WTC ingestort dmv THEL Tactical High-Energy Laser

quote:

---

Tim Wilkinson, Lecturer in Civil Engineering

(This is an initial suggestion on one possible reason for failure, and should not be regarded as official advice)

The structural integrity of the World Trade Center depends on the closely spaced columns around the perimeter. Lightweight steel trusses span between the central elevator core and the perimeter columns on each floor. These trusses support the concrete slab of each floor and tie the perimeter columns to the core, preventing the columns from buckling outwards.

After the initial plane impacts, it appeared to most observers that the structure had been severely damaged, but not necessarily fatally.

It appears likely that the impact of the plane crash destroyed a significant number of perimeter columns on several floors of the building, severely weakening the entire system. Initially this was not enough to cause collapse.

However, as fire raged in the upper floors, the heat would have been gradually affecting the behaviour of the remaining material. As the planes had only recently taken off, the fire would have been initially fuelled by large volumes of jet fuel, creating potentially enormously high temperatures. The strength of the steel drops markedly with prolonged exposure to fire, while the elastic modulus of the steel reduces (stiffness drops), increasing deflections.

Modern structures are designed to resist fire for a specific length of time. Safety features such as fire retarding materials and sprinkler systems help to contain fires, help extinguish flames, or prevent steel from being exposed to excessively high temperatures. This gives occupants time to escape and allow fire fighters to extinguish blazes, before the building is catastrophically damaged.

It is possible that the blaze, started by jet fuel and then engulfing the contents of the offices, in a highly confined area, generated fire conditions significantly more severe than those anticipated in a typical office fire. These conditions may have overcome the building's fire defences considerably faster than expected.

Eventually, the loss of strength and stiffness of the materials resulting from the fire, combined with the initial impact damage, would have caused a failure of the truss system supporting a floor, or the remaining perimeter columns, or even the internal core, or some combination. Failure of the flooring system would have subsequently allowed the perimeter columns to buckle outwards. Regardless of which of these possibilities actually occurred, it would have resulted in the complete collapse of at least one complete storey at the level of impact.

Once one storey collapsed all floors above would have begun to fall. The huge mass of falling structure would gain momentum, crushing the structurally intact floors below, resulting in catastrophic failure of the entire structure.

(US readers note: storey is the Australian/English spelling of story)

Perimeter columns, several storeys high, and still linked together, lie amongst all the debris on the ground.

(Wie zei er ook alweer dat er geen grote stukken staal tussen het puin lagen?)

The only evidence so far are photographs and television footage. Whether failure was initiated at the perimeter columns or the core is unknown. The extent to which the internal parts were damaged during the collision may be evident in the rubble if any forensic investigation is conducted. Since the mass of the combined towers is close to 1000000 tons, finding evidence will be an enormous task.

This photograph shows the south tower just as it is collapsing. It is evident that the building is falling over to the left. The North Tower collapsed directly downwards, on top of itself. The same mechanism of failure, the combination of impact and subsequent fire damage, is the likely cause of failure of both towers. However, it is possible that a storey on only one side of the South Tower initially collapsed, resulting in the "skewed" failure of the entire tower.

The gigantic impact forces caused by the huge mass of the falling structure landing on the floors below travelled down the columns like a shockwave faster than the entire structure fell. The clouds of debris coming from the tower, several storeys below the huge falling mass, probably result from the sudden and almost explosive failure of each floor, caused by the "shockwave".

---

quote:

---

Op donderdag 25 september 2003 01:40 schreef Aurora025 het volgende:It can bombard its target with either beams that will destroy it outright, or by beams of lesser strength to disable the targets electronics and cause it to go out of control.

---

quote:

---

Op donderdag 25 september 2003 16:26 schreef Aurora025 het volgende:
"Wie zei er ook alweer dat er geen grote stukken staal tussen het puin lagen?)"

De stukken die op de foto's te zien zijn, zijn ook klein als je bedenkt dat de kern van het wtc bestond uit een stalen kern van enkele honderden meters hoog. Staal breekt niet zomaar, het buigt.
Veel stukken werden ook direct afgevoerd.

---

quote:

---

Op donderdag 25 september 2003 02:38 schreef TheWilliedockSaints het volgende:

[..]

ja das ook zo

ik beleef er ook wel plezier aan, maar bij deze 2 is het wel erg makkelijk...een kind kan de was doen..

ParAlien en M.ALTA zijn moeilijkere gevallen....maar die zijn echt compleet gestoord..

---

quote:

---

Op donderdag 25 september 2003 18:32 schreef Jeukaanmenaat het volgende:

[..]

Vergeet Yrrab/Hoogl289 en kloons niet, en MokroKrees/Flamez/Fonkmeistah. Ze geloven die shit gewoon serieus.

---

quote:

---

Op donderdag 25 september 2003 18:43 schreef janszzen het volgende:
Er zijn mensen die dit serieus geloven???????

---

Al moeten ze het natuurlijk niet gaan overdrijven.

quote:

---

Op donderdag 25 september 2003 18:50 schreef Aurora025 het volgende:
Er zijn zelfs mensen die de officiele versie geloven.

---

En wat is hier ongeloofwaardig aan?

quote:

---

Op donderdag 25 september 2003 18:58 schreef janszzen het volgende:

[..]

Wat is er mis met de offieciele versie: moslim-klootzakken kapen vliegtuig- hebben geleerd te sturen- vliegen dat ding WTC in, wat nauwelijks te missen is...

En wat is hier ongeloofwaardig aan?

---

quote:

---

Op donderdag 25 september 2003 19:02 schreef Aurora025 het volgende:

[..]

Nee, je hebt gelijk, stom van me, het is zelfs heel geloofwaardig.

---