NWS Nieuws & Achtergronden
Discussieer hier diepgaander over de actualiteiten.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:http://godaddyboycott.org/
GoDaddy has publicly put their support behind the heinous Stop Online Piracy Act or SOPA. If you work on the internet and do business with GoDaddy you're supporting a company who is actively working against your best interests.
Reddit user selfprodigy got the ball rolling today by posting that he would be pulling 51 GoDaddy-registered domains from the company. He was quickly followed by Ben Huh of Cheezburger (I Can Has Cheeseburger, FAIL! Blog, Know Your Meme) who pledged to move 1000+ of the companies domains. We want you to follow their lead. Can we get GoDaddy's attention?
Several other domain registration services have publicly proclaimed their opposition to SOPA: Hover, NameCheap and Dreamhost, and Name.com to name a few. Many will even give you a special discount if you're switching from GoDaddy. Lifehacker has a good list of alternatives and some instructions.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:Go Daddy No Longer Supports SOPA
SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. (Dec. 23, 2011) - Go Daddy is no longer supporting SOPA, the "Stop Online Piracy Act" currently working its way through U.S. Congress.
"Fighting online piracy is of the utmost importance, which is why Go Daddy has been working to help craft revisions to this legislation - but we can clearly do better," Warren Adelman, Go Daddy's newly appointed CEO, said. "It's very important that all Internet stakeholders work together on this. Getting it right is worth the wait. Go Daddy will support it when and if the Internet community supports it."
Go Daddy and its General Counsel, Christine Jones, have worked with federal lawmakers for months to help craft revisions to legislation first introduced some three years ago. Jones has fought to express the concerns of the entire Internet community and to improve the bill by proposing changes to key defined terms, limitations on DNS filtering to ensure the integrity of the Internet, more significant consequences for frivolous claims, and specific provisions to protect free speech.
"As a company that is all about innovation, with our own technology and in support of our customers, Go Daddy is rooted in the idea of First Amendment Rights and believes 100 percent that the Internet is a key engine for our new economy," said Adelman.
In changing its position, Go Daddy remains steadfast in its promise to support security and stability of the Internet. In an effort to eliminate any confusion about its reversal on SOPA though, Jones has removed blog postings that had outlined areas of the bill Go Daddy did support.
"Go Daddy has always fought to preserve the intellectual property rights of third parties, and will continue to do so in the future," Jones said.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
twitter:YourAnonNews twitterde op vrijdag 23-12-2011 om 19:54:47 RT @a_w_young: @GoDaddy appears to still support #SOPA, they're just spinning it differently. #NoDaddy #BoycottGoDaddy #Anonymous reageer retweet
RT @
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
http://www.reddit.com/r/p(...)_to_drop_its/c3an4se
SOPA Hearing Will Never Endquote:And everything is suddenly explained. Fucking hypocrites corporate immoral cunts.
quote:Polis pointed out that SOPA and Smith’s amendment already excluded certain operators of sub-domains, such as GoDaddy.com, from being subject to shutdowns under SOPA.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:Boston police versus Anonymous: An Update
Today saw the release of a leaked administrative subpoena from Suffolk County District Attorney Daniel F. Conley to Twitter, demanding that the company release to them any IP addresses and other information associated with several Twitter accounts held by Anonymous participants. Although the document also requests that Twitter refrain from informing those account holders of the move, the company nonetheless sent an e-mail to one of those involved noting that the subpoena had been issued and that they would decline to pursue the issue if they are informed of any motion to quash. Two of the individuals involved contacted me today and have now been referred to the Liederman Devine law firm in San Francisco, which is already representing another Anon operative who was heavily involved in the North African revolts and which has additionally assisted in arranging pro bono legal defense for Anon activists accused of DDOSing Paypal's website in retaliation for its move against Wikileaks last year.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:‘Wij, burgers van cyberspace, eisen onze broncodes’
.Ik probeer altijd sceptisch te blijven over ICT-denkers die claimen dat de samenleving revolutionair verandert door de digitalisering van Alles. Zeker, zo is het, maar de krant wordt nog steeds bezorgd. En zolang ik op tijd alle updates installeer, ook in m’n eigen hoofd, hou ik de veranderingen wel bij.
Maar na de oratie van Mireille Hildebrandt donderdag in Nijmegen ben ik uit mijn comfort zone. Zij schetst hoe rechtsrelaties in cyberspace structureel veranderen. Vrijwel alles wat we zien, wat we weten en wat er beslist wordt, is de uitkomst van geheime algoritmes op de computer. Daarbij raken rechtsbeginselen als privacy, discriminatieverbod en gegevensbescherming uit het zicht. De beginvraag ‘mag dat wel’ wordt ingehaald door ‘het kan, het gebeurt, dus het is wel best zo’. En àls de burger al een akkoordje moet aanvinken op zijn scherm, gebeurt ook dat automatisch. Zij heeft het over de ‘computationele wending’ in de rechtsorde. Haar conclusie: in de nieuwe techniek moet rechtsbescherming standaard worden ingebouwd. Aan meer papieren wetten is hier geen behoefte.
Vorige maand zat ik op een studiemiddag over de ‘cookiewet’, die het automatisch verzamelen van informatie over surfgedrag aan banden moet leggen. Cookies zijn kleine peilbakens die worden geplaatst door websites die je bezoekt. Ze houden bij hoeveel en welke pagina’s je bezocht (zodat je terug kunt bladeren), ze personaliseren websites en houden je ingelogd.
Reuze handig, maar ze passen ook de advertenties aan op jouw zoekgedrag. Ze vertellen door waar je was en wie je bent. Dat ‘track and trace’ is een voorbeeld. Wie vandaag online een vliegticket zoekt, wordt nog dagen automatisch getrakteerd op hotel- en huurauto opties in de plaats van bestemming. Websurfen doe je tegenwoordig wadend door een veld vol luistervinken, geplaatst door advertentienetwerken, die zien hoe vaak u ‘like’ op Facebook aanklikt en wat u zocht en kocht.
Hildebrandt, nieuw hoogleraar ‘ICT en rechtsstaat’, beschrijft de ‘cognitieve economie’, de handel in informatie die met elkaar in verband is gebracht. Alles draait nu om ‘patroonherkenning’ – het voorspellen van gedrag op basis van digitale sporen. Die informatie is veel geld waard. In cyberspace staat behalve wat je er deed inmiddels ook vrijwel vast wat je straks gaat doen. Je gedrag wordt voortdurend opgeslagen en met gelijksoortige anderen vergeleken: „Om je preferenties te achterhalen, risicovol gedrag te voorzien, prijzen aan te passen, of problemen te voorspellen. En hoe meer cyberspace de toekomst weet te voorspellen, hoe meer het die toekomst ook lijkt te maken”, zegt zij.
