Dat is dacht ik inderdaad door naar de aardlagen te kijken gedaan. Deze zijn bijvoorbeeld te dateren door naar radioactieve stoffen te kijken.quote:Op zaterdag 11 februari 2017 17:15 schreef schommelstoel het volgende:
[..]
Door te kijken naar de grond/bodem waar ze het gevonden hebben dacht.
Weet ik niet geheel zeker.
Fotos van illustraties, neppe botten en replikas.quote:
Wat is je bewijs daarvoor? Hoe kom je tot je conclusies?quote:Op zaterdag 11 februari 2017 18:10 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
Fotos van illustraties, neppe botten en replikas.
En jij trapt daar in? Neem dat eerste punt nou, over de stap van tanden naar volledig skelet. Heb je er niet aan gedacht dat die eerste vinding niet de laatste is geweest? Ze hebben later ook grotendeels complete skeletten gevonden.quote:Op woensdag 15 februari 2017 13:04 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Er is veel over de dinosaur hoax te vinden.
Helaas heb ik niet erg veel tijd momenteel...maar hier is 'n aardig korte filmpje over:
Dinosaurs debunked in 3 minutes
Wie heeft die fossielen in de grond gestopt?quote:Op woensdag 15 februari 2017 13:04 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Er is veel over de dinosaur hoax te vinden.
Helaas heb ik niet erg veel tijd momenteel...maar hier is 'n aardig korte filmpje over:
Dinosaurs debunked in 3 minutes
Maar de hoeveelheid aan video's doet er niet toe.quote:Op woensdag 15 februari 2017 13:04 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Er is veel over de dinosaur hoax te vinden.
Helaas heb ik niet erg veel tijd momenteel...maar hier is 'n aardig korte filmpje over:
Dinosaurs debunked in 3 minutes
So what? Dat het begin wat blurry was is en te verwachten, en het zegt helemaal niets negatiefs over alle andere duizenden vindingen sindsdien.quote:Op woensdag 15 februari 2017 23:55 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Meer over de geschiedenis van de dinosaur hoax/scam....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/loc(...)_8484000/8484720.stm
"The earliest account we have a proper record of is in Robert Plot's Natural History of Oxfordshire that was published in 1677, and in that he illustrated what we would now recognise as the end of a dinosaur limb bone," Professor Kennedy said.
"He then debated in his account at length what it might be, whether it may be the remains of a giant or giantess, or whether it might be the remains of an elephant.
"Somewhat later in 1699 a man called Edward Lhwyd illustrated and described a tooth of a dinosaur but both he and Plot had no idea what fossils were."
The bones were identified much later as a Megalosaurus bucklandi.
It takes its title from William Buckland, who has the distinction of being the first man to assign a name to a dinosaur.
Professor Jim Kennedy, Director of the Oxford University Museum of Natural History:
"We have for instance two slabs from roofs. When people were doing house repairs they noticed little dinosaur footprints on the surfaces of their roofing slates."
"In 1825 near Chipping Norton bones of a huge animal were recovered and early workers thought they might be the remains of whales.
http://www.strangescience.net/plot.htm
Practicing alchemy for a profit, Robert Plot claimed to find the secret of "first matter," the holy grail of alchemy.
Plot's dinosaur-bone-bearing Natural History of Oxfordshire was printed in 1676 or 1677 (accounts vary). Almost a century later, another English historian, Richard Brookes, copied the figure and gave it a name highlighting its resemblance to a piece of manly anatomy. Historians in the throes of arrested adolescence have ever since snickered that the first known illustration of a dinosaur bone bears a salacious name. As for the bone itself, it was long ago lost, as were Plot's other formed stones.
Scrotum Humanum notwithstanding , Megalosaurus represents the first dinosaur genus to be described and validly named. In 1824, William Buckland gave the genus the name Megalosaurus in his article "Notice on the Megalosaurus or Great Fossil Lizard of Stonesfield," describing it as an extinct giant reptile. The lithograph of the Megalosaurus jaw that accompanied the description was based on drawings done by Buckland's wife, Mary Morland. Later in 1827, Gideon Mantell, in his The Geology of the southeast of England, assigned the type specimen its current valid binomial: Megalosaurus bucklandii.
http://blog.biodiversityl(...)d-validly-named.html
Dus helaas de dinosaur bot al 400 jaar verloren of nooit bestaat heeft. Misschien 'n bot van 'n heel andere grote,maar iets kleinere beest was. Het lijkt dat de dinosaur scam allemaal begonnen van 'n 450 jaar oud tekening is. Dan 150 jaar later er 'n gedoe over is toen Richard Brookes 'n tekening van 'n tekening heeft gemaakt. Lekker vaag.
Het lijkt dat de hele dinosaur scam (scientiffifantastische dinosaur boeken,illustraties,artistic impressions,artifacts,documentaren,films,themeparks,leuke merchandise,speelgoed,fantasie enz.) in Oxford UK begonnen is.
Wow ,Oxford University just happens to be in that 'dinosaur rich' environment.
Al die evolutionist theoristen allemaal uit Oxford Uni komen.
Lijkt op een of ander vriendjes of 'ja-knikkers' clubje te zijn.
'Scrotum humanum' inderdaad.
Aldous Huxley,ook familie van Thomas Henry Huxley dinosaur/evolutionist was.
Verklaard ook niet hoe ik uit een steen bij Dover (GB), een aantal foesiellen heb kunnen halen.quote:Op woensdag 15 februari 2017 23:55 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Meer over de geschiedenis van de dinosaur hoax/scam....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/loc(...)_8484000/8484720.stm
"The earliest account we have a proper record of is in Robert Plot's Natural History of Oxfordshire that was published in 1677, and in that he illustrated what we would now recognise as the end of a dinosaur limb bone," Professor Kennedy said.
"He then debated in his account at length what it might be, whether it may be the remains of a giant or giantess, or whether it might be the remains of an elephant.
"Somewhat later in 1699 a man called Edward Lhwyd illustrated and described a tooth of a dinosaur but both he and Plot had no idea what fossils were."
The bones were identified much later as a Megalosaurus bucklandi.
It takes its title from William Buckland, who has the distinction of being the first man to assign a name to a dinosaur.
Professor Jim Kennedy, Director of the Oxford University Museum of Natural History:
"We have for instance two slabs from roofs. When people were doing house repairs they noticed little dinosaur footprints on the surfaces of their roofing slates."
"In 1825 near Chipping Norton bones of a huge animal were recovered and early workers thought they might be the remains of whales.
http://www.strangescience.net/plot.htm
Practicing alchemy for a profit, Robert Plot claimed to find the secret of "first matter," the holy grail of alchemy.
Plot's dinosaur-bone-bearing Natural History of Oxfordshire was printed in 1676 or 1677 (accounts vary). Almost a century later, another English historian, Richard Brookes, copied the figure and gave it a name highlighting its resemblance to a piece of manly anatomy. Historians in the throes of arrested adolescence have ever since snickered that the first known illustration of a dinosaur bone bears a salacious name. As for the bone itself, it was long ago lost, as were Plot's other formed stones.
Scrotum Humanum notwithstanding , Megalosaurus represents the first dinosaur genus to be described and validly named. In 1824, William Buckland gave the genus the name Megalosaurus in his article "Notice on the Megalosaurus or Great Fossil Lizard of Stonesfield," describing it as an extinct giant reptile. The lithograph of the Megalosaurus jaw that accompanied the description was based on drawings done by Buckland's wife, Mary Morland. Later in 1827, Gideon Mantell, in his The Geology of the southeast of England, assigned the type specimen its current valid binomial: Megalosaurus bucklandii.
http://blog.biodiversityl(...)d-validly-named.html
Dus helaas de dinosaur bot al 400 jaar verloren of nooit bestaat heeft. Misschien 'n bot van 'n heel andere grote,maar iets kleinere beest was. Het lijkt dat de dinosaur scam allemaal begonnen van 'n 450 jaar oud tekening is. Dan 150 jaar later er 'n gedoe over is toen Richard Brookes 'n tekening van 'n tekening heeft gemaakt. Lekker vaag.
Het lijkt dat de hele dinosaur scam (scientiffifantastische dinosaur boeken,illustraties,artistic impressions,artifacts,documentaren,films,themeparks,leuke merchandise,speelgoed,fantasie enz.) in Oxford UK begonnen is.
Wow ,Oxford University just happens to be in that 'dinosaur rich' environment.
Al die evolutionist theoristen allemaal uit Oxford Uni komen.
Lijkt op een of ander vriendjes of 'ja-knikkers' clubje te zijn.
'Scrotum humanum' inderdaad.
Aldous Huxley,ook familie van Thomas Henry Huxley dinosaur/evolutionist was.
Dat vind ik eerlijk gezegd ook een schatting die op zijn minst discutabel is. 165 million years! Hoe weten ze dat nou?quote:Op vrijdag 17 februari 2017 21:30 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Het blijft meer dan 'n beetje 'blurry'.
http://www.bbc.com/earth/(...)at-gave-us-dinosaurs
“It's anyone's guess exactly where and when humans first stumbled upon the fossilised remains of ancient giant beasts. But according to Hugh Torrens of Keele University in the UK, we know exactly where the first dinosaur was discovered.
Anyones guess indeed!
It was found in the centre of London: to be precise, at 15 Aldersgate Street, a few hundred metres north of St Paul's Cathedral.
Sometime in late 1841 or early 1842, Richard Owen – a brilliant anatomist and, by many accounts, a spectacularly unlikeable man – paid a visit to William Devonshire Saull's geological collection. There, Owen came across a rather ordinary-looking fossil: a chunk of bone from the spine of a large prehistoric animal that had been named Iguanodon a few decades earlier.”
