Tis gewoon informatie.quote:Op donderdag 1 november 2018 06:38 schreef ChrisCarter het volgende:
Ok, en behalve het ridiculiseren van een historisch figuur, wat is je punt?
Tot nu toe ontbreekt elk spoor van argumentatie daarvoorquote:Op donderdag 1 november 2018 13:25 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
Tis gewoon informatie.
Historical teller of tall tales imo.
There is every good reason to question such miraculous stories.
Just a theory. An appropriate title if nothing else.quote:
Sodeju zeg, moet het weer zo triest? Heb je dan echt zo weinig dat je de messenger aanvalt om het voor jezelf te kunnen verantwoorden dat je de message kan negeren?quote:Op donderdag 1 november 2018 23:10 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
Just a theory. An appropriate title if nothing else.
Scott 'before-I-get-down-to-the-nitty-gritty-of-the-physics-and-history' Manley, should also be able to get Einsteins first name right for a start, especially as he is clearly reading from a script.
Unless of course Albert Einstein had an identical twin brother called Alfred. He even uses 'Alfred' (which is kind of cute) as if these trendy gamer-scientistic types were on first name terms. Peculiar collection of space toys in the background. Who the fuck is this shallow, adolescent crap supposed to appeal to I wonder.
I already knew that the word 'atomic' was first used by H.G. Wells in a science FICTION book.
Hier kan je leuke dingetjes van Scott kopen:
https://www.redbubble.com/shop/scott+manley
The presentation style reminds me of that stupid american space fan bitch (Amy Titttler?)
Dear me, you're going to have to do better than this, matey.
Maybe you should take a 'history' lesson from your sidekick.
Still not found any credible information about 'nuclear' EMP then?
No. If you had, then you would've already posted it.
Oh there's plenty more accounts of Mr.Yamaguchis amazing escapades.quote:Op donderdag 1 november 2018 14:45 schreef ChrisCarter het volgende:
[..]
Tot nu toe ontbreekt elk spoor van argumentatie daarvoor
I certainly don't need your 'messengers'.quote:Op donderdag 1 november 2018 23:16 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
Sodeju zeg, moet het weer zo triest? Heb je dan echt zo weinig dat je de messenger aanvalt om het voor jezelf te kunnen verantwoorden dat je de message kan negeren?
Je zou ook voor de verandering een inhoudelijke reactie erop kunnen geven.quote:Op donderdag 1 november 2018 23:27 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
I certainly don't need your 'messengers'.
You probably didn't even watch it yourself, but it doesn't matter, I'll be kind and not go on about it.
Please try better in future.
The Japanese government didn't recognise any atomic bomb survivors until 1957.quote:“The blast sent him spinning through the air, and he landed in a nearby potato patch. When he opened his eyes, he couldn’t see anything—the world was completely black.
The blast hadn’t blinded him, but instead blotted out the sun with an enormous cloud of dust. Yamaguchi’s arms and face were badly burned and his eardrums were ruptured. As the debris cleared, he saw a towering mushroom cloud over the city.”
“Still injured, he made his way through a city of crumbling buildings, fires, and bodies melted to the streets. At one point, he had to swim across a river filled with burned corpses. Yamaguchi eventually made it to the train and settled in for the night as it took him to his hometown of Nagasaki.”
“When Yamaguchi arrived home, his wife and daughter didn’t even recognize the burned man standing in front of them. His wife knew her husband had been in Hiroshima, and thought his bandaged figure might even be a ghost. After finally receiving medical attention, he collapsed in bed for the night.”
“It was during this meeting that the sky once again lit up with fire. The building was destroyed and his bandages were blown away, but—once again—he survived.”
“Though Yamaguchi is the only officially recognized double-survivor of atomic bombings, as many as 165 people experienced both atomic weapons firsthand.”
Hoe wil jij honderden kilometers power en telephone line opblazen met een conventionele explosie op zo'n afstand? Dat is nogal een claim om te maken.quote:Op zaterdag 3 november 2018 14:27 schreef Tingo het volgende:
The Soviet K project tests...
184 K3 (Joe 157) October 22nd, 1962:
“Exploded short of target above Sary Shagan, west of Dzhezkazgan (or Zhezqazghan). EMP ran to thousands of amps, damaged at least 570km of telephone lines, 1000km of buried power lines, and caused the destruction of the Karaganda power plant.”
Are there any credible photographs, film, witness testimonies, etc. of such destruction from 'nuclear' EMP to find? The reported damage could easily have been caused by conventional explosives. Sary Shagan was a closed city in the middle of nowhere. The military could do and report what they wanted, as they had control of the whole area for hundreds of miles around.