Dankzij deze patroonkennis wordt de vrije handelingsruimte van de burger ongemerkt kleiner. Internet, ooit de gedroomde vrije anonieme ruimte waarin je een second life kon beginnen, desnoods als hond, is nu een gouden kooi waarin de gebruiker exact die prikkels krijgt die statistisch zijn afgeleid uit zijn voorkeuren. Ieder leeft in zijn eigen dorp met zichzelf als ijkpunt, met aanbiedingen op smaak, voorgesorteerde informatie en toezicht op maat.
Het recht moet de digitale burger volgens Hillebrandt weer greep geven op de juistheid, betrouwbaarheid en relevantie van de informatie die over hem wordt verzameld. Vooral de rechten op privacy, gegevensbescherming, gelijke behandeling en op tegenspraak worden geraakt door wat zij de nieuwe ‘IT-inkijkstructuur’ noemt. De burger moet weten welke risicoprofielen over hem bestaan en moet kunnen zien hoe die worden beïnvloed.
Er zou daarom een grondrecht op de betrouwbaarheid en doorzichtigheid van cyberspace moeten komen. De burger moet zicht krijgen op de manier waarop hij wordt ‘gelezen’ op internet. „De burger, consument, gebruiker kan dan veel beter inschatten welke machinaal leesbare gedragingen zij unplugged (onbespied) wil verrichten”. Zij stelt zich programmaatjes voor waarmee de burger op ieder moment ‘onder water kan kijken’ om te zien „wie er vanuit welke locatie meekijkt, wat voor profielen de ‘content’ bepalen die we te zien krijgen en hoe data-analyse de beslissingen beïnvloedt waarmee we worden geconfronteerd”. Zodat je kunt begrijpen waarom jouw zorgtoeslag wordt geweigerd, je aanbetaling zo hoog uitvalt en waarom je al dagen alleen maar advertenties voor damespumps te zien krijgt. (‘En wie is er weer via mijn pc online wezen shoppen?’) ‘Wij, burgers van cyberspace’ moeten dus toegang tot de broncodes bedingen, zegt zij. Argumenten als bedrijfsgeheimen, nationale veiligheid of auteursrecht waar bedrijven of overheden mee zullen komen, moeten daar voor wijken. Wie hecht aan een scheiding tussen de publieke en private versie van zijn leven moet dat verdedigen.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
https://www.eff.org/deepl(...)gainst-sopa-and-pipa
quote:An Open Letter From Internet Engineers to the U.S. Congress
We, the undersigned, have played various parts in building a network called the Internet. We wrote and debugged the software; we defined the standards and protocols that talk over that network. Many of us invented parts of it. We're just a little proud of the social and economic benefits that our project, the Internet, has brought with it.
Last year, many of us wrote to you and your colleagues to warn about the proposed "COICA" copyright and censorship legislation. Today, we are writing again to reiterate our concerns about the SOPA and PIPA derivatives of last year's bill, that are under consideration in the House and Senate. In many respects, these proposals are worse than the one we were alarmed to read last year.
If enacted, either of these bills will create an environment of tremendous fear and uncertainty for technological innovation, and seriously harm the credibility of the United States in its role as a steward of key Internet infrastructure. Regardless of recent amendments to SOPA, both bills will risk fragmenting the Internet's global domain name system (DNS) and have other capricious technical consequences. In exchange for this, such legislation would engender censorship that will simultaneously be circumvented by deliberate infringers while hampering innocent parties' right and ability to communicate and express themselves online.
All censorship schemes impact speech beyond the category they were intended to restrict, but these bills are particularly egregious in that regard because they cause entire domains to vanish from the Web, not just infringing pages or files. Worse, an incredible range of useful, law-abiding sites can be blacklisted under these proposals. In fact, it seems that this has already begun to happen under the nascent DHS/ICE seizures program.
Censorship of Internet infrastructure will inevitably cause network errors and security problems. This is true in China, Iran and other countries that censor the network today; it will be just as true of American censorship. It is also true regardless of whether censorship is implemented via the DNS, proxies, firewalls, or any other method. Types of network errors and insecurity that we wrestle with today will become more widespread, and will affect sites other than those blacklisted by the American government.
The current bills -- SOPA explicitly and PIPA implicitly -- also threaten engineers who build Internet systems or offer services that are not readily and automatically compliant with censorship actions by the U.S. government. When we designed the Internet the first time, our priorities were reliability, robustness and minimizing central points of failure or control. We are alarmed that Congress is so close to mandating censorship-compliance as a design requirement for new Internet innovations. This can only damage the security of the network, and give authoritarian governments more power over what their citizens can read and publish.
The US government has regularly claimed that it supports a free and open Internet, both domestically and abroad. We cannot have a free and open Internet unless its naming and routing systems sit above the political concerns and objectives of any one government or industry. To date, the leading role the US has played in this infrastructure has been fairly uncontroversial because America is seen as a trustworthy arbiter and a neutral bastion of free expression. If the US begins to use its central position in the network for censorship that advances its political and economic agenda, the consequences will be far-reaching and destructive.
Senators, Congressmen, we believe the Internet is too important and too valuable to be endangered in this way, and implore you to put these bills aside.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:Desperation: Go Daddy calling customers, begging them to stay
Not to keep beating a dead horse (or elephant), but Go Daddy continues to screw up with its latest PR effort is to let you know that it was just kidding, and that it doesn’t really support SOPA.
When the Internet decided to let the company know that they’d rather have their domain names be kept by a company who doesn’t support the Stop Online Piracy Act, the company flip-flopped on its stance.
They’re not stopping there though, they want to keep you as a customer, because they care about you. Or something like that. One person has reported getting a phone call from a Go Daddy customer support representative, basically begging him to keep his domains put.
Heres an excerpt from a Google+ post describing the awkward call:
. I just got a call from #GoDaddy. The rep said he noticed that Id transferred my 60+ domains away (Ive still got a few there that Im working on transferring, but am being conservative with, since I cant afford any downtime at all with them), and wanted to know if Id tell them why. I got to tell them that it was because of their #SOPA support, and that I couldnt in good conscience give my money to a tech company that would support legislation like that. I told him I was aware that they had reversed their position, but that their explicit support of it in the first place had cost them my confidence in them, as it is at the best viciously ignorant, and at worst, malicious.
The rep was quite sincere in his apology to me, asked if there was anything they could do to win me back. He had a We support IP protections, and now realize that support of SOPA is too broad song-and-dance routine that probably came in from a PR memo today. I told him no thanks, and that was that. Im impressed by the customer service hustle, but it shows that this little incident really spooked them.
While its nice that Go Daddy customer support reps are apologizing to customers, its sad that they have to do this in the first place. Its been a complete PR shitstorm for the company the past few days, and its not getting any better.
Go Daddy failed by supporting a half-baked act that would affect a lot of peoples lives and careers. You cant back it one day, only to back down the next. The damage is done. No amount of phone calls will change that.
/facepalm
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:Digitale spionage dreiging voor Nederland
Nederland moet uitkijken voor digitale spionage door andere landen. Volgens de Nationaal Coördinator Terrorismebestrijding (NCTb) is het aantal incidenten met spionage bij overheid en bedrijven in 2011 gegroeid. Dat staat in het eerste Cybersecuritybeeld Nederland dat de NCTb heeft gepubliceerd.
De samenleving merkt nu het meest van criminelen die op internet opereren, maar staten hebben de kennis en middelen om op grote schaal geavanceerde aanvallen uit te voeren. Landen die bij andere landen spioneren, zijn uit op geheime politieke of economische informatie, of ze hopen er financieel beter van te worden.
Zeer aantrekkelijk
Als het gaat om digitale criminaliteit, lopen bedrijven en burgers meer risico dan de overheid. De dreiging die van deze criminelen uitgaat groeit nog steeds en is duur om te bestrijden, staat in het CSBN. Digitale criminaliteit is voor daders zeer aantrekkelijk, want ze hoeven niet veel te investeren om veel winst te kunnen maken. Bovendien is de kans klein dat ze gepakt worden.
Versterking
Als verdediging tegen de groeiende digitale dreigingen wordt het Team High Tech Crime van de Nationale Recherche versterkt. Dat heeft het kabinet gezegd in een reactie op de dreigingsanalyse. Ook bij Defensie wordt meer aandacht besteed aan digitale dreigingen. Zowel aanvallend als verdedigend moet Defensie meer kunnen. Daarom krijgen de strijdkrachten binnenkort een eigen Taskforce Cyber. Ook zal meer worden samengewerkt met de militaire en algemene inlichtingendiensten (MIVD en AIVD).
In januari gaat het Nationaal Cyber Security Centrum (NCSC) van start, dat onder meer adviezen zal uitbrengen. Ook kan het centrum (helpen) reageren op cyberdreigingen en -aanvallen. In het centrum komen onder andere Govcert - de instelling die gaat over ICT-veiligheid bij de overheid - AIVD, politie, Openbaar Ministerie en Defensie samen. Daar komen in 2012 nog mensen bij uit 'vitale sectoren' zoals telecom en energiebedrijven.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
whois godaddy.com
SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:Cabincr3w doxes Santga Claus.
Santa Claus
AKA: Kristopher Kringle
Wife: Laura Claus
Brother: Jack De’Frost
7,599 kids (names redacted due to age)
Bastard Child: Santi Klaus Jr.- Nov. 5 1988 (23)
Ex Wife: Robbin Grinch
Aliases: DJ Big Kringle, JellyBelly, MC Clause, Waka Flocka Clause, Svan Claus
3250 snowball lane,
Santas Hill, NP 00001
House Worth: $53,675,322,1229.23 (tax free due to charity status)
Occupation: Toy Shop Entrepreneur, Reindeer Rancher
Common Hobbies: Making Gingerbread Houses, Flying Sleighs, Spreading Christmas Cheer, stealing cookies , adding kahlua to his milk, breaking and entering, Using magical elves to steal him cartons of smokes, stealing weed and speed from all the houses he visits on Christamas eve
Most Letters Received From: Caleb Spilchen
Most Naughty On List: Barack Obama, Hermain Cain, Tyler Durden, Rob Portman
Favorite Song: YTCracker - Antsec
Favorite Hacking Tool: Slowloris
Most Used Attack: perl slowloris.pl thegrinch.com 1000
Favorite Musicians: AC/DC (duh!)
Favorite Social Network: www.noradsanta.org
Favorite Disney Movie: Lion King
Favorite Food: Cookies and Milk, Brownies (magic ones)
Fun Facts: He likes it when you are naughty (re: lulzy) & nice, Takes pride in his elves ability to create Stuxnet, his most accomplished gift yet
Court Records:
Kristopher Kringle vs State | Child Labor (suspicion of running a sweat shop)
Kristopher Kringle vs ASPCA | Animal Neglect & Inhumane Treatment (reported whipping of Rudolph)
Kristopher Kringle vs State | Breaking and Entering
Kristopher Kringle vs State | Stalking Of Minors
Favorite song lyrics:
You better not put pout,
You better not cry,
You better not shout im telling you why,
Santas stealing your weed tonight
He knows when you are sleeping
He Knows when you’re awake
He knows when you’ve been bad or good
Hes smoking your bud and about to get baked
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
You better not put pout,
You better not cry,
You better not shout im telling you why,
Santas stealing your speed tonight
He knows when you are sleeping
He Knows when you’re awake
He knows when youve been bad or good
Hes all geeked up, snortin off of your fireplace
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
You better not put pout,
You better not cry,
You better not shout im telling you why,
Santas Clause is coming to town
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
twitter:EricHerboso twitterde op zondag 25-12-2011 om 09:26:24 Private global intelligence company @STRATFOR had its site rooted earlier today by #antisec as part of #LulzXmas. BIG data dump. #anonymous reageer retweet
Private global intelligence company @And the list goes on.....quote:Could this be Stratfor's "private client list"? And what kind of info do you think we have on them?
#antisec #lulzxmas
Company: Homeland Security Bureau of Miami Dade Police Dept
Company: 17 Concepts
Company: 1707 Corp
Company: 2 Years / $349 - Academic acct
Company: 2-377 PFAR
Company: 21st Century Technologies
Company: 23 Shillings LTD.
Company: 230th ALT, TNARNG
Company: 3 month $59 academic memberships
Company: 3 months and The Next Decade / $16
Company: 303-279-0773
Company: 308-792-4109
Company: 312-719-1711 cell
Company: 3157313 nova scotia ltd.
Company: 334-857-3857
Company: 360∞ MEDIZIN
Company: 3M
Company: 403-263-7052
Company: 4M Firearms Import Service,LLC
http://pastebin.com/8MtFze0s
quote:Subject: Important Announcement from STRATFOR
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 19:49:58 -0500
From: STRATFOR <mail[at]response.stratfor.com>
Dear Stratfor Member,
We have learned that Stratfor's web site was hacked by an unauthorized party. As a result of this incident the operation of Stratfor's servers and email have been suspended.
We have reason to believe that the names of our corporate subscribers have been posed on other web sites. We are diligently investigating the extent to which subscriber information may have been obtained.
Stratfor and I take this incident very seriously. Stratfor's relationship with its members and, in particular, the confidentiality of their subscriber information, are very important to Stratfor and me. We are working closely with law enforcement in their investigation and will assist them with the identification of the individual(s) who are responsible.
