Ja. WK gaat terug naar 10 landen ipv 14. De Associate en Affiliate hebben nu bijna helemaal geen kans meer om zich te plaatsen voor het WK. Eigenlijk was de bedoeling dat aan dit WK slechts tien landen zouden deelnemen, maar dat werd toch nog aangepast na veel protest.quote:Op zaterdag 31 januari 2015 14:26 schreef heywoodu het volgende:
Als ik het op Twitter zo lees is de ICC hard bezig om cricket de nek om te draaien? (of het WK in elk geval)
Hoe het precies zit weet ik niet, maar ik lees woedende reacties over de opzet van het WK 2019 en mensen die niet begrijpen hoe het ICC zo achterlijk kan zijn.
quote:So India win their first international after close to three months in this Australian summer. But it is a big one. Against Pakistan. A win against a big team that ensures them against any unlikely slip in the league stages
India were once again cooler and calmer than the old rivals. Dhawan set the tone really with a patient return to form. Hardly looked like a bloke who has been struggling all summer. Kohli pkayed the big innings, Raina provided the impetus, and despite a blip in the end you knew India had enough. Shehzad and Haris Sohail threatened India briefly, but they played too many dots. They didn't bat like modern limited-overs batsmen do. Shami's good work was followed up by Ashwin, who bowled three maidens, and began Pakistan's slide with Sohail's wicket. It was all over when Shehzad fell on 48. Misbah's 76 was, alas and predictably, an effort in vain, and one that took shape after all had been lost. Will Pakistan have to wait four more years before having a go at India in a World Cup or will the two meet again in the knockouts?
West Indies - voormalig wereldkampioen - zijn helaas ook niet meer wat ze zijn geweest. Wel jammer want cricket is daar echt een populaire sport.quote:Op maandag 16 februari 2015 07:54 schreef bartrid het volgende:
Ierland van de West Indies gewonnen:
West Indies 304-7; Ireland 307-6 (Ireland win by four wickets)
Beetje hetzelfde verhaal als in rugby. De landen onder de top 10 krijgen ook amper wedstrijden tegen de toplanden buiten het WK om. Denk hierbij aan Georgië, Roemenië, Samoa, Fiji, Tonga, Canada, Uruguay, Rusland... Die gaan ook naar het WK in de hoop een keer te kunnen laten zien wat ze kunnen tegen een topland.quote:Op dinsdag 17 februari 2015 10:17 schreef heywoodu het volgende:
Een wat uitgebreider stuk over waarom de zege van Ierland zoveel betekent:
http://www.independent.co(...)r-bias-10047980.html
Er is nog genoeg talent, maar de cricket bond daar is ontzettend ongeorganiseerd dus het zijn vaak niet de beste spelers die voor het land uitkomen. Een mooie documentaire over de geweldige teams uit de Jaren 70 en 80 is Fire in Babylon:quote:Op dinsdag 17 februari 2015 10:15 schreef Nielsch het volgende:
[..]
West Indies - voormalig wereldkampioen - zijn helaas ook niet meer wat ze zijn geweest. Wel jammer want cricket is daar echt een populaire sport.
quote:We thought West Indies had bowled pretty well until about the 35th over, when they’d restricted Amla and du Plessis and kept the scoring rate down.
Their last 16 overs went for: 10, 8, 18, 12, 16, 18, 11, 11, 6, 13, 13, 11, 7, 34, 14, 30.
It’s a glut, a feast that crosses over to becoming slightly sickening. It won’t make for a great match, chances are, but it’s a spectacle in itself.
You have to praise AB de Villiers, who now has the fastest ODI score of 150 or more by a matter of about 30 balls. He’s red as a radish but he’s made the West Indies blush harder. 64 from Jason Holder’s final two overs, the poor bugger. Time to go and lie down with an ice towel and forget this ever happened.
Nou... Eerste stap gezet. Terug naar 10 teams is niet goed voor de sport.quote:The number of teams taking part in the 2019 World Cup may not be cut, International Cricket Council chief David Richardson has said.
The ICC had initially planned to cut the number of teams participating in the tournament – which will be hosted by England – from 14 to 10.
Had the current tournament been played under those rules, UAE, Scotland, Afghanistan and Ireland would be present.
But the four associate sides have played well so far, far exceeding expectations.
Ireland have already beaten the West Indies, Afghanistan pushed Sri Lanka all the way, Scotland gave New Zealand a far better game than England did, whilst the UAE only lost to the Irish in the final over.
Richardson admitted: "I've learnt never to say never to anything. I'm sure the format of the next World Cup will be debated after this one has finished.
"I'm pleased with the performances of the qualifiers so far, but the bigger tests are still to come."
Richardson did say however that there are sound reasons for considering a cut.
"The question is what do you want the World Cup to be? Do you want it to be a jamboree of world cricket or the pinnacle of the one-day game?" he said.
"Heading into this tournament there was criticism that the format (where 14 teams are split into two groups of seven, with the top four in each pool qualifying for the quarter-finals) would leave us with a long group stage at the end of which the eight teams everyone thought would get through had made it into the quarter-finals."
Asked what his feelings were following the initially improved showing by the four associate sides taking part in Australia and New Zealand, Richardson said: "There's a sense of relief. Our biggest concern before the tournament was that these teams would be uncompetitive."
Richardson said the thinking in reducing the number of teams had been motivated by the experience of the 1992 World Cup, when the tournament was last staged in Australia and New Zealand.
According to Richardson, the 1992 event had the "best format" of any of cricket's 11 World Cups, with the then nine competing sides all playing each other with the top four from the round-robin phase going straight into the semi-finals.
"The best format was 1992," said Richardson, South Africa's wicketkeeper at that World Cup. "You had nine teams, then the semi-finals. There was something up for grabs in every match."
However, Steve Waugh, Australia's former World Cup-winning captain, was among those concerned by a reduction in the number of sides competing at the 2019 World Cup, telling Friday's Sydney Morning Herald: "It is definitely important to have the minnow countries to grow the game in different markets.
"The World Cup of soccer has 32 countries. Cricket needs more than eight teams playing.”
|
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |