De atoombom - feit of fictie?

quote:

Op woensdag 20 december 2017 19:08 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:

[..]

Opmerkelijke foto. Wat is het verhaal erachter?

quote:

First, study the edge of the spout, where it meets the background. Doesn't look right, does it? It looks like one photo was superimposed on top of another, sort of like they do with greenscreen now.

Next, stare at the spout itself for a moment. Looks a lot like carpet, doesn't it? Is that a nuclear spout, or a cat's scratching post?

quote:

Op woensdag 20 december 2017 20:36 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:

Serieus als dat moet het echte werk voorstellen?

quote:

That's one brave kitty cat. And this gives a whole new meaning to “carpet bombing.”

quote:

Op woensdag 20 december 2017 21:19 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:

[..]

Thanks, I get it. Interessant documentje.

quote:

Op woensdag 20 december 2017 22:01 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

Deze heb ik 'n paar jaren geleden gelezen. Had ik ook 'n keer hier op BNW gepost.
Excellent stuff. Moeite waard om de hele thread te lezen. imo.
Atom Bomb Hoax revisited:
https://engforum.pravda.r(...)bomb-hoax-revisited/

quote:

Op woensdag 20 december 2017 22:51 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

YW.
Toen ik 'n kind was heb ik aardig wat over oorlogen, ruimte avontuurtjes gelezen en alles geloven.
It's shocking at first to understand that it's all horse shit...then it gets 'funnier' as time goes by.

quote:

Two men in a closed room, knee-high in gasoline. Both do not trust each other and each has a pocket full of matches. Why won't they use the matches to attack each other? Because the doctrine of Mutually-Assured-Destruction says that both will be killed if one attacks the other.

Makes sense. If one side attacks the other both will be killed and the room will burn down to ashes. By the same logic one might expect to see diplomatic policies on both sides favoring a peaceful resolution to any disputes that may arise between them. One might even expect that failed diplomacy could be the end for all concerned.

A situation similar to this hypothetical gasoline-and-matches scenario can be found in the global proliferation of so-called atom bombs especially where those said to be in possession of them possess then in great measure. This claimed saturation of weapons of mass destruction has been seen as a potential to extinguish all life on the planet. Hostilities of an irreconciliable nature arising between the owners of the lion's share of the global stockpiles was estimated to result in such destruction as to be final and irreversible. The Doctrine of Mutually-Assured-Destruction at its finest hour.

Global politics and statesmanship have not improved one bit in the face of this terrible potential for armageddon. Instead we have witnessed countless military action around the globe ransacking and destroying everything in sight seemingly oblivious to the potential global destruction and extinction of mankind that might escalate from any one of these miliitary actions.

They are behaving as if both men, knee-high in gasoline do not possess the means to ignite it. In other words, as if they know atom bombs are not real and do not pose a threat.

quote:

Op woensdag 20 december 2017 23:09 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Heb je ook al bedacht wat er zo verdacht is aan die volgens jou stilstaande elementen van de explosie?