Anonops #11: Stop ACTA

quote:

Op zondag 19 februari 2012 02:28 schreef Nemephis het volgende:

[..]



Hopelijk niet alleen een Paulus de dDos-kabouter-actie maar die hele server plunderen.

twitter:

YourAnonNews twitterde op zondag 19-02-2012 om 02:03:48 Follow the hashtag #AnonMeans on Twitter and find out what #Anonymous means to different people. It's amazing to read the responses. reageer retweet

quote:

Op zondag 19 februari 2012 09:42 schreef gogosweden het volgende:
interessant topic!

(verkapte TVP )

Anonymous Thinking Together - Awakening of Planetary Consciousness

quote:

Op zondag 19 februari 2012 02:22 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:

twitter:

A3nigmus twitterde op zaterdag 18-02-2012 om 23:40:35 http://www.meldpuntoosteuropeanen.nl/ is TangoDown!!! #anonymous #pvv #wildershttp://t.co/Qjg8ecZ7 reageer retweet

quote:

http://pastebin.com/qvB5zjvH

Dit weekeinde, heeft Anonymous een succesvolle aanval uitgevoerd op het Meldpunt Midden en Oost Europeanen. De eerste van velen.

Wij veroordelen Wilders en zijn xenofobe vriendenclubje, en we zullen er alles aan doen om vanaf nu elke vorm van vreemdelingenhaat tentoongespreid door de PVV te bestrijden.

Gelukkig staan we niet alleen, getuige de internationale ophef over deze verraderswebsite.

Een dringende oproep aan Geert Wilders:

Stop met deze haatzaaierij!

Je aanwezigheid in de Nederlandse politiek is niet langer gewenst.

Ons kleine landje is groot geworden door zijn betrekkingen met het buitenland. Al vele eeuwen zijn wij een handelaarsvolk, geroemd door onze (zaken)partners om onze vrije denken en onze open houding naar andersdenkenden.

Wat wij in eeuwenlang hard werken hebben opgebouwd, wordt nu door jouw populistisch gekrakeel in sneltreinvaart afgebroken.

Je verandert ons land in een bang, kortzichtig, Polen-verradend kippenhok met jou, als opper-kip-zonder-kop, voorop.

Wij, Anonymous, zeggen nu:

Het Is Genoeg!

Nu is het Carnaval, maar vanaf woensdag begint de Vastentijd; een tijd voor reflectie en bezinning. Tijd om orde op zaken te stellen. Tijd om te beseffen dat, als je beweert een Partij voor de Vrijheid te zijn, je ook voor Vrijheid moet staan! En niet alleen de vrijheid om je eigen haat de wereld in te kotsen.

Denk hier maar eens goed over na, als je deze dagen bij een Polonaise aansluit. Of klinkt "Polonaise" je ook al te Oost Europees in je oren?

Wij, Anonymous, waarschuwen ook Mark Rutte:

Als premier van Nederland dien je ten allen tijde in het belang van ons land en al haar inwoners te handelen.

Jij bent onze premier, Mark. Dus doe je mond open; spreek je uit tegen deze nieuwe, door Wilders veroorzaakte zweer op het aangezicht van Nederland. En laat zondebok Leers niet jouw vuile zaakjes oplossen, maar toon dat er ergens nog iets van een ruggegraat in je lijf zit.

Juist als VVD-er zou jij respect en bewondering moeten hebben voor het arbeidsethos van de honderdduizenden Oost-europeanen in ons land.

En mocht je alleen aan de centjes willen denken: deze groep mensen (MENSEN, ja!) levert een jaarlijkse bijdrage van 3 miljard euro aan onze economie. En nu er een internationale oproep is om Nederlandse goederen en bedrijven te boycotten, komt onze toch al wankele economie nog verder in gevaar.

Dus, Mark: laat zien dat je een vertegenwoordiger bent van het héle Nederlandse volk!

Wij, Anonymous, zullen de ontwikkelingen de komende tijd scherp in de gaten houden. dit Carnavalsoffensief is slechts het begin.

Zoals de Havenzangers al zongen:

"Het feest kan beginnen, want wij zijn binnen. We gaan er tegenaan.."

#VerwachtOns!

quote:

Op zondag 19 februari 2012 20:41 schreef YazooW het volgende:

[..]

[..]

Statement van "anonymous", althans zo noemen/noemt ze/hij/zij zichzelf, is toch wel behoorlijk raar te noemen. Quotes als: Je aanwezigheid in de Nederlandse politiek is niet langer gewenst. kunnen gewoon niet. Anonymous heeft zich nooit, zover ik het weet, bezig gehouden met politiek.

quote:

Natuurlijk zijn ze bezig met ACTA en heel de zooi, en dat is natuurlijk ook politiek beladen, maar ik heb ze nog nooit zo zien uitspreken over 1 bepaalde partij.

quote:

Wat nog het meest rare van de gehele (anti Wilders) statement is dat het in gaat tegen waar anonymous eigenlijk voor staat, en dat zijn gewoon de basisrechten van de mens (recht van privacy, recht van leven etc etc etc). Het is mijn recht om een mening te hebben over een bepaalde politieke partij, en het is mijn recht om voor een politieke partij te kiezen. Door te stellen dat de partij van Wilders niet langer gewenst is in de Nederlandse politiek gaan ze, in mijn opinie, in tegen al de rechten waar ze vroeger voor stonden.

quote:

Maar zoals in mijn eerste zin al te lezen viel, dit heeft niks met anonymous te maken, dit is gewoon 1 persoon die zich anonymous noemt om zo aan aandacht te komen.

quote:

Op zondag 19 februari 2012 20:58 schreef YazooW het volgende:
Ja ik snap wat je bedoelt te zeggen, het is voor mij ook lastig uit te leggen wat ik eigenlijk bedoel. Maar wat ik eigenlijk probeer te zeggen is dat de partij van Wilders, of je het er nou mee eens bent of niet, gewoon democratisch gekozen is door het volk. Ga je nu als "groepering" quotes erin gooien als: Je aanwezigheid in de Nederlandse politiek is niet langer gewenst. dan ga je in tegen alles waar anonymous voor staat, en dat is gewoon de vrijheid van de mens met alle rechten die daarbij horen, het is mijn recht om op de PVV te stemmen, wie is anonymous dan om te zeggen dat een partij als de PVV niet gewenst is de politiek? Daarmee zeggen ze toch eigenlijk dat ze scheit aan hebben aan alles en iedereen die op de PVV gestemd hebben?

quote:

- Politieke partij zegt/doet iets
- Anonymous is het er niet mee eens en voert een aanval uit
- Brengt statement naar buiten waarin partij niet gewenst wordt genoemd.

Dit is nou gewoon het democratische systeem waarmee wij leven, soms zijn er politieke partijen die wel eens wat doen wat jij niet goedkeurt, tsja, pech gehad dan. Als je dan vervolgens zo'n partij gaat aanvallen en niet gewenst gaat noemen dan breng je het democratische systeem alleen maar in gevaar lijkt mij.

quote:

Op zondag 19 februari 2012 21:30 schreef YazooW het volgende:
Maar ben jij dan van mening dat de PVV, net zoals de Tunesische regering ten val gebracht moet worden?

Anonymous Thinking Together - Awakening of Planetary Consciousness

quote:

RCMP investigating threats to Vic Toews from Anonymous hacker group

OTTAWA - The RCMP is investigating "serious threats" against Public Safety Minister Vic Toews and his family, as popular blowback to the government's Internet surveillance bill continues to escalate.

Toews' spokesman Mike Patton said that the RCMP has been asked to investigate the threats. He described the threats as "serious."

"Threatening communications have been directed at the minister," he said. "These incidents have been reported to the proper authorities."

In a letter distributed to his Manitoba constituents this weekend, Toews says he has been the target of numerous threats since the firestorm over Bill C-30, the Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act erupted this week.

The bill would give police much broader powers to snoop on the online communications of Canadians. It has been met with fierce opposition from Internet privacy and civil rights groups, who say the bill would build a state surveillance system into Canada's Internet.

In his letter, Toews said he has already been attacked.

"These attacks, which have included criminal acts and threats of criminal acts against me and my family, have been referred to the police for investigation," Toews wrote.

Toews angered many observers when he said opponents of Bill C-30 were friends of child pornographers. Opposition to the bill became the most Tweeted about subject in Canada Thursday, and among some of the top trending subjects around the world.

While some Twitter users suggested the public "Tweet him to death," the social media response to Bill C-30 has been mostly peaceful, and does not include direct threats of violent action toward Toews or his family.

The hacker group Anonymous, however, has posted a video to YouTube in which threats are levelled against Toews. The video talks about an "Operation White North," which appears to be the name for Anonymous' campaign against Bill C-30.

