Bij welk geloof pas jij ?

mine results:

1. mainline - conservative christian protestant (100%)
2. church of jesus christ of latter-day saints (mormons) (99%)
3. jehovah\\\\\\\'s witness (87%)
4. orthodox quaker (84%)
5. seventh day adventist (77%)

al denk ik dat ik nooit ergens 100% in een hokje past

[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door Boomstam op 06-07-2004 03:12:12 ]

_{edit: verkeerdetopic}

1. secular humanism (100%)
browse secular humanism related books. click here for info

2. unitarian universalism (94%)
browse unitarian universalism related books. click here for info

3. non-theist (83%)
browse non-theist related books. click here for info

4. theravada buddhism (79%)
browse theravada buddhism related books. click here for info

5. liberal quakers (76%)
browse liberal quakers related books. click here for info

6. mainline - liberal christian protestants (61%)
browse mainline - liberal christian protestants related books. click here for info

7. neo-pagan (61%)
browse neo-pagan related books. click here for info

8. mahayana buddhism (50%)
browse mahayana buddhism related books. click here for info

9. new age (49%)
browse new age related books. click here for info

10. new thought (42%)
browse new thought related books. click here for info

11. taoism (41%)
browse taoism related books. click here for info

12. christian science (church of christ, scientist) (36%)
browse christian science (church of christ, scientist) related books. click here for info

13. reform judaism (36%)
browse reform judaism related books. click here for info

14. scientology (36%)
browse scientology related books. click here for info

15. hinduism (33%)
browse hinduism related books. click here for info

16. orthodox quaker (30%)
browse orthodox quaker related books. click here for info

17. jainism (28%)
browse jainism related books. click here for info

18. sikhism (24%)
browse sikhism related books. click here for info

19. mainline - conservative christian protestant (23%)
browse mainline - conservative christian protestant related books. click here for info

20. eastern orthodox (21%)
browse eastern orthodox related books. click here for info

21. islam (21%)
browse islam related books. click here for info

22. jehovah\'s witness (21%)
browse jehovah\'s witness related books. click here for info

23. orthodox judaism (21%)
browse orthodox judaism related books. click here for info

24. roman catholic (21%)
browse roman catholic related books. click here for info

25. bahá\'í faith (18%)
browse bahá\'í faith related books. click here for info

26. church of jesus christ of latter-day saints (mormons) (18%)
browse church of jesus christ of latter-day saints (mormons) related books. click here for info

27. seventh day adventist (13%)

1.neo-pagan (100%)

2. unitarian universalism (97%)

3. new age (93%)

4. theravada buddhism (84%)

5. liberal quakers (83%)

6. secular humanism (78%)

7. new thought (77%)

8. mahayana buddhism (74%)


neo-pagan a community of faiths bringing ancient pagan and magickal traditions to the modern age -- including mostly wicca but also druidism, asatru, shamanism, neo-native american, etc. neo-pagan is an umbrella term for various and diverse beliefs with many elements in common. (see pagan path selector below) some neo-pagans find no incongruence practicing neo-paganism along with adherence to another faith, such as christianity or judaism.

belief in deity: some believe in a supreme being. many believe in god and goddess - a duality. many believe there are countless spirit beings, gods and goddesses, in the cosmos and within all of nature - god is all and within all; all are one god. the great mother earth, or mother nature, is highly worshipped. divinity is immanent and may become manifest within anyone at any time through various methods.
incarnations: no human incarnations are worshipped in particular, as all of nature and the universe are considered embodiments of god and goddess, or of gods and goddesses, worthy of respect, reverence or worship.
origin of universe/life: generally there is no conflict between observations revealed through science and neo-pagan beliefs on origins of the physical universe and of man. many believe in a supreme intelligence that created a duality of god/goddess who then created a spirit world of gods and goddesses as well as all of the universe and nature.
after death: many believe in reincarnation, after some rest and recovery in the “otherworld.” there is generally no concept of hell as a place of punishment, but some believe wrongdoing can trap the soul in state of suffering after death. some (wicca) believe the soul joins their dead ancestors who watch over and protect their family. some believe that life energy continues in some, if unknown, form. some believe in various spiritual resting places. many say we don’t or can’t know what happens after death.
why evil? “evil” is imbalance. most believe there is no evil but rather that people sometimes make mistakes. wrongdoing results when we forget we are one with the universal spirit.
salvation: the concept of “salvation” is essentially irrelevant; rather the belief that people can attain spiritual balance and harmony with each other and nature. the path includes group ceremonies, dances, songs/chants, prayers, meditation, trance, altered states of consciousness, the metaphysical, magic, invoking or evoking deities or spirits, tantric practices. intercessors are commonly used: psychics, seers, shamans, tarot, oui-ja board. ethical choices are influenced by belief in rebirth and karma - that one is rewarded or punished within this or after this lifetime for one’s choices, and an ethical code to do no harm.
undeserved suffering: most do not believe in satan or any spirit being as the cause of suffering. some believe in karma, that choosing to live a life of wrongdoing and pain will naturally result in suffering in this or later lifetimes. many view suffering as a result of spiritual imbalance in one’s life or on the planet or in the universe. the focus is generally on healing suffering rather than answering definitively why it exists.
issues: abortion choice is supported by many, but beliefs about abortion range from “pro-life” to “pro-choice.” views on divorce, homosexuality, and gender equality are generally very supportive of human differences, equality, and personal choice. many believe that involvement in community action, especially regarding environmental concerns, is integral to the belief in human interdependence and worship of the earth mother. many promote strict nonviolence to humans and animals.


ik ben het niet met de uitslag eens...
mijn \"geloof\" staat er ook niet tussen en wat ik lees over de neo-pagan komt niet echt overeen met mijn opvattingen.
ik weet wel dat je zulke vragenlijsten meerdere keren moet doen en dan de wisselende uitslag moet vergelijken

hokjes . maar hieronder de rc-top 5 :

1. new age (100%)
2. neo-pagan (90%)
3. mahayana buddhism (88%)
4. new thought (84%)
5. scientology (80%)

your results:

1. islam (100%)


2. orthodox judaism (88%)


3. sikhism (85%)


4. bahá'í faith (80%)


5. jehovah's witness (77%)


grappig

1. secular humanism (100%)
2. non-theist (95%)
3. unitarian universalism (90%)

tussen hemel en aarde is een heleboel lucht.

/is hardcore atheist.

1 theravada buddhism (100%) browse theravada buddhism related books. click here for info
2. non-theist (89%) browse non-theist related books. click here for info
3. unitarian universalism (85%)
wtf is theravada
of unitarian universalism

quote:

op donderdag 8 juli 2004 01:15 schreef steve-o het volgende:
wtf is theravada

theravada is oldskool boeddhisme
dus niet de mainstream zoals men die nu kent. enkel de originele leer van de boeddha, zonder mahayana poespas.

1. secular humanism (100%)

2. unitarian universalism (91%)

3. non-theist (75%)

4. liberal quakers (74%)

5. theravada buddhism (64%)

goh, verrassend zeg...

_{hetgeen wel betekent dat het geen slechte test is...!}

beetje onzinnige test. iedere is bij/ vanaf geboorte moslim.

quote:

op donderdag 8 juli 2004 10:34 schreef pro_jeex het volgende:
beetje onzinnige test. iedere is bij/ vanaf geboorte moslim.

de test bepaalt dan ook niet wat je bij je geboorte was, maar wat je nu bent.

quote:

op donderdag 8 juli 2004 10:34 schreef pro_jeex het volgende:
beetje onzinnige test. iedere is bij/ vanaf geboorte moslim.

getuige het feit dat er vrijwel niemand hier 100% moslim scoort, kan je dus wel zeggen dat allah een zooitje van z'n pr gemaakt heeft

1. unitarian universalism (100%)
browse unitarian universalism related books. click here for info

2. secular humanism (95%)
browse secular humanism related books. click here for info

3. neo-pagan (92%)
browse neo-pagan related books. click here for info

4. liberal quakers (90%)
browse liberal quakers related books. click here for info

5. theravada buddhism (80%)
browse theravada buddhism related books. click here for info

6. new age (73%)
browse new age related books. click here for info

7. mainline - liberal christian protestants (69%)
browse mainline - liberal christian protestants related books. click here for info

8. mahayana buddhism (66%)
browse mahayana buddhism related books. click here for info

9. non-theist (65%)
browse non-theist related books. click here for info

10. taoism (59%)
browse taoism related books. click here for info



verrassend vind ik de relatief hoge plaats van die quakers en de mainline protestanten

sofisme

unitarian universalism (100%)

mainline - liberal christian protestants (92%)

bahá'í faith (90%)

quote:

