The Nauru files: cache of 2,000 leaked reports reveal scale of abuse of children in Australian offshore detentionquote:https://i.guim.co.uk/img/(...)e0bc21dcd8e570a7325d
Two United Nations agencies and dozens of human rights, legal, religious and medical groups have demanded the Australian government put a stop to the suffering of asylum seekers and refugees in its offshore processing regime, following the publication of the Nauru files.
The Australian government faced widespread condemnation after the Guardian revealed thousands of leaked documents from inside its detention centre on the Pacific island of Nauru, covering a period of more than two years.
The documents, part of the largest ever leak from inside the Australian-run regime, included incident reports detailing countless instances and allegations of abuse and trauma, often perpetrated by or involving detention centre staff.
The UN high commissioner for refugees said it was “gravely concerned” by the allegations raised and said all refugees and asylum seekers should be moved off Nauru “to humane conditions”.
“The documents released are broadly consistent with UNHCR’s longstanding and continuing concerns regarding mental health, as well as overall conditions for refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru,” it said.
“UNHCR has observed and reported a progressive deterioration of the situation of refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru through its regular visits since 2012.”
Officials from the UNHCR were present – though they had not spoken to him – when a 23-year-old Iranian refugee, Omid Masoumali, doused himself in petrol and set himself alight on Nauru in May this year in protest at conditions on the island.
After delays in flying him from Nauru for medical attention, Masoumali died in a Brisbane hospital two days later.
In the wake of the publication of the Nauru files, the UNHCR said permanent and humane solutions for Nauru’s asylum seeker and refugee populations were needed urgently. “Delays in immediate action to rectify the current situation are exacerbating human suffering and causing ongoing deterioration.”
A group of 26 former Save the Children staff released a statement on Wednesday afternoon to say they were the authors of many of the reports but the leaked cache was just “the tip of the iceberg”.
On Wednesday the Australian Department of Immigration and Border Protection said many of the incident reports “reflect unconfirmed allegations or uncorroborated statements and claims – they are not statements of proven fact”.
“The documents published today are evidence of the rigorous reporting procedures that are in place in the regional processing centre – procedures under which any alleged incident must be recorded, reported and where necessary investigated,” it said.
The department said it was examining the matters raised to ensure the reporting process by the centre’s service providers was appropriate, but there was no evidence to suggest under- or misreporting.
“The Australian government provides support to the Nauruan government, including the deployment of Australian federal police officers to work alongside the [Nauruan police force] and build their capacity to investigate complex and sensitive incidents.
“It also takes seriously its role in supporting the government of Nauru to protect children from abuse, neglect or exploitation.”
Amnesty International’s senior director for research Anna Neistat, who went undercover last month to investigate the centre, said the Guardian’s report “laid bare a system of ‘routine dysfunction and cruelty’ that is at once dizzying in its scale and utterly damning for the Australian authorities who tried so hard to maintain a veil of secrecy”.
“The Australian government has engaged in one of the most successful mass cover-ups I’ve witnessed in my career of documenting human rights violations,” said Neistat. “They’ve repeatedly said this kind of abuse has not been going on. They’ve been lying.”
The Australian Medical Association called for the establishment of an investigative body, entirely independent of government, to immediately assess the health and living conditions of every person in offshore detention.
“These disturbing reports echo long-held concerns by the AMA about the lack of proper physical and mental health care being provided to people in immigration detention,” said the peak body’s president, Dr Michael Gannon.
The Australian Lawyers Alliance called for Comcare, the federal workplace regulator, to investigate and prosecute for the abuses under the Work Health and Safety Act, which a spokesman, Greg Barnes, said applied to anyone in a workplace, not just employees.
A number of people and organisations, including activist group GetUp and the Australian churches refugee taskforce, called for the establishment of a royal commission, the country’s most powerful form of inquiry.
Some drew comparisons with the Four Corners television report last month that broadcast brutal treatment of young people in juvenile detention in the Northern Territory, noting that the former sparked an immediate inquiry. The response from the federal government on Wednesday was muted.
