USA is een bedrijf, geen land

De VS begon als de verenigde staten van Amerika.

Nu heet het de Verenigde Staten van Amerika.

In 1871 is een wet gepasseerd die de VS effectief van een land omvormde naar een bedrijf, om preciezer te zijn van Washington District of Columbia een bedrijf maakte.

De Federale Overheid van de VS heeft officieel geen zeggenschap buiten DC. In de praktijk werkt dit echter anders, zoals wel duidelijk is. De VS is het eigendom van enkele internationale bankiers.

Dit maakt dat elke burger van de VS geen persoon is, maar een product en eigendom van de corporatie Verenigde Staten van Amerika.

Verder geldt de grondwet niet. Deze is aangepast toen de VS een bedrijf werd, en vertegenwoordigt niet langer meer door God gegeven rechten maar privileges gegarandeerd door de overheid. Dit heeft wellicht de FED mogelijk gemaakt, en daarmee de huidige crisis.

Een stukje geschiedenis wat niet erg bekend is.

Hier text en uitleg. Het is niet erg professioneel geschreven, als ik betere bronnen vind zal ik die erbij plaatsen.

quote:

The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.

What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let's look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated "front" for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.

The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodn
ess of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

"The Constitution for the united states of America".

The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

Capitalization — an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn't. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. Think about that for a moment.

Incidentally, this corporate constitution does not benefit the Republic. It serves only to benefit the corporation. It does nothing good for you or me — and it operates outside of the original Constitution. Instead of absolute rights guaranteed under the "organic" Constitution, we now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example of this is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has been transformed under corporate government policy into a "privilege" which we must be licensed to engage in. This operates outside of the original Constitution.

So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. When we consider the word "Sovereign," we must think about what the word means.

quote:

With the passage of the Act of 1871, a series of subtle and overt deceptions were set in motion — all in conjunction and collusion with the Congress, who knowingly and deliberately sold the People down the river. Did they tell you this in government school? I doubt it. They were too busy drumming the fictional version of history into your brain — and mine. By failing to disclose what THEY did to the American People, the people became ignorant of what was happening. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin to the point of a knockdown. With the surrender of their gold in 1933, the People essentially surrendered their law. I don't suppose you were taught THAT in school either. That's because our REAL history is hidden from us. This is the way Roman Civil Law works — and our form of governance today is based upon Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law — better known as the "Divine Right of Kings" and "Law of the Seas", respectively. This explains a lot. Roman Civil Law was fully established in the original colonies even before our nation began and is also known as private international law.

The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the Constitutional Republic. This is very important to note since it impacts all Americans in concrete ways. You must recognize that private international law is only applicable within the District of Columbia and NOT in the other states of the Union. The various arms of the corporation are known as "departments" such as the Judiciary, Justice and Treasury. You recognize those names? Yes, you do! But they are not what you assume them to be. These "departments" all belong to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. They do NOT belong to you and me under the corporate constitution and its various amendments that operate outside of the Constitutional Republic.

I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It IS the government. YOUR government. This is extremely important. I refer to this as the "corporate empire of the UNITED STATES," which operates under Roman Civil Law outside of the Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a cheesy, sleazy corporation? You'll ask your Congressperson about this, you say? HA!!

Congress is fully aware of this deception. You must be made aware that the members of Congress do NOT work for you and me. Rather, they work for the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Is this really any surprise to you? This is why we can't get them to do anything on our behalf or to answer to us — as in the case with the illegal income tax — among many other things. Contrary to popular belief, they are NOT our civil servants. They do NOT work for us. They are the servants of the corporate government and carry out its bidding. Period.

Gehele artikel http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm

quote:

The case of In re Merriam’s Estate, which was affirmed in the Supreme Court in United States v. Perkins, lays down a solid foundation for something far more ominous that the mere fact that the United States is a corporation:

“It is suggested that the United States is to be regarded as a domestic corporation, [*485] so far as the State of New York is concerned. We think this contention has no support in reason or authority. A domestic corporation is the creature of this state created by its legislature, or located here and created by or under the laws of the United States. (Code of Civil Pro., § 3343, sub. 18.) The United States is a government and body politic and corporate, ordained and established by the American people acting through the sovereignty of all the states.”

-- In re Merriam’s Estate, 36 N.E. 505 (1894).

In Volume 19, CJS (Corpus Juris Sec.) § 968 one finds the statement that “The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State.” The above case is cited as the authority. That the United States is a foreign corporation is exactly what the court held. By affirming the decision, the United States Supreme Court concurred in U.S. v. Perkins, 163 U.S. 625 (1896). The legal definition of a "foreign corporation" is different from the colloquial use of the phrase.

Two attorneys made argument for the United States in the New York Court of Appeals. One attorney, Jesse Johnson, argued that “stock held by decedent in foreign corporations should not be included in the value on which the tax is to be levied.” However, Charles Baker argued that the “legacy in question on the death of the testator vested immediately in the United States, and became at once their property, free from liability to taxation.” Baker then confronted the court with an either/or position. Either the United States was not a corporation at all, and therefore not within the meaning of those terms employed in the New York laws, OR the United States was a domestic corporation entitled to all the privileges and immunities respectively. The court did not find for either argument. It held the United States was a corporation, it was not domestic, and was not immune from being taxed on the legacy of the estate. It further held that the tax imposed was on the right of succession and not on the property itself, rendering the United States argument with respect to stocks of foreign corporations completely moot. The Supreme Court affirmed New York’s holding by stating that the legacy became the property of the United States only after it had suffered a dimunation to the amount of the tax. However the Supreme Court also made clear that the United States was not one of the class of corporations intended by law to be exempt from taxation and that the United States was indeed a government corporation.

There is no arguing to the contrary. The United States is a foreign corporation. In fact, if one reads Title 28 USCS § 297, the “compact states” of subsection (a) are clearly defined as “countries” in subsection (b). So if the United States is a foreign corporation in relation to a group of “countries,” then what are the ramifications to those who have dual citizenship, especially when the foreign corporation formally enters into bankruptcy and becomes pledged to a third party creditor?

This is also supported by the statement; "The United States Government is a Foreign Corporation With Respect to a State", Volume 20, Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785 based on the definitions § 1783. "Definitions" and § 1784. "What Are Foreign Corporations".

For supporting material and evidence see the following with references...

"Essay on Citizenship"


"The United States Government is a Foreign Corporation With Respect to a State", Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785
*

"The Corporate Conception of the State and the Origins of Limited Constitutional Government", Washington University Journal of Law & Policy (Vol. 6, Number 1, 2001)

Zie verder:
# "On the establishment of the United States of America and its corporation"

"The Two United States and the Law"

"The District of Columbia Act of 1871 and on the formation of the United States Corporation

Ook interessant:

quote:

Not only the UNITED STATES, but also the UNITED KINGDOM, CANADA, AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND and other nations are established as corporations with which we contract through 'submission', 'application', 'registration', 'understanding' and in their de-facto commercial courts.

http://www.reddit.com/r/C(...)he_us_a_corporation/

[ Bericht 12% gewijzigd door Ali_Kannibali op 10-08-2009 11:33:06 ]

quote:

Op maandag 10 augustus 2009 02:00 schreef bas-beest het volgende:
waarom wist ik nou, toen ik dit aanklikte, dat het een topic van jou zou zijn?

Doe er je voordeel mee. Ik heb misschien geen conventionele topics, die voor veel mensen over dingen gaan die belachelijk lijken te zijn, of irrelevant, of niet de moeite waard om over na te denken, maar misschien heb ik gewoon net iets dieper gegraven dan de gemiddelde huis tuin en keuken fokker. Dit is allemaal onderbouwd met bronnen. De wereld is niet zo simpel als in het hoofd van bas-beest. Verdiep je in dit soort zaken want dit leer je niet op school maar geeft je wel de mogelijkheid iets meer te begrijpen van de wereld waar je in leeft.

quote:

Op maandag 10 augustus 2009 02:02 schreef Bolkesteijn het volgende:

[..]

Toch wordt de vinger wel op de zere plek gelegd, grondrechten, door de Amerikaanse grondwet gegeven aan de Amerikaanse burgers, worden door de Amerikaanse overheid met voeten getreden. Een ernstige zaak want een grondwet moet burgers beschermen tegen de overheid.

Het is denk ik nog erger. Als de VS een bedrijf is in handen van buitenlanders, wie zijn dan de eigenaren? Ondertussen ben ik er achter gekomen dat dat Groot Brittannie is. En dat Groot Brittannie wettelijk in handen is van het vaticaan, de kroon is in handen van de paus. Ik weet dat het idioot klinkt, maar dit is denk ik wel hoe de vork in de steel zit. We leven officieel nog steeds in het Heilige Romeinse Rijk. Het is een kwestie van tijd voordat na de hele crisis, dat Rijk zal herrijzen en opnieuw volledige macht krijgt, nog meer dan in de middeleeuwen.

quote:

Op maandag 10 augustus 2009 03:14 schreef bas-beest het volgende:

[..]



met dit soort opmerkingen lijk je wel een kloon van Lambiekje...en niet alleen met dit soort opmerkingen, maar ook met het soort topics dat je opent.
Het gaat nl. nagenoeg altijd over Amerikaanse onderwerpen (die gewoon niet één op één over te zetten zijn op de Nederlandse/Europse situatie), je komt altijd met bronnen die helemaal precies in jouw straatje passen, je probeert altijd mensen die het niet met je eens zijn belachelijk te maken, etc. etc.

Die reactie was inderdaad niet echt netjes. Ik geef normaal gesproken ook niet zulke reacties.

Maar het verhaal in de OP is onderbouwd. Dit zijn feiten, dat kan je zelf nachecken. Ik begrijp niet zo goed waar je bekrompenheid vandaan komt, en je onwil tot verdieping, zeker in een forum als dit. Het gaat over AMerikaanse onderwerpen, omdat de VS zo'n beetje de nr 1. militaire en economische macht is geweest de afgelopen tientallen jaren of langer. Dat is nu hevig aan het veranderen, en heeft dus grote gevolgen voor ons allemaal.

Verder denk ik dat ik ongeveer wel weet wat er komen gaat, en de VS speelt hier een grote rol in.

De VS is niet alleen een bedrijf, maar failliet en staat te koop.

WAS AMERICA SOLD? Check out Ex. Order 12803. I dare you!
In 1992, George H.W. Bush signed Executive Order 12803, which gave D.C. the authority to sell America’s infrastructure. They called this authority “Infrastructure Privatization.” E.O. 12803 tells us this power cleared the way for the “disposition or transfer of an infrastructure “asset” such as by sale or by long-term lease from a State or local government to a private party.”

E.O. 12803 also lists examples of America’s saleable and/or lease-able infrastructure:

• Roads
• Tunnels
• Bridges
• Electricity supply facilities
• Mass transit
• Rail transportation
• Airports
• Ports
• Waterways
• Recycling/wastewater treatment facilities
• Solid waste disposal facilities
• Hospitals
• Prisons
• Schools
• Housing

E.O. 12803 tells us that this list represents infrastructure “examples.” Let us, therefore, assume that this is not the complete list of America’s saleable infrastructure. However, this list is a stunning confession.

Notice that all items listed in 12803 are the very same infrastructure items listed in all Martial Law Executive Orders (see here). Martial Law kicks in to power during declared states of emergency and with the single signature of the president. Strangely (and ignorantly), we currently have multiple declared states of emergency:

• Act of March 9, 1933, a declared state of emergency at the request of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. This state of emergency was never lifted.

• Global pandemic - Level 6
• Mortgage/housing crisis
• Banking/lending crisis
• Automobile industry crisis
• Insurance industry crisis
• Healthcare crisis
• Southwestern border crisis
• Black market drug crisis
• National education crisis
• Nature/global warming crisis
• Jobs/unemployment crisis
• On-going weather and forest fire crises
• Extreme and unread congressional legislation crisis due to on-going crises

What are the odds of complete and total social and “natural” crisis in every single facet of our lives and all at the same time? I will tell you how it was accomplished with simple math:

Federal Reserve System + Politicians + Tell-A-Vision = Assembly Line Crises. It is called the Hegelian Dialectic Show.