Where is the definitive evidence, information etc. about 'nuclear EMP?
Or are we just supposed to rely on the vague report of 'informal communications' between Soviet and American scientists?
How can we know for sure that any 'informal communications between Russian and American scientists' ever occured at all?
It amounts to nothing more than hearsay.
Despite there being a lack of detailed information and/or evidence such as photos, film,witness testimony etc. you are assuming that what we are told is true.quote:Op zaterdag 3 november 2018 19:37 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
Hoe wil jij honderden kilometers power en telephone line opblazen met een conventionele explosie op zo'n afstand? Dat is nogal een claim om te maken.
No, you claimed that all those damages can be replicated using a conventional explosion. That's a pretty crazy claim to make.quote:Op zondag 4 november 2018 18:34 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
Despite there being a lack of detailed information and/or evidence such as photos, film,witness testimony etc. you are assuming that what we are told is true.
Even if there were reports of thousands of homes being left without power (which there doesn't seem to be) it still wouldn't be proof of nuclear EMP.
Like I said – the whole area would have been in control of the military, so they could cause a power outage and then tell people it was due to nuclear tests.
According to wiki:
“After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the level of this (emp)damage was communicated informally to scientists in the United States.”
Pity there are no transcriptions of these informal communications or information as to who these scientists were.
It's all a bit vague and amounts to nothing more than hearsay really.
You claimed that there was 'veel info' about the Soviet Project K nuclear tests to find, but that seems not to be the case.
You are taking what we have been told as true.Your opinion is based on nothing more than hearsay.quote:Op zondag 4 november 2018 20:30 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
No, you claimed that all those damages can be replicated using a conventional explosion. That's a pretty crazy claim to make.
Hoe dan?quote:Op zondag 4 november 2018 23:55 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
Like I said - a power and telephone communications outage could easily have been caused by something other than EMP. Of course they could easily be severed by conventional explosives
No I didn't, dat maak jij er van.quote:You claimed that there was 'veel info' to find about the Soviet nuclear EMP tests, yet you still haven't presented any.
Where is the 'veel info' that the Russians collected?quote:Op vrijdag 19 oktober 2018 13:40 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
Ten eerste is was dat niet het enige EMP effect, en al helemaal niet de enige test. Dat die streetlights het enige bewijs is, is simpelweg onzin. De Russen hebben rond die tijd ook een serie tests gedaan boven bewoond gebied, en daar veel info over EMP schade verzameld.
Een (groot) deel daarvan ligt waarschijnlijk te verstoffen in een archief ergens ja, of is in zijn geheel verloren gegaan.quote:Op maandag 5 november 2018 13:11 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
Where is the 'veel info' that the Russians collected?
If you can't provide any evidence of it - how would anyone know that it even ever existed?
You're most probably taking someones word for it again.
Dus voor nu heb je het vooral van horen zeggen, precies zoals Tingo je al een tijdje probeert duidelijk te maken.quote:Op maandag 5 november 2018 13:48 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
Een (groot) deel daarvan ligt waarschijnlijk te verstoffen in een archief ergens ja, of is in zijn geheel verloren gegaan.
Dat was het punt ook niet. Het punt was dat volgens Tingo die ene test van de VS de enige test was.quote:Op dinsdag 6 november 2018 10:18 schreef DupingDelight het volgende:
[..]
Dus voor nu heb je het vooral van horen zeggen, precies zoals Tingo je al een tijdje probeert duidelijk te maken.
Verplaats je nu de doelpalen?quote:Op dinsdag 6 november 2018 10:37 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
Dat was het punt ook niet. Het punt was dat volgens Tingo die ene test van de VS de enige test was.
De VS en Rusland zijn niet de enige met deze wapens.quote:Op dinsdag 6 november 2018 10:38 schreef DupingDelight het volgende:
[..]
Verplaats je nu de doelpalen?
You have not presented any evidence whatsoever of any nuclear EMP tests ever having taken place at all. Your claims are based on nothing more than hearsay. That is the 'point'.quote:Op dinsdag 6 november 2018 10:37 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
Dat was het punt ook niet. Het punt was dat volgens Tingo die ene test van de VS de enige test was.
En waar zijn jouw "beweringen" dan op gebouwd?quote:Op dinsdag 6 november 2018 13:15 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
You have not presented any evidence whatsoever of any nuclear EMP tests ever having taken place at all. Your claims are based on nothing more than hearsay. That is the 'point'.
You also claim to have some knowledge and understanding of science. Hearsay is not scientific.
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |