quote:“Hey guys hope everything is good over there in Rockstar. Just a question referring to GTA 4, the game was brilliant and I really enjoyed and still do, but what disappointed me was the lack of planes and jets... Can you tell me why you didn't include them, I'm sure you have a very valid reason?” – via Mouthoff
The city was simply too small for effective and enjoyable flying. It was the first time we made a high definition open world, and it was a massive amount of work to make something on that scale – we simply could not make an environment big enough for planes to work properly. Fear not, they are returning in what is our biggest open world game to date.
Zou RDR niet groter zijn? Hoe dan ook fucking groot iig :Dquote:Op donderdag 12 juli 2012 18:18 schreef TwyLight het volgende:
[..]
! Groter dan San Andreas dus!
[ afbeelding ]
Groter dan RDR!!quote:Op donderdag 12 juli 2012 18:18 schreef TwyLight het volgende:
[..]
! Groter dan San Andreas dus!
[ afbeelding ]
quote:
Bron: http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=494526&st=60quote:The entire "sheet of paper" in the in-game image of Red Dead Redemption's map encompasses 13.75 square miles. This is based on my own measurement of Marston walking the north-south length of the train platform at the beginning of the game: 133 feet. The area within the boundaries of the game is about 6 square miles but the visible scenery around the boundaries can be counted as content beyond that.
Hier nog eentje die ook in het vorige topic stond:quote:Op donderdag 12 juli 2012 19:06 schreef ZwartmetSuiker het volgende:
JONGESN JONGENS JOGNENS SKREENSHOTS!??!?!!!!!11!!
Thanks, even in de OP gezetquote:Op donderdag 12 juli 2012 19:53 schreef MaxMark het volgende:
[..]
Hier nog eentje die ook in het vorige topic stond:
[ afbeelding ]
Erg groot. Teringeind paardrijden de hele tijd. Gelukkig is er fasttravelquote:
Dat staat niet in het interviewquote:
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |