quote:Ik had het ergens gelezen maar wist niet meer precies waar. In het volgende stuk (bij punt 3) komt het echter terug. Alleen blijkt het niet over deze maar over de zaak in '93 te gaan. Sorry voor de foute info.
Op woensdag 10 december 2003 00:06 schreef Cosma-Shiva het volgende:
[..]Heb je een bron voor deze versie?
Uit het volgende artikel blijkt ook dat de Jackson familie vandaag een persconferentie geeft.
D.A. Dismisses another Govt Agencys Report?
A governmental agency doing an independent investigation has previously vindicated Michael Jackson of any wrongdoing against the very accuser who is now making allegations against him. District Attorney, Tom Sneddon, has inexplicably disregarded the findings of a joint investigation done by the Department of Children & Family Services (DCFS) and the LAPD. In his response, Sneddon calls the conclusion of that investigation insignificant: Given what we know, we do not consider the DCFS statement a significant factor (see Internal Memo: Case Against Jackson Unfounded).
Reporters, commentators, and hosts of various cable and network shows all around the country have a problem with the dismissive attitude of the DA. Even Joe Scarborough (MSNBC Dec 9 show) expressed that this case is going up in smoke. He is, by no means, the only person who feels that way. To claim this bombshell of a memo has no bearing on their case would either be career suicide or symptomatic of a DA so blind that anything contrary to what he already believes to be true will be disregarded by him.
Besides the fact that the findings of an earlier investigation clears Jackson, there are other holes in the case which this DA cannot seem to overcome as of yet:
There are also rumblings from sources close to the Jackson family that this memo is only the tip of the iceberg as to evidence that will exonerate Jackson. It is reported the Jackson family will hold a press conference tomorrow afternoon (Dec 10).
The tale of Sir Robin: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZwuTo7zKM8
quote:
LOS ANGELES, California (CNN) -- A leaked memo from the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services concludes that allegations of sexual abuse of a young boy by pop superstar Michael Jackson were "unfounded."But Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon, who announced he will formally charge the entertainer by sometime next week, said he was "discounting" the memo, which was posted Tuesday on the "Smoking Gun" Web site.
According to the November 26 memo, the mother felt "the entertainer was like a father to the children and part of her family."
Sneddon confirmed she was referring to Jackson.
The memo, which was written in response to a request and summarizes an investigation conducted between February 14-27, concerns the young cancer patient on whose behalf Sneddon's office is prosecuting Jackson.
The memo said the child -- now 14 -- denied he slept in the same bed as Jackson or that any sexual abuse had ever occurred. It also indicates the boy's older sister said she had accompanied her brothers to numerous sleepovers at Jackson's Neverland Ranch and "had never seen anything sexually inappropriate between her brother and the entertainer."
"Our investigators were aware of the contents of the memo prior to seeking the search warrants and arrest warrant for Mr. Jackson," Sneddon said.
"We provided all the information to the judge about the circumstances and the timing of the child welfare investigation, and the judge still issued the warrants," he said.
Asked if the leaked memo that appears to exonerate Jackson hurts his case, Sneddon replied, "No, we are not worried."
A Jackson spokesman told CNN the leaked memo supports his innocence.
"There is no merit to the allegations, Michael is innocent," said Stuart Backerman. "This is in keeping with what we've said all along."
The L.A. child welfare agency got involved because the alleged victim is a county resident.
The 45-year-old singer returned to Santa Barbara, California, from Las Vegas, Nevada, to surrender to authorities November 20, was booked on charges of "lewd and lascivious conduct" with a child under 14, and released on $3 million bond.
If the formal charges are filed next week, he will be arraigned January 9.
CNN's Art Harris contributed to this report.
quote:Thanks. (foutje kan gebeuren)
Op woensdag 10 december 2003 18:36 schreef Brave_Sir_Robin het volgende:[..]
