[False flag] E.T. is coming to you this august! US Style!

quote:

Sorry that I haven't been able to reply since last night.

I am writing these posts from a computer at a library where I have signed in as an anonymous/general public computer user. This means that I won't be able to post at any given time and it also means that I don't have the time to read and respond to every question that is posted on the board. I have skimmed through some of the replies, however, and have the following responses to some of the most important questions:

1) The 'need to know' question is the most important. The reason behind those questions is that any classified material is only shared with government employees if they need to know the truth to perform their job. So what is my 'need to know'? Let me put it this way... do you really think it would be in the government's interest to have state trooper's shooting at Special Ops in alien disguises? Do you think the government wants state resources to be wasted chasing false flag operations or duplicating work? Sure, some 'mistakes' need to be made by state government and it would backfire if even a large minority of higher state employees knew about what was going on... but, in terms of my job, there has to be some coordination between state and fed in regards to these matters. Specifically, selected state officials need to know the difference between what is real and what isn't. This is also why I was shown a real retrieved object and Visitor cadavers. There is more to this line of thinking but I don't have the time to go into it now.

Also, keep in mind that not every area of the country is the same. I study public opinion and the response of government to it. This means that I need to know what will happen, or what the truth is, if I am to accurately predict what the reaction of a town in Alabama will be to the Visitors in comparison to the reaction of a town in Michigan. In other words, if I didn't know the basics of the truth -- and I know that I do not know everything -- I would not be able to analyze the situation correctly or coordinate with state officials once the operations start.

2)As far as monitoring goes: Not everyone in our project is happy with what is going on. The people who also monitor this site -- and know who I am -- are sympathetic to me. The gov is not some evil institution. The people I am hiding my identity from are a (influential) minority.

This might not seem to make sense in light of decades of conspiracy theories, but you have to know that the Visitor issue, so far as it is handled by the government, is rapidly changing. I cannot vouch for the exact numbers... but I sense that far more gov employees have been brought into it during the last few months than have been brought into it over the last 100 years. This is making things 'looser'. Why are they bringing more people in? Because for any large project, no matter its goals, you have to have a certain number of deckhands. This means that any project that goes from the dark to the light is bound to bring in workers who are not happy with it.

3)I tried to give a simplified summary of the military's thinking before. This was unsatisfactory to people. Let me go further. The military knows that the Visitors have superior tech, but they do not think they will go 'all the way' and use it to its fullest extent. Why? Because the Visitors are passing scientists who will use their tech for defense (as they have) and the military thinks they will only respond, one for one, to any individual engagements. I think that this will be true... but only to a certain point. Continous provocation will, I believe, generate new reactions from the Visitors.

Does this contradict my statement that the Visitors aren't totally evil? No... because what I'm saying is that they are basically scientists, not missionaries or social workers. Even a team of biologists that search the jungles for medicines carry rifles in case they cross an aggressive tiger.

quote:

Again, I have been reading some of these posts and I have to say that I am surprised that you guys expect me to write long posts instantly. It took me several minutes to write the above post (which explains my timing issues). The reality is simply that I do not have the time or ability to respond to every single post or write long posts in a matter of seconds. That is just not going to happen (as a sidenote, I now know how every other informant who has ever been on ATS feels. It is impossible to answer everyone at once).

Ok, to continue what I was writing above (I ran out of space):

4)Why I needed to see the craft: This relates to #1. I need to know the difference between real craft and fake ones. As for the real ones, the one I saw was bell or, you could say, thimble shaped. It appeared to be damaged along one side. This was pretty weird, actually, because the exterior in places that weren't burned/discolored seemed to reflect light in strange ways. Only a dull, unshaded form would appear were, normally, you would expect some sort of pure reflection. I noticed this while our briefing officer led us around the object. He said that it was some sort of 'intelligent material' or something like that.

