Olieramp in Golf van Mexico: deel 8 - de kap zit erop

quote:

Op woensdag 21 juli 2010 20:50 schreef jeoff het volgende:
Waarschijnlijk raakt de eerste relief well dit weekend al de bron! Als de eerste poging meteen raak is kan het daarna nog 2 weken duren voordat de 'bottom kill' procedure de bron helemaal heeft afgesloten.

Ook hebben de experts van zowel BP als de regering besloten dat de kans op een nieuwe blow-out minimaal is. Ze zullen dus de huidige kap gesloten houden tot de relief well zijn werk gedaan heeft.

http://www.pnj.com/articl(...)each-pipe-by-weekend

quote:

PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Quote

All anyone has to do is look up the below positions on a map to see where the first abandoned and blown out well is positioned in relation to the current well they supposedly capped. The first well, WELL #A, has been spewing oil into the Gulf since February 13. WELL #B (meant to be a relief well) commenced on or about February 20 and blew up Deepwater Horizon on April 20.

Look at the plans and the facts. Look at the maps. Do searches and see for yourself. All that's necessary is to read what has already been revealed.

This has been a monumental COVER UP since February 13. It is no different than the cover-up of what


BP WELL #A (the first well that blew and was abandoned)

Latitude 28/44/17.277 N
Longitude 88/21/57.340 W

On location in Mississippi Canyon Block 252 in the Gulf of Mexico, the Deepwater Horizon semi-sub commenced exploration drilling at the Macondo prospect on 03FEB10.

This exploration well had been partially drilled by Transocean in OCT09. The Marianas semi-sub was damaged by hurricane Ida and was removed for repairs in late NOV09.

BP immediately experienced serious problems with its Deepwater Horizon semi-sub operation on 03FEB10. They were unable to seal large cracks at the base of the well for ten days.

BP informed the U.S. Minerals Management Service Dept. of the Interior on 13FEB10 that the cracks were causing uncontrollable bursts of natural gas and they filed a permit to abandon the well immediately.

President Obama was notified of the well blowout on February 13, 2010.


BP WELL #B (the second well that blew up Deepwater Horizon)

Latitude 28/44/16.027 N
Longitude 88/21/57.340 W


BP's Exploration Plan for both wells A and B filed with the Minerals Management Service (Dept. of the Interior) on February 23, 2009.

quote:

Another reference to WELL #A:

On Feb. 13, BP told the minerals service it was trying to seal cracks in the well about 40 miles (64 kilometers) off the Louisiana coast, drilling documents obtained by Bloomberg show. Investigators are still trying to determine whether the fissures played a role in the disaster http://www.bloomberg.com/(...)-documents-show.html

quote:

SKANDI NEPTUNE
the Rov that shows the "NEW cap"
is the exact coordinates of the FIRST well that blew in February....NOT of the second well (the blew up the rig).

quote:

Op woensdag 21 juli 2010 21:10 schreef jeoff het volgende:
Zucht, Ik ga er nog niet meer op reageren. Als er na het week-end geen Tsunami is geweest, en de Relief Well zijn werk kan gaan doen, dan nog vinden jullie wel een of andere self-claimed expert op een vage BNW bron die iets te melden heeft.

quote:

'Static kill' of breached Gulf oil well could begin within 48 hoursNew Orleans, Louisiana (CNN) -- BP could try an operation by this weekend to permanently seal its breached Gulf of Mexico oil well -- but only if federal officials approve the plan and BP gets a crucial casing in place, the government's point man on the oil spill said Wednesday.

The tactic, called a "static kill," involves pumping mud into the well to force oil back into the reservoir below.

Retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, who's leading the federal response to the spill, told reporters time is of the essence because of the potential for severe weather coming from the Caribbean. BP is not attempting to get the casing in place until they determine what the weather may do, he said.

Officials from BP have said the "static kill" option could succeed where similar attempts have failed because pressure in the well is lower than expected.

Geologist Arthur Berman said on CNN's "American Morning" Tuesday that the relative simplicity of a static kill makes it an attractive option for BP.

"I think the reason that they're considering it is because they've yet to intercept the well bore," Berman said. "They're very close, a few feet away with the relief well, as everyone knows. But to actually intersect the 7-inch pipe does involve a bit of technology and accuracy, whereas if they do the static kill through the existing well bore at the top, there's less uncertainty about their ability to actually get the mud into the pipe."

A team of scientists and engineers led by the Unified Area Command will decide whether to proceed with the "static kill" technique.


Video: BP's next move for tests

Video: Is BP buying scientists?

Video: Seepage detected in Gulf

Video: Airship aiding cleanup effort RELATED TOPICS
Gulf Coast Oil Spill
BP
Gulf of Mexico
BP said Wednesday the cap that was placed on the sunken well July 12 is still keeping the oil inside. No oil is leaking into the water as pressure slowly rises, it said, but critical tests on the capped well continue as scientists work on the ultimate solution to end the oil disaster.

Pressure testing on the well was extended for another 24 hours Tuesday, Allen said.

The tests on the new, tightly fitting containment cap began last Thursday and are designed to determine its effectiveness. Federal officials said Tuesday that one reported leak is coming from another old well a couple of miles away and is inconsequential.

Though the new cap has stopped the incessant flow of oil into the Gulf, government officials and BP have said that the cap on the well is only a temporary fix for the oil disaster, which was sparked when the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded and sank April 20.

BP officials are still working on the permanent fix: a relief well that is scheduled to be in place by the end of July.

