Spectaculair nieuws: Moord op Fortuyn !

Source: www.geocities.com/aaactions/index2.html

MCC will show and expose the true background to the Prof. Fortuyn murder as it took place on the 6th of May 2002 in Hilversum, The Mediapark

MCC is able to do so on the basis of the unique and international composition of its Prof. Fortuyn Taskforce, which consists of some very dedicated and committed investigative journalists and ex-members of various Asian and American intelligence services working under a set of conditions and codes as outlined by our leader and teacher Miss. Oyako Shimura.

Why we placed emphasis on this particular political murder that took place in a small European country will become painfully clear in the course of the coming few weeks while the story unfolds. It will be shown that the Prof. Fortuyn murder can be understood as the result of a large number of factors conversing into a very specific region in time and space where it was Prof. Fortuyn who was sacrificed for the sins of the House Of Orange-Nassau (The Royal House of The Netherlands) accumulated through its primary, this in conjunction with The House of Windsor, and leading role in the Black Nobility ruling both in Europe as in the US. Subsequent articles and contributions will proof this to be a true statement.

Why did the murder take place and who ordered it?

In the coming few weeks we will expose and proof that there existed, and to a degree still exists, a conspiracy in which the following individuals and organizations are involved for four reasons as outlined below.

1) Narcotics/weapons line

The Mena (Arkansas)/Parimaribo/Rotterdam/Pristina/Adana/Tripoli (Lebanonon)/Ryad weapons/narcotics line which in part financed and armed Ben Laden for his CIA sponsored operations in Afghanistan

Reason for (1) to be included as one of the reasons contributing to the decision to eliminate Prof. Fortuyn is the circumstance that Prof. Fortuyn, would he have become the Dutch Prime Minister in the 2002 elections (which on the 6th of May was practically certain), was on the verge to expose the Dutch leg of this line. Partly due to information planted on him by Mrs. Bijlhout, a former and current operative for ex Dictator Mr. Bouterse of Surinam, with the objective to influence him to bring out the Bouterse part of the story which would have had a major impact of key people within the Dutch Political Establishment including members the House Of Orange-Nassau and affiliates. We will show that the following organizations and individuals played a key role in the decision making process in the context of (1)

The Bush Family (father and son)

Dutch former Prime Minister Kok

Docters van Leeuwen (former head of BVD)

Mr. Teeven (currently member of parliament for the Leefbaar Nederland party)

Mr. Korthals (former Minister of Justice)

The BVD (Dutch Intelligenge now AIVD)

The CIA

The DEA

The CID (Dutch intelligence service specialized on international crime)

The House Of Orange-Nassau

Relevant articles

Chronology of the murder. By Kamakura CIA Drugs Please read for more information on sanctioned narcotics lines.

2) European Union/Bilderberg

Prof. Fortuyn's intended European Policies were perceived as detrimental by consequence of their impact, and this certainly in conjunction with (1), to the rest of Europe and the objective of creating and implementing a European Super State. In the course of the coming weeks detailed proof will be presented showing the validity of our statements in this respect.

Key names and organizations involved in this aspect of the decision-making process are:

The House Of Orange

Mr. Bolkenstein (EU and prominent Bilderberger)

Mr. Kok

The Bilderberg group

Europol

AIVD (formerly BVD)

3) The JSF Contract

Prof. Fortuyn's intended rejection of the JSF contract as he even personally made clear during a visit at the American Embassy in The Hague (proof that this visit actually took place and with who will be released in shortly)

Key names and organizations involved in this aspect of the decision-making process are:

The House Of Orange (longtime defender of the interests of the American Military-Industrial Complex)
Mr. Bolkenstein

Mr. Herber (planted in the LPF party by forces in the Dutch Military Establishment), who directly after the murder took effective control over LPF and rapidly implemented a change in policy favorable to the JSF contract.

Mr. Blaauw (Dutch MP, who via his wife, an employee of the American Embassy The Hague, is linked to ODC and DoD)

ODC

DoD

CIA

AIVD

4) The Dutch eco-mafia and collusion-system

Prof. Fortuyn intended to expose of the Dutch Political and Juridical establishment and its subservience to the House Of Orange, as well as its operation of a widespread collusion-system corrupting most, if not all, of its services, departments, and ministries. Part of the collusion-system involves the flourishing Dutch eco-mafia which was one of the reasons for the application of the current murder suspect as a prominent member of the Dutch eco-scene.

Key names and organizations involved in this aspect of the decision-making process are:

Mr. Donner (current Minister of Justice)

Mr. Korthals (ex Minister of Justice)

Mr. Haak (currently leading the Pim Fortuyn security investigation, the Dutch Warren Commision)

Mr. Pronk

Mr. Hoekstra (Member of the Dutch Warren Commission)

The House Of Orange

The AIVD

It will be shown that the sum of 1 through 4 formed the required consensus for a high publicity, political murder to have been implemented and the subsequent effective cover-up.

Further it will be shown that the current murder suspect has been a longstanding AIVD mole within the Dutch eco-scene and acted out a role which is very similar to the role played by Lee Harvey Oswald in the JFK murder. It probably can be proven that there was a second (actually primary) highly qualified hit man, who fired the two first shots, hired in from a contractor close to Syrian Intelligence. The same contractor who earlier handled the murder of Mr. van Traa in the Netherlands, about which we will provide further details in the coming few days.

***

This chronology is the result of our own investigation, witness reports, and highly reliable sources which, for obvious reasons, we do not disclose at this time.

May 6th, 17:25 to 18:45

17:25
Primary hit man (I will refer to him as Abu Fatah) enters the media park and takes position on the roof of the energy centre. He unpacks his weapon which consists of a modified Firestar handgun allowing for shoulder support and by consequence much more precision.

17:40
Volkert van der Graaf takes position in the bushes close to the parking area. At this time, Volkert van der Graaf is unaware of Abu Fatah

18:05:52
Abu Fatahe fires two shots hitting Prof. Fortuyn in the upper part of his skull causing mortal trauma to the victim. The time interval between the first two shots is a little less than .30 seconds. Volkert van der Graaf at this time is approaching with his gun drawn, however does not fire yet

18:06:02
Volkert van der Graaf seems shocked and slightly panicked

18:06:15
Volkert van der Graaf starts firing at the body, while moving himself around in a left to right direction. His shooting can be qualified as uncontrolled. He seems to hit the, at that point, dead body in three instances.

18:07:49
Volkert van der Graaf begins his escape into the direction of where he initially came from.

Note: the sequence of events between 18:05:45 and 18:07:49 originate from a transcript of a video segment inspected by a highly reliable US source. The video segment currently is not yet released to us, however we may be able to present the segment in an internet usable format any time soon. In respect to the origin of the segment, our information points at it to be stolen by an for now unnamed US Intelligence Agency. It was made part of a set of security camera video images which were removed and subsequently destroyed by most likely the Dutch AIVD. It is however not at all unlikely that the segment was part of a clandestine CIA recording, in particular the time/date format on the video would indicate this.

18:25
A witness supposedly spotted Abu Fatah entering a dark blue 7 series BMW, at a location between the main entrance to the media park and the escape route used by Volkert van der Graaf. This car shortly halted at the right side of the Insulindelaan, the witness observed a male person of probably South European or Middle Eastern descent entering the car. Description; 5.9 feet of height, well built, dressed similar to what Volkert van de Graaf was wearing on the pictures of his arrest.

Note: This account originates from on single witness, even though his/her story seems to correspond to information we have received earlier, this account should be handled with care.

18:27
Two independent witnesses report to have spotted the "same" BMW crossing the overpass (railroad tracks) nearby the media centre.

18:40/45
Three independent witnesses report to have spotted a dark blue 7 series BMW escorted by four Police or MP motor cycles travelling at high speed between Hilversum and Amsterdam.

Note: Information we received cannot be effectively verified at this time as the witnesses in question wish to remain anonymous. From information originating from various sources and contacts indicate with very high probability that Abu Fatah was extracted from the murder scene with help of the AIVD and rushed to Schiphol Airport from where he left the country.

Background to Abu Fatah

Various American and Middle Eastern sources identify Abu Fatah as hired from a contractor close to Syrian Intelligence who earlier had provided the hitteam responsible for the staged car accident that took the live of Mr. van Traa, who headed a Dutch Parliamentary Commission Of Inquiry into the Dutch leg of a sanctioned Narcotics/Weapons line via which CIA stages from Mena Arkansas were channeled into Europe and the Middle East. The Dutch leg which basically involved the Parimaribo/Rotterdam/Prestina segment became known in the Netherlands as the IRT Affair.

The contractor, Monzer al-Kassar (some background on Mr. al-Kassar), acted as the primary Middle Eastern middleman in this line, in part as a compensation for his loss of another sanctioned line which ran from Malta/Frankfurt/London to New York.

Mr. van Traa made the unfortunate mistake to aim at a degree of exposure far exceeding his mandate which turned him into a liability to be neutralized.

Result was that a team was hired in from Monzer al Kassar which staged the accident by a well know Syrian method involving a explosive charge (C4 in this case) to be placed a on (in this case) the left frontwheel suspension of the car which at a predetermined location (in this case just prior to crossing a road construction site) would be remotely triggered by a follow-up car.

Relevance to the Prof. Fortuyn case

Prof. Fortuyn, partly influenced by a Bouterse mole within his party, became overly interested in the backgrounds of the IRT Affair and attempted to pick up where Mr. van Traa had left off. His own probing and to an extend information he was feeded with from Mr. Bouterse, who had become the fall guy in the Dutch IRT cover-up, side developed plans to expose additional and highly explosive information about the IRT cover-up and the roles of prominent Dutch officials among who Mr. Teeven, Mr. Korthals, Mr. Kok, Mr. Docters van Leeuwen (ex director of BVD) as well as the roles of the CIA, DEA, CID and BVD causing what could have become a very major national and international upset, to phrase it mildly.

The Mr. Teeven, Mr. Korthals, Mr. Kok, Mr. Docters van Leeuwen aspect

During the early nineties when Mr. Docters van Leeuwen was in function as Director Of BVD (now AIVD) ex Prime Minister Kok was for all intends and purposes an BVD operative who worked or facilitated in operational aspects of the Dutch leg of the sanctioned narcotics/weapons line mentioned earlier. In the context of this role Mr. Kok was facilitating not only the BVD but various foreign Intelligence services among which the CIA, DEA and by implication Syrian Intelligence through Monzer al Kassar. In 1993 after the IRT Affair came into the public attention Mr. Kok continued his facilitation and active involvement with the IRT cover-up.

In 1995 a deal struck between Mr. Kok and Mr. Teeven in which Teeven would provide information about future narcotics/weapons deals ad corruption cases. In truth an axis Teeven/Kok was created allowing for the undisturbed operation of sanctioned lines as well as the provision of means to control possible leaks and opposition of members of the Dutch Political and Legal system. Spring 1999 Mr. Teeven produced and handed out to "het college van procureurs generaal" and the Minister of Justice at that time Mr. Korthals, a list containing 80 names of Dutch Politicians, Judges, and high level civil servants who found themselves in blackmailable positions. Information contained in the list ranging from sexual exploitation of minors to corruption and abuse of power. Important is that this list provided a guarantee that what had to stay under wraps would stay under wraps. In addition this list, which as to this date is with Mr. Teeven, formed the foundation for the Dutch collusion-system to remain operational.

In December 1999 Minister Korthals, after an investigation into the allegations made in the Teeven Dossier, asserted that no conclusive evidence could be found for either the risk of blackmail or corruption. In effect Mr. Korthals became, as in fact he been for a long time, a co-conspirator in the Kok/Teeven/van Leeuwen/CIA/BVD/CID axis.

Where it is commonly assumed that this axis (minus the CIA which is never mentioned in this context) its main purpose was to minimize the damage suffered from the part exposure of IRT and safely keep the whole issue within the criminal circuit rather as in the larger perspective of the CIA operated line. Mr. van Traa however proved unwilling to go along and suffered the consequences.

An important aspect of the whole was that, largely due to the efforts of Mr. Docters van Leeuwen, the Surinam co-conspirator Mr. Bouterse was dumped and turned into an international criminal to prosecuted in the Netherlands for among others his role in the shared narcotics/weapons scam. In effect Mr. Bouterse became the sacrificial lamb for the sins of the operators in the Dutch leg.

It may be obvious to even the most trusting citizen that the combination of a Dutch Secret Team and the Teeven Dossier ideal circumstances are created for the operation of a block of controllers and a climate in which cover-ups are easily maintained, by means of blackmailing potential deserters.

Relevance to the Prof. Fortuyn case revised

As was indicated Prof. Fortuyn bursting into the political scene unaffected by prior affiliation with the control structure and immune against most forms of blackmail, the fact that he was an homosexual who frequented the so-called "dark rooms" could hardly be used against him as he used to be rather loud about those aspects of his live, and determined to overthrow and/or exposing the ruling establishment for what it is, made him into a liability. This conjunction with own findings in the IRT context, Prof. Fortuyn was painfully aware of the existing conspiracy within the Kok/Teeven/van Leeuwen/Korthals/CIA/BVD/CID axis and its potential to blackmail a significant part of the Dutch Political/Juridical Establishment.

In addition, by means of Mrs. Bijlhout who remained loyal to her former employer, Prof. Fortuyn had received extremely damaging information from Mr. Bouterse, who largely for personal reason was more as only a little interested in setting the record straight, allowing him to effectively expose the full story of the Dutch leg and to make matters worse cause very serious damage to the CIA for their role in the cabal.

Intermediate Conclusion

In short the circumstances indicated in the above form the background to the use of Middle Eastern and namely Monzer al-Kassar's resources in the murder case. Clearly what is presented here by no means is complete or detailed but solely serves as an explanation of the role of Abu Fatah in the Prof. Fortuyn murder case.

Subsequent articles will go into far more detail and will provide sufficient evidence for an evaluation of what has been asserted here.

Press Release 1

Date: 21-11-2002

Subject: Distribution of evidence in the Prof. Fortuyn murder case.

As of 18-12-2002 02:00 GMP this site will publish the results of our investigations into the Prof. Fortuyn murder case.

Synopsis:

The Dutch politician, and most likely Prime Minister of the Netherlands, fell victim to a sinister plot involving the AIVD (Dutch Intelligence), the CIA, as an facilitator, Mr. Bolkenstein (Dutch Euro MP) and a number of Dutch politicians.

Formats: The report will become available as a series of WebPages (such as will be published here) spread of a large number of sites, as well as in a zip and tarball.

Contents:

A video fragment + analysis proofing that Prof. Fortuyn was murdered by two rather as by one hitman. The video fragment will be made available as streaming media as well as downloadable mpg.
A video file showing the get away car as it waited opposite to the Hilversum Media Park.
A video files showing the escorted get away car as it passes the BP gasoline station at the opposite site of the A1, opposite from the direction it travelled
An audio file containing the intercepted conversation between Petra Lievense and the former Minister Pronk.
Several audio files containing statements by expert contacts.
Two audio files of private telephone conversations by Prof. Fortuyn as well as recording originating from his offices, proofing wiretapping on Prof. Fortuyn by the BVD (now AIVD).
Affidavits from contacts confirming the authenticity of all video and audio materials.
Approximately 15 Meg of textual evidence, including two affidavits confirming pre-knowledge on Queen Beatrix part.

Method of publication:

In addition to publication on this site, the material will be mirrored on a large number of sites worldwide, of which the URL's will be published here as well as in various forums and newsgroups.
CCMCC

Press Release 2

Date: 23-11-2002

Subject: In responds to the so-called confession.

In responds to the Vokert van de Graaf confession, published in the NRC (Dutch Newspaper) of 23-11-2002, we are most happy to observe the desperate attempts by the Dutch Justice Department to sustain their cover-up in spite of the fact that it is futile.

The factual proof MCC and affiliated organizations will release on 18-12-2002 is overwhelming and irrefutable. From this perspective, and informations we receive; we are very surprised by the childishness of their current attempts, which surely will only serve to worsen their problems after 18-12.

From experiences in many other cases, both in Asia as in the US, it shows when the Controllers and servants of the Global Cabal find themselves cornered by they lack the intelligence and stamina to launch an effective counterstroke. It is most interesting to observe the inherent weakness manifested in the seemingly all-powerful structure of the oppressors.

Of course for true and honestly dedicated investigators, no matter they are professionals or brave and patriotic members of the public, we must point at the dangers posed by the servants of the Great Cabal once they are on the verge of being exposed, and smashed by the populations opening their eyes to the criminal nature of their controllers.

Unfortunately, for themselves, they are too late; we will not be deterred by any form of oppression or dangers to our live and healthiness. Exactly at the time we have announced we will publish and blow their covers.

CCMCC (Oyako Shimura)

Received by CCMCC

Date: 11-09-2002

From: Anon PGP Encrypted

Keywords: IRT, Runner, Red-haired Girl, Prof. Fortuyn, Volkert van de G., Petra L. Minister Pronk

Cleared for publication: CCMCC

Notice CCMCC does not take responsibility for the contents prior to own investigations and verification. Nevertheless CCMCC has indications that the informations are probably accurate.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Message Text

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Petra L. officially ex VROM employee and confirmed personal contact of Mr. Pronk during and after the period of her employment at VROM. Petra L. further was connected to the FOK in which she acted as a BVD mole. At this time the exact circumstances of her recruitment are not fully know.

Volkert van de G. was and for all intends and purposes is a BVD mole assigned to an infiltration role within the Dutch Eco-scene. The circumstances of his recruitment date back to an earlier murder case, in which he was temporarily implicated after the 6th of May. Soon after the connection was denied by the Justice Department. Factual is that VdG. was the killer in this case and was identified by the BVD. However not by Law Enforcement while the BVD did not pass on the information. Instead VdG. was recruited and assigned to the same CO who handled Petra L. (PL) as well.

Their CO manipulated the relation VdG PL without their knowledge at a later stage for reasons of handling.

PL. remained a personal contact of Mr. Pronk until as late as 05-05-2002, which was confirmed by an intercepted telephone contact between PL. and Mr. Pronk. The contents of this telephone conversation, which will be released at a later stage, leave little doubt as to Mr. Pronk having had pre-knowledge of the May 6th events.

The reasons for VdG to have been selected as a secondary hitman in the May 6th killing of Pim Fortuyn were (a) his eco-connections which would proof opportune for the case he would be arrested (b) the aspect of VdG. and PL as operatives handled by the same CO would allow for the construction of an effective cover story for the intended situation where VdG. would have extracted from the murder scene.

Operational planning was based on the assumption that VdG. as the secondary hitman would be able to extract himself from the murder scene, however draw all attention of witnesses on himself, allowing for the primary hitman to be extracted and helped out of the country. When due to circumstances at the scene, the very fact that Pim Fortuyn's driver at that time kept following VdG, an arrest became unavoidable and alternate plan became activated.

A co-conspirator with the GL of the VdG. arrest tipped off Pl.

Evidence against VdG was planted in his car and later after PL had been brought into a protected environment, in his house as well.

PL placed under protection was instructed about the further course of events involving efforts to cause a mis-trial in the case against VdG. So nothing to worry about as long as both she and VdG would maintain silence.

Prior to the second search of the VdG's home, materials were planted which subsequently during the second search were retrieved and identified as raw materials for explosives.

Witnesses in Harderwijk and in particular the street where VdG resided can confirm nightly exploits by un-identified law-enforcement and/or spooks in and around the VdG home

The reasons for the second search and the later arrest (with her consent and pre-knowledge of it to be for a very short period) was nothing more as a deception for public consumption.

Additionally I would urge you to go back into your memory of the murder scene and the exact moment of the first two shots, think about the movements VdG made at the time you first saw him, the degree to which he lacked control and seemed confused about his surroundings.

Factually those two first shots where fired from the roof of the energy centre by another highly trained hitman, who was hired in from an Syrian operator close to Manzur al Kazar, who acted as the primary gunman and was assisted out of the country within two hours after the event.

It should be possible to find witnesses who noticed a dark blue governmental BMW travelling from Hilversum into the direction of Schiphol Airport.

Further and more detailed information on request and by channels as indicated.

A Red-haired Girl

The new politics of hate

By Pat Buchanon

"Volkert van der Graf, 32, is a slender, blond-haired Dutchman whose pictures reveal nothing special except perhaps a taut, ascetic look.

"But for almost a decade, friends and associates say, this quiet man and strict vegetarian has been consumed by his fight to reduce the suffering of animals reared in industrial quantities for food, fur coats or medical experiments."

Sounds like a description of St. Francis of Assisi, doesn't it? But it is not. These are the lead paragraphs in The New York Times story that describes the environ-fanatic charged with gunning down Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn outside a TV studio this week.

What the Times does not describe is the pivotal role played by the European establishment and media in creating the climate of hysteria and hate in which a fanatic like Volkert van der Graf might feel morally justified in murdering Fortuyn.

Since Jean-Marie Le Pen carried 17 percent of the vote in the first round of the French election, it has been Hate Week across Europe. The Left has gone berserk, savaging populist leaders who challenge the EU or demand tougher immigration laws.

Fortuyn, whose party was running first in some polls for the Dutch elections this month, got the full treatment. Denounced as a "dangerous man" by the Dutch finance minister, he repeatedly protested that he was being demonised. Yet, day after day, it continued. He, Le Pen and Jorge Haider of Austria were painted as extremists or neo-fascists. Europeans were admonished to unite to stop the spreading menace. In Europe's media, it is open season and the Populist Right has become a free-fire zone.

The results are now in, and the European establishment is as much to blame for this man's death as the Likudnik fanatics were for the murder of Yitzhak Rabin, whom they painted as a traitor and Nazi for his willingness to trade land for peace.

In the two weeks between the first round and the run-off of the French election, there were riots against Le Pen, he was shouted down when speaking to the European parliament and his press conference had to be cancelled because of threats of disruption. And who protested these fascist tactics? Meanwhile, President Chirac was given a free pass as he trashed French tradition and refused Le Pen's challenge to debate.

The message sent by the Euro media: The Populist Right is an illegitimate force in the New Europe and tactics that might be judged fascist if used by the Right may be used against it, and absolution is available. Umberto Boss, whose Northern League is a partner in the government of Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, said Fortuyn was killed in a "climate which the left has created and continues to create throughout Europe with the help of the media aimed at demonising all who oppose what they think."

What were the sins of Pim Fortuyn for which it was acceptable for the Dutch finance minister to brand him a "dangerous man," and for others to call him an extremist and neo-fascist? What made this liberal and open homosexual a man of the Right, whom it was acceptable to vilify? Fortuyn had linked immigration to crime, called Islam a "backward" religion, and was campaigning to maintain the ethnic and cultural identity of the Dutch nation and people.

That Fortuyn had thrown off the morality of his church did not matter. His unpardonable sin that cried out to heaven for vengeance was that he rejected the higher truths of multiculturalism.

There is a new totalitarianism afoot in the West. Unlike the Stalinist form, it does not use police-state violence to command conformity. Its method is to redefine Rightist positions as evil, the product of a hate-filled or diseased mind, then read the Right out of the human race. Thus, anyone who argues that immigration has become so huge it threatens national cohesion or security is a "xenophobe." Oppose racial quotas, and you are a "racist." Defend the all-male military schools like VMI and the Citadel, and you are a "sexist." Oppose homosexual marriages, and you are a "homophobe" who hates and fears homosexuals.

Scholar Paul Gottfried has called it "the dehumanisation of dissent." First, you strip away an opponent's claim to decency and fair treatment by painting him as a right-wing extremist and hater, then you wash your hands of culpability when some wacko concludes he is doing the world a favour by murdering him -- like they murdered Pim Fortuyn.

bron: MCC