Although we are still learning more and the law enforcement investigation is active and ongoing, we wanted to provide you with notice of this incident as quickly as possible. We will keep you updated regarding these matters.
Sincerely,
George Friedman
STRATFOR
221 W. 6th Street, Suite 400
Austin, TX 78701 US
www.stratfor.com
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:Intelligence Service Stratfor Suffered A Devastating Hacking Attack Last Night
This Christmas will not be a happy one for George Friedman (who incidentally was the focus of John Mauldin's latest book promotion email blast) and his Stratfor Global Intelligence service, because as of a few hours ago, hacking collective Anonymous disclosed that not only has it hacked the Stratfor website (since confirmed by Friedman himself), but has also obtained the full client list of over 4000 individuals and corporations, including their credit cards (which supposedly have been used to make $1 million in "donations"), as well as over 200 GB of email correspondence.
And since the leaked client list is the who is who of intelligence, and capital management, including such names as Goldman Sachs, the Rockefeller Foundation and, yep, MF Global, we are certain that not only Stratfor and its clients will be waiting with bated breath to see just what additional troves of information are unleashed, but virtually everyone else, in this very sensitive time from a geopolitical point of view. And incidentally, we can't help but notice that Anonymous may have finally ventured into the foreign relations arena.
We can only assume, for now, that this is not a formal (or informal) statement of allegiance with any specific ideology as otherwise the wargames in the Straits of Hormuz may soon be very inappropriately named (or halfway so).
Chronology of releases from AnonymousIRC starting early this afternoon:
Read more: http://www.businessinside(...)011-12#ixzz1hYLppkeK
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
The Huffington post:
quote:Anonymous said it was able to get credit details, in part, because Stratfor didn't bother encrypting them – an easy-to-avoid blunder which – if true – would be a major embarrassment for any security company.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:http://pastebin.com/bQ2YHDdw
How is everybody enjoying Lulzxmas so far? Did you enjoy the epic defacement and destruction of Stratfor's websites? Hey George Friedman, did you ever figure out how much of your subscriber data was compromised yet? If you haven't yet, then allow us to clue you in.
Attached are ~4000 credit cards, md5 passwords, and home addresses to just a few of Stratfor's "private client list". Not as many as you expected? Worry not, fellow pirates and robin hoods. These are just the "A"s.
While the rich and powerful are enjoying themselves with all their bourgeois gifts and lavish meals, our comrade Bradley Manning is not having that great of a time in federal custody. Instead of being heralded as a fighter for free information and government transparency, he is criminalized, marginalized, and incarcerated, threatened with life imprisonment.
We hereby ask that Bradley Manning be given a delicious meal this Lulzxmas, and no, not the "holiday special" in the prison chow hall. We want him out on the streets at a fancy restaurant of his choosing, and we want this to happen in less than five hours.
MERRY LULZXMAS!! h0h0h0h0h0
http://wikisend.com/download/601776/stratfor_full_a.txt.gz
http://www.verzend.be/2u590vnzz586/stratfor_full_a.txt.gz.html
http://www.wupload.com/file/2625119457
http://depositfiles.com/files/o0q2sliiv
http://imagebin.org/190298
http://imagebin.org/190299
http://imagebin.org/190300
http://imagebin.org/190301
http://imagebin.org/190302
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:http://pastebin.com/5H33nPEK
Here's some cracked md5s to go with that Strafor's A client list. 46.94% of it to be exact. I use stronger passwords on porn sites. Good job.
BTW 80 clients have this hash: 0b6baa8c1e120281b338b8478a4c264c:stratfor
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Police-Led Intelligence
quote:PLI is far more concerned about the state of the classified information provided by STRATFOR to the US Government.
STRATFOR maintains separate classified and unclassified networks and information, and PLI understands that none of the STRATFOR data has been spared the attention of the hacking group. Of course, had STRATFOR placed any classified data on the server which we know has been hacked, they’d be in blatant violation of the laws of the US and of common sense, but it’s against the law why? Because it’s happened before.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
twitter:GhostRiderRadio twitterde op zondag 25-12-2011 om 22:46:31 Wanted to give you a heads up @anonymouSabu @AnonymousIRC STRATFOR is DELETING comments & posts on their Facebook wall https://t.co/R30SKCKG reageer retweet
Wanted to give you a heads up @quote:http://pastebin.com/UTHWsY2X
http://www.facebook.com/stratfor
Victor Gebilaguin
The hackers ought to be shot then hanged upside down in public.
umad?
Name: VICTOR A GEBILAGUIN
CC Number: 4055984392110004
Expiration: 2/2013
CVV: 101
Username: vgebilaguin@gmail.com
Pass (md5): 3f31469d10163c60620d48698f3445e2
E-mail: vgebilaguin@gmail.com
Address:
Name: Victor Albert Gebilaguin
Phone: 63324911214
Address: B1 L5 Ruby St Countryside Homes
Lawaan III
Talisay City, Cebu, 6045 Philippines
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Volgens Tweakers hebben degenen die de data gestolen hebben ook 1 miljoen dollar aan "donaties" opgehaald met die data, maar daarvan zie ik hier niks terug (of ik lees er overheen)
Papier, weet jij of 't waar is of niet? En hoe moet ik "donaties" in het artikel opvatten? Echt gedoneerd aan goede doelen of naar henzelf overgemaakt?
Papier, weet jij of 't waar is of niet? En hoe moet ik "donaties" in het artikel opvatten? Echt gedoneerd aan goede doelen of naar henzelf overgemaakt?
http://tweakers.net/nieuw(...)nalist-stratfor.htmlquote:[..] en Anonymous claimt deze creditcarddata te hebben gebruikt om voor 1 miljoen dollar aan 'donaties' op te halen. [..]
De linkjes onderaan deze post:quote:Op zondag 25 december 2011 23:25 schreef Bakakame het volgende:
Volgens Tweakers hebben degenen die de data gestolen hebben ook 1 miljoen dollar aan "donaties" opgehaald met die data, maar daarvan zie ik hier niks terug (of ik lees er overheen)
Papier, weet jij of 't waar is of niet? En hoe moet ik "donaties" in het artikel opvatten? Echt gedoneerd aan goede doelen of naar henzelf overgemaakt?
[..]
http://tweakers.net/nieuw(...)nalist-stratfor.html
Het zijn screenshots van donatie aan o.a. het Rode Kruis. Ik weet natuurlijk niet of het echt is, maar het suggereert donaties aan goede doelen.quote:
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Ah bedankt! Waarschijnlijk moet het worden teruggestort, maar toch goed om te zien.quote:Op zondag 25 december 2011 23:35 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:
[..]
De linkjes onderaan deze post:
[..]
Het zijn screenshots van donatie aan o.a. het Rode Kruis. Ik weet natuurlijk niet of het echt is, maar het suggereert donaties aan goede doelen.
[ afbeelding ]
[ afbeelding ]
De berichtgeving op Tweakers doet namelijk vermoeden dat ze het naar zichzelf hebben overgemaakt 
bronquote:Emergency Christmas Anonymous Press Release
-------------------------------------------
12/25/2011
THE STRATFOR HACK IS NOT THE WORK OF ANONYMOUS
Stratfor is an open source intelligence agency, publishing daily reports on data collected from the open internet. Hackers claiming to be Anonymous have distorted this truth in order to further their hidden agenda, and some Anons have taken the bait.
The leaked client list represents subscribers to a daily publication which is the primary service of Stratfor. Stratfor analysts are widely considered to be extremely unbiased. Anonymous does not attack media sources. In this excerpt from Time, there is a brief description of how Stratfor analysts uncovered a possible US backed coup in Iraq preceding the US invasion.
"In the past month Stratfor has drawn attention to a carefully assembled open-source report that asserted that last month's attack on Iraq wasn't intended just to punish Saddam Hussein for blowing off U.N. weapons inspectors. By sorting through thousands of pieces of publicly available data--from Middle East newspapers to Iraqi-dissident news--Stratfor analysts developed a theory that the attacks were actually designed to mask a failed U.S.-backed coup. In two striking, contrarian intelligence briefs released on the Internet on Jan. 5 and Jan. 6, Stratfor argued that Saddam's lightning restructuring of the Iraqi military, followed by executions of the army's Third Corps commanders, was evidence that the coup had been suppressed. Predictably, U.S. officials said the report was wrong."
Stratfor has been purposefully misrepresented by these so-called Anons and portrayed in false light as a company which engages in activity similar to HBGary. Sabu and his crew are nothing more than opportunistic attention whores who are possibly agent provocateurs. As a media source, Stratfor's work is protected by the freedom of press, a principle which Anonymous values greatly.
This hack is most definitely not the work of Anonymous.
We are Anonymous
We do not forgive
We do not forget
Expect us
quote:Is Anonymous Squabbling over the Stratfor Hack?
Representatives from the global intelligence company Stratfor awoke to find a lump of coal in their stockings this morning – or, more specifically, their clients' credit card information strewn across the Web. It's the latest cyber-attack being claimed by members of the hacktivist group Anonymous, one that allegedly resulted in the publishing of nearly 4,000 credit card numbers, site passwords, and home addresses for some of the (formerly) confidential clients of the U.S.-based security firm.
The goal? The attackers indicated they were planning to use the stolen credit card information (allegedly stored as unencrypted text) to amass a sum of one million dollars that could then be given to various charities for the holiday season. Images posted alongside the hack's alleged Pastebin-based press release show that some of these charity donations are already underway.
The attackers were also hoping to secure the release of Pfc. Bradley Manning, the U.S. Army soldier who just wrapped up pretrial proceedings this past week related to his alleged involvement in the leak of hundreds of thousands of confidential military documents. Manning is charged with 22 different counts related to the various leaks, and it's expected that he'll face a full court-martial in 2012 – with the possibility of a life sentence as a punishment, if convicted.
"We hereby ask that Bradley Manning be given a delicious meal this Lulzxmas, and no, not the 'holiday special' in the prison chow hall. We want him out on the streets at a fancy restaurant of his choosing, and we want this to happen in less than five hours," reads the statement by the alleged Stratfor attackers.
However, there appears to be a bit of contention among the ranks of Anonymous, as the aforementioned press release conflicts with another release -- allegedly from the "official faction" representing Anonymous – detailing that the Stratfor attack has nothing to do with the organization as a whole.
"Stratfor has been purposefully misrepresented by these so-called Anons and portrayed in false light as a company which engages in activity similar to HBGary. Sabu and his crew are nothing more than opportunistic attention whores who are possibly agent provocateurs. As a media source, Stratfor's work is protected by the freedom of press, a principle which Anonymous values greatly," reads the Pastebin release.
"This hack is most definitely not the work of Anonymous," it adds.
No matter who represents Anonymous officially, the potential implications of the attack remain: The information already made public by the Stratfor hackers is allegedly just a subset of the 200 gigabytes of data allegedly stolen in the attack.
"Stratfor and I take this incident very seriously. Stratfor's relationship with its members and, in particular, the confidentiality of their subscriber information, are very important to Stratfor and me," reads a message posted to the Stratfor Facebook page by CEO George Friedman. "We are working closely with law enforcement in their investigation and will assist them with the identification of the individual(s) who are responsible. "
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
twitter:BarrettBrownLOL twitterde op maandag 26-12-2011 om 06:57:42 I've been authorized by @AnonymouSabu and others involved in #Stratfor hack to begin dialog with the firm. We'll see if they agree. reageer retweet
I've been authorized by @
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:Austin-based security contractor victim of hacking attack
A Texas man who spent more than a decade dealing with cybercrime at banks is now among the apparent victims of a hacking attack against a security contractor based in Texas.
Hackers with the loosely-affiliated group known as "Anonymous" say they stole emails and credit card data from the company, Stratfor, and that it's the start of a week-long assault on a long list of targets -- inspired by Christmas.
One hacker says the plan is to use the credit card data to steal a million dollars, and give the money away as Christmas donations. Images posted online claimed to show the receipts for the donations.
Allen Barr of Austin -- who recently retired from the Texas Department of Banking -- says he discovered Friday that a total of $700 had been spent from his account. He says five transactions were made, with the money going to charities including the Red Cross, CARE and Save the Children.
The hackers also posted a link on Twitter to a site containing the email, phone number and credit number of a U.S. Homeland Security employee.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
twitter:Anon_Central twitterde op maandag 26-12-2011 om 08:36:03 #Stratfor hack is a desperate attempt to gain attention by anonops. We don't hurt the innocent and steal their creditcards. Ever! #Anonymous reageer retweet
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:STRATFOR Hires “leading identity theft protection and monitoring service”
STRATFOR , George Friedman has made another statement via its facebook page that states a few different things.
First of all they have stated they have acquired the help of a “Leading identify theft protection and monitoring service” for its clients and that no later then the 28th of this month will all its effected clients be contacted with the services details.
On a more interesting point they have also stated that the so called private client list is just a list of clients that paid for a subscription service.
One very good strong point comment to the statement is “Why didn’t you encrypt the data? You would think in your industry, this would be the first things you’d do!”
Also they have stated they are working closely with authorities, but infact it should really be them who faces any type of penalty’s for lettings this happen in the first place, just like when a oil tank spills at sea….
See the full statement and comments, here
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Niet alleen Anonymous of Occupy heeft klachten over Twitter:
quote:Is Twitter Unfollowing People On Your Account?
No matter what your politics are, I'm sure you'll agree that you don't want your cellphone suddenly blocking your ability to call a friend because it's decided that your friend's politics are "undesirable."
Now, I know that anecdotal evidence is an iffy thing, but for the past several days I've been getting multiple stories from multiple sources that something is rotten in the state of Twitter, and that this is exactly what is happening.
Multiple conservative Twitter accounts are complaining that they are spontaneously "unfollowing" other conservative Twitter accounts. I've had it happen to me, where my account has "unfollowed" people without my consent or knowledge. Simple bug? Maybe.
An anonymous source, who claims to be with Twitter, contacted me today claiming that there's a "hacktivist" on Twitter's payroll who's having a little fun at the expense of his ideological opponents. I can't confirm this as just a simple rumor or hoax, since the upper management of Twitter is beyond impossible to contact.
Given that Twitter has had "issues" with censoring conservative accounts in the past, I find this new round of anecdotal stories troubling.
Either Twitter is an uncensored medium that allows all political viewpoints, or it isn't. It claims to be unbiased in this regard, and likens itself to a telephone company -- and prefers to intervene only when threats are made between individual users (just as a telephone company would). It trumpets its efforts in the middle-east to spread news of the Arab Spring, but seems to display an odd behavior when it comes to politics on its own shores.
Now look, if this is true, then this isn't exactly a case of censorship. First, there's no government involved. Secondly, if Twitter doesn't like conservatives on its site, then hey, it's their private property, more power to them. But management should come out and declare its sentiments outright, rather than do it sneakily, behind the scenes.
Bear in mind, there can be other explanations for this new Twitter oddness. The more complex a system, the more apt it is to have weird bugs. The explanation could be entirely innocent. So I'd like to gather evidence on this new behavior, and I'd like enough "noise" to be made for Twitter's management to give us a definitive statement on its neutrality.
It could very well be that this "hacktivist" is doing this without the knowledge or consent of Twitter's management. Sometimes programmers go off the reservation, after all.
So if you can, please leave a comment below through your Twitter account. Let me know if you have noticed this odd "unfollowing" behavior. And please tweet out this article so that the folks who are "still" following you can see it.
Update 9/22/11: Smitty from TheOtherMcCain has a caution which is duly noted here not to go too overboard on a sense of entitlement to Twitter's service. I agree. I simply want to know if it's a bug or something being done on purpose.
Update 9/22/11: A fellow claiming to be from Twitter is trying to figure it out in a helpful and respectful way.
Share it!
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:twitter:Anon_Central twitterde op maandag 26-12-2011 om 08:36:03 #Stratfor hack is a desperate attempt to gain attention by anonops. We don't hurt the innocent and steal their creditcards. Ever! #Anonymous reageer retweet
twitter:AnonymousIRC twitterde op maandag 26-12-2011 om 12:26:26 @Anon_Central The team responsible for #Stratfor is neither located on nor affiliated with #AnonOps. AnonOps was just used for public chan. reageer retweet
@
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:antisec teaser 12/26
#AntiSec
Greetings Global Pirates,
We truly hope that you’ve been enjoying the Lulzxmas festivities so far. The gifts that AnonSanta left under the LulzXmas tree are just the beginning. As we speak, his little helpers at the North Pole are readying his battle sleigh of lulz with more goodies to bring you LulzXmas joy all week long. Joy in the form of over $500,000 being expropriated from the bigshot clients of Stratfor. You didn’t think we’d let 2011 end without a BANG, did you?
However, if you are one of the hundreds of thousands of customers of STRATFOR Global [Un]Intelligence, you probably woke up Christmas morning to find heaps of burning coal in your stocking. But don’t fret. Take comfort in the fact that at least you’re not George Friedman or any of the STRATFOR IT guys right now.
We create chaos. We create mayhem. We curb stomp companies that play fast and loose with their customers’ private and sensitive information. We bring pain to greedy whitehats willing to flip for a dime on government payrolls. And don't worry—there's plenty more havoc in store for the rest of the week. So throw a log on the fire, grab some hot chocolate and settle in for a long week of lulz.
Did you have fun looting and plundering from the pocketbooks of the rich and powerful? How about laughing at the reaction of some of their butthurt customers. We LOL’d hard when poor little Cody Sultenfuss, ranch owner and DHS employee, who asked "Why me?" and when Allen Barr, just retired from the Texas Dept. of Banking, exclaimed, "It made me feel terrible. It made my wife feel terrible.” Let us not forget dear old Victor Gebilaguin, who posted the following on STRATFOR’s Facebook wall in defense of the company: "The hackers ought to be shot then hanged upside down in public." Well since you feel so strongly about it Victor, we went ahead and ran your card up a bit. Hope you don't mind. Really guys, cry us a river. Then go and fill out our all-purpose Butthurt Form, so we can get back to you promptly. Your feedback is important to us. Thanks.
Interestingly, one thing we noticed in the fallout of this catastrophic hack was that STRATFOR hired not one, but two outside consultants to try to bail their sorry asses out of the hellhole of a grave we dug them. Top identity theft protection? Professional security consultant? We'll see how that works out for you, if you ever dare to put your servers back online again. Until then, we’ll be watching and waiting. And laughing, of course.
By the way, now that you have notified your customers of this massive security breach, we might have to pick up the pace of releasing peoples’ credit card information.
Accordingly, we'll start the day after Christmas off right by dropping a third of the damn alphabet. How does a drop of 30,000 additional names, credit cards, addresses, phone numbers, and md5 hashed passwords sound? Sounds like a financial calamity to us. And just as the markets in the US are opening after the holiday weekend? Might be trouble.
But wait! That’s not all folks. 0h hell n0. Tomorrow, we will be dropping another enormous dump on our next target: the entire customer database from an online military and law enforcement supply store. Bring the pain? Shit, we brought the motherfuckin’ ruckus. You really trying to step this this?
Of course, this could all be averted. Have you given our comrade Bradley Manning his holiday feast yet, at a fancy restaurant of his choosing? Better make it happen, captain.
We’ll end today’s LulzXmas festivities by throwing in 25,000 tickets from the it.STRATFOR.com online support database. It's probably not as controversial as the contents of their private mail spools that we'll be dropping later, but perhaps it will shed some light on just how clueless this company really is when it comes to database security.
Stay tuned ...