Hugh de Kretser, the executive director of the Human Rights Law Centre, told Guardian Australia: “Nothing excuses the failure to act. There is a real hypocrisy in the fact we have two royal commissions currently afoot – one into institutional child sexual abuse and another into youth detention centres – and yet at the very same time we’re warehousing children on Nauru in conditions that allow this kind of abuse to thrive.”
The Australian Council for International Development and the Australian Council of Social Service said the current royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse should immediately examine incidents and allegations raised in the Nauru files.
“In the face of the extraordinary evidence of such abuse and harassment of children in immigration detention in Nauru there must be an investigation into whether this is an explicit breach of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection’s duty of care,” said the former’s chief executive, Marc Purcell.
More than half of the 2,116 Nauru files reports related to children.
Unicef said the Nauru files were further evidence that the island nation was not a suitable place to resettle refugee children, and called on the Australian government to find a permanent resettlement solution for families.
“The Australian government must take immediate action for children and their families to prevent further harm,” Nicole Breeze, director of policy and advocacy at Unicef Australia, said, adding that Australia should also do more to assist with resettling refugees from across the region and around the world.
Other advocacy groups called for the immediate transfer of the 48 children believed to still be living on Nauru.
The End Child Detention Coalition called for the government to legislate time limits to getting juveniles out of detention and into community situations. “Even short periods of detention are incredibly harmful for children, with extremely high rates of depression and unaddressed trauma exacerbated by detention,” said the chair of the group, Leeanne Torpey.
The Australian human rights commissioner, Gillian Triggs, responded to the report by urging the Australian public to “speak out and talk up”.
“We really need the public’s attention to ensure that our politicians change the policy,” she said.
The prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull said the incident reports would be “carefully examined to see if there are any complaints ... or issues ... that were not properly addressed.” He said the Australian government supported Nauru in ensuring the welfare of people in detention.
The treasurer, Scott Morrison – a former immigration minister – told reporters incident reports “are reports of allegations, they are not findings of fact in relation to an incident”.
The Labor leader, Bill Shorten, urged the government to improve oversight in the detention centres, and appoint a children’s commissioner to protect the welfare of children in immigration detention.
“Just because people are indirectly in the care of Australia doesn’t absolve Australia of ensuring that people are safe,” Shorten told reporters. “And so these files, I think, again point to the immediate need for an independent children’s advocate.”
The Greens party called for a royal commission into conditions in detention as a matter of urgency. Greens immigration spokeswoman, Sarah Hanson-Young, said the government could not claim ignorance of “institutionalised child abuse, taxpayer-funded sexual assault” of women in Nauru.
“This is not new information to [current immigration minister] Peter Dutton. It’s not new information for Scott Morrison, and I don’t believe it’s new information for Malcolm Turnbull,” she said. “The sad truth is the government knowingly turned a blind eye [to] collateral damage for their stop-the-boats policy.”
‘I want death’: Nauru files chronicle despair of asylum seeker childrenquote:The devastating trauma and abuse inflicted on children held by Australia in offshore detention has been laid bare in the largest cache of leaked documents released from inside its immigration regime.
More than 2,000 leaked incident reports from Australia’s detention camp for asylum seekers on the remote Pacific island of Nauru – totalling more than 8,000 pages – are published by the Guardian today. The Nauru files set out as never before the assaults, sexual abuse, self-harm attempts, child abuse and living conditions endured by asylum seekers held by the Australian government, painting a picture of routine dysfunction and cruelty.
The Guardian’s analysis of the files reveal that children are vastly over-represented in the reports. More than half of the 2,116 reports – a total of 1,086 incidents, or 51.3% – involve children, although children made up only about 18% of those in detention on Nauru during the time covered by the reports, May 2013 to October 2015. The findings come just weeks after the brutal treatment of young people in juvenile detention in the Northern Territory was exposed, leading to the Australian prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, announcing a wide-ranging public inquiry.
The reports range from a guard allegedly grabbing a boy and threatening to kill him once he is living in the community to guards allegedly slapping children in the face. In September 2014 a teacher reported that a young classroom helper had requested a four-minute shower instead of a two-minute shower. “Her request has been accepted on condition of sexual favours. It is a male security person. She did not state if this has or hasn’t occurred. The security officer wants to view a boy or girl having a shower.”
Some reports contain distressing examples of behaviour by traumatised children. According to a report from September 2014, a girl had sewn her lips together. A guard saw her and began laughing at her. In July that year a child under the age of 10 undressed and invited a group of adults to insert their fingers into her vagina; in February 2015 a young girl gestured to her vagina and said a male asylum seeker “cut her from under”.
In the files there are seven reports of sexual assault of children, 59 reports of assault on children, 30 of self-harm involving children and 159 of threatened self-harm involving children.
http://www.theguardian.com/world
The reports show extraordinary acts of desperation. One pregnant woman, after being told she would need to give birth on Nauru in October 2015, was agitated and in tears. “I give my baby to Australia to look after,” she pleaded with a caseworker, adding: “I don’t want to have my baby in PNG, the [Nauru hospital] or have it in this dirty environment.”
The files raise stark questions about how information is reported on Nauru, one of Australia’s two offshore detention centres for asylum seekers who arrive by boat. They highlight serious concerns about the ongoing risks to children and adults held on the island. They show how the Australian government has failed to respond to warning signs and reveal sexual assault allegations – many involving children – that have never been previously disclosed.
The most damning evidence emerges from the words of the staff working in the detention centre themselves – the people who compile the reports. These caseworkers, guards, teachers and medical officers have been charged with caring for hundreds of asylum seekers on the island.
The publication is likely to renew calls for an end to the political impasse that has seen children in Australia’s care languish on Nauru for more than three years.
Nauru is the world’s smallest island state, home to fewer than 10,000 people. Australia supplies aid and buys services from Nauru’s government and companies, leading to accusations Nauru is effectively a “client state”. On the last official count at the end of June, 442 people – 338 men, 55 women and 49 children – were held in the Nauru regional processing centre. The other offshore centre, on Manus Island in Papua New Guinea, was holding 854 people, all men. Australia’s policy has been criticised regularly by the UN.
The Guardian is publishing the files because it believes Australians have the right to know more about the regime at the Nauru and Manus centres, which costs Australian taxpayers $1.2bn a year.
The documents cover the period examined in a review into allegations of sexual assault, the Australian Human Rights Commission’s inquiry into children in detention as well as the period examined by a Senate inquiry and beyond. They encompass the final days of Labor’s time in government and the ruling conservative Coalition’s time in office since September 2013.
In each successive inquiry, the Australian government and its contractors, including Broadspectrum (formerly Transfield Services) and its subcontractor Wilson Security, have maintained that they are improving conditions and reporting measures to raise the quality of life on the island.
In April 2015 the Australian immigration minister, Peter Dutton, said he wanted to make Nauru a “safe environment”. He said he had “instructed the department to do whatever they possibly can, both domestically within the detention network here and with our partners in the regional processing centres, to make sure that the standard of care is as high as it possibly can be”.
Wilson Security has previously told the Australian parliament it had “robust policies, procedures and processes that support the operations in Nauru”.
It continued: “Allegations of sexual assault are treated in a timely and sensitive manner. Where Wilson Security receives an allegation we take immediate action following disclosure or notification.”
But the files show a very different picture. Rather than serious events diminishing, they continued – and in some cases escalated – during the course of 2015. A vast number of incidents from across the timeframe have never before been reported.
Many asylum seekers held on Nauru were unable to leave the detention compounds during the period covered by the files. Some had been granted permission to leave on day trips but were closely monitored to ensure they returned before curfews. Those found to be refugees were released into the Nauruan community – yet still remain effectively detained on the remote island.
The primary evidence from the files backs up testimony from former immigration detention staff members interviewed by the Guardian as part of its investigation.
Access to Nauru is tightly controlled. Events on the island are reported sporadically through refugee advocates and whistleblowers, but the Australian government’s policy of shrouding its offshore detention centres in secrecy has prevented the reporting of many serious incidents. The Nauru files shatter that secrecy.
In response to the Nauru files, the Australian Department of Immigration and Border Protection said in a statement: “The Australian government continues to support the Nauruan government to provide for the health, welfare and safety of all transferees and refugees in Nauru.
“The documents published today are evidence of the rigorous reporting procedures that are in place in the regional processing centre – procedures under which any alleged incident must be recorded, reported and where necessary investigated. Many of the incident reports reflect unconfirmed allegations or uncorroborated statements and claims – they are not statements of proven fact.
“All alleged criminal incidents within the regional processing centre are referred to the Nauru Police Force (NPF) for investigation. Refugees living in the community are encouraged to report all criminal incidents to the NPF. A number of matters remain under active investigation.
“The department is examining the matters published today to ensure all of these matters have been reported appropriately by service providers, consistent with the policies and procedures covering such matters.”
The department added that it “also takes seriously its role in supporting the government of Nauru to protect children from abuse, neglect or exploitation”.
Sexual violence and threats
Allegations of sexual assault, particularly against young women, are a persistent theme of the files. In one report an asylum seeker described being told she was “on a list” written by local Nauruan guards naming single women they were “waiting for”. “She has received offers to get her pregnant when she gets out,” the caseworker wrote.
They reveal allegations of misconduct by Wilson Security guards at the detention centre. In one report a “cultural adviser” for Wilson Security, the company that employs guards at the detention camp, allegedly told an asylum seeker who had been sexually assaulted in camp that “rape in Australia is very common and people don’t get punished”.
The caseworker who filed the report wrote that the female asylum seeker also told her the guard had questioned whether the sexual assault had occurred and said: “If that happened to you why didn’t you scream at the time?”
“You have to take it out of your head if you go into Nauru then he [the alleged perpetrator] could be your neighbour or if you go to Cambodia then he could be on the plane next to you,” the adviser reportedly told the woman. “You also have to teach your son to treat this man nicely.”
The detention centre on Nauru
Secrecy is tight in the Australian-run detention centre on Nauru. Taking photos – even carrying a smartphone with a camera – is banned
There are allegations that bus drivers – employed by Australia’s detention contractors – took voyeuristic pictures of women in the camp to use to masturbate. Other reports range from a man facing threats of sexual violence from other asylum seekers to a woman threatening self-harm because she doesn’t want “men to touch her body”.
Speaking before the publication of the Nauru files, Prof Louise Newman, a former member of the Immigration Health Advisory Group, says such attacks have continued. She speaks “on a nightly basis” to women on Nauru who have been sexually assaulted.
“I am prepared to say the sexual assault of women is a major problem on Nauru,” Newman says. “Some of the women’s descriptions of what is happening to them is incredibly alarming in terms of the lack of process.
“It’s not just one incident. If it was one incident and there had been a poor response in a developing nation then maybe it was something to work on. I think what we’re seeing is a systemic lack of processes and understanding of this.”
Trauma and self-harm
Health and medical experts have consistently warned of the mental harm caused by prolonged detention. The files show in graphic detail how this harm has manifested.
One man asked a caseworker where he could buy bullets so he could get someone else to shoot him. A woman sharpened a pencil with a razor blade, then cut her wrists. Another wrapped a rope around her neck and tried to hang herself. She had to be held up by guards until she could be cut down.
In one report from January 2015, a teenage girl struggled to cope after her mother’s miscarriage. She began having “ongoing hallucinations from a ‘small person’ ”, a Save the Children worker wrote.
“She is unsure if it is a man or women but has a dark face and is the size of a child.” The hallucination had threatened to kill her: “At other times the hallucination is encouraging [REDACTED] to kill herself.”
The toll on children’s mental health is particularly heavy. According to an April 2015 report a girl began screaming “uncontrollably” during a fight in a recreation tent.
“During this time [REDACTED] also gouged at her own face consistently and pulled her own hair,” the child protection officer wrote. “It was observed that [REDACTED] could not breath properly and had a glazed look in her eyes.”
‘I want death’: Nauru files chronicle despair of asylum seeker children
The voices of children emerging repeatedly from the official reports betray the ruin of lives with no signs of respite from Australia’s detention regime
Read more
Other files show the anguished outbursts to which some asylum seekers have become prone since their detention: one report described a woman seeking a bandage after punching a metal pole with both hands. Another told of a woman who began banging her head with her fists after an altercation with guards. Another woman carved her husband’s name on to her chest; she wanted a tattoo but could not get one so used a knife instead. Her husband lives in Australia.