As for the rest of the craft, the top or 'nose' (though I don't know if it was the true front) had been removed for research purposes. The whole vehicle was displayed at a 45 degree angle on some sort of pneumatic pallet (sorry, I am not a mechanic so I may be using the wrong terms) in the middle of a pretty barren looking workshop (no computers or strange gizmos... just basic storage). Actually, the facility it was in was not that impressive. I WAS NOT TAKEN OUT TO A SECRET MILITARY BASE. This part of the briefing occured in an industrial park near a fairly well populated area. It was not out in the desert or undergound or anything. In fact, the nearby companies were all pretty normal ones and I suspect that this location could fit into pretty much any recently developed suburb. Though it was a highly secured room, the overal 'complex' (and I hate to call it that because it wasn't even that big) was mostly dedicated to what we would consider to be 'everyday' technological concerns. Before we entered the security zone we passed what looked like normal scientists/engineers/researchers and none of them appeared to be military. You'd be surprised, actually, at the number who looked like they just got out of college.

Ok, that's all I have time for now.

quote:

Op dinsdag 26 juni 2007 11:41 schreef jogy het volgende:

[..]

, kom over twee maanden maar terug met die opmerking, ik weet ook niet of dit wel gaat gebeuren hoor, maar als het wel zo is dan is het goed om mensen in te lichten dat het dus niet die kleine grijze wezentjes zijn die ons aan het bang maken zijn.

Het is een beetje een twijfelgeval lijkt me. Het zijn buitenaardse wezentjes (TRU) maar wel waar de VS ons mee poogt bang te maken en te misleiden via die valse vlag operaties (BNW). Ik neig meer naar BNW in deze .

quote:

Op dinsdag 26 juni 2007 14:05 schreef CoolGuy het volgende:
Daarnaast, hoe wil je dat bewijzen? Je schrijft dat ze dat willen doen door onder andere 'een sightinkje hier en daar'. Leuk, maar er worden denk ik zo'n beetje elke dag wel sightings gedaan. Wat je nu gaat krijgen is dat labiele personen die dit mochten lezen de conclusie trekken dat dit daadwerkelijk aan de gang is , terwijl het helemaal niet hoeft te zijn dat er meer sightings worden gedaan waarbij de reden die jij aangeeft ook daadwerkelijk de reden is.

quote:

Op dinsdag 26 juni 2007 16:58 schreef UncleScorp het volgende:
Stephen Greer :

the ultimate false flag operation pt1

the ultimate false flag operation pt1b

quote:

Op dinsdag 26 juni 2007 16:46 schreef UncleScorp het volgende:
Lol, daan gaan we hier een situatie krijgen :

De aliens zullen dus geopenbaard worden en alle debunkers hier zullen het volledig geloven, gezien de hoeveelheid officieel bewijs.
Dan gaan wij met het verhaal op de proppen komen dat de aliens dus fake zijn en dat de US er achter zit, en dan zijn wij weer de complotgelovers

quote:

Op dinsdag 26 juni 2007 15:34 schreef UncleScorp het volgende:
Dit is idd een verhaal dat al een tijdje rondgonst op het net.
Het wordt dan meestal direct weer gelinkt aan de NWO, want de ganse wereld verenigd, tégen een buitenaardse vijand, is natuurlijk een ideaal moment om een Nieuwe Wereld Orde in te voeren ... someone's gotta be in charge, not ?

quote:

EXTRATERRESTRIAL ENEMY?

When this was written, over 30 years ago they acknowledged that this would be hard to convince the people of. Even with the UFO sightings that had already been put out. What has happened in the past 30 years?

Well, there have been "alien abductions", and many more UFO sightings. To top it off, there are UFO clubs where people who have "seen aliens" or "been abducted" can get together for conventions.

To top that off, we have had over 25 years of Star Trek, which has enforced a one world government. Throughout both series and the movies they have the "New Age" philosophy. (New Age will be the only philosophy accepted by the NWO) These folks have all kinds of experience with various races on other planets. see: Dirty Watchtower Secrets. // Like Father Like Son: George W. Bush and the Fake Alien Invasion

Star Wars has also conditioned people to believe in a "galaxy far far away". These reinforce extra terrestrial life on other planets. The two movies, "V" and "V the Final Battle" and then the series shows and invasion from another planet. The movie "Alien" shows this also.

The world would have to unite, should the "movies and television programs" come to life with a "real" enemy. see: "War of the Worlds" Mind Control Experiment - New World Order Test Run

quote:

Op woensdag 27 juni 2007 00:53 schreef jogy het volgende:

[..]



Laatste post van de user.