Natalee Holloway (in the rebound) #17

in draad 16 schrijft mr b

Karin Jansen is gestopt omdat haad contract (detachering) was afgelopen. Zij had ook al een nieuwe baan, namelijkk die van AG (Advocaat Generaal) bij het Gerechtshof in Den Haag.

Daarnaast had zij, denk ik, niet veel zin om haar contract te verlengen, zij was niet de beste vrienden met de PG op Aruba destijds.

When one looks over the pattern of her involvement in the Natalee Holloway case, we have to ask did Karin Janssen do a "friend a favor" or purposely buy time for the suspects to rehearse their lies, erase all evidence, change statements, allow some statements to become missing and therefore was she directly involved in a cover-up?

Karin Janssen knew that neither John nor Jones were working as security guards during the time frame that Joran, Deepak and Satish claimed to have dropped Natalee off at the Holiday Inn hotel. She also knew that the descriptions given by Joran, Deepak and Satish of clothing they claimed the "dark skinned" guard wore was not anything remotely close to what Holiday Inn security guards wore. Yet, Karin Janssen ignored these discrepancies and had the security guards arrested claiming she had evidence.

It can be concluded that given all the information Karin Janssen had available to her, the notion that there was good "cause for suspicion" was knowingly false, and the fact that the guards were still pursued, in light of ALE and prosecutors knowing that no drop off ever occurred, suggests collusion between the ALE and Karin Janssen for the sole purpose of denying Natalee's family the truth of what had been inflicted upon their child, and covering up for the real perpetrators: Joran van der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe, Satish Kalpoe and Paulus van der Sloot.

Prior to their arrest, Karin Janssen did not investigate John and Jones, she knew the three last seen taking Natalee had lied, and yet went forward with their arrest. After which she took yet another curious step by requesting that the attorney representing both the Security Guards, Chris Lejuez, drop Mickey Johns as a client.

Why did Karin Janssen withhold Joran van der Sloot’s statement from the security guards’ attorney claiming it to be irrelevant to his clients, while turning over the Kalpoe brother’s statements when reportedly Joran’s statement contained the same lie?
How was Karin Janssen able to complete the paperwork correctly for the search of the security guards’ residences, but not for the van der Sloot’s home?

How was Karin Janssen able to complete the paperwork correctly for the search of the security guards’ residences but did not follow proper procedures for DNA testing of the Kalpoe brothers and Joran van der Sloot?
WHY WAS A BIG SEARCH CONDUCTED ON JUNE 6TH? THEY HAD ALREADY ARRESTED THE SECURITY GUARDS WHOM THEY HAD "EVIDENCE" AGAINST?

Why was this search conducted away from the area the victim, Natalee Holloway was last seen?

These were diversionary tactics utilized by the Aruban Justice Department along with Janssen's statement that "you can't barge in their like cowboys" which was meant to demean American standards while her actions and methodologies were corrupt attempts to protect the suspects by zeroing in on the innocent Security Guards who for 10 days were not in any line-up, only questioned one time, and their alibis ignored.

Karin Janssen and the other Aruban officials continue, even today, along with the bloggers on-line, in planting lies and disrupting forward progress in this case.

The fact that Prosecutor Karin Janssen and polis detectives Dennis Jacobs and Jan van der Straten, all in charge of the investigation, were not pursuing the facts, or the surveillance tapes that demonstrated Natalee never return to the hotel; while ignoring all the contradictions of the statements by Joran and Kalpoe brothers paints a very clear picture indeed. It would seem impossible for any competent professional to come up with the strategical course that Karin Janssen utilized and not realize she was involved in a collusion to cover up these crimes.

Karin Janssen has been a Prosecutor for 12 years and the Chief Prosecutor in Aruba for a year and one half, and she made the choices and procedural errors based upon her experience. Common sense says she knew exactly what she was doing to help cover-up a crime in Aruba.

Bron: sm

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2669.640

Er komt wel meer over Karin Janssen aan hoor !

Karin janssen kwam in 2004 in opspraak omdat ze
illegaal een huis gebouwd heeft .
In limburg Nederland ligt dat gevoelig omdat ze belast was met grote fraudezaken .

Volgens mij schreef je DEN HAAG en is de prinsengracht in Amsterdam

quote:

Op vrijdag 23 mei 2008 15:59 schreef CCtje het volgende:
Dan mag deze ""dame"" ook wel eens onder ede verhoord worden.
Als dat mogelijk zou zijn dan komt er wellicht iets aan het licht over de rol van vader van de S.
Misschien dat dit bij de civiele zaak kan gebeuren.
Want het handelen van deze janssen is altijd een beetje op de achtergrond gebleven.
Maar ik neem aan dat er op de achtergrond hard aan deze zaak wordt gewerkt?
Moeder van de S. lijkt er weinig last van te hebben en duikt in de slachtoffer rol.
Ben benieuwd hoe dit verder gaat lopen en ik hoop dat de vader van Nada van Nie zich ook blijft laten horen.

ik denk dat ze idd eens onder ede verhoord moet worden ja

[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door johan555 op 23-05-2008 22:10:14 ]

quote:

Op vrijdag 23 mei 2008 22:03 schreef mrBhimself het volgende:
Zij werkt nu bij het ressortparket in Amsterdam. Is na Aruba tijdelijk werkzaam geweest bij het functioneel parket in Den Haag en per 26 juni geïnstalleerd in Amsterdam.

oh bedankt ,Den Haag wist ik niet

Hoeft iemand die grote Fraude zaken doet zich zelf niet aan de Wet te houden ?

Welke berichtgeving bedoel je precies ?
Ik plaats een berichtje uit de krant en een brief aan van Nie

Staat dat hier op fok dan ?of ga je allerlei forums door elkaar halen
En er staat een lachend aapje achter mr b himself !

quote:

Op vrijdag 23 mei 2008 22:37 schreef Tmaatje het volgende:
De brief aan van Nie.

Die is geschreven door mr. drs. T.D. Croes en gestuurd aan Rene v Nie en
staat ook op z'n website
Dat is de Arubaanse P-G die op bezoek was naar Nederland en vervangen werd door Karin Janssen.

Die zijn er denk ik ingeluisd door Pa vd Sloot
En ze zijn er ingetrapt om samen met Joran zo'n verhaal met z'n 3 en te verklaren .
Erg dom van die jongens