KLB Klaagbaak
Klaag maar raak voor een knaak.
Pak zo'n Amerikaans leger vracht vliegtuig, gooi laadruim vol met batterijen die de kracht aan kunnen,quote:Op woensdag 14 augustus 2013 01:16 schreef krioro het volgende:
[..]
Since the late 1980s, there have been several attempts to investigate the possibility of harvesting energy from lightning. While a single bolt of lightning carries a relatively large amount of energy (approximately 5 billion joules[1] or about the energy stored in 145 liters of petrol), this energy is concentrated in a small location and is passed during an extremely short period of time (milliseconds); therefore, extremely high electrical power is involved.[2] It has been proposed that the energy contained in lightning be used to generate hydrogen from water, or to harness the energy from rapid heating of water due to lightning,[3] or to use inductors spaced far enough away so that a safe fraction of the energy might be captured.[4]
A technology capable of harvesting lightning energy would need to be able to rapidly capture the high power involved in a lightning bolt. Several schemes have been proposed, but the ever-changing energy involved in each lightning bolt render lightning power harvesting from ground based rods impractical – too high, it will damage the storage, too low and it may not work.[5] Additionally, lightning is sporadic, and therefore energy would have to be collected and stored; it is difficult to convert high-voltage electrical power to the lower-voltage power that can be stored.[3]
In the summer of 2007, an alternative energy company called Alternate Energy Holdings, Inc. (AEHI) tested a method for capturing the energy in lightning bolts. The design for the system had been purchased from an Illinois inventor named Steve LeRoy, who had reportedly been able to power a 60-watt light bulb for 20 minutes using the energy captured from a small flash of artificial lightning. The method involved a tower, a means of shunting off a large portion of the incoming energy, and a capacitor to store the rest. According to Donald Gillispie, CEO of AEHI, they "couldn't make it work," although "given enough time and money, you could probably scale this thing up... it's not black magic; it's truly math and science, and it could happen."[6]
According to Martin A. Uman, co-director of the Lightning Research Laboratory at the University of Florida and a leading authority on lightning,[7] a single lightning strike, while fast and bright, contains very little energy, and dozens of lightning towers like those used in the system tested by AEHI would be needed to operate five 100-watt light bulbs for the course of a year. When interviewed by The New York Times, he stated that the energy in a thunderstorm is comparable to that of an atomic bomb, but trying to harvest the energy of lightning from the ground is "hopeless".[6]
Another major challenge when attempting to harvest energy from lightning is the impossibility of predicting when and where thunderstorms will occur. Even during a storm, it is very difficult to tell where exactly lightning will strike.[1]
A relatively easy method is the direct harvesting of atmospheric charge before it turns into lightning. At a small scale, it was done a few times with the most known example being Benjamin Franklin's experiment with his kite. However, to collect reasonable amounts of energy very large constructions are required, and it is relatively hard to utilize the resulting extremely high voltage with reasonable efficiency.[citation needed]
stalen net om het vliegtuig heen als conductie en door een storm heen vliegen.
Seems legit.quote:Op woensdag 14 augustus 2013 01:26 schreef Gridlok het volgende:
[..]
Pak zo'n Amerikaans leger vracht vliegtuig, gooi laadruim vol met batterijen die de kracht aan kunnen,
stalen net om het vliegtuig heen als conductie en door een storm heen vliegen.
full stops and exclamation marks
Zijn toch anders ook wel spots waar het vaak onweert? Midden pool ofzo, zet overal geleiders, bam! Of zonnepanelen in de Sahara.quote:
In hedendaagse maatschappij lijkt het er wel op, waar wat mooi is lelijk is en waar er meer van moet zijn er minder is.quote:
quote:Op woensdag 14 augustus 2013 01:35 schreef Gridlok het volgende:
[..]
In hedendaagse maatschappij lijkt het er wel op, waar wat mooi is lelijk is en waar er meer van moet zijn er minder is.
full stops and exclamation marks
Wat creatief, een inverse ontkenning van de Holocaust.quote:
[..]
In hedendaagse maatschappij lijkt het er wel op, waar wat mooi is lelijk is en waar er meer van moet zijn er minder is.
" Hedendaags "quote:Op woensdag 14 augustus 2013 01:43 schreef Panzermaus het volgende:
[..]
Wat creatief, een inverse ontkenning van de Holocaust.
Op 
Sowieso alles onder spuiten met graffiti als niemand kijkt.quote:Op woensdag 14 augustus 2013 02:15 schreef Salatrel het volgende:
Choochoo privé intercity terug naar roffa
gewoon peuk opsteken terwijl ik in de eerste klas zit met voeten op de bank dit dat. Ik heb ook niet ingecheckt want ik heb scheut je weet tochquote:Op woensdag 14 augustus 2013 02:17 schreef Gridlok het volgende:
[..]
Sowieso alles onder spuiten met graffiti als niemand kijkt.
