[POLL] Was 9/11 een Inside Job?

Hier een update over de hologram technologie.
Ja het is weer een lap tekst, maar dat is moeilijk in te korten, dus niet gaan zeiken


A "Defense Weekly" article dated 31 March 1997, describes a quasi-information warfare/ psychological operations programme that was discussed by the USAF after Operation "Desert Storm" in the Gulf War.
This involves projection of a three-dimensional holographic image to act as decoys.

The Pentagon would have enjoyed seeing 'an angry God' or some other form of religious imagery appear above the battlefield.

The Pentagon spoke openly about its use of holographic projections when discussing its "non-lethal weapons" programme back in 1994. Since then however, the programme disappeared from view, evidently becoming a "black budget" effort, according to "Defense Weekly".

In conclusion, the article states that the U.S. Army's "JFK Special Warfare Center and School", disclosed back in 1991 that it was looking to develop a "PSYOPS Hologram System" with the capability to 'protect persuasive messages and three-dimensional pictures of cloud, smoke, rain droplets, buildings, flying saucers and religious figures'.

'The use of holograms as a persuasive message will have worldwide implications,' wrote "Defense Weekly".

An "Offensive Information Warfare Division" has now been created by the USAF and is headed by Lt. Col. 'Jimmy' Miyamoto. On communications traffic, the division is recognised as AF/XOIOW.

This division co-ordinates with the following:

Joint Chiefs of Staff; National Security Agency; Defense Intelligence Agency; Central Intelligence Agency; National Reconaissance Office; Defense Airborne Reconaissance Office and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency.

The fact that these agencies have proven links to a division which specialises in projecting holographic 'flying saucers' will come as a revelation to some, but serious UFO researchers have been aware of the fact for some considerable period of time.

Alas, little more is known about the activities of this division, or its sphere of operation.


Some very knowledgable researchers actually deny that there was any flying object at all. While there is consensus what the flying object was NOT - it was NOT flight UA175, an alleged hijacked plane - there is no consensus what it was. The opinions range from: a remote controlled drone, a holographically cloaked missile (from government project „ghost Gun“ under Dr. Gary Wood at the Adelphi, Maryland U.S. Army Research Laboratory) to a 100% camera fake ala Walt Disney Corp. We feel intuitively that none of these theories has hit the nail on the head.


9-11 AND THE ALIEN QUESTION

The strangest thing within this strangeness is the entry mode of the seeming „plane“ into south wall of south Tower, Manhattan, at 9:02:56 a.m. on 9-11-1. The „plane“ glides non-collisionally like a ghost or laser light show object through the tower’s wall. The wall consisted of aluminum-clad steel support columns that were three feet and some inches apart from each other. No loss of speed by the so-called „plane“, no shudder, no veer, no wings flipping foreward and breaking off, no explosion (on the wall). If you look closely at the photos of the alleged entry hole, the columns calibrate the hole’s size – it is about 99 feet wide at its widest while the alleged „plane“ if real had a 156 foot wingspan. Then an explosion follows coming from the inside of the tower well behind the steel-column wall, folding the rims of the hole to the outside. Actually, it is my firm impression from slow motion video analysis that there was no hole from the „plane“ impact but the hole was created in the explosion slightly later under cover of the monstrous fireball. What we see at the end of the impact event just before the explosion (when the „plane“ is almost all in the building) are very small whitish puffs of smoke like from cutter explosions (not dark-burning aircraft kerosene). These vey small smoke puffs initially fill what might or might not be a plane-shaped hole cut through steel and through at least three steel-cement tower floors – the latter is held impossible by all without exception, including the most conservative MIT construction engineer.................
http://www.gallerize.com/(...)ALIEN%20QUESTION.htm


Project Ghost Gun

In my book “T MINUS 9-11” (www.gallerize.com), I present a secret weapons technology of “holographic deception” (U.S. top-secret project “Ghost Gun”). A very knowledge analyst of the problem has used the word “animation” (see note after answer 2). Evan Fairbanks, the ABC cameraman of the WTC on 9-11-1, used the expressions “bad special effect” and “Hollywood makes it” and similar. What it exactly-down-to-the-blueprint was we don’t know. In any case, it demonstrates the use of exotic, secret and most likely military hightech such as only the Pentagon can commandeer. This technical finding is the technical refutation of the government’s al Qaeda and bin Laden conspiracy theories.

Apart from project Ghost Gun for holographic deception (visual camouflage), to my mind the most feasible starting point for analyzing this plane-like weapon is Col. Thomas E. Bearden’s description of an electromagnetic hologram missile shooting down an airplane in Gander during the cold war in the 1980s, see
http://www.cheniere.org/books/gravitobiology/dc8.htm


From Nexus magazine Aug 97

U.S. Congress has approved funding for the Army to perfect a laser that
projects life-sized hologram decoys of troops and tanks, designed to
fool enemies on the battlefield. Dubbed the "Ghost Gun", the hologram
projector could also be used to display virtual images of religious or
political leaders in order to create calm or panic amongst the public.

U.S. Army scientist Dr. Gary Wood, who is leading the project at the
Army Research Laboratory in Adelphi, Maryland, said: "One of the scenarios
was Saddam Hussein standing on a balcony spouting pro-American
messages or telling troops to lay down their arms. We are well on the way
to perfecting it".

It is predicted that within 10 years many of the troops seen by enemy
units on the battlefield may be no more than 3D, laser-generated images.
U.S. defense consultant Dr. Brenda Mark said, "Anyone looking at the
target area will think the U.S. Army has a major presence there when in fact
there will be nothing but empty space."


911 test for sceptics
http://www.cloakanddagger(...)1%209-11%20Tests.htm


interessante links
http://www.ar.utexas.edu/Staff/White/BlueNote2.html
http://www.truinsight.com(...)URE%20PART%20TWO.htm
http://www.cheniere.org/books/gravitobiology/dc8.htm

Als je mijn vorige post goed gelezen had hoefde je deze vraag niet te stellen.

Jij zegt dat een hologram geen interactie kan hebben met de muur, maar als je mijn vorige posts over de hologram technologie gelezen had zie je dat het niet compleet een hologram is, maar een missile of misschien ook een ander vliegend real object wat door holografische technologie eruit ziet als een Boeing.