"All this legislation does is give your corrupted government more power to control its citizens," the video says through a robotic voice. "Anonymous will not stand for this."

"We demand that you scrap the bill in its entirety and step down as safety minister," the video says. "We know all about you, Minister Toews."

"We told you to expect us," it continues. "We are legion, we do not forgive, we do not forget, we are here."

Read more: http://www.canada.com/new(...)y.html#ixzz1msCntQBp

quote:

V for Vendetta: Comic vs. Film
^{US, March 18, 2006}

quote:

The Wachowskis took the premise and general theme and adapted the story (and added some digging dialogue) to fit the modern world and point a finger at the Bush administration. This is not an admonition of war, but a clear condemnation of the Patriot Act. Liberals will cheer (and call this movie patriotic) and Bill O'Reilly will implode.

Both Moore and the Wachowskis avoid laying the blame on corrupt and over-reaching governments. For both the movie and the book, the guilt is laid on the public, for "knowing something is wrong with this country" and sitting on the couch doing nothing. The film alters the plot and involves the public, inspiring a nation towards possible revolution. Moore's V never goes so far. It, instead, focuses on V's attempts to inspire one person to carry on his legacy, with the implication that if he can inspire one, his ideals can inspire a nation.

quote:

Op maandag 20 februari 2012 00:26 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:
"Threats"

[..]

quote:

VIDEO: Anonymous threatens Toews over Bill C-30

quote:

“We know all about you, Mr. Toews, and during Operation White North we will release what we have unless you scrap this bill.”

Another individual that appears to be unaffiliated with Anonymous already published alleged details of the minister’s divorce on a Twitter account (@Vikileaks30).

Toews called for an investigation into the matter after the Ottawa Citizen reported that the posts were coming from an IP address linked to the House of Commons.

quote:

Opinion: How Dangerous Does the Government Want the Internet to Be?

With the rising tide of internet surveillance and tough copyright laws, Drew Wilson comments on an infrequently discussed topic that really could be the elephant in the room in all of this. He then concludes that threatening the internet is a bad idea.

In the last several months, we’ve seen seemingly countless stories about broad internet surveillance and overreaching copyright laws. We’ve seen the relatively under-reported H.R. 1981 which is the latest US surveillance legislation. We’ve seen the spectacular rise and fall of SOPA and the PROTECT IP Act which was also a piece of US legislation aimed at bringing forth an unprecedented internet censorship regime under the guise of protecting the artists and protecting copyright. I, for one, am all too familiar with what it’s like, as an artist, to be censored by copyright. These actions are by far not an isolated case with what is going on in the world today.

In Canada, there is copyright reform bill known as Bill C-11 which contains the flawed digital locks provision. There’s even surveillance legislation known as Bill C-30 which has been heavily protested in Canada. In Europe, there’s also the disintegrating Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) which is being dropped by a number of countries already. In addition, there’s new surveillance legislation which would log all communication and store it all for a year. There’s the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) which has been known as the trade agreement that contains all the provisions that even the record labels failed to keep in ACTA (including the push for a global three strikes law). Really, the list keeps going on and on and on with examples of government and corporate attempts to reign in on personal freedoms that exist on the internet to this day.

But, with all of these attempts to control how people use the internet today, there’s been a well-documented push back to retain these freedoms over the years. There’s been countless protests in Canada over the copyright laws, there’s been the massive protests in Europe over ACTA (as we just mentioned), there’s been the rise of the global political party known as the Pirate Party, and there’s been numerous DDOS attacks and more made by the nebulous group known as Anonymous (just how many tango-downs have there been so far in the last few years anyway?). When one looks at all of these threats to the internet and free speech, it can be easy to understand why there has been such a push back in the first place. Is all of this the result of a completely ignorant corporate world? Possibly. Is the government completely ignorant about all of this? Depends on what part of the government you talk about.

I would argue that even the government, specifically, the NSA (National Security Agency), saw a glimmer of the elephant in the room. In 2010, there was a very heated debate over France’s HADOPI law which is essentially the infamous French Three Strikes Law. The idea is that you get accused of copyright infringement three times, you get disconnected from the internet. The law was morphed and changed numerous times, but that was the core original idea of it. As the debate raged, it turns out, the NSA was very nervous about it. A report surfaced that the NSA “yelled” at the French government saying that such a law could encourage more people to use better security that would, in turn, make their jobs of maintaining national security more difficult. Now, say what you will about congress critters going back in forth saying that they are not a “nerd”, but they need to pass SOPA, but with respect to the NSA on the HADOPI law, the US government really hit the nail on the head in all of this.

The only other glimmer I can recall seeing in regards to the elephant on the room was also in 2010 when the British record labels insisted on ramming through the Digital Economy Bill. In that case, British spies expressed concerns that their jobs would be made more difficult because of a potential encryption arms race thanks to such a piece of legislation. If you think that these are just empty words, take a look at one of the more recent TOR project blog posts where there’s been discussion of the development of Obfsproxy which is said to defeat Deep-Packet-Inspection employed by ISPs just to name one example.

So, what does all of this mean? I’ll just go back to what I’ve been referring to as the elephant in the room. Before any government wants to employ surveillance of any kind or copyright reforms that would stifle free speech, the government really needs to ask itself, “How dangerous do we want the internet to be?” If the government, regardless of country, wants the internet to be the most dangerous threat to its existence ever, then it should push through legislation that would heavily crack down on free speech and privacy as seen in the previous examples I mentioned above. Go ahead and put 8 year olds in prison for life for downloading the latest bad album through an unauthorized channel. Threaten everyone with unimaginable fines for downloading a bad quality cam film. Make sure every man, woman or child is being monitored for every single key stroke they make, every offhanded comment they make in their own personal podcast or every drunken rant they put on a YouTube video. Believe me, at this stage, the powers that be have made the internet angry and it’s already causing major headaches for them. Just imagine what will happen when the internet generally feels threatened. People merely got a very small taste with the blackout protests that protested SOPA. We’re talking encrypted communications that would take spooks centuries to decipher, alternate networks not controlled by traditional ISPs, hidden services that would likely never be traced to its original servers (let alone having the ability to track down those who started up such services in the first place), untraceable e-mail messages and things we today didn’t even think of.

Bottom line, you mess with the internet, the internet will mess back. Go ahead and brag you got the best in the business to take down the leaders and facilitators of defiance today, but you have an untold number of coders willing to piece together solutions that will constantly frustrate the best and brightest who are paid to stop any form of dissent against efforts to control the internet. This is the kind of war that is entirely possible if the governments around the world insist on trying to curtail any freedoms that even smells like a threat to deprecated business models or the political status quo.

If, however, the governments around the world want to simply stop all that is bad, rather than trample on personal freedoms in the process, they need to put the breaks on everything that even kind of looks like copyright and internet surveillance. Take a breather if need be. They are, after all, probably trying to deal with a crowd who is already angry at them anyway. If consultations have already occurred recently (say, within the last two years), look back on the expert opinions made by those who really know the internet well. If not, call for a consultation and involve everyone. I mean everyone. Not just the big lobbyists who have a stake in destroying the internet – everyone including people who want to preserve the internet and the general public. After a period of time and study, return with legislation that is surgical and precise. Clearly state that, for example, this surveillance legislation will only go after those who are dealing with, say, child pornography and that this surveillance is conducted under the explicit approval of the courts. If you have no intentional relationship with said content, your activities will go unmonitored and should anything about you be monitored accidentally, then it’ll be both in-admissible in court and destroyed quickly.

Can such an idea be improved on? Probably. I only say this as an example in part because going out in public and borderline saying that you have no idea what is in the very legislation you are pushing through or simply hanging up the phone in an interview when asked general questions about copyright legislation you are pushing for after giving a few confused sounding questions or even mumbling about not being a nerd during congress markups about SOPA makes it sound like legal precision and careful thought was never even considered. Heck, at the risk of stating the painfully obvious, it’s just downright embarrassing.

Bottom line, if a government does eventually get a grasp on this internet techno mumbo jumbo, that government, in this day and age, has a very simple choice: either it can have an internet it can live with or an internet that will be a continual threat. If it chooses to make the internet dangerous, attack it with sledge-hammer legislation we’ve already mentioned. If it chooses to not upset the internet, work with it. Crowd-sourcing can be workable. I think that reasonable and incremental solutions can be found in all of this.

When a given government is at the drawing board to draft such legislation, the ball is really in their court. In this day and age, threatening the internet is a bad idea.

quote:

Kazakhstan upgrades censorship to deep packet inspection

In December 2011 we were aware of Kazakhstan increasing Internet censorship in response to some unrest and protests in Zhanaozen in the west. The censorship was then deployed around the country, in many cases with the full support of the populace. The initial invesitgation showed simple IP address blocking coupled with basic dns censorship. Tor continued to work without incident until this week.