Wat meer over Robert Plot de 'dinosaur' bot vinder.
Even so, when Plot came across a fossil that looked uncannily like a fragment from an unusually large thigh bone, he had to admit that it probably once belonged to an animal. In his 1677 Natural History of Oxford-shire, he discussed the find at great length, finally concluding that it might have come from a gigantic ancient human. After all, he argued, "Goliath for certain was nine foot nine inches high".
Exactly which animal his large thigh bone belonged to must remain a mystery, because the fossil was lost long ago.
But Plot did describe how it had been "dug out of a quarry in the Parish of Cornwell": an area of Oxfordshire that was mined for limestone, which we now know dates back to the Jurassic.
From the fossil's age, and from its appearance in Plot's illustration, palaeontologists now suspect that it belonged to a large predatory dinosaur that terrorised Britain about 165 million years ago.
"Educated at the Free School in Wye, in 1658 he matriculated at Magdalen Hall, Oxford, where subsequently he served as dean and as vice-principal, before moving to University College in 1676. It was initially as a student ...."
http://emlo-portal.bodlei(...)atalogue=robert-plot
Gaat ie naar Oxford Uni 1676 en dan maar binnen 'n jaartje heeft ie de rare 'bot' gevonden.
Beetje vreemd dat er niks over de fantastische 'dinosuar bot' ontdekking van 1677 in deze biographie te vinden is.
Oprichter van de Ashmolean Museum en de 'eerste dino bot' nergens meer te vinden is....maar gelukkig er 'n tekening van is die wetenschappers dat de (tekening van de) bot
' belonged to a large predatory dinosaur that terrorised Britain about 165 million years ago' kunnen concluderen.
A large predatory dinosaur that terrorised Britain? Hoe komen ze daar bij?quote:Op vrijdag 17 februari 2017 21:56 schreef Lavenderr het volgende:
[..]
Dat vind ik eerlijk gezegd ook een schatting die op zijn minst discutabel is. 165 million years! Hoe weten ze dat nou?
Allemaal = 40/200? Ruim begrip dan.quote:Op zondag 19 februari 2017 11:07 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Het lijkt dat 't allemaal vrijmetselaren en/of 'enlightened ones' achter de eerste 'dinosaur' bot waren.
To further underscore the strong links between the scientists of the day and their membership of the Craft, in 1723, of the 200 members of the Royal Society, 40 were masons. In 1725, 47 members of the Royal Society were masons, and in 1730, 97 members of the Grand Lodge of London (Moderns) were members of the Royal Society, or were future members of that society.
This showed the strong links between the scientists who ushered in the Age of Enlightenment and the Craft.
http://www.freemasons-fre(...)y_enlightenment.html
In 1730 waren er 97 van 200.Waarschijnlijk dat veel meer was toen de evolution theoristen over begonnen.quote:Op zondag 19 februari 2017 11:20 schreef ChrisCarter het volgende:
[..]
Allemaal = 40/200? Ruim begrip dan.
So what? Hoe zit dat dan met de duizenden botten die daarna zijn gevonden?quote:Op zondag 19 februari 2017 11:07 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Het lijkt dat 't allemaal vrijmetselaren en/of 'enlightened ones' achter de eerste 'dinosaur' bot waren.
To further underscore the strong links between the scientists of the day and their membership of the Craft, in 1723, of the 200 members of the Royal Society, 40 were masons. In 1725, 47 members of the Royal Society were masons, and in 1730, 97 members of the Grand Lodge of London (Moderns) were members of the Royal Society, or were future members of that society.
This showed the strong links between the scientists who ushered in the Age of Enlightenment and the Craft.
http://www.freemasons-fre(...)y_enlightenment.html
Maar opgegraven fossielen dan?quote:Op zondag 19 februari 2017 15:30 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Ocean Art China - for all your dinosaur needs....
https://zgdy.en.alibaba.c(...)keleton_Replica.html
Het is welbekend dat er veel neppe (maar verkocht en gepubliciseerd als echt) dinosaur fossielen uit China komen.
En dat maakt alle fossielen fake?quote:Op zondag 19 februari 2017 15:30 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Ocean Art China - for all your dinosaur needs....
https://zgdy.en.alibaba.c(...)keleton_Replica.html
Het is welbekend dat er veel neppe (maar verkocht en gepubliciseerd als echt) dinosaur fossielen uit China komen.
China staat bekend om zijn neppe producten, wat dus in feite betekent dat het land zelf nep is, oftewel niet bestaat.quote:Op zondag 19 februari 2017 15:30 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Ocean Art China - for all your dinosaur needs....
https://zgdy.en.alibaba.c(...)keleton_Replica.html
Het is welbekend dat er veel neppe (maar verkocht en gepubliciseerd als echt) dinosaur fossielen uit China komen.
Ik heb 't over 'dinosauren' .quote:Op zondag 19 februari 2017 15:40 schreef ChrisCarter het volgende:
[..]
Maar opgegraven fossielen dan?
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |