TRU Linkdump

quote:

Op vrijdag 16 februari 2007 17:51 schreef merlin693 het volgende:
Popular Mechanics Debunked series - "Pull it" REVISITED

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=4530569594233714828

quote:

At 8.46 we hear this BOOOM!! An Explosion so hard that it pushed us upwards, the walls cracked, the false ceiling fell right on top of us, the sprinkler system got activated, there was water everywhere... the first thing that comes to my mind is, "O my God, the generator blew up right below us."

[...]

Seven seconds after, we hear "Pow!!" - the impact, all the way on the top, of the plane.

quote:

Op vrijdag 9 maart 2007 04:32 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:
BBC Radio Interview met William Rodriguez (van 23 februari 2007) (31.17 min)

Naast het indrukwekkende persoonlijk verhaal vertelt Rodriguez een paar opmerkelijke dingen.

quote:

Ik zette de radio af en ging door met de klim naar boven; opende deuren en liet mensen naar buiten, totdat ik op de drieendertigste verdieping kwam. Daar had ik een bergruimte met diverse spullen. Op elke zestiende verdieping had ik een kleine kast met spullen. Ik wilde stofmaskers pakken en ze aan de mensen geven die op hun weg naar buiten waren, vanwege de rook die in de trappenhuizen ontstond. Het was een bijtende rook. Het leek op ammoniak dat je keel dichtkneep. Ik sprak er (later) met professor Jones over (waarschijnlijk wordt hier Steven E. Jones bedoeld, noot f.h.). Ik sprak met experts en die zeiden dat het klonk als ammoniumnitraat.
http://www.waarheid911.nl/william_rodriguez.html#amoniumnitraat

quote:

De stof wordt echter ook veel als explosief gebruikt, vooral in combinatie met benzine of kerosine
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammoniumnitraat

quote:

Terwijl we klommen hoorden we kleine explosies die afgingen, PAHH!, PAHH!, in verschillende delen van het gebouw.
Ik vroeg aan een brandweerman, wat zijn dat? Hij antwoordde: "Ik denk dat het de gastanks van de keukens zijn." Welnu, dat was erg onlogisch, omdat het een klasse A gebouw was. Alle keukens waren elektrisch! Dus dat klopte niet. Waar kwamen die explosies vandaan?

quote:

Toen ik weer terug de gang inliep, hoorde ik iets zeer vreemds. Op de verdieping boven mij, de vierendertigste verdieping, hoorde ik dat er zware apparatuur werd verschoven. Jullie kennen de afvalcontainers als die over de vloer worden geschoven, deze stalen afvalcontainers? Het klonk precies als dat.
http://www.waarheid911.nl/william_rodriguez.html#amoniumnitraat

quote:

Mike Pecoraro:

"When I walked out into the lobby, it was incredible, the whole lobby was soot and black, elevator doors were missing. The marble was missing off some of the walls. 20-foot section of marble, 20 by 10 foot sections of marble, gone from the walls. The west windows were all gone. They were missing. Broken glass everywhere, the revolving doors were all broken and their glass was gone. Every sprinkler head was going off. I am thinking to myself, how are these sprinkler heads going off? It takes a lot of heat to set off a sprinkler head."

OK, so just MAYBE the fireball racing down the elevator shaft could cause the black soot and missing doors. But really, blowing huge marble panels off of the walls. Blowing out all of the glass. I thought this was the same jet fuel that weakened the steel above to cause the pancake collapse? Remember, the plane hit 95 stories above.
http://st12.startlogic.co(...)round_explosions.htm

quote:

Samuel Danner (electrical engineer for AmTrak), was involved in the clean-up at the Pentagon crash site and inspected the debris at the site. He said, "It was not a Boeing 757 that hit the Pentagon

He says that the plane was not a 757, no way. "It was like a humpback whale" he says. Size of a gulfstream 300, about 100 ft wingspan, one engine on the backside with a "V" tail and no windows he could see.

He smelled cordite and he saw a 3-foot single engine on the ground there.

http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=6636

quote:

Two major 9/11 anomalies have been thoroughly documented, specifically:

1) The stand down of US air defense on the morning of 9/11 that ... all » permitted commercial jet aircraft to fly erratically and in restricted air space without challenge

2) Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings #1, #2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition

A third significant anomaly has not been discussed, let alone acknowledged: the reporting by the major US TV news networks in the first few hours immediately after the attacks.

Specifically:

1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the lifestyle and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while
both towers were still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused by anyone.

2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye witness who explained in strangely formal language the science behind why the towers collapsed when most engineers and firemen were utterly baffled and in shock by what had just taken place.

3. CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive charges placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way they did.

How was it that these stories - based on no fact, no research and no inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly on US news networks and then became part of the core myths of what happened on 9/11?

Were these stories prepared in advance?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/050307Solution.htm

quote:

Bombs in the WTC Buildings Proves Nothing to Racist-Fascist Bigots
By Ed Ward, MD

quote:

August 21, 2006

Fireman Lou Cacchioli was the first to grab me by the heart, mind and soul with his isolated courage by simply telling the truth about what he experienced to the only media that cared to ask about his eyewitness account of 9/11 on July 19, 2005. In the Arctic Beacon article, by Greg Szymanski, he related his observations during the efforts to save as many as he could with little regard for personal safety: "...there were bombs...elevator doors completely blown out... we heard this huge explosion that sounded like a bomb... another huge explosion like the first one hits.... Oh. My God, these bastards put bombs in here like they did in 1993! Then as soon as we get in the stairwell, I hear another huge explosion like the other two. Then I heard bang, bang, bang - huge bangs..."

For the first time, this article finally allows Lou to tell his story, the way he wanted to tell it - truthfully and to the best of his knowledge. The article gives more than just the facts as he lived them. It gives insight into the fate of all the heroes present on that despicable day. A fate that awaits other eyewitnesses of the clean up crews and city inhabitants that had inadequate or no protection because the EPA had stated the air was safe to breathe.

quote:

Op woensdag 21 maart 2007 13:52 schreef Resonancer het volgende:
UH??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUl9kyH7cgA

Plane- No plane..9-11

quote:

Op donderdag 22 maart 2007 09:51 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:

[..]

Geef me een paar uurtjes en ik edit een complete WTC toren weg.

quote:

Op vrijdag 23 maart 2007 00:56 schreef Orwell het volgende:

[..]

maar wat als het origineel footage is geweest..?