###
http://ibhg35kgdvnb7jvw.onion/lulzxmas/STRATFOR_full_d_m.txt.gz
https://rapidshare.com/#!download|44tl6|2444489251|STRATFOR_full_d_m.txt.gz|3255|R~7B8842ED6343CEAE67A23C094E131679|0|0
http://depositfiles.com/files/t0hkk2wif
http://www.wupload.com/file/2625986107
http://www.verzend.be/kx1n5oixnqn1/STRATFOR_full_d_m.txt.gz.html
http://ibhg35kgdvnb7jvw.onion/lulzxmas/it.tar.gz
http://www.verzend.be/s8v8ccig12hp/it.tar.gz.html
http://www.wupload.com/file/2626086337
http://depositfiles.com/files/ifnw3s34a
https://rapidshare.com/#!download|418l34|3218055206|it.tar.gz|416|R~0|0|0|You%20need%20RapidPro%20to%20download%20more%20files%20from%20your%20IP%20address.%20%288d5611a9%29
##
SPECIAL NOTICE: We are aware that there has been some confusion as to whether the STRATFOR hack is an "official" Anonymous operation, due to a ridiculous "Emergency Anonymous Press Statement" being circulated, undermining our work while also making baseless accusations that we frequently see perpetrated by agent provocateurs. Whether this is the work of malicious counter-intelligence,, some butthurt pacifists, or stratfor employees themselves is unknown. Unfortunately, some main stream news agencies have picked up on this statement, looking for any reason to highlight and exploit any potential "inner divisions” within Anonymous. However, there has been no such squabble or infighting regarding the STRATFOR target, or any other LulzXmas target for that matter. Anyone can claim to be Anonymous, but because of the inherent decentralized nature of Anonymous, without central top-down leadership, no individual is in a place to speak to the legitimacy of another individual or group’s operation. Furthermore, our history of owning high profile targets as Anonymous has been well documented at the #antisec embassy (http://ibhg35kgdvnb7jvw.onion/) and is well known and respected within all Anon communities. Case closed.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:To Boston DA
- It has recently come to my attention that you have deemed it necessary to issue an Administrative Subpoena for my Twitter account along with a few #hashtags. Not only do I find it funny that you issued subpoenas for hashtags, I find it even funnier that you failed to read Twitters terms of service stating that they inform users of people requesting information on their accounts. Let me just quote that for you.
- " In accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, non-public information about Twitter users is not released except as lawfully required by appropriate legal process such as a subpoena, court order, or other valid legal process document. Some information we store is automatically collected, while other information is provided at the user’s discretion. Though we do store this information, it may not be accurate if the user has created a fake or anonymous profile. Twitter doesn’t require email verification or identity authentication. Twitter's policy is to notify users of requests for their information prior to disclosure unless we are prohibited from doing so by statute or court order. "
- And fortunately enough for me, your "administrative subpoena" does not fall under the category of a "Court order" Therefor Twitter notified me of your request and conveniently attached a PDF file of the subpoena. Now as I'm sure you know this document has been spread all over the web. So I ask you, how's the "Confidentiality and integrity" of your "Ongoing criminal investigation" working out? Not so confidential huh?
- Anyways this is just my official statement to you letting you know your subpoenas will not shake me. So do whatever you think you can to try and stop Anonymous, but you will learn fast. One of us is not nearly as harsh as all of us. You cannot arrest an idea. You cannot subpoena a hashtag.
We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Don't expect us.
We're already here.
#Anonymous #Antisec #CabinCr3w #doxcak3 #OpPigRoast
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:GoDaddy loses 21,000 domains in a day
Domain registrar Go Daddy lost over 21,000 domains yesterday. It could be a coincidence--or it could be the result of the company's PR debacle over its support for the Stop Online Piracy Act.
Yesterday, Go Daddy actually reversed course and dropped its support for the controversial legislation. "Go Daddy will support it when and if the Internet community supports it," Go Daddy CEO Warren Adelman announced in a statement.
SOPA, introduced in Congress this fall, would make it easier for the Justice Department to shut down sites allegedly dedicated to piracy.
An anti-Go Daddy thread on social site Reddit led to the creation of Godaddyboycott.org, a site set up to let people amass their disapproval with the company's support of SOPA.
While 21,054 domains transferred out Friday of Domaincontrol.com--which is managed by Go Daddy--it is only fair to note that 20,034 transferred in the same day, according to domain tracker Dailychanges.com
According to techie site TheNextWeb.com, though, the transfers-out have been building over the course of the week, with 8,800 reported on Monday and 14,500 on Wednesday.
Go Daddy did not immediately respond to CNET's request for comment.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
When telling the truth becomes a terror-attack.quote:'Anonymous' plans for 'violent revolution'
The hackers known as "Anonymous," who helped organize and support the Occupy movement's protests, have released an online survivor guide for citizens "in case of a violent revolution in your country."
The guide warns protests can be a "bloody mess." It trains rioters on how to avoid tear gas, rubber bullets and live ammunition.
The 15-page PDF document claims police will not help protesters and may actually be enemies of the revolution while warning that protest groups may be infiltrated by "fake civilians."
The Anonymous survival guide was published just before the hacker group claimed Sunday to have stolen thousands of credit card numbers and other personal information belonging to clients of U.S.-based security think tank Stratfor.
. "Red Army: The Radical Network that must be defeated to save America" exposes the extremists behind Occupy Wall Street along with the radical socialist network that seized political power in Washington over decades, shaped Obama's presidential agenda and threatens the very future of the U.S.
Anonymous has promised more infiltrations and hacker jobs, saying it has "enough targets lined up to extend the fun fun fun of LulzXmas through the entire next week."
The group previously claimed responsibility for attacks on major credit card and Internet companies. It has warned it may try to disrupt the U.S. and global banking infrastructure.
(Story continues below)
Read more: 'Anonymous' plans for 'violent revolution' http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=381477#ixzz1hkyLtA1A
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:Mobieltjes zijn eenvoudig te hacken
Vrijwel elke mobiele telefoon kan eenvoudig worden gehackt. Dat meldt Elsevier op basis van een onderzoeksrapport.
Twee beveiligingsdeskundigen hebben 31 aanbieders van mobiele telefoons in verschillende landen onderzocht. Met behulp van goedkope apparatuur en gratis software lukte het de deskundigen om in te breken in andere telefoons.
Ze konden bij telefoonnummers, sms'jes en voicemailberichten. Ook konden de twee gesprekken afluisteren en andere telefoons gebruiken om te bellen. In korte tijd konden de beveiligingsdeskundigen honderdduizenden telefoons hacken.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
quote:Conservatives lining up in opposition to SOPA
Views on copyright law have never broken down cleanly along ideological or partisan lines, but many of the key supporters for the Stop Online Piracy Act have come from the political right. The legislation is sponsored by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) and it enjoys support from right-leaning, corporate-funded organizations like the Chamber of Commerce and Americans for Tax Reform.