Everything in the country, including the current planet-sized medical emergency, is in crisis. So enters Martial Law.

Think of our president’s promises to “change” the country and to fix the economy (which the Federal Reserve and Congress destroyed) by rebuilding America’s infrastructure, including “21st Century schools” and by greening-up our living standards and conditions (International Code Council, Carbon Credits, Waxman-Markey Climate Bill, etc.) - minus, of course, privately owned land and homes (Agenda 21). In the last six months, consider the massive growth of the Federal Government, the national debt, and the powers of the Federal Reserve Central Banking System - all with stated intentions of fixing the economy that they single-handedly destroyed - and fixing it with “infrastructure” projects.

As Martial Law militarily guards all of E.O. 12803’s infrastructure as listed in the Order, and with homeland paramilitary armies holding practice drills with foreign armies, local law enforcement, and emergency responders all across the nation (and with a big drill planned July 27th through July 31st in FEMA Region 6),

And with all public schools, private schools, and universities forced to have “lock-down policies” and to be forced-used as quarantine holding tanks, and with all Americans having been repeatedly told to prepare for an emergency (meaning an emergency that will bring Martial Law into the full light of day, which the “drills“ have clearly done),

AND the very same infrastructures listed in Executive Order 12803 are also listed in all Martial Law Executive Orders, and all these infrastructures having been for sale, lease-able, or having been sold during the last 17 years- including our children’s schools, our hospitals, and our homes - I suggest to you that you are witnessing Central Banking Debt Magic at its finest moment. Wouldn’t you love to know how much money has been made by selling our nation to the highest bidders?

Let us review:

1. The country’s infrastructure has been for sale for 17 years. Roads, tunnels, bridges, electricity supply facilities, mass transit, rail transportation, airports, ports, waterways, water supply facilities, recycling/wastewater facilities, solid waste facilities, prisons, hospitals, schools, and housing -- this being of “examples” of saleable infrastructure and not the entire list of saleable items according to E.O. 12803--so the question begs: What exactly has been sold to “private parties in our nation? We would like to see the complete list. We know that many highway systems have been sold to foreign countries, but what of the other listed items? Have they been sold as well?

If so, who owns them, and more to the question, which D.C. department sold them and for how much? Did the Federal Reserve and Congress sell our nation? Where is the paperwork? Did they repay any of America’s debt that they purposefully created with their pyramid fiat money lending schemes? And why are they still raising our taxes if America is no longer America but belongs to foreign nations or “private parties?” Since the Federal Reserve is a “private” corporation, did the Fed buy any of America’s infrastructure “assets?”

As American “housing” is on 12803’s list, and since D.C. recently took over the mortgage industry, has the housing market been sold and/or leased to a “private party” like a foreign nation or the Federal Reserve Corporation? Are the American people tenants to unknown parties? Are American children occupying foreign-owned schools, and are our loved ones lying in foreign hospitals that are clearly chock-full of foreign doctors? Equally, who, exactly, is financing the building of 21st Century schools and classrooms complete with foreign curricula? The questions beg: who are the foreigners....the foreigners or the American people?

More to the point, who is dissolving, partitioning, and/or divvying up our nation? Is it Obama? Geithner? Bernacke? Bushes? Clintons? FDR? Wilson? American morons?

It would seem that we are preparing for the Big Transfer - the transfer of our nation to and beneath a new authority or several new authorities. It now makes a great deal of sense why foreign troops have been cross-training with our new paramilitary systems, and yes, there are foreign troops on American soil, which I fear may not be American soil at all. Equally, multiculturalism suddenly makes a great deal of sense. I believe we can call it “behavior modification” so that we the stupid people will behave and be obedient under the new rules of new and foreign leaders.

I ask you, has our nation been sold out from under us, and without our knowledge? Could there be any other possible explanation for selling the most critical components of our country, while at the same time creating new, multicultural and cross-trained armies; permanently bankrupting the nation and selling its debt to foreign countries, and having Martial Law orders written specifically to protect the sold “assets” of our nation--including our schools and homes? Are America’s new owners to be protected by new Martial Law armies, cross-trained with foreign armies, while our “traditional” military is spread all over the planet - except here with its nation’s people? Are we being transferred to new ownership as we speak?

