BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
Vaccinatie werken.quote:Op zondag 6 juni 2021 17:59 schreef TFL het volgende:
Ik krijg het gevoel nu het steeds duidelijker wordt dat de pandemie en de maatregelen een grote bullshit zijn.
Landen waar nog niet volop gevaccineerd wordt, daar lopen de gevallen de spuigaten uit.
Ah, de complotdenkers bereiden alvast het zoveelste tribunaal voor.
Eng volk.
Eng volk.
Omnibus in omnibus.
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Ik hoop echt dat als we deze periode gaan evalueren ze ook gaan kijken naar gasten zoals Engel, van Haga en Baudet die bewust de boel aan het ondermijnen/muiten zijn.quote:Op zondag 6 juni 2021 19:38 schreef EttovanBelgie het volgende:
Ah, de complotdenkers bereiden alvast het zoveelste tribunaal voor.
Eng volk.
Als Rutte en een de Jonge kanslopen om berecht voor mismanagement kunnen worden, dan ook zeker dat soort lui.
Overigens ben ik zelf aardig tevreden hoe NL de boel heeft aangepakt.
Mijn blog over o.a. leven met OCD (dwang) | https://mdj-stek.nl
Prima als je deze voorwaarden eraan toevoegt. Als je zo consequent hierin zou zijn, waar zijn dan al die topics van je over Trump, Trump Jr., Ivanka, Kushner, McConnell en Gaetz over de afgelopen 4 jaar dat je actief bent geweest.quote:Op zondag 6 juni 2021 17:12 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
[..]
Als ik zou werken voor de overheid en goed betaald zou worden van belastinggeld, dan lijkt me dat niet meer dan normaal.
Wat is je punt precies?
Fauci is een groot brok geslepen marmer trouwens.
Peter Daszak, een W.H.O. onderzoeker, komt ook in de emails voor. Hij bedankte Fauci voor het benadrukken van de natuurlijke overdracht theorie. Wat meer info over hem:
Peter Daszak is a British zoologist, consultant and public expert on disease ecology, in particular on zoonosis. He is a president of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit non-governmental organization that supports various programs on global health and pandemic prevention.
He is also a member of the Center for Infection and Immunity at the Columbia University Maillman School of Public Health. Daszak is known for his involvement with investigations into the outbreak which caused the COVID-19 pandemic. He was a member of the WHO team sent to investigate the origins of the virus in China, and has collaborated with prominent virologists and infectious disease ecologists around the world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Daszak
Artikel over Peter Daszak:
The Pentagon gave $39 MILLION to Dr. Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance - the charity that funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan lab accused of being the source of the outbreak, federal data reveals
-Federal data seen by DailyMail.com reveals The Pentagon gave $39 million to EcoHealth Alliance, which funded a lab in Wuhan, China, between 2013 and 2020
-The Wuhan Institute of Virology is accused of being the source of Covid-19
-The majority of the DoD funding came from the DTRA, a military branch with a mission to 'counter and deter weapons of mass destruction and improvised threat networks'
-Federal grant data assembled by independent researchers shows that the charity has received more than $123 million from the government in total
-Grants from the Pentagon included $6,491,025 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from 2017 to 2020
-EHA also received $64.7 million from the US Agency for International Development (USAID)
-It received $13 million from Health and Human Services, which includes the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control
-It is not known how much of the money actually went to the Wuhan lab
-EHA has also funded deeply controversial 'gain of function' experiments, where dangerous viruses are made more infectious to study their effect on human cells
The Pentagon gave $39 million to a charity that funded controversial coronavirus research at a Chinese lab accused of being the source for Covid-19, federal data reveals. The news comes as the charity's chief, British-born scientist Dr. Peter Daszak, was exposed in an alleged conflict of interest and back-room campaign to discredit lab leak theories.
The charity, EcoHealth Alliance (EHA), has come under intense scrutiny after it emerged that it had been using federal grants to fund research into coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The U.S. nonprofit, set up to research new diseases, has also partly funded deeply controversial 'gain of function' experiments, where dangerous viruses are made more infectious to study their effect on human cells.
A political storm broke when former president Donald Trump canceled a $3.7 million grant to the charity last year amid claims that Covid-19 was created in, or leaked from, the Wuhan lab funded by EHA.
But federal grant data assembled by independent researchers shows that the charity has received more than $123 million from the government – from 2017 to 2020 - and that one of its biggest funders is the Department of Defense, funneling almost $39 million to the organization since 2013.
Exactly how much of that money went toward research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology is unknown.
Gaat verder:
https://www.dailymail.co.(...)unded-Wuhan-lab.html
Peter Daszak
Nog een artikel over Peter Daszak:
WHO inspector caught on camera revealing coronavirus manipulation in Wuhan before pandemic
Video shows scientist mention coronavirus experimentation in Wuhan lab weeks before pandemic
TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — Video taken just days before the start of the coronavirus pandemic shows a current World Health Organization (WHO) inspector discuss the testing of modified coronaviruses on human cells and humanized mice in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), just weeks before the first cases of COVID-19 were announced in the city of Wuhan itself.
In a video that was originally taken on Dec. 9, 2019, three weeks before the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission announced an outbreak of a new form of pneumonia, virologist Vincent Racaniello interviewed British zoologist and president of EcoHealth Alliance Peter Daszak about his work at the nonprofit to protect the world from the emergence of new diseases and predict pandemics. Since 2014, Daszak's organization has received millions of dollars of funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), which it has funneled to the WIV to carry out research on bat coronaviruses.
In the first phase of research, which took place from 2014 to 2019, Daszak coordinated with Shi Zhengli, (石正麗), also known as "Bat Woman," at the WIV on investigating and cataloging bat coronaviruses across China. EcoHealth Alliance received US$3.7 million in funding from the NIH for this research and 10 percent was channeled to the WIV, reported NPR.
The second, more dangerous phase, which started in 2019, involved gain-of-function (GoF) research on coronaviruses and chimeras in humanized mice from the lab of Ralph S. Baric of the University of North Carolina. Funding for the program was withdrawn by the NIH under the Trump administration on April 27 amid the pandemic.
At the 28:10 mark of the podcast interview, Daszak states that researchers found that SARS likely originated from bats and then set out to find more SARS-related coronaviruses, eventually finding over 100. He observed that some coronaviruses can "get into human cells in the lab," and others can cause SARS disease in "humanized mouse models."
Bij 29:52 "coronaviruses are pretty good... you can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily... the spiked proteins drive a lot about what happens."
Artikel gaat verder:
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4104828
[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door Probably_on_pcp op 06-06-2021 20:33:26 ]
Peter Daszak is a British zoologist, consultant and public expert on disease ecology, in particular on zoonosis. He is a president of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit non-governmental organization that supports various programs on global health and pandemic prevention.
He is also a member of the Center for Infection and Immunity at the Columbia University Maillman School of Public Health. Daszak is known for his involvement with investigations into the outbreak which caused the COVID-19 pandemic. He was a member of the WHO team sent to investigate the origins of the virus in China, and has collaborated with prominent virologists and infectious disease ecologists around the world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Daszak
Artikel over Peter Daszak:
The Pentagon gave $39 MILLION to Dr. Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance - the charity that funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan lab accused of being the source of the outbreak, federal data reveals
-Federal data seen by DailyMail.com reveals The Pentagon gave $39 million to EcoHealth Alliance, which funded a lab in Wuhan, China, between 2013 and 2020
-The Wuhan Institute of Virology is accused of being the source of Covid-19
-The majority of the DoD funding came from the DTRA, a military branch with a mission to 'counter and deter weapons of mass destruction and improvised threat networks'
-Federal grant data assembled by independent researchers shows that the charity has received more than $123 million from the government in total
-Grants from the Pentagon included $6,491,025 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from 2017 to 2020
-EHA also received $64.7 million from the US Agency for International Development (USAID)
-It received $13 million from Health and Human Services, which includes the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control
-It is not known how much of the money actually went to the Wuhan lab
-EHA has also funded deeply controversial 'gain of function' experiments, where dangerous viruses are made more infectious to study their effect on human cells
The Pentagon gave $39 million to a charity that funded controversial coronavirus research at a Chinese lab accused of being the source for Covid-19, federal data reveals. The news comes as the charity's chief, British-born scientist Dr. Peter Daszak, was exposed in an alleged conflict of interest and back-room campaign to discredit lab leak theories.
The charity, EcoHealth Alliance (EHA), has come under intense scrutiny after it emerged that it had been using federal grants to fund research into coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The U.S. nonprofit, set up to research new diseases, has also partly funded deeply controversial 'gain of function' experiments, where dangerous viruses are made more infectious to study their effect on human cells.
A political storm broke when former president Donald Trump canceled a $3.7 million grant to the charity last year amid claims that Covid-19 was created in, or leaked from, the Wuhan lab funded by EHA.
But federal grant data assembled by independent researchers shows that the charity has received more than $123 million from the government – from 2017 to 2020 - and that one of its biggest funders is the Department of Defense, funneling almost $39 million to the organization since 2013.
Exactly how much of that money went toward research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology is unknown.
Gaat verder:
https://www.dailymail.co.(...)unded-Wuhan-lab.html
Peter Daszak
Nog een artikel over Peter Daszak:
WHO inspector caught on camera revealing coronavirus manipulation in Wuhan before pandemic
Video shows scientist mention coronavirus experimentation in Wuhan lab weeks before pandemic
TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — Video taken just days before the start of the coronavirus pandemic shows a current World Health Organization (WHO) inspector discuss the testing of modified coronaviruses on human cells and humanized mice in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), just weeks before the first cases of COVID-19 were announced in the city of Wuhan itself.
In a video that was originally taken on Dec. 9, 2019, three weeks before the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission announced an outbreak of a new form of pneumonia, virologist Vincent Racaniello interviewed British zoologist and president of EcoHealth Alliance Peter Daszak about his work at the nonprofit to protect the world from the emergence of new diseases and predict pandemics. Since 2014, Daszak's organization has received millions of dollars of funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), which it has funneled to the WIV to carry out research on bat coronaviruses.
In the first phase of research, which took place from 2014 to 2019, Daszak coordinated with Shi Zhengli, (石正麗), also known as "Bat Woman," at the WIV on investigating and cataloging bat coronaviruses across China. EcoHealth Alliance received US$3.7 million in funding from the NIH for this research and 10 percent was channeled to the WIV, reported NPR.
The second, more dangerous phase, which started in 2019, involved gain-of-function (GoF) research on coronaviruses and chimeras in humanized mice from the lab of Ralph S. Baric of the University of North Carolina. Funding for the program was withdrawn by the NIH under the Trump administration on April 27 amid the pandemic.
At the 28:10 mark of the podcast interview, Daszak states that researchers found that SARS likely originated from bats and then set out to find more SARS-related coronaviruses, eventually finding over 100. He observed that some coronaviruses can "get into human cells in the lab," and others can cause SARS disease in "humanized mouse models."
Bij 29:52 "coronaviruses are pretty good... you can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily... the spiked proteins drive a lot about what happens."
Artikel gaat verder:
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4104828
[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door Probably_on_pcp op 06-06-2021 20:33:26 ]
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Wat meer over Peter Daszak:
On April 17, 2020 Fauci announced that it was believed the virus had emerged from bats in China.
In an email sent two days after the announcement, Dr. Peter Daszak, a virologist who was doing US government-funded coronavirus research in Wuhan, thanked Fauci for: 'publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for Covid 19 from a bat-to-human spillover.'
Daszak then persuaded 26 other scientists to sign off on a letter he had written to world-leading scientific journal The Lancet claiming the virus could only have been natural in origin and to suggest otherwise creates 'fear, rumours, and prejudice'.
The letter flatly denied the virus could have originated in a lab in Wuhan and dismissed it as a 'conspiracy theory'.
The letter was seen as so influential it cowed most experts into refusing even to consider that the virus could have been man-made and escaped from the Wuhan Institute.
Jamie Metzl, who sits on the World Health Organization's advisory committee on human genome editing and is a form Bill Clinton administration staffer, said Dr Daszak's letter was a 'form of thuggery'.
He said: ‘The Lancet letter was scientific propaganda and a form of thuggery and intimidation.
https://www.dailymail.co.(...)icted-bioweapon.html
On April 17, 2020 Fauci announced that it was believed the virus had emerged from bats in China.
In an email sent two days after the announcement, Dr. Peter Daszak, a virologist who was doing US government-funded coronavirus research in Wuhan, thanked Fauci for: 'publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for Covid 19 from a bat-to-human spillover.'
Daszak then persuaded 26 other scientists to sign off on a letter he had written to world-leading scientific journal The Lancet claiming the virus could only have been natural in origin and to suggest otherwise creates 'fear, rumours, and prejudice'.
The letter flatly denied the virus could have originated in a lab in Wuhan and dismissed it as a 'conspiracy theory'.
The letter was seen as so influential it cowed most experts into refusing even to consider that the virus could have been man-made and escaped from the Wuhan Institute.
Jamie Metzl, who sits on the World Health Organization's advisory committee on human genome editing and is a form Bill Clinton administration staffer, said Dr Daszak's letter was a 'form of thuggery'.
He said: ‘The Lancet letter was scientific propaganda and a form of thuggery and intimidation.
https://www.dailymail.co.(...)icted-bioweapon.html
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Best wel grappig, al die users die hardnekkig blijven volhouden dat Fauci brandschoon is en alle aanwijzingen naar vermoedelijk gesleutel in Wuhan en de Amerikaanse link daarnaar constant als complottheorie blijven benoemen.
Scratch a liberal and you will find a fascist
Kunnen die lappen tekst met gecherrypickte contextloze conspiracysoundbites niet in BNW? Dit soort drek hoort naar mijn mening niet in NWS thuis.
Ik ben een kl ⭕⭕n van deze user
Het is allemaal nogal geneuzel van de bovenste plank.
over de herkomst was in het vroegste stadium weinig feitelijk bekend. Iemand anders die steun vraagt om een hypothese te steunen is op geen grond verboden. Ik had Fauci ook met iets willekeurigs kunnen mailen, dat maakt Fauci nog niet strafbaar.
over de herkomst was in het vroegste stadium weinig feitelijk bekend. Iemand anders die steun vraagt om een hypothese te steunen is op geen grond verboden. Ik had Fauci ook met iets willekeurigs kunnen mailen, dat maakt Fauci nog niet strafbaar.
Ik zie dat je veel verstand hebt van soundbitesquote:
Kunnen die lappen tekst met gecherrypickte contextloze conspiracysoundbites niet in BNW? Dit soort drek hoort naar mijn mening niet in NWS thuis.
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Heb je deze zin zelf gelezen eigenlijk?quote:Op zondag 6 juni 2021 21:25 schreef EdvandeBerg het volgende:
Best wel grappig, al die users die hardnekkig blijven volhouden dat Fauci brandschoon is en alle aanwijzingen naar vermoedelijk gesleutel in Wuhan en de Amerikaanse link daarnaar constant als complottheorie blijven benoemen.
Dus Fauci is niet brandschoon, want er zijn vermoedens van gesleutel? Klinkt wel lekker logisch.
Ik heb ook niemand horen zeggen dat er strafbare zaken in de emails staan. En je opmerking van "geneuzel van de bovenste plank" is inmiddels ook achterhaald:quote:
Het is allemaal nogal geneuzel van de bovenste plank.
over de herkomst was in het vroegste stadium weinig feitelijk bekend. Iemand anders die steun vraagt om een hypothese te steunen is op geen grond verboden. Ik had Fauci ook met iets willekeurigs kunnen mailen, dat maakt Fauci nog niet strafbaar.
Liberal media FINALLY admit they made a mistake dismissing Wuhan Lab leak theory just because Trump backed it: Washington Post, New York Times and ABC pundits say some 'have egg on their face'
-Reporters and pundits for ABC and The New York Times admitted on television news that journalists were wrong to dismiss the lab leak theory
-They claimed the journalists refused to consider the theory because it was being espoused by former President Donald Trump and Senator Tom Cotton
-A columnist for the Washington Post, meanwhile, slammed the mainstream media for not 'owning up' to the fact they made an error in dismissing the theory
-The lab leak theory has gained traction in recent weeks as more scientists and political officials question the origins of COVID-19
https://archive.md/1yEZb#selection-943.0-967.132
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Zegt onze man die Tucker Carslon journalistieke krediet geeftquote:
[..]
Ik zie dat je veel verstand hebt van soundbites
PolitiFact Quietly Retracts ‘Pants On Fire’ Lab Leak Fact Check
-PolitiFact quietly retracted a fact check from September 2020 on Monday that called a Hong Kong virologist’s claim that COVID-19 was a lab-created virus a “debunked conspiracy theory.”
-“The claim is inaccurate and ridiculous. We rate it Pants on Fire!” the now-retracted fact check stated.
-A PolitiFact editor’s note appended to an archived version of the fact check stated that the statements from scientists who asserted that the virus that causes COVID-19 could not have been manipulated is “now more widely disputed.”
PolitiFact retracted a fact check from September 2020 on Monday that had stated a Hong Kong virologist was pushing a “debunked conspiracy theory” when she said on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show that COVID-19 was a lab-created virus.
Virologist and former University of Hong Kong postdoctoral fellow Dr. Li-Meng Yan had claimed on Carlson’s show that not only was COVID-19 a man-made virus created in a Wuhan lab, but it was also released intentionally into the human population by the Chinese government.
“The claim is inaccurate and ridiculous. We rate it Pants on Fire!” PolitiFact’s now-retracted fact check stated.
The retracted fact check stated that Facebook posts that contained the comments Yan made on Carlson’s show had been flagged as part of the social media network’s efforts to curb fake news and misinformation.
https://dailycaller.com/2(...)lab-leak-fact-check/
-PolitiFact quietly retracted a fact check from September 2020 on Monday that called a Hong Kong virologist’s claim that COVID-19 was a lab-created virus a “debunked conspiracy theory.”
-“The claim is inaccurate and ridiculous. We rate it Pants on Fire!” the now-retracted fact check stated.
-A PolitiFact editor’s note appended to an archived version of the fact check stated that the statements from scientists who asserted that the virus that causes COVID-19 could not have been manipulated is “now more widely disputed.”
PolitiFact retracted a fact check from September 2020 on Monday that had stated a Hong Kong virologist was pushing a “debunked conspiracy theory” when she said on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show that COVID-19 was a lab-created virus.
Virologist and former University of Hong Kong postdoctoral fellow Dr. Li-Meng Yan had claimed on Carlson’s show that not only was COVID-19 a man-made virus created in a Wuhan lab, but it was also released intentionally into the human population by the Chinese government.
“The claim is inaccurate and ridiculous. We rate it Pants on Fire!” PolitiFact’s now-retracted fact check stated.
The retracted fact check stated that Facebook posts that contained the comments Yan made on Carlson’s show had been flagged as part of the social media network’s efforts to curb fake news and misinformation.
https://dailycaller.com/2(...)lab-leak-fact-check/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Faal na faal maar MatthijsDJ is tevreden.quote:
[..]
Ik hoop echt dat als we deze periode gaan evalueren ze ook gaan kijken naar gasten zoals Engel, van Haga en Baudet die bewust de boel aan het ondermijnen/muiten zijn.
Als Rutte en een de Jonge kanslopen om berecht voor mismanagement kunnen worden, dan ook zeker dat soort lui.
Overigens ben ik zelf aardig tevreden hoe NL de boel heeft aangepakt.
Je legt de lat wel erg laag.
Het begon al met een vakantie houden ipv debat over corona toen het net er aan kwam. daarna carnaval en kleine kring en zo sukkelde men van de ene in de andere faal.
Maar we zullen je roep om een tribunaal voor andersdenkenden noteren. over eng volk gesproken
quote:
[..]
Faal na faal maar MatthijsDJ is tevreden.
Je legt de lat wel erg laag.
Het begon al met een vakantie houden ipv debat over corona toen het net er aan kwam. daarna carnaval en kleine kring en zo sukkelde men van de ene in de andere faal.
Maar we zullen je roep om een tribunaal voor andersdenkenden noteren. over eng volk gesproken
Omnibus in omnibus.
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Zou het voor crisis management in de pandemie heel erg van belang zijn geweest dat Fauci in zijn bubbel in het begin zou moeten vaststellen waar het vandaan komt?quote:
[..]
Ik heb ook niemand horen zeggen dat er strafbare zaken in de emails staan. En je opmerking van "geneuzel van de bovenste plank" is inmiddels ook achterhaald:
Liberal media FINALLY admit they made a mistake dismissing Wuhan Lab leak theory just because Trump backed it: Washington Post, New York Times and ABC pundits say some 'have egg on their face'
-Reporters and pundits for ABC and The New York Times admitted on television news that journalists were wrong to dismiss the lab leak theory
-They claimed the journalists refused to consider the theory because it was being espoused by former President Donald Trump and Senator Tom Cotton
-A columnist for the Washington Post, meanwhile, slammed the mainstream media for not 'owning up' to the fact they made an error in dismissing the theory
-The lab leak theory has gained traction in recent weeks as more scientists and political officials question the origins of COVID-19
https://archive.md/1yEZb#selection-943.0-967.132
Is het niet dat Fauci al voor de documenten verschenen aangegeven heeft dat hij niets uitsluit.
Zou het via de pers beschuldigen van China in een vroeg stadium handig zijn geweest of zou het extra problemen gegenereerd hebben waar deze praktisch niets toevoegen aan samenwerken tot een oplossing?
BNW'ers...
Kan die rotzooi in het eigen subforum blijven svp?
Kan die rotzooi in het eigen subforum blijven svp?
Omnibus in omnibus.
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Het punt is dat het dus geen conspiracy is maar waarschijnlijk is dat het uit een lab kwamquote:
BNW'ers...
Kan die rotzooi in het eigen subforum blijven svp?
Wie zei dat ook alweer al een hele tijd terug...?
De conspiracy is dat er een nefarisch netwerk van notabele elitaire supermensen is die dit allemaal bekokstoofd heeft. En natuurlijk het verlies van Trump.quote:
[..]
Het punt is dat het dus geen conspiracy is maar waarschijnlijk is dat het uit een lab kwam
Wie zei dat ook alweer al een hele tijd terug...?
> BNW
Omnibus in omnibus.
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Uitendelijk komt de waarheid vanzelf boven. (hou arizona op het moment maar in de gaten)quote:
[..]
De conspiracy is dat er een nefarisch netwerk van notabele elitaire supermensen is die dit allemaal bekokstoofd heeft. En natuurlijk het verlies van Trump.
> BNW
Maar wie heeft het over "en nefarisch netwerk van notabele elitaire supermensen"? Dat maak jij er van. Het is gewoon waarschijnlijk dat het uit het lab daar kwam, dat is alles. Waarom dat zo politiek gemaakt wordt?
Blijkbaar ging er ook geld vanuit fauci daarheen.
En dan krijg je de vraag, wie is er verantwoordelijk en waarom werd dat virus ontwikkeld en hoe is het ontsnapt.
Laat me dit nog toevoegen.
De Trump regering geloofde niet dat het virus veel deed en deed het collectief af als een griepje waar de maatschappij gewoon op kan doordraaien.
Waarom zou je dan überhaupt prioriteit leggen bij het onderzoeken waar het vandaan komt
Dat het in een lab is ontwikkelt of niet vind ik al vanaf dag 1 aan ondergeschikt belang aan hoe het bestreden wordt. Ook is grondig onderzoek daarin nodig voor je een land om de oren slaat.
Trump had graag willen horen dat het in een lab is gecreerd om China lam te tweeten en de aandacht van zijn eigen Mafia familie af te leiden.
De Trump regering geloofde niet dat het virus veel deed en deed het collectief af als een griepje waar de maatschappij gewoon op kan doordraaien.
Waarom zou je dan überhaupt prioriteit leggen bij het onderzoeken waar het vandaan komt
Dat het in een lab is ontwikkelt of niet vind ik al vanaf dag 1 aan ondergeschikt belang aan hoe het bestreden wordt. Ook is grondig onderzoek daarin nodig voor je een land om de oren slaat.
Trump had graag willen horen dat het in een lab is gecreerd om China lam te tweeten en de aandacht van zijn eigen Mafia familie af te leiden.
Nee hoor, ik ken BNW'ers.quote:
[..]
Uitendelijk komt de waarheid vanzelf boven. (hou arizona op het moment maar in de gaten)
Maar wie heeft het over "en nefarisch netwerk van notabele elitaire supermensen"? Dat maak jij er van. Het is gewoon waarschijnlijk dat het uit het lab daar kwam, dat is alles. Waarom dat zo politiek gemaakt wordt?
Blijkbaar ging er ook geld vanuit fauci daarheen.
En dan krijg je de vraag, wie is er verantwoordelijk en waarom werd dat virus ontwikkeld en hoe is het ontsnapt.
En als je nu nog gelooft dat Trump gewonnen heeft, geeft dat precies aan waarom zinnige discussies met complotdenkers bij voorbaat kansloos zijn.
Omnibus in omnibus.
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Ik ben geen BNWer, ik zit sowieso niet veel op fok om me een subforum link te geven imoquote:
[..]
Nee hoor, ik ken BNW'ers.
En als je nu nog gelooft dat Trump gewonnen heeft, geeft dat precies aan waarom zinnige discussies met complotdenkers bij voorbaat kansloos zijn.
TDS viert weer hoogtijquote:
Laat me dit nog toevoegen.
De Trumo regering geloofde niet dat het virus veel doet en doet het af als een griepje waar de maatschappij gewoon op kan doordraaien.
Waarom zou je dan überhaupt prioriteit leggen bij het onderzoeken waar het vandaan komt
Dat het in een lab is ontwikkeld of niet vind ik al vanaf dag 1 aan ondergeschikt belang aan hoe het bestreden is. Ook is grondig onderzoek daarin nodig voor je een land om de oren slaat.
Trump had graag willen horen dat het in een lab is gecreerd om China lam te tweeten en de aandacht van zijn eigen Mafia familie af te leiden.
|
|
