Not a clue,could be grampa..I always thought PVDS had 2 brothers one of them was in the Dutch Govt and the other a scientist or a proffesor but I am not sure at all. That blonde in the Amsterdam Airport with the VDS family looks just like the blonde with them when they were in NY.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 02:07 schreef letsgetthiscasesolved het volgende:
Observer,
about he uncle of Joran on SM:
Out of my head:On his flickr account there is a picture of somebody at schiphol (I think?) who's pushing a card with bags and suitcases..is that the uncle?
Hi Johan,I researched him as good as I could but could not find anymore info. I seem to remember I have more somewhere on his mom.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 02:21 schreef johan555 het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]
have a look here
Political parties and leaders:
Aliansa/Aruban Social Movement or MSA [Robert WEVER]; Aruban Liberal Organization or OLA [Glenbert CROES]; Aruban Patriotic Movement or MPA [Monica ARENDS-KOCK]; Aruban Patriotic Party or PPA [Benny NISBET]; Aruban People's Party or AVP [Mike EMAN]; People's Electoral Movement Party or MEP [Nelson O. ODUBER]; Real Democracy or PDR [Andin BIKKER]; RED [Rudy LAMPE]; Workers Political Platform or PTT [Gregorio WOLFF]
Bizarre isn’t it? One can confess having thrown a girl, who has been missing for almost three years, having thrown a girl into the ocean, not knowing if she was alive or dead, and you still wont get arrested and brought in for questioning.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 02:36 schreef observer777 het volgende:
The OM does not see any grounds for a new arrest of Van der Sloot in the broadcasting and things that were stated afterwards.
Hi NS!quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 02:51 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:
[..]
Bizarre isn’t it? One can confess having thrown a girl, who has been missing for almost three years, having thrown a girl into the ocean, not knowing if she was alive or dead, and you still wont get arrested and brought in for questioning.
Makes you wonder what’s so special about Joran cause you can bet that if it where me or you, we would have been behind bars faster than you could say "protection".
Yes, my guess is they dont know how to prosecute him without bringing a whole lot of other things into light. Things that certain people in key positions are desperately trying to keep hidden. Just like you say, its not about Joran anymore.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 03:01 schreef observer777 het volgende:
[..]
Hi NS!
Yes..Very Bizarre but this case has been just outrageous for 32 months now. They do not want to prosecute or to let the truth be known. He has confessed now twice and all the answers are already known to people like Jan Van Der Straaten,Dennis Jacobs and Karen Janssen. It is not Joran that needs to be questioned in order to solve this case. IMO
Show me the tape where Joran confessed he himself did this, and you`ll have enough proof to bring him in. I already told you to get your facts straights, you`re telling an obvious lie here.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 02:51 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:
[..]
Bizarre isn’t it? One can confess having thrown a girl, who has been missing for almost three years, having thrown a girl into the ocean, not knowing if she was alive or dead, and you still wont get arrested and brought in for questioning.
These people don't know the difference between assuming something and that's what is actually said. They omly put things here to support theri own conspiracy theories. other things prdv en jvds have said, which reduce the meaning of their points are being ignored.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 11:30 schreef Scorpie het volgende:
[..]
Show me the tape where Joran confessed he himself did this, and you`ll have enough proof to bring him in. I already told you to get your facts straights, you`re telling an obvious lie here.
Reacties van wie? Op wat? Waar?quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 11:24 schreef johan555 het volgende:
dat heb ik gemerkt uit de reacties die ik krijg
You told me something? O I'm sorry, I tend to ignore you I guess.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 11:30 schreef Scorpie het volgende:
[..]
Show me the tape where Joran confessed he himself did this, and you`ll have enough proof to bring him in. I already told you to get your facts straights, you`re telling an obvious lie here.
Yes, you ignore any sign that does not fit your theory, I guess.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 12:32 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:
[..]
You told me something? O I'm sorry, I tend to ignore you I guess.
So, when he confessed he was there when Natalee died, you say he is telling the truth, but when he says he has nothing to do with her dissapearance, he is lying?quote:I'm sure you mean that according to Joran it was "Daury" who threw Natalee in the ocean, so technically he didn't do it. Thats not going to fly. He remains responsible for disposing of the body. Daury facilitated.
Nou poeh poeh, wat komt er veel aan het licht zeg. Er worden connecties gemaakt die in elk normaal dorp in Nederland vanzelfsprekend zijn, en iedereen hier doet alsof het hele eiland een grote conspiracy verbergtquote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 13:47 schreef johan555 het volgende:
TE ver ? er komt vanalles aan het licht ! steeds meer zou ik zo zeggen wacht maar af !
oja?quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 14:18 schreef Felixa het volgende:
Een van de belangrijkste aanwijzingen vind ik nog steeds dat de Arubaanse advocaat van Joran, Antonio Carlo, aan hoofdofficier Karin Jansen in een vertrouwelijk gesprek heeft gemeld dat Joran in grote mate betrokken was bij de verdwijning van Natalee maar dat het de taak van justitie was om dit te bewijzen.
I dont have a theory. I seem to remember a pm from you asking for us to ignore eachother.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 14:11 schreef Scorpie het volgende:
[..]
Yes, you ignore any sign that does not fit your theory, I guess.
You accuse others from making assumption (like its not allowed). Claiming he's not responsible for what happened to Natalee is quite an assumption imo. You weren't there that night where you?quote:So, when he confessed he was there when Natalee died, you say he is telling the truth, but when he says he has nothing to do with her dissapearance, he is lying?
And no, he is not responsible for disposing the body, otherwise the OvJ would have ordered his arrest.
Jazeker.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 14:35 schreef KlaasOosterbos het volgende:
[..]
oja?
Heb je daar een bron van misschien?
Yes I did, but I cannot ignore the postings you do in which you deliberately make false assumptions about Joran van der Sloot, which makes you just about as trustworthy as Joran himself.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 14:48 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:
[..]
I dont have a theory. I seem to remember a pm from you asking for us to ignore eachother.
There is no assumption in the fact that the OvJ has not seen any reason to suspect Joran`s involvement in the dissapearance of Natalee. Ergo; I treat this decision as an fact.quote:You accuse others from making assumption (like its not allowed). Claiming he's not responsible for what happened to Natalee is quite an assumption imo. You weren't there that night where you?
Yes, I did. But he did not call this character to dump her body. He called him for help. The other character has taken care of the body, you still know this part don`t you? He said to Joran to go him and he would fix it. So, is Joran in any way associated with the dumping of the body? no, he wasnt. .quote:By his own admission Joran called this "Daury" character to dispose of her body. Not even knowing she was alive or dead. You did watch the show didnt you?
Yes this is tiring; I cannot stand people like you who spread false information, just like Joran supposedly is doing. Can you please just stick to the facts, don`t make false assumptions and don`t treat Joran as a murder-suspect? There is no evidence whatsoever to back up your ridiculous idea`s and postings in this thread, making it a bit embarrassing for fellow dutchman like myself to even read your lies.quote:This is very tiring Scorpie. Do you have a specific point or do you just want to bicker about nothing.
Ik quote hem nog maar even aangezien johan555 selectief leest en ik best benieuwd ben naar de waarheid van zijn claim.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 13:15 schreef I.B het volgende:
johan555, welke reacties?
quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 15:30 schreef johan555 het volgende:
de reacties die ik krijg zijn er nogal wat dus die ga ik niet plaatsen
dat is niet netjes
If this is true, I mean that this guy saw Joran with Nathalee, he probably told his friends and family about it.quote:A confidential source came forward with some interesting information. The source specifically stated:
“There was a teenage boy, 17, who saw Joran and Natalee at the lighthouse that night. Joran paid this boy not to say anything. He has curly hair and dark skin.”
Kerwin Anthony Orville Goijla
13 Aug 1988 - 04 Jun 2005
After some research, you will see that this boy, aged 17, died 4 days after Natalee went missing. Age 17. Curly hair. Dark skin.
Coincidence? His cause of death has not been listed. Murder? Suicide? Accident? Did this young boy know something?
Knoops denkt wel vaker..........quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 20:11 schreef BwennieBren het volgende:
[bSterker nog, Joran van der Sloot, die door Peter R. de Vries ontmaskerd zou zijn, zal vermoedelijk nooit veroordeeld worden, denkt ook de gerenommeerde advocaat Knoops.
I don’t have any problem in ignoring you. Ridiculing Beth when she saw the recordings with Peter and now portraying yourself as some sort of righteous referee. Gimme a break.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 15:10 schreef Scorpie het volgende:
[..]
Yes I did, but I cannot ignore the postings you do in which you deliberately make false assumptions about Joran van der Sloot, which makes you just about as trustworthy as Joran himself.
[snip]
Knoops isquote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 20:18 schreef kinkajoe het volgende:
[..]
Knoops denkt wel vaker..........
Die man maakt er zo nu en dan echt een potje van. Die neem ik maar liever niet meer serieus.
Wel hoor!quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 21:47 schreef BwennieBren het volgende:
Ik zie helemaal geen berichtgeving over dat Joran niet meer kan worden opgepakt in de US media?
Niet bij CNN, ABC of FOX??
daar verbazen ze zich op SM ook al over...quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 21:47 schreef BwennieBren het volgende:
Ik zie helemaal geen berichtgeving over dat Joran niet meer kan worden opgepakt in de US media?
Niet bij CNN, ABC of FOX??
wordt niet zo groot gebracht blijkbaar...quote:
Hier is het ook amper nieuws meer.quote:Op vrijdag 15 februari 2008 22:07 schreef Caesu het volgende:
[..]
daar verbazen ze zich op SM ook al over...
gister was het wel op FOX News bij Greta.
maar ook uren nadat het hier al nieuws was.
| Forum Opties | |
|---|---|
| Forumhop: | |
| Hop naar: | |