Consider:

Washington D.C. debts were sold to foreign nations.

• Washington D.C. = politicians
• Debts = Federal Reserve Central (Fiat) Banking
• Sold = Wall Street

Is it not realistic to think that big league politicians, bankers, and CEOs are loyal to no nation when they were massively enriched by internationalized banking, internationalized trade, absurd and illegal taxation, and by interest rates forced upon the people of this nation, while at the same time selling our nation to other central banks around the world and “private parties” - and for personal profit? Truth is, they sold the infrastructure first, and then they sold we the people as tax generators and life-long human resources to their global banking and business partners in crime.

What is the crime, you ask? The Federal Reserve, which is a piece of a global banking cartel, and their politicians and CEO partners who made counterfeiting and Ponzi/pyramid schemes legalized theft on continental scales. Your country is 1) not your country and, 2) not what you thought it was for at least 100 years. You are going to have to seek God’s grace(if you so choose) to be relieved from the bitterness of that truth. Today, we don’t know under whose authority we live, but Washington, D.C. and the Federal Reserve do know.

PDF for Executive Order 12803:

www.channelingreality.com/Documents/Executive_Order_12803.pdf

Nu is er natuurlijk (nog) geen Martial Law, maar die executive order is een feit.

Wellicht verklaart dit alles veel beter de idiote dingen die in de VS zijn gebeurd en nog steeds gebeuren dan simpele domheid van de politici en de FED.

[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door Ali_Kannibali op 10-08-2009 11:33:25 ]

quote:

Op maandag 10 augustus 2009 03:37 schreef bas-beest het volgende:

[..]

niet alleen in mijn ogen...
en verder is het precies dezelfde tactiek die o.a. Lambiekje, TS en jij ook gebruiken.
[..]

in het soort gevallen dat TS aangeeft, is dat idd. wel van belang. Vooral ook omdat de bronnen waar hij mee komt, ook allemaal niet Nederlands zijn.
[..]

met zo'n soort opmerking maak je alleen mijn punt over de gebruikte tactieken maar duidelijker.
Ik val alleen zijn manier van discussiëren aan, Ik ben niet persoonlijk...

Wat maakt het uit of een bron Nederlands is of Engels?

Ik wil niet altijd per se discussieren maar ook gewoon informatie geven. Dit is feitelijke informatie. Doe er je voordeel mee. Wellicht zijn er meer mensen die hier dingen aan toe kunnen voegen, zodat het totaal plaatje duidelijker wordt.

quote:

Op maandag 10 augustus 2009 14:32 schreef Leonatos het volgende:
Aangezien hier niemand over begint en er toch wat onduidelijkheid over is:

Het Heilige Romaanse Rijk (Holy Roman Empire, HRE) is een verbond van kleine Duitse en Italiaanse staten tijdens de middeleeuwen. De hoofden van de verschillende stad-staten (en enkele grotere, zoals Oostenrijk-Hongarije) waren hierin electors, keuzeheren. Één van hen werd gekozen tot Holy Roman Emperor, en deze bezat binnen de unie een grote macht, maar bestuurde niet de verschillende stadstaatjes. In het algemeen werd de Oostenrijkse keizer hiervoor gekozen, aangezien deze behoorlijk wat macht bezat.

Dit rijk is ontstaan na het uit elkaar vallen van het rijk van Karel de Grote en heeft verder niets te maken met het Romeinse Rijk waarover je bij de geschiedenisles hebt geleerd. Frankrijk was traditioneel geen lid van het HRE.

Leuk detail is wellicht dat dit het Rijk is waar Hitler naar refereerde als hij het over het 1e rijk had.


*disclaimer:bovenstaande tekst heb ik zo even uit het geheugen opgeschreven, het is al jaren geleden dat ik hier iets mee deed, voor actuele kennis en informatie verwijs ik je naar bijvoorbeeld http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Empire

Oke, dankjewel voor de aanvulling.