nog steeds mensen die denken dat 9/11 echt is

quote:

Op donderdag 5 december 2013 00:30 schreef eend112 het volgende:

[..]

Ja, staat gewoon op beeld ook
Word ook niks over gezegd door CNN of Amerika ofzo

Het is allemaal ook wel een bietje vreemd en ik kan me best voorstellen dat het echt een complot is, maar TS praat poep.

quote:

Op donderdag 5 december 2013 00:35 schreef deadprez het volgende:

[..]

Het is allemaal ook wel een bietje vreemd en ik kan me best voorstellen dat het echt een complot is, maar TS praat poep.

Dat is een feit

Here’s where any rational-minded person should stop and ponder: What are the odds that so many amateur cameramen would capture a clear shot of an unexpected 550mph airplane in its very last second of flight - both 'plane' and towers nicely framed - with no apparent motion blur of either? There are, for instance, no such precedents in the history of motorsport photography: no speedway crash has ever been captured by 55+ cameramen, in crowded arenas where hundreds of lenses are aimed right at the action. On most occasions, only a handful of professionals will capture an image sharp enough for publication.



Net de site bekeken en het klinkt wel allemaal geloofwaardig. Maar ja who gives a FUCK

quote:

Op woensdag 4 december 2013 23:39 schreef deadprez het volgende:

[..]

In BNW zouden ze deze TS ook uitlachen hoor.

Ach zolang daar mensen kunnen posten die beweren dat radioactieve straling AIDS veroorzaakt (en ze worden ook nog serieus genomen en geloofd) geef ik TS en z'n topic een goede kans daar.

quote:

Op donderdag 5 december 2013 02:00 schreef BlueMage het volgende:

[..]

Ach zolang daar mensen kunnen posten die beweren dat radioactieve straling AIDS veroorzaakt geef ik TS en z'n topic een goede kans daar.

link?

quote:

Op donderdag 5 december 2013 02:01 schreef deadprez het volgende:

[..]

link?

BNW / Fukushima deel 4

Veel leesplezier, het is 'n reeks.

quote:

Op donderdag 5 december 2013 02:02 schreef BlueMage het volgende:

[..]

BNW / Fukushima deel 4

Veel leesplezier, het is 'n reeks.

Daar ga ik nu niet aan beginnen. Heb het bij mijn bookmarks gezet, misschien dat ik het morgen ofzo ga lezen.

Als het niet de moeite waard blijkt te zijn kom ik naar Venlo om je te klappen.

quote:

error #144

Er is geen vorig topic in deze reeks.

Als ik naar het eerste topic wil gaan.

Visual Control of 9/11

Since the core of the 9/11 operation relied on airing fake imagery on TV (to simulate the real-life events of the day), it would be only logical to assume that a solid infrastructure was in place to ensure 'success'. To be sure, the news media has been caught red-handed many times in the past, shamelessly airing outright fake news. This time, however, more sophisticated safeguards were necessary in order to control and impede any inconvenient private footage being captured - most embarassingly leaking out and exposing the hoax. Here, we will look at some technology which conceivably could achieve these goals. Admittedly, addressing this issue requires some level of speculation - yet one may well presume that this operation would have put to good use the most advanced technology available.

Why don’t we have a single authentic video of the crucial 9/11 events? Firstly, there are many indications that a blanket evacuation of Lower Manhattan took place after the first "plane" strike at 8:46AM. Few people were likely left dwelling around snapping pictures. In any circumstances, the chances for anyone capturing a clear image of an unexpected, sky-diving 550mph+ object are extremely slim. These factors alone drastically reduced the probabilites of undesired image recordings in the area. Nevertheless, one must assume that the 9/11 military-backed operation would have required no less than a 110% "safety level". It should also be safe to say that the perpetrators relied on top-end military technology. Thus, we may formulate a plausible hypothesis - based on the known objectives which had to be met.

If total visual control of the wider Manhattan area was a top priority of the 9/11 psyop, it would have been essential to impede any authentic footage to be captured in NY that morning. Electromagnetic weaponry (EMP/HERF or HPM) is routinely used in war zones to jam the enemy’s electronics. Read about it here . Conceivably, this technology was used to prevent any private footage being recorded throughout the limited (102min) time-window in which the defining 9/11 events took place (from first "plane" strike to last tower collapse). To be sure, the research into this field has long been a top military priority: with this in mind, we may reasonably consider that this well-tested technology was employed on 9/11. It is, all in a

Do we have any indications from the day that may back-up this hypothesis? Indeed, we do: it is a well-known fact that thousands of electronic devices malfunctioned - or blacked-out altogether. As many as 4 important electronics-related disruptions were reported in the 9/11 aftermath :

1) : all New York cell phones
2) : the firefighters' NYFD radio-transmitters
3) : the WTC’s internal communication system
4) : the Port Authority's transmission repeater on top of WTC5
These disruptions caused quite some controversy - and were explained away with claims such as:
1) : “the NY cell phone network was overloaded”
2) : “the NYFD had faulty radios/was confused over new T-R channels”
3) : “the WTC intercom wiring was damaged by the crashing airplane”
4) : The Port Authority simply denied that their equipment malfunctioned.

hier, bietje muziek.

quote:

Op donderdag 5 december 2013 02:04 schreef deadprez het volgende:

[..]

Daar ga ik nu niet aan beginnen. Heb het bij mijn bookmarks gezet, misschien dat ik het morgen ofzo ga lezen.

Als het niet de moeite waard blijkt te zijn kom ik naar Venlo om je te klappen.

Die posts van Resonancer zijn wel de moeite waard vind ik dan , het vervelende is alleen dat heel veel mensen kerncentrales sowieso al eng vinden en hem dus ook op z'n woord geloven dat de hele boel op ontploffen staat.

Alleged Flights and Passengers

Q: “What about the 4 flights - and the passengers on those flights? Where did they go? Do we have any solid documentation certifying their very existence?”

A: Before asking oneself these questions - one must of course verify the available, relevant official data. Prominent researchers have revealed (throughout years of cross-examined investigations) that both flights and passengers lack the required data necessary to establish the alleged flights'and passengers' very existence.

ALLEGED FLIGHTS

The 4 purported hijacked flights have grave problems as far as their authenticity is concerned: A long list of documentation (or plain lack of it) reveals inconsistent NTSB, BTS and FAA data. The 2 American Airlines flights lacked records of required airport log data such as taxi-off and wheels-off times. The 2 United Airlines flights were not deregistered until October 2005, as of official FAA records. Both should have been listed, by law, as 'destroyed'. Shortly thereafter, the FAA rectified this 'oversight' in a peculiar manner : in place of 'destroyed', the wording used was 'cancelled'. This evidence has not been challenged, to this day, by any of those air-regulating agencies nor by the airlines themselves.

ALLEGED PASSENGERS

Since no evidence has been forthcoming of the very existence of the 4 ‘hijacked’ airplanes, the question of the passengers allegedly on board of them should be moot. However, multiple and repeated people-searches have attempted to backtrack and contact the alleged families of those passengers - to no avail. Thus, the prevailing indications of those longstanding investigations suggest that none of these people have ever existed. Moreover, the stories created around the alleged passengers simply do not stand up to scrutiny. As for the cell phone calls that they allegedly placed to their loved ones, they have by now been established as a technical impossibility.

quote:

Op donderdag 5 december 2013 02:08 schreef BlueMage het volgende:

[..]

Die posts van Resonancer zijn wel de moeite waard vind ik dan , het vervelende is alleen dat heel veel mensen kerncentrales sowieso al eng vinden en hem dus ook op z'n woord geloven dat de hele boel op ontploffen staat.

Ik vind kerncentrales ook best eng.

quote:

We'll get a bottle to keep us warm
A little fuckin' shelter from the wicked storm

quote:

Op donderdag 5 december 2013 02:16 schreef Rozzje het volgende:

911 ACTORS

quote:

Op donderdag 5 december 2013 02:18 schreef deadprez het volgende:

[..]

Bekijk het maar dan ga je beseffen dat het idd vreemd is

Zou zo uit een South Park aflevering kunnen komen.

Ik vind het triest. waarom?

Omdat mensen die in die onzin complotten geloven nog veel meer misleid worden dan de mensen die er niet in geloven.

quote:

Op donderdag 5 december 2013 02:29 schreef tong_poh het volgende:
Ik vind het triest. waarom?

Omdat mensen die in die onzin complotten geloven nog veel meer misleid worden dan de mensen die er niet in geloven.

Problems processing this research? Look at it this way: what better news than the likelihood of no one getting killed in this false-flag operation? There can be no doubt by now that the obsolete, asbestos-filled WTC complex was rigged for demolition. What a convenient plan it all was: disposing of 8 old buildings - and blame it on an 'evil foreign enemy'! A mass murder of several thousand brokers/ bankers/rescue workers never was an envisaged proposition by the perpetrators; in fact, it would have been completely foolish and pointless. Since the perpetrators could count on the total loyalty of the mainstream media and the corrupt Giuliani administration, they would have logically preferred to rely on these assets and use them to their full capacity. On the other hand, bureaucracy matters were apparently a problem for this operation; for instance, to this day, the vast majority of the 'victims' have not been entered in the SSDI (Social Security Death Index).

It is truly game over for the 9/11 hoaxers. The entire 9/11 simulation was based on fake imagery - evidently the core instrument of deception which, in fact, effectively fooled most people on this planet. The profoundly corrupt 'establishment' (selected world leaders / corporate bankers / newsmedia moguls, et cetera) make up a rogue clique no different from a tightly knit, ruthless and unscrupulous mafia ring. They have failed - and they know it.

Grote kans dat Snowden info heeft omtrent 9/11.
het hele spionage circus is namelijk na 9/11 in gang gezet.

Snowden heeft nog heel veel staatsgeheimen, daarom wil de VS hem ook zo graag achter slot en grendel.

Kom je ook chillen bij Braddie op z'n verjaardagsfeestje, deadprez?