But a growing number of right-leaning individuals and organizations have come out against SOPA. Last Wednesday, the Heritage Foundation, one of the nation's largest and most influential conservative think tanks, published an article by senior research fellow James Gattuso warning about the "unintended consequences" of SOPA. And on Thursday, he was joined in opposing SOPA by Erick Erickson, editor of the popular conservative blog RedState.
In his article, Gattuso noted that SOPA would undermine Internet security by delaying the implementation of DNSSEC and by causing Internet users to use offshore DNS servers to circumvent DNS blocks. He also warned that government regulation of search results would be "the first step down a classic slippery slope of government interference that has no clear stopping point."
Gattuso's stance is notable because Heritage has traditionally supported strong enforcement of copyright law. As former US attorney general Edwin Meese put it in a 2005 article for Heritage, "stealing is stealing, and it must stop."
Gattuso agrees with Meese that the "stealing" needs to stop, but he argues Congress should deal with the problem "in a way that does not disrupt the growth of technology, does not weaken Internet security, and respects free speech rights." And he doesn't think SOPA fits the bill.
Erickson also opposes SOPA, and he is taking a more activist approach to the issue. In a Thursday blog post, he pledged to recruit primary challengers to run against conservatives who support SOPA.
"I love Marsha Blackburn (R-TN). She is a delightful lady and a solidly conservative member of Congress," he wrote. However, because Blackburn is a SOPA cosponsor, Erickson pledged to "do everything in my power to defeat her in her 2012 re-election bid."
Erickson proposed that liberals and conservative SOPA opponents make a pact in which each agrees to support primary challenges against SOPA cosponsors in their own parties.
Erickson and Gattuso are jumping on a bandwagon that has long been occupied by the more libertarian sectors of the American right. GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul came out against SOPA last month, and his libertarian-leaning son, Senator Rand Paul has criticized the Senate version of the legislation. Scholars from libertarian think tanks such as the Cato Institute (where I'm an adjunct scholar), the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and the Mercatus Center have all criticized PIPA and SOPA.
In short, the fight over SOPA is less about left versus right than it is about declining industries—Hollywood and major labels—versus the Internet community. Conservative bloggers like Erickson, Matt Drudge, and Glenn "Instapundit" Reynolds are as offended by the legislation as are their liberal and libertarian counterparts. Conversely, even staunch civil libertarians seem to get confused about copyright issues if they're too closely tied to Hollywood.
Speaking to CNET last week, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) predicted that Republican opposition would help kill SOPA. "I think the Republican House leadership will look and say, 'Unless we have the support of the vast majority of Republicans, we're not going to take the bill to the floor,'" he said.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
262 van de 293 posts zijn van de TS. Aangezien er blijkbaar weinig interesse meer is in dit onderwerp en er geen enkele discussie plaatsvindt lijkt een deel 10 me overbodig.
Ik vind jouw mening niet zo rullevant. Bedankt voor de updates Papierversnipperaar.
Reis ver, drink wijn, denk na, lach hard, duik diep. Kom Terug.
Dan kijk jij even fijn niet in deeltje 10, probleem opgelostquote:Op dinsdag 27 december 2011 21:30 schreef chibibo het volgende:
262 van de 293 posts zijn van de TS. Aangezien er blijkbaar weinig interesse meer is in dit onderwerp en er geen enkele discussie plaatsvindt lijkt een deel 10 me overbodig.
Graag gedaan, Mani.quote:Op woensdag 28 december 2011 01:11 schreef Mani89 het volgende:
Ik vind jouw mening niet zo rullevant. Bedankt voor de updates Papierversnipperaar.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
En dan mijn dagelijkse ergernis missen?quote:
Dan kijk jij even fijn niet in deeltje 10, probleem opgelost
Volgens mij is het NWS-forum bedoeld om te discussiëren over het nieuws, en worden simpele linkdumps en copy/paste-topics hier normaliter geweerd. Wellicht kan de TS het nieuws als submits naar de Frontpage sturen, daar lijkt het me beter op zijn plaats.
quote:https://www.readwriteweb.(...)oena_under_wraps.php
Twitter Ignored Request To Keep Subpoena Under Wraps [UPDATED]
Twitter appears to have forwarded a subpoena requesting user information to at least one of the owners of the accounts in question, despite a request from the Suffolk Massachusetts District Attorney's office that the request not be disclosed "to protect the confidentiality and integrity of the ongoing criminal action" regarding the hackitivist group Anonymous and events surrounding the Occupy Boston protest.
"Haha. Boston PD submitted to Twitter for my information. Lololol? For what? Posting info pulled from public domains? #comeatmebro," said the owner of the Twitter handle @p0isAn0N last week, in a post that included the subpoena. The subpoena also sought user information, including IP addresses for @OccupBoston, Guido Fawkes (there are more than 30 accounts using the name Guido Fawkes on Twitter) and subscriber information for the hash tage #BostonPD.
Requests for comment have been made to both Twitter and the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office. We'll update when they get back to us.
Update: "We can't comment on any specific order or request," Matt Graves, a spokesperson for Twitter said in an email. "However, to help users protect their rights, it is our policy to notify our users about law enforcement and governmental requests for their information, unless we are prevented by law from doing so."
Twitter's guidelines for law enforcement say the company notifies users when information is requested unless forbidden from doing so by statute or court order. It's not clear if Twitter turned over the subpoena to @p0isAn0N and, if so, why it chose to ignore the request made on the second page of the subpoena.
Twitter's guidelines also say that the company will only turn over personal information if presented with a subpoena or a court order. Unlike Facebook, which prohibits users from registering anonymously, Twitter users can use false identities when signing up for an account.
"Never declare war on the young," said Harvey Silverglate, a noted civil libertarian, told the Boston Herald in reference to the less-than-tech-savvy wording of the subpoena. "They'll outlast you. They'll outthink you. They'll outdo you... That may be the lesson the DA's office is about to learn."
In October, at the height of the Occupy Boston protest, hackers claiming to be members of Anonymous broke into the Boston Police Patrolmens' Association and copied members' names, union email addresses and passwords. The information was later posted online.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Als je LaPo hebt, vergeet je dan niet om een nieuw deel te openen?quote:Op woensdag 28 december 2011 12:12 schreef chibibo het volgende:
[..]
En dan mijn dagelijkse ergernis missen?
Volgens mij is het NWS-forum bedoeld om te discussiëren over het nieuws, en worden simpele linkdumps en copy/paste-topics hier normaliter geweerd. Wellicht kan de TS het nieuws als submits naar de Frontpage sturen, daar lijkt het me beter op zijn plaats.
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
| Forum Opties | |
|---|---|
| Forumhop: | |
| Hop naar: | |