Covid-vaccin data gehackt en gelekt online

Cyber Attackers Leaked Covid-19 Vaccine Data After EU Hack

Hackers posted confidential documents regarding Covid-19 medicines and vaccines on the internet after a data breach late last year at the European Medicines Agency.

Timelines related to evaluating and approving Covid medicines and vaccines haven’t been affected, the EMA said in a statement on Tuesday. The agency said it remains fully functional and that law enforcement authorities are taking action on the breach.

Caught up in the hack were some documents submitted by Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE during regulatory review of their vaccine, approved last month. The EMA said it would notify any additional entities and individuals whose documents and personal data may have been subject to unauthorized access.

Artikel gaat verder:

https://www.bloomberg.com(...)-drug-regulator-says

Ik post dit hier, omdat ik niet heb kunnen bevestigen of onderstaande emails echt uit de hack komen:

From today's Pfizer leaks, looks like the integrity of the RNA payload is found to be significantly lower in commercial batches - the reasons and implications unknown:


https://old.reddit.com/r/(...)_like_the_integrity/

Nog een reddit topic:

Leak ongoing: Pfizer BioNtech documents show vaccines degrade up to 90%

At the risk of being banned, here is the actual table from the recent EMA/FDA leaks showing how quickly the RNA vaccines degrade. What you're injected with can be only 10% stable RNA. Thus, all other RNA is already broken down into other non-target (not of integrity) RNA strands. The problem is that the carrier molecules which take the RNA into the cell do not break down. After it all, you are getting an RNA strand whether it's protecting from covid or not. Does this explain all the adverse reactions? Is this why the FDA dragged their feet for approval?

Key concepts

RNA Content: Physical Size of the RNA delivered measured in mass
RNA Integrity: What percentage of the RNA delivered is the intended molecule
Report LMS result: FDA or 3rd party adjudicated test of RNA integrity (and other values)
RNA Encapsulation: Percentage of RNA delivered which is still wrapped in the carrier molecule. the carrier molecule brings the RNA past the immune system to the cells.



https://old.reddit.com/r/(...)_docs_show_vaccines/

Nog een post van Reddit die ik hier drop voor mensen die hier mogelijk in willen duiken:

https://old.reddit.com/r/(...)idential_hack_files/

Acquired all the confidential internal Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine files from the recent EMA hack (obviously i cant upload those here): some brief parts i dug up and condensed on its safety profile: -it degenerates quickly and deterates past 50% effectiveness when it is out of perfect lab conditions easily (but its supposed to be 97%...)

Discussing distribution at the injection site and to the liver. To the untrained eye it is not clear that the bioluminescence signal is solely liver specific. Although the signal appears to be in the liver region, from the data submitted it cannot be excluded that the bioluminescence signal could include distribution to other organs located in proximity of the liver. Several literature reports indicate that LNP(Lipid nano particles)-formulated RNAs can distribute rather non-specifically to several organs such as spleen, heart, kidney, lung and brain

While no extensive pharmacological assessment has been conducted in rats (only in mouse and non-human primate, with no deeper discussion on the choice of animal models. The immune responses, especially at the injection sites (e.g. oedema (build-up of fluid in the body's tissue), erythema (inflamed blood capillaries), seem to increase with each injection in the studies (n=3). There was a marked increase in acute phase proteins, fibrinogen (most often seen in inflammation) and reduced albumin-globulin ratio ( Associated With The Risk of Cancer Prediction Cancer Mortality Associated With The Risk of Dying From Heart Diseases Predict Poor Outcomes After Stroke Myasthenia Gravis - an autoimmune disorder wherein a person’s antibodies attack their own nerves. This type of nerve damage leads to muscle weakness, drooping eyelids, and trouble speaking Linked to Cognitive Decline (but no increase in cytokines with V8, unclear for V9).

There was also a general increase in immune cells (LUC, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils) and a decrease in red blood cell parameters (reticulocytes, RGB, HGB, HCT). The spleen was enlarged at both 30ug V9 and 100ug V9 and the lymph nodes were enlarged mostly at 100ug (V8) but also in a few animals at 30g (V9). While an immune response is expected from V8 and V9, the strong reaction of the injection site and immune system in rat is difficult to interpret/risk assess as the vaccine candidate(s) are derived from a novel vaccine platform. There is also the possibility, which is difficult to assess non-clinically or effectively in-silico, that the generated antibodies may react with endogenous proteins(vital to a multitude of metabolic and genomic + processes in the body) . An absence of dose-response designs in the studies increases the difficulty to interpret the effects. As the pharmacokinetic distribution study in rat was limited (mainly giving data on liver), the distribution (and its effects) has to be inferred indirectly from the toxicological studies.

