IJsland en de walvissen

quote:

Op vrijdag 27 oktober 2006 10:20 schreef ijsmeis het volgende:

[..]

Zoals.. ?

_{Ik ben gewoon benieuwd.}

quote:

Op vrijdag 27 oktober 2006 10:22 schreef Netsplitter het volgende:
Mexico bv...

quote:

Nieuw Zeeland

quote:

Op vrijdag 27 oktober 2006 10:33 schreef TechXP het volgende:

Schildpaddenhandel, dolfijnenhandel, fiesta's waar dieren gemarteld worden, stierenvechten,

quote:

Op vrijdag 27 oktober 2006 12:37 schreef TechXP het volgende:
Voor je gaat boycotten en zo moet je inschatten in hoeverre dat mogelijk is. Voor sommige landen gaat dat gewoon totaal niet werken. IJsland is wel een goed land om te boycotten en om internationaal druk op te voeren.

quote:

Op vrijdag 27 oktober 2006 17:14 schreef BabyNuke het volgende:
Ik zou op het moment meer energie steken in het veranderen van hoe wij dieren behandelen dan het stoppen van de walvisvangst in IJsland. De huige vangst plannen van IJsland vormen geen bedreiging voor het voortbestaan van de soort en zijn verder qua schaal ook niet vergelijkbaar met wat wij dieren aandoen in de bio-industrie. Ik praat het niet goed, zeker niet - maar als ik de verontwaardiging zo zie dan vraag ik me wel eens af ons mensen wel goed doorhebben waar hun hamburgertjes vandaan komen en waarom ze daar dan niet eerst eens wat aan doen. Net als dat een goed milieu bij je zelf begint lijkt me dat ook voor dierenwelzijn - steek er eerst energie in om hier de zaken op orde te krijgen.

quote:

Thank you for your correspondence concerning Iceland’s policy on whaling.

I wish to assure you that Iceland has no intention of catching any of the endangered species of whales, killed on a large scale by other whaling nations in the past. Iceland’s resumption of sustainable whaling only involves abundant stocks and is linked to Iceland’s overall policy of sustainable utilisation of marine resources.

Several countries catch whales, most of them on a much bigger scale than Iceland. The biggest whaling countries among the members of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) are the United States, Russia, Norway, Japan and Greenland. The whaling operations practiced by all those countries, as well as Iceland, are sustainable and legal and in accordance with the rules of the IWC.

Iceland fully appreciates the need for careful conservation of marine resources. Our economy depends on those resources as marine products constitute around 60% of Iceland’s revenue from exported goods and almost 40% of all Icelandic exported goods and services. Disruption of the ecological balance in Icelandic waters due to overfishing or other reasons could have catastrophic consequences for the livelihood of Icelanders.

As you may know, Iceland was among the first countries in the world to extend its fishery limits to 200 nautical miles in the year 1975, in order to put an end to the uncontrolled fishing around Iceland by trawlers from other countries. Since then Iceland has taken great care in maintaining balanced and sustainable fishing in Icelandic waters by enforcing an effective management system for various fish species including cod, herring and capelin.

Iceland takes pride in its pioneering work in this field, which has been emulated by many countries in the world wishing to avoid unsustainable practices. The annual catch quotas for fishing and whaling are based on recommendations by scientists, who regularly monitor the status of the stocks, thus ensuring that the activity is sustainable.

For a number of years, Iceland has acknowledged the need for scientific research on whales to gain a better understanding of the interaction between the different whale stocks and other marine species and the role of whales in the marine ecosystem. Therefore, Iceland began implementing a research plan on minke whales in 2003. So far, 161 minke whales have been taken and we look forward to the completion of the research plan in 2007 when the sample size of 200 minke whales has been obtained. Whaling quotas will take into account the number of whales that are taken in the implementation of the research plan, ensuring that the total number remains well below sustainable levels.

There are many different whale species and stocks in the world's oceans. Some are in a poor state and in need of protection. However, many whale populations are far from being threatened or endangered. The total stock size of Central North-Atlantic minke whales, for example, is close to 70,000 animals. Of those, around 43,600 live in Icelandic coastal waters. Fin whales in the Central North Atlantic number around 25,800 animals. Both estimates have been agreed by consensus by the Scientific Committees of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) and the North-Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO).

Iceland’s decision to resume sustainable whaling involves takes of 30 minke whales and nine fin whales, during the current fishing year which ends on 31 August 2007. This will bring the total catches of minke whales in Icelandic waters during this fishing year to 69, including the minke whales taken in completing the research plan. These takes equal less than 0.2% of the number of minke whales in Icelandic coastal waters, an even smaller fraction of the total stock, and less than 0.04% of fin whales in the Central North Atlantic. Both are considered to be close to pre-exploitation levels and estimated sustainable annual catch levels are 200 and 400 fin and minke whales respectively. As the catch limits now issued are much lower, the catches will not have a significant impact on whale stocks. A responsible management system will ensure that the catch quotas set will not be exceeded. The catches are clearly sustainable and therefore consistent with the principle of sustainable development.

Iceland’s resumption of sustainable whaling is legal under international law. At the time of the re-entry of Iceland into the IWC, Iceland made a reservation with respect to the so-called moratorium on commercial whaling. As a part of that reservation, Iceland committed itself not to authorise commercial whaling before 2006 and thereafter not to authorise such whaling while progress was being made in negotiating the IWC’s Revised Management Scheme (RMS), a management framework for commercial whaling.

At the IWC’s Annual Meeting in 2005, Iceland went on record expressing its regret that no progress was being made in the RMS discussions. At this year’s IWC Annual Meeting, Iceland’s judgement of the situation was reconfirmed as the IWC generally agreed that talks on an RMS had reached an impasse. As a result, Iceland’s reservation has taken effect. Therefore, Iceland is no longer bound by the so-called moratorium on commercial whaling. In this respect, Iceland is in the same position as other IWC members that are not bound by the moratorium.

Iceland was one of the first countries in the world to realize the importance of a conservation approach to whaling. As signs of overexploitation of whales emerged early in the last century, Iceland declared a ban on whaling for large whales around Iceland in 1915. Whaling was not resumed until 1948, except for limited catches 1935-1939. Strict rules and limitations were applied to whaling in Iceland from 1948 to 1985 when all commercial whaling was halted again following a decision by the IWC.

Iceland has been a leading advocate for international cooperation in ensuring sustainable use of living marine resources, including whales. This has been the position taken by Iceland within the IWC, based on the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling from 1946. The stated role of the IWC, according to its founding Convention, is to “provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry”.


I hope that this information will be useful to you in understanding Iceland’s position on sustainable whaling. You may rest assured, that the desire to ensure the conservation of the whale stocks around Iceland and elsewhere is fully shared by the Icelandic Government.

With regards,
Sturla Sigurjonsson
Foreign Policy Advisor

quote:

Op donderdag 30 november 2006 12:45 schreef ijsmeis het volgende:

[..]

quote:

21 December 2006 - Enough is enough. The Greenpeace fraud about saving the whales must be exposed. For years, I have been tolerating their pretense of action and watching them rake in tremendous profits from whaling. Greenpeace makes more money from anti-whaling than Norway and Iceland combined make from whaling. In both cases, the whales die and someone profits.

quote:

Op woensdag 3 januari 2007 01:08 schreef TechXP het volgende:
Een weblog van iemand die ook strijd tegen walvisjagers: http://www.rootsofcompassion.org/sarah/

quote:

Op donderdag 4 januari 2007 10:56 schreef LeeHarveyOswald het volgende:
Is dat hetzelfde piratenschip als wat toen bij Kamphuis voorbij kwam? (De reunie, van de zomer als ik mij niet vergis).

quote:

Op donderdag 4 januari 2007 12:08 schreef TechXP het volgende:

[..]

Ja klopt. Alex Cornelissen van Sea Shepherd was toen in die uitzending. Ik geloof dat die nu op dat andere schip zit. Ze gaan met twee schepen daar tegen de walvisjacht strijden.