JSC KazTransCom, AS35104, has deployed or begun testing deep packet inspection (dpi) of all Internet traffic. They specifically target SSL-based protocols for blocking. This includes Tor, IPsec, and PPTP-based technologies, as well as some SSL-based VPNs. Business and private users of these technologies are equally affected.

An example of the censorship, as recorded by volunteers in country, can be found in this network flow diagram. Kazakhstan is identifying and blocking the SSL client key exchange during the setup of an SSL connection. This graph shows the effects of this deployment of censorship based on dpi.

Luckily, due to our recent experience with Iran we have an answer for people: use obfsproxy. Obfsproxy continues to work in Kazakhstan, as well as Iran. In fact, it works in any country where dpi is used to censor citizens' access to the Internet.

Thank you to the volunteers for spending their Valentine's Day collecting and analyzing data.

quote:

Tor gaat dataverkeer maskeren om filters te omzeilen

De ontwikkelaars van Tor werken aan de mogelijkheid om dataverkeer zo te maskeren dat deze afkomstig lijkt van een ander protocol. Hierdoor moet Tor-verkeer minder last krijgen van agressieve internetfilters.

De methode wordt door Tor omschreven als obfsproxy, oftewel een obfuscated proxy. Via een dergelijke Tor-proxy is het mogelijk om de datastroom te manipuleren. Aan Forbes geeft Tor-ontwikkelaar Andrew Lewman het voorbeeld van een obfsproxy die een met ssl versleutelde datastroom laat lijken op een chatsessie volgens het xmpp-protocol. Hierdoor zouden agressieve filtermethoden als deep packet inspection omzeild kunnen worden.

De obsproxy-methode in Tor is nog experimenteel en zou een stream nog onvoldoende kunnen aanpassen om deze op een betrouwbare manier geheel onherkenbaar te houden. Ook worden alleen verbindingen die gebruik maken van het tls-, ssl- en socks-protocol ondersteund, maar de ontwikkelaars streven er naar om ook http en andere veelgebruikte protocollen te gaan ondersteunen.

Ondanks de alpha-status van obfsproxy, krijgen de Tor-ontwikkelaars positieve reacties vanuit onder andere Iran. In dit land heeft het regime niet alleen ip-blokkades ingesteld, maar sinds kort ook een blokkade op al het ssl- en tls-verkeer doorgevoerd. Door obfsproxy te activeren kunnen Iraanse internetgebruikers alsnog websites als Gmail en Hotmail bereiken doordat het versleutelde dataverkeer gemaskeerd wordt.

quote:

http://translate.google.c(...)F%3Faid%3D1231182589

Athens
An 18 year old arrested in the process of a crime, and two other Greek high school students, 16 and 17 years, accused by the Electronic Crime to participate in the falsification of the website of the Greek Ministry of Justice on February 2.

The three hackers allegedly belonging to the group Greek Hacking Scene (GHS) and declared members of the wider, international organization Anonymous.

"Justice is coming," wrote English invaders in the first page of the site, and upload and video message is also fluent in English, which said: "What is happening in your country is unacceptable. Came to power to express the wishes of your people and you have failed utterly. Kill the most sacred thing for your country is the Republic. "

The three accused students now illegal access to computer systems in accordance with Article 370 of the Penal Code.

During surveys conducted in the homes of the accused seized three laptops and 12 hard drives.

Police are now continuing investigations to identify and other team members

No reference to other objectives

The police statement says, according to online postings, these defendants "have committed dozens of digital attacks." The objectives, however, not specified.

In the evening Sunday, February 13, shortly before the crucial vote in parliament on the new memorandum, Anonymous announced that had set off the sites of ELAS, the Ministry of Citizen Protection, the Greek Prime Minister and the Greek Parliament.

The fact this website was not accessible at that time. The same happened later on the websites of PASOK, New Democracy, the Ministry of Finance and Evangelos Venizelos, but it is not clear whether this was associated with Anonymous.

quote:

Anonymous Invades the Spanish Academy Awards Ceremony For Real



Rather than just crashing web pages, Spanish anonymous members had the balls to crash the equivalent of the Oscars ceremony in Madrid today. Three members of Anonymous sneaked past extreme police and private security controls to jump onto the stage as the event was at one of its highest points, as this image shows.

