Een tijdje geleden maakte ik een post over breezer slettjes op een engels forum:
quote:
How I hate Breezer, This post is dedicated to all the girls you'd hate to have and love to stip on after using them for your pleasurel; "Breezah-Sluts", possibly like your sister(?).As they look over the world's painful panorama of war and terror, some people conclude that it is too late, that no amount of information or activity could possibly issue a call to conscience and reason. But those who take that pessimistic view understand neither Miss Breezah Slut nor her current rung on the ladder to total power. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: If it were up to Breezah Slut, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. I realize that cronyism is a tremendous problem in our society, but does it constantly have to be thrown in our faces? To ask that question another way, how will her apparatchiks react when they discover that she wants to expand, augment, and intensify the size and intrusiveness of her club? Although I haven't yet been able to concoct an acceptable answer to that question, I can suggest a tentative hypothesis. My hypothesis is that her philippics will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that. Here's some news for you: Breezah Slut's tracts serve only to safeguard her own power and privilege. Interesting, isn't it? What you may find even more interesting is that if she would abandon her name-calling and false dichotomies it would be much easier for me to straighten out her thinking.
From secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, Breezah Slut's legates have always found a way to wage an odd sort of warfare upon a largely unprepared and unrecognizing public. A great many of us don't want Breezah Slut to replace love and understanding with anarchism and recidivism. But we feel a prodigious societal pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to her iconoclastic, unprincipled rantings. A good friend of mine once said that we should all refute her arguments line by line and claim by claim. Amen to that! In fact, I even informed my friend that Breezah Slut does not merely poke someone's eyes out. She does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically.
In the end, the most telling thing is that Breezah Slut has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that she presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, Breezah Slut devises new schemes to project a stream of mudslinging images of death, sex, disaster, material goods, celebrities, and other fixtures in a mock-Olympian firmament. I believe in "live and let live". Breezah Slut, in contrast, demands not only tolerance and acceptance of her personal attacks but endorsement of them. It's because of such coprophagous demands that I claim that she and her subordinates are resentful nebbishes. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely as analysis.
All this aside, Breezah Slut's paroxysms are an icon for the deterioration of the city, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth. While you or I might find it natural to want to redefine in practical terms the immutable ideals that have guided us from the beginning, she likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it's okay for her to indulge her every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of her pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that prudish, annoying criticasters often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Breezah Slut enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever she threatens to make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to her half-measures. She always demands instant gratification. That's all that is of concern to her; nothing else matters -- except maybe to divert attention from her unprovoked aggression. I tell you this because to say that Breezah Slut should resort to underhanded tactics because "it's the right thing to do" is larcenous nonsense and untrue to boot.
I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that we must put our religious and factional differences aside if we are ever to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Breezah Slut-induced disaster, and the second is that her hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it. If I said that we're supposed to shut up and smile when she says hostile things, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being absolutely honest if I said that it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. Breezah Slut distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain her current opinions. It's unfortunate that she has no real education. It's impossible to debate important topics with someone who is so mentally handicapped.
According to the laws of probability, it does not take much perspicacity to see that cowardice, irresponsibility, and absenteeism are inextricably wedded in Breezah Slut's projects. Period, finis, and Q.E.D. While we all despair over Breezah Slut's damnable, narrow-minded obiter dicta, we must also remember the principles that will guide our better behaviors and higher aspirations.
To put this in context, Breezah Slut believes that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigoddess like her. Sorry, but I have to call foul on that one. What I have been writing up to this point is not what I initially intended to write in this letter. Instead, I decided it would be far more productive to tell you that this is not the place to develop that subject. It demands many pages of analysis, which I can't spare in this letter. Instead, I'll just state the key point, which is that the ripples of reaction to Breezah Slut's drug-induced ravings have spread, giving rise to universal calls to discuss, openly and candidly, a vision for a harmonious, multiracial society. (Actually, Breezah Slut's tirades have been a millstone around our neck for quite some time but that's not important now.) It may be soothing and pleasant for Breezah Slut to think that her vices are the only true virtues, but were he alive today, Hideki Tojo would be her most trustworthy ally. I can see Tojo joining forces with Breezah Slut to help her destabilize society.
Breezah Slut's surrogates are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Breezah Slut, who wants nothing less than to lead people towards iniquity and sin.
Breezah Slut's intimates perpetrate all kinds of atrocities while alleging that they are simply not capable of such activities and that therefore, the atrocities must be the product of my and your feverish and overworked imaginations. It may not seem to be very important right now, but Breezah Slut's sophomoric codices have led to more, not less, mandarinism in our society. More than that, Breezah Slut's more than filthy. She's mega-filthy. In fact, to understand just how filthy Breezah Slut is, you first need to realize that we are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which cold-blooded soi-disant do-gooders like Breezah Slut are completely absent. The other road leads into the darkness of pharisaism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? I can give you only my best estimate, made after long and anxious consideration, but I do not pose as an expert in these matters. I can say only that Breezah Slut wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving her lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well, because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that I've never bothered Breezah Slut. Yet Breezah Slut wants to harm others, or even instill the fear of harm. Whatever happened to "live and let live"? In the genesis of Breezah Slut's teachings, negligent begat complacent, which begat diabolic, which begat pretentious. I'm not going to say why; we all know the reason. Unsettling as that is, the more infuriating fact is that Breezah Slut thinks it's good that her accusations overthrow the government and eliminate the money system. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: The problem with her is not that she's gin-swilling. It's that she wants to contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply. She is off her trolley, but I guess nobody ever explained that to her lapdogs.
Every so often, you'll see Breezah Slut lament, flog herself, cry mea culpa for seeking to force us to tailor our declamations just to suit her lazy whims, and vow never again to be so boisterous. Sadly, she always reverts to her old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that she either is or elects to be ignorant of scientific principles and methods. Breezah Slut even intentionally misuses scientific terminology to force us to experience the full spectrum of the Breezah Slut Rainbow of Solecism. We need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with her. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that whatever your age, you now have only one choice. That choice is between a democratic, peace-loving regime that, you hope, may subject Breezah Slut's activities to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant and, as the alternative, the impertinent and discourteous dirigisme currently being forced upon us by Breezah Slut. Choose carefully, because hedonism is dangerous. Breezah Slut's insensate version of it is doubly so. The Breezah Slut-ization of our political and spiritual lives will promote violence in all its forms -- physical, sexual, psychological, economical, and social -- by the end of the decade. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that sometimes the best course of action will be obvious, sometimes not? Now for some parting advice: Look at the facts. Analyze the arguments. Think about the motives of the people who are telling you that going through the motions of working is the same as working. And have confidence in yourself. Remember, we are becoming a nation of cankered lamebrains.