There is some uncertainty in this regard as not all tissues have been investigated in the V8 study and histopathological details are unknown for the V9 study and it is recommended to study as many tissues as possible (the following tissues were not studied: nasal body cavity, clitorial gland, dorsal root ganglion, larynx, mandibular lymph node, tibial nerve, preputial gland, ureter, Zymbal’s gland). While there was pathogenesis in liver, there were some hepatic and/or biliary effects with V8 and V9 (enlarged liver, vacuolation, strongly increased gGT levels at >200% and activity, minor-moderate increase in levels of ALT and ALP), (there 3 indicate possible liver damage) which may be linked to the LNP. The gGT changes were not observed with 30ug V9, which may be due to variant differences and/or a lower dose. the lipids contain an acetamide moiety which has been linked to carcinogenicity in animals, including liver tumors, potentially related to genotoxicity, and liver distribution and functional effects have been observed in rats.

Direct from Pfizer, but they say its safe and all should take it, no proper safety trials on a new technology 'vaccine'

Nog een post van Reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/(...)still_testing_their/

A reminder that Pfizer is still testing their vaccine according to their own documentation

Here is a link to a report published by Pfizer themselves. The report shares details about the protocol they are supposed to follow regarding the vaccine:
https://pfe-pfizercom-d8-(...)Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

There is a table describing the phase 3 of the trial. The trial includes follow-up visits up to 24 months after getting the jab.

Here is another reminder that they started their trials end of July 2020:
https://www.dailymail.co.(...)ccine-candidate.html

That means their vaccine is not supposed to be ready for commercialization before August 2022, at the very least. You are a guinea pig !

You are taking the vaccine and they have no idea what happens next. Why do you think they say they cannot be held liable legally for potential damage ? I know the vaccine comes with a nice packaging, sexy nurses wearing a nice blouse, and that makes you kind of feel confident, but they literally don't know what they are doing.

Here is what the FDA says about the vaccine:
https://www.fda.gov/emerg(...)ntly-asked-questions

To the question : How long will the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine provide protection? the FDA answers :

Data are not yet available to inform about the duration of protection that the vaccine will provide

To the question : Is the the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine effective at reducing the severity of COVID-19? the FDA answers :

To date, only a small number of severe cases have occurred during the study, which makes it difficult to evaluate whether the vaccine reduces the severity of COVID-19

Such important questions about the vaccine they approved, and they say they don't know. Does that raise your confidence level ?

Also, check out the board of directors at Pfizer. Scott Gottlieb, for instance, served as the 23rd Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2017 to 2019. He joined Pfizer very shortly before covid was officially announced:
https://www.pfizer.com/people/leadership/board-of-directors

There is great potential for conflicts of interests here.

quote:

Op woensdag 20 januari 2021 20:20 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
Nog een post van Reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/(...)still_testing_their/

A reminder that Pfizer is still testing their vaccine according to their own documentation

Here is a link to a report published by Pfizer themselves. The report shares details about the protocol they are supposed to follow regarding the vaccine:
https://pfe-pfizercom-d8-(...)Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

There is a table describing the phase 3 of the trial. The trial includes follow-up visits up to 24 months after getting the jab.

Here is another reminder that they started their trials end of July 2020:
https://www.dailymail.co.(...)ccine-candidate.html

That means their vaccine is not supposed to be ready for commercialization before August 2022, at the very least. You are a guinea pig !

You are taking the vaccine and they have no idea what happens next. Why do you think they say they cannot be held liable legally for potential damage ? I know the vaccine comes with a nice packaging, sexy nurses wearing a nice blouse, and that makes you kind of feel confident, but they literally don't know what they are doing.

Here is what the FDA says about the vaccine:
https://www.fda.gov/emerg(...)ntly-asked-questions

To the question : How long will the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine provide protection? the FDA answers :

Data are not yet available to inform about the duration of protection that the vaccine will provide

To the question : Is the the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine effective at reducing the severity of COVID-19? the FDA answers :

To date, only a small number of severe cases have occurred during the study, which makes it difficult to evaluate whether the vaccine reduces the severity of COVID-19

Such important questions about the vaccine they approved, and they say they don't know. Does that raise your confidence level ?

Also, check out the board of directors at Pfizer. Scott Gottlieb, for instance, served as the 23rd Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2017 to 2019. He joined Pfizer very shortly before covid was officially announced:
https://www.pfizer.com/people/leadership/board-of-directors

There is great potential for conflicts of interests here.

En een reply:

Concerning the 24 months follow up. It’s on page 35 of study in OP’s first link.

The objectives:

To evaluate the immune response over time to prophylactic BNT162b2 and persistence of immune response in participants with and without serological or virological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccination

The estimands:

GMC/GMT, GMFR, and percentage of participants with titers greater than defined threshold(s), at baseline and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after completion of vaccination

The endpoints:

• S1-binding IgG levels and/or RBD-binding IgG levels • SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing titers

So they’re checking the long time persistence of the immunization, which only can be done - you guessed it - after a long time like 24 months.

Edit:

Explanation of scientific terms:

BNT162b2 is the name of vaccine.

A titer is a laboratory test that measures the presence and amount of antibodies in blood. S1-Binding IgG/RBD-Binding igG are those antibodies.

GMT = Geometric mean titres and GMC = geometric mean concentrations, GMFR = geometric mean fold rises. Those are statistical indicators.

PFIZERLEAK: EXPOSING THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT.

Background:
Pfizer has been extremely aggressive in trying to protect the details of their international COVID19 vaccine agreements.

Luckily, I've managed to get one.

Gaat verder:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1419653002818990085.html

Uit dat artikel:

Long term effects and efficiency:

"Purchaser acknowledges...the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known."

quote:

Op zondag 1 augustus 2021 19:01 schreef George_of_the_Jungle het volgende:
Niks nieuws toch? Natuurlijk weet men niet welke zeldzame bijwerkingen op de lange termijn opduiken, en hoe vaak. Dat weet men nooit bij de introductie van een vaccin.

En toch zijn er users op dit forum die ontkennen dat men mogelijk niet alle lange-termijn effecten kent.

Iemand heeft mij een tijd terug zelfs gezegd dat wetenschappers zo goed zijn dat ze op korte-termijn, in principe alle lange-termijn effecten kunnen achterhalen.

quote:

Op zondag 1 augustus 2021 19:18 schreef wappie1986 het volgende:

[..]

Mensen die weet hebben van een vaccin die weten dat er geen lange termijn effect is. Die is er namelijk nog nooit bij een vaccinatie geweest.

De Antivax 'lange termijn'-leugen

HarryHolgod

Je weet dat een vaccin binnen twee weken uit het lichaam verdwijnt? als het immuunsysteem goed werk doet althans.

Dan negeren we het vaccin voor de varkensgriep eventjes gemakshalve?

These NHS Staff Were Told The Swine Flu Vaccine Was Safe, And Now They're Suffering The Consequences

Dozens of NHS workers are fighting for compensation after developing narcolepsy from a swine flu vaccine that was rushed into service without the usual testing when the disease spread across the globe in 2009. They say it has destroyed their careers and their health.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/(...)flu-vaccine-was-safe

https://archive.is/4fdKb

quote:

Op zondag 1 augustus 2021 19:55 schreef wappie1986 het volgende:

[..]

Meer dan 200 jaar is lang genoeg?

En wat denk je van de werking, het vaccin dat al na twee weken uit het lichaam is.
[..]

Of die man grappig is is subjectief. Wat hij zegt daarentegen zijn meestal feiten.

En of hij centjes verdiend op YT weet ik niet. Zal wel door reclame zijn.. Hij verkoopt in elk geval geen shirtjes met "freedom" erop zoals anderen.

Waarom heb jij je vandaag op fok geregistreerd?

Het valt me op de laatste maanden dat wanneer ik redelijk actief ben met het posten van zaken die tegen de mainstream ingaan, dat er dan plotseling een nieuwe account opduikt die overal tegen in moet gaan. Jij bent nummer 3 in een paar maanden tijd.

Got to control that narrative!

quote:

Op zondag 1 augustus 2021 20:22 schreef wappie1986 het volgende:

[..]

O dat moet wel een complot zijn. Normaal komen er geen drie nieuwe users in een paar maanden tijd op fok.

Of je bent een kloon van 1 van de usual suspects die door heeft dat hij bij mij op de ignore-lijst staat en die er niet tegen kan dat hij geen aandacht meer krijgt van mij.

Je bent nl. wanhopig op zoek naar aandacht in de topics waar ik aanwezig ben.