Pedro Almodovar, Antonio Banderas and Salma Hayek were among those who assisted the awards ceremony, called the Goyas in honor of famous Spanish painter Francisco de Goya. While the award for best director was being presented, three Anonymous members wearing Guy Fawkes' masks tried to jump onto the stage from the orchestra seats. Private security caught them before they could actually made it.

Meanwhile, the Spanish film academy web page was under attack. Anonymous also published contact information of actors, actresses and directors who supported the so-called Ley Sinde, a SOPA-like law designed to kill any kind of web pages without a court order.

I wonder if some Guy Fawkes would have the courage to slip through security the same at Hollywood's Academy Awards. [El Mundo]

quote:

'Britse regering wil internetgebruik realtime kunnen monitoren'

Op initiatief van de veiligheidsdiensten werkt de Britse regering aan wetgeving die het mogelijk moet maken om realtime telefoon- en internetverkeer te monitoren. Privacybeschermers kwalificeren de voorstellen als onacceptabel en gevaarlijk.


Dat meldt The Telegraph op basis van niet nader genoemde bronnen. Volgens de krant wordt er in het kader van nieuwe antiterrorismewetgeving gewerkt aan voorstellen voor het Communications Capabilities Development Programme. Daarin worden internetproviders en telecombedrijven verplicht om onder andere gegevens over telefonie- en dataverkeer een jaar lang in databases op te slaan. De inhoud van telefoongesprekken of e-mailberichten zou niet worden bewaard, maar in de databases moeten wel contactgegevens als telefoonnummers, ip-adressen en e-mailadressen zijn terug te vinden.

De databases zouden door inlichtingendiensten als MI5, MI6 en de politie realtime doorzocht moeten kunnen worden. Zo zou bijvoorbeeld een verdacht persoon die mobiele telefoongesprekken voert razendsnel opgespoord kunnen worden. De voorstellen zouden echter nog verder gaan: ook gebruikers van sociale-netwerksites zouden in kaart gebracht moeten worden. Zo willen de voorstanders inzicht krijgen in berichten die gebruikers van onder andere Facebook en Twitter naar elkaar sturen, terwijl zelfs communicatie tussen de spelers van multiplayergames te volgen zou moeten zijn.

Het ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken zou al twee maanden onderhandelingen zijn aangegaan met bedrijven als O2, BT, Vodafone en Virgin Media, terwijl de wetsvoorstellen in mei door de Britse regering openbaar gemaakt kunnen worden. Hoewel de Conservatieve premier Cameron bij zijn aantreden nog beloofde de privacy hoog in het vaandel te hebben, lijken de inlichtingendiensten met succes druk te hebben uitgeoefend om een eerder gesneuveld wetsvoorstel van de regering Blair nieuw leven in te blazen.

Britse voorvechters voor de privacy hebben al afwijzend gereageerd op de plannen voor een 'spionagewet'. Zo spreekt de Open Rights Group van een onacceptabele 'systematische methode' om alle digitale communicatie van burgers af te tappen. Naast de vraag of de voorstellen technisch haalbaar zijn, stelt de organisatie dat de opgeslagen informatie hoogst aantrekkelijk is voor hackers. Ook zouden internetproviders misbruik kunnen maken van de verzamelde data van hun gebruikers, bijvoorbeeld voor gerichte reclame. Vanuit de organisatie Privacy International klinken soortgelijke geluiden, maar een regeringswoordvoerder laat in een reactie aan de Britse krant weten dat de wetgeving nodig is om criminaliteit en terrorisme effectief te kunnen bestrijden.

quote:

s3rver.exe exposed SQLi vulnerability in Chinese Police website

A Hacker known as s3rver.exe break into a Chinese police website and exposed the vulnerability details. In twitter , he announced that "Chinese police owned" and tweet a link to pastebin.

Hacker exploit the SQL Injection vulnerability in the Panjin City Public Security Bureau website(http://gaj.panjin.gov.cn). He published the vulnerable link and a code to extract the database details.

In past , hacker hacked The ICT Specific Council (ICTSC) website, Tongcheng Environmental Protection Agency website(tchjbh.gov.cn)

quote:

Op maandag 20 februari 2012 17:01 schreef Ronnie_bravo het volgende:
Is dat nou leuk zo'n monoloog met knip en plakwerk??