretrial detention for a small subset of crimes and under very limited circumstances — regardless of a defendant’s risk to re-offend or their known danger to the community."
"Under the new law, entire categories of crime, such as aggravated batteries, robberies, burglaries, hate crimes, aggravated DUIs, vehicular homicide, drug induced homicides, all drug offenses, including delivery of fentanyl and trafficking cases, are not eligible for detention no matter the severity of the crime or the defendant’s risk to a specific person or the community, unless the People prove by clear and convincing evidence the person has a “high likelihood of willful flight to avoid prosecution.”
Additionally, in cases involving non-probationable forcible felonies, such as murder and armed robbery, judges may only detain a defendant under the new law if the prosecution proves by clear and convincing evidence the defendant “poses a real and present threat to the safety of a specific, identifiable person or persons.”
Imagine the defendant who murdered his wife, to whom he no longer poses a threat, being released because of this ridiculously limited legal standard. Even more absurd, judges may no longer issue a warrant when a defendant fails to come to court. Instead, an absent defendant must next be served with a court order asking them again to appear and then fail to appear a second time before a warrant may be issued."
Ik zie toevallig 3 zessenquote:
Toevallig heeft het wef logo een omlijning van een hemellichaam.
[ afbeelding ]
Wat betekent dat?quote:
God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;