Speaking to the Guardian before the publication of the Nauru files, Dr Peter Young, a former medical director of mental health for Australia’s immigration detention system, said: “Self-harm and suicide attempts increase steadily after six months in detention. This is driven by hopelessness which is known to be the strongest predictor of suicide.
“Some self-harm, such as lip sewing, has a protest element and is common in prisoners as an expression of feeling powerless and voiceless.”
Squalor
Other reports show the squalor and the difficulties getting medical treatment. One female asylum seeker, who has urinary incontinence, complained about how she was no longer provided with sanitary pads to treat the condition.
According to another report a female guard allegedly refused to let a child under 10 use a toilet and made her squat on the ground instead. Her mother told a caseworker the guard had then shone her torch on the girl’s genitals.
Twelve of the most harrowing accounts from the Nauru files – in pictures
View gallery
The logs illustrate the squalid conditions often experienced by asylum seekers at the centre, including frequent complaints of cockroaches infesting tents housing the detainees.
One report showed how the companies’ failure to communicate traumatises asylum seekers. The medical provider International Health and Medical Services ran a “mass casualty simulation” that had people daubed with fake blood walking around. But the plan was not reported to the Save the Children teachers at the nearby school.
“The incident prompted every student to start talking about incidents of self-harm they had witnessed,” a teacher wrote. “They did not know this one was false and so were forced to experience another incident at school, which should be a safe, distracting environment.”
Hoe is dat niet beter dan ze in ons eigen land overlast laten veroorzaken? Klinkt mij namelijk perfect in de oren.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 19:28 schreef Eyjafjallajoekull het volgende:
Op FOK! hoor je altijd van "kijk naar asiel beleid van Australie!, die sturen mensen meteen terug!" maar het is al tijden bekend dat dat echt niet beter is. Ze sturen mensen niet terug, ze dumpen ze of hier, of bij de omringende landen..
Die 'mensenrechten'organisaties doen eindelijk goed werk. Hopelijk verspreiden ze het woord nog meer zodat de boodschap ook aan komt in barbaristan waar moslims de meerderheid zijn. We willen jullie niet: blijf in die woestijn.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 20:29 schreef bluemoon23 het volgende:
Lijkt mij een goed signaal inderdaad.
Aan de gevangenissen hier kan het Hilton in zandbakkistan nog een puntje aan zuigen.
Er zijn nu al heel wat maanden geweest waarin meer mensen verzopen op weg naar Europa dan er in totaal in die kampen vastzitten, omdat na een tijdje nee zeggen de boodschap aankomt dat ze niet zomaar welkom zijn.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 19:28 schreef Eyjafjallajoekull het volgende:
Op FOK! hoor je altijd van "kijk naar asiel beleid van Australie!, die sturen mensen meteen terug!" maar het is al tijden bekend dat dat echt niet beter is. Ze sturen mensen niet terug, ze dumpen ze of hier, of bij de omringende landen..
Dat is overduidelijk. Het is een georkestreerde aanval op het Australische asielbeleid. Door Australië publiekelijk aan de schandpaal te nagelen, daar doen weinig kritische media zoals helaas ook de NOS graag aan mee, probeert men het succesvolle Australische asielbeleid te beïnvloeden.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 21:20 schreef Fir3fly het volgende:
Er zit natuurlijk een duidelijke politieke agenda achter deze 'lek'-operatie. Dat niet vergeten.
Je vergeet er even bij te vermelden dat er ook geen geen doden meer vallen door de zinkende bootjes van die dobbernegers.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 19:28 schreef Eyjafjallajoekull het volgende:
Op FOK! hoor je altijd van "kijk naar asiel beleid van Australie!, die sturen mensen meteen terug!" maar het is al tijden bekend dat dat echt niet beter is. Ze sturen mensen niet terug, ze dumpen ze of hier, of bij de omringende landen..
Enkele tienduizenden mensen, wat op wereldschaal natuurlijk een schijntje is, er zijn volgens het rode kruis 60 miljoen vluchtelingen. En enkele miljarden mensen die 'gewoon' in miserabele omstandigheden leven.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 22:07 schreef Arthur_Spooner het volgende:
[..]