unitarian universalism a liberal and diverse religious organization comprised of mostly atheists (or non-theists), agnostics, humanists, liberal christians, jews, buddhists, hindus, neopagans, etc.
belief in deity: very diverse beliefs - unitarian universalists welcome all deity beliefs as well as nontheistic beliefs. some congregations are formed for those who share a common belief, e.g. christianity.
incarnations: very diverse beliefs, including belief in no incarnations, or that all are the embodiment of god. some believe christ is god's son, or not son but "wayshower."
origins of universe/life: diverse beliefs, but most believe in the bible as symbolic and that natural processes account for origins.
after death: diverse beliefs, but most believe that heaven and hell are not places, but are symbolic. some believe heaven and hell are states of consciousness either in life or continuing after death; some believe in reincarnation; some believe that afterlife is nonexistent or not known or not important, as actions in life are all that matter.
why evil? diverse beliefs. some believe wrong is committed when people distance themselves from god. some believe in ?karma,? that what goes around comes around. some believe wrongdoing is a matter of human nature, psychology, sociology, etc.
salvation: some believe in salvation through faith in god and jesus christ, along with doing good works and doing no harm to others. many believe all will be saved, as god is good and forgiving. some believe in reincarnation and the necessity to eliminate personal greed or to learn all of life?s lessons before achieving enlightenment or salvation. for some, the concepts of salvation or enlightenment are irrelevant or disbelieved.
undeserved suffering: diverse beliefs. it would be a rare unitarian universalists that believes that a literal satan causes suffering. some believe suffering is part of god?s plan, will, or design even if we don?t immediately understand it. some don?t believe in any spiritual reasons for suffering, and most take a humanistic approach to helping those in need.
contemporary issues: the unitarian universalist association?s stance is to protect the personal right to choose abortion. other contemporary views include working for equality for homosexuals, gender equality, a secular approach to divorce and remarriage, working to end poverty, promoting peace and non-violence, and environmental protection.

precies zoals ik denk. er is iets spiritueels in de wereld. maar het is niet de 'bijbelse god' zoals hij omschreven wordt. ook moet de bijbel symbolisch en niet letterlijk worden opgevat. eindelijk een goede test.

quote:

op maandag 10 maart 2003 01:00 schreef k3vil het volgende:

hoe krijg je dat voor elkaar? jodendom op een en islam op twee. ik vraag me af welke antwoorden je hebt gegeven om tot die uitslag te komen.

quote:

op dinsdag 6 juli 2004 00:56 schreef baajguardian het volgende:
# unitarian universalism a liberal and diverse religious organization comprised of mostly atheists (or non-theists),

wat doen 'atheists' in een religious organisation?

1. secular humanism (100%)
2. unitarian universalism (95%)
3. liberal quakers (82%)
4. theravada buddhism (77%)
5. neo-pagan (73%)
6. non-theist (68%)
7. mainline - liberal christian protestants (68%)
8. new age (58%)
9. reform judaism (51%)
10. mahayana buddhism (50%)
11. taoism (50%)
12. orthodox quaker (45%)
13. bahá'í faith (39%)
14. jainism (38%)
15. sikhism (36%)
16. new thought (35%)
17. scientology (33%)
18. christian science (church of christ, scientist) (31%)
19. church of jesus christ of latter-day saints
20. hinduism (28%)
21. seventh day adventist (24%)
22. mainline - conservative christian protestant (22%)
23. islam (20%)
24. orthodox judaism (20%)
25. jehovah's witness (17%)
26. eastern orthodox (14%)
27. roman catholic (14%)

quote:

op zaterdag 10 juli 2004 16:14 schreef sirbennimiles het volgende:

[..]

hoe krijg je dat voor elkaar? jodendom op een en islam op twee. ik vraag me af welke antwoorden je hebt gegeven om tot die uitslag te komen.

ik heb veel onderzoek gedaan naar de 3 boek religies, uiteindelijk verschillen ze geen ene reet. het verschil zit em in de interpretatie, bij mij is dat verschil verdwenen

quote:

op zaterdag 10 juli 2004 16:50 schreef k3vil het volgende:

[..]

ik heb veel onderzoek gedaan naar de 3 boek religies, uiteindelijk verschillen ze geen ene reet. het verschil zit em in de interpretatie, bij mij is dat verschil verdwenen

dat verklaart waarom je islamcritici afkraakt wegens het leveren van kritiek op kirmizibeyaz, terwijl je je ogen sluit voor zijn intolerante standpunten mbt homo's.

wat een verrassing. dora in een religieus topic.

quote:

op zaterdag 10 juli 2004 16:50 schreef k3vil het volgende:

[..]

ik heb veel onderzoek gedaan naar de 3 boek religies, uiteindelijk verschillen ze geen ene reet. het verschil zit em in de interpretatie, bij mij is dat verschil verdwenen

het is toch ook zo dat jezus zelf een jood was. hij kwam in opstand tegen de conservatieve joden en daaruit ontstond christendom. christendom en jodendom is zoiets als protestantisme en rooms katholicisme.

alleen zie ik de islam nergens terugkomen in het plaatje.