"We've just got a little ways left to go, probably within 50, 60 feet of the bottom of the hole," BP Senior Vice President Kent Wells said Tuesday. "Once we reach the bottom, we'll do what we call 'circulate bottoms up' to make sure the hole's clean, and then we'll start pulling out of the hole to run casing, and that will take place over Wednesday and Thursday, followed by cementing. And of course, that all assumes that we have no issues, no weather, whatever that could possibly disrupt that. But that's sort of the plan."

Weather could disrupt the plan. Allen said Wednesday the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration planned to send a plane to a severe weather system traversing the Caribbean early Wednesday afternoon to gather data on its potential impact on the Gulf. Allen said a tropical storm making a direct impact on the area could disrupt operations for 10 to 14 days. He said no decision has been made on the status of the well cap if a storm directly impacts the site.

Supplemental boom placed to protect counties in Florida's Panhandle from the oil will be removed because of the potential tropical storm activity, the state Emergency Response Team and Florida Department of Environmental Protection said Wednesday.

"During a tropical storm boom can cause additional damage to the natural resources that we are trying to protect from oil spill impacts," said Michael Sole, secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection, in a written statement. The boom was deployed by the state using funds from the $50 million distributed by BP in areas not covered by the U.S. Coast Guard's contingency plan.

Meanwhile, Allen said, crews are "starting to have trouble finding oil." Officials have said that is a reflection of the work that skimmers and cleanup crews are doing as no new oil flows into the Gulf.

British Prime Minister David Cameron, who was visiting Washington on Tuesday, said he "completely understands" the anger that "exists ... across America" regarding the ruptured oil well.

"It is BP's role to cap the leak" and compensate people affected by it, he said during a visit with President Barack Obama. Cameron said he is in regular touch with the leadership of BP, a British-based company.

Several U.S. politicians have criticized BP for trying to put a positive spin on the crisis during the three months since the Deepwater Horizon exploded and sank. Wednesday, BP confirmed to CNN that a staff photographer had altered pictures of engineers looking at three blank screens at the company's oil spill control center, making the screens look like they were displaying underwater shots, to "enhance the quality of the photo."

BP says that the photographer had no intention to mislead anybody and the altered picture was taken off the BP website as soon as the issue was discovered.

quote:

Op woensdag 21 juli 2010 18:39 schreef gebrokenglas het volgende:

Pressure continues to slowly increase and is approximately 6844 psi.

quote:

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 10:30 schreef Oo-blackgirl-oO het volgende:
tvp: 2010 the year we make contact.

Camera 7, 21-7-2010:

BP webcam 8 leak - 21 juli 2010

quote:

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 10:35 schreef xenobinol het volgende:

[..]

Gewoon 'stof' dat door de propellors van de ROV wordt opgeblazen, big deal.

Waarom verplaatsen we deze topic reeks eigenlijk niet naar BNW

quote:

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 10:43 schreef jeoff het volgende:

Ja is overduidelijk stof. En al zou het gas zijn, dat is ook al verklaard door BP.

Ik dacht al dat ik de enige roepende was over het BNW gehalte. Er zijn meerdere olieramp topics in BNW, maar toch komen ze hier steeds die vage bronnen neerpleuren.

quote:

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 09:39 schreef Revolution-NL het volgende:
Wederom word er hier gesproken over het feit dat de beelden van de ROV's niet afkomstig zijn van de bron die 20 april opgeblazen is.

Matthew Simmons Discusses BP's Oil Leak in Gulf of Mexico

quote:

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 14:42 schreef francorex het volgende:

[..]

Als ook maar iets van wat Simmons zegt waar is, thats shocking !

quote:

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 10:43 schreef jeoff het volgende:

[..]
Ik dacht al dat ik de enige roepende was over het BNW gehalte. Er zijn meerdere olieramp topics in BNW, maar toch komen ze hier steeds die vage bronnen neerpleuren.

quote:

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 14:54 schreef Jungpionier het volgende:

[..]

Ja idd, de BNW dingen horen hier eigenlijk niet, er lopen volgens mij al 3 topics in BNW.

Verder moet je ook in NWS toch wel kritisch kunnen zijn over wat er in het nieuws gebeurd, of niet?
Dat er rare verhalen zijn van de BP kant dat is wel duidelijk. Ook blijft er altijd ook de vraag wat is "nieuws". Alleen dingen uit de gangbare media? Is het niet van de ANP mag het niet in NWS?

Youtube conspiracy filmpjes plaatsen is niet op zijn plaats in NWS, dat klopt wel, maar een filmpje plaatsen van een live-feed van de ROVs dat moet wel kunnen, toch?

trouwens de enige die zegt dat op de 23ste iets gaat gebeuren is een of ander blogger die graancircles bestudeerd. Volgens mij vind je niemand hier die er serieus in geloofd. Dat neemt niet weg dat de potentie voor een of andere gebeurtenis ivm de lekkages wel daadwerkelijk bestaat.

quote:

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 14:56 schreef Ermanon het volgende:

[..]

Nou ja, morgen/vannacht weten we of de graancirkels gelijk hebben of liegen

quote:

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 14:56 schreef Jungpionier het volgende:

[..]

hehe, of dat er een rekenfoutje is gemaakt in de interpretatie. Zou net zo goed kunnen..

quote:

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 17:05 schreef MantaGSi het volgende:
De olieramp in Mexico: deel 7- worst case scenario's
Met die oude titel krijg je wel vage posts ja.
Wat is BNW ,soort van NWO?