Let wel, dit gaat dus over migranten die Australië illegaal proberen binnen te dringen. Ze hadden ook via de officiële weg asiel aan kunnen vragen. Australië neemt geloof ik ieder jaar enkele tienduizenden vluchtelingen op. Die worden dan gewoon ingevlogen.
Maar het volk waar we het nu over hebben zal er wel niet voor in aanmerking komen omdat het gewoon gelukzoekers zijn.
Ik weet niet wie zieliger is, de vluchteling uit Damascus (Syrië) waar het leger gewoon op straat loopt om de orde te bewaken, of de met HIV-besmette arme Afrikaanse moeder.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 22:19 schreef Confetti het volgende:
We moeten niet vergeten dat deze mensen een illegale poging hebben gedaan om Australie binnen te dringen.
Dat gezegd hebbende hebben ook deze mensen natuurlijk recht op hun lichamelijke integriteit en moeten die bewakers aangepakt worden.
DIt is een beetje het gevolg van het halfbakken beleid. Niet durven deze mensen de rug te keren maar ook niet in de ogen te kijken. Globalisatie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat de ellende dichterbij dan ooit is maar dat betekent niet dat we er wat aan kunnen doen zonder onze eigen welvaart op te geven.
Ik ben altijd al een voorstander van de Australische aanpak geweest.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 20:20 schreef George_Zina het volgende:
Prima, een message van hier ligt het bedje niet gespreidt. Zouden meer landen moeten doen. Ze gaan maar een beschaving opbouwen in in hun eigen woestijn.
Nee dat is het probleem niet. Het aantal immigranten dat Australië inkomt is gedaald en het aantal mensen dat naar Australië komt en illegaal probeert binnen te komen is gedaald. Naar hun mening werkt dit dus prima.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 21:20 schreef Fir3fly het volgende:
Er zit natuurlijk een duidelijke politieke agenda achter deze 'lek'-operatie. Dat niet vergeten.
Dat gezegd hebbende vind ik het niet heel verrassend dat met hoe laks Australië er mee omgaat zulke dingen voorkomen. Het is maar een half plan, op dit moment. Dump ze maar op de eilanden en we zijn er vanaf. Dat lijkt me het primaire probleem dat aangepakt moet worden.
Wat onbelicht blijft is dat ondanks de belabberde condities waar iedereen van weet de mensen maar blijven komen. Al deze ellende is blijkbaar nog steeds beter dan in het thuisland blijven. De vraag waarom lijkt totaal niet gesteld te worden.
Er zijn ook geen massa verkrachtingen in Australië....quote:Op donderdag 11 augustus 2016 09:44 schreef Harlon het volgende:
[..]
Nee dat is het probleem niet. Het aantal immigranten dat Australië inkomt is gedaald en het aantal mensen dat naar Australië komt en illegaal probeert binnen te komen is gedaald. Naar hun mening werkt dit dus prima.
Reken maar dat als hier in Europa rechts het meer en meer voor het zeggen krijgt er een zelfde soort beleid zal worden opgezet, gericht op het afschrikken van de asielzoekers.
Precies, er is dus geen beginnen aan.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 22:26 schreef luxerobots het volgende:
[..]
Ik weet niet wie zieliger is, de vluchteling uit Damascus (Syrië) waar het leger gewoon op straat loopt om de orde te bewaken, of de met HIV-besmette arme Afrikaanse moeder.
De Syriër mag een leven opbouwen in Nederland, met alle rechten die daarbij horen, maar de Afrikaan mag in de stront zakken.
Zelfs als elke westerling een arme wereldbewoner adopteert, bestaat het probleem van armoede nog steeds en is er door het hoge geboortecijfer zo weer een nieuwe grote onderlaag.
En? Het bericht is 10x beter dan 'kom hier gratis geld' die vervolgens een armada de middellandse zee over lokt.quote:Op woensdag 10 augustus 2016 19:28 schreef Eyjafjallajoekull het volgende:
Op FOK! hoor je altijd van "kijk naar asiel beleid van Australie!, die sturen mensen meteen terug!" maar het is al tijden bekend dat dat echt niet beter is. Ze sturen mensen niet terug, ze dumpen ze of hier, of bij de omringende landen..
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |