liegen tegen het riag etc ( een masker dragen )

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 14:28 schreef dandybleu het volgende:

[..]

ja

nou dat doen ze al vrij snel hoor....bijv bijna al als je als man een rokje draagt ha ha

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 14:29 schreef Aneurysma het volgende:
Dandyblue topic.

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 14:22 schreef dandybleu het volgende:
ha ha hey? .....ha ha ........ha ha.. ......ha ha.....

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 14:34 schreef monkyyy het volgende:
There is an idea of a dandyblue, some kind of abscration, But there is no real him. Only an entity. Something illusory. And though he can hide his cold gaze, and you can shake his hand and feel flesh gripping yours, and maybe you can even sense your lifestyles are probably comparable, he simply is not there.

quote:

RIAGG's propositions are absolutely disgusting—so much so, that if there are any children or sensitive people reading this letter, I suggest that they stop now and not read what I am about to describe. The nub of what I intend to say here is that it has been said that RIAGG's cowardly attacks not only demean RIAGG's victims, they dehumanize all of us and are contrary to the principles of a free society. I believe that to be true. I also believe that it has been trying to convince us that the government (and perhaps it itself) should have sweeping powers to arrest and hold people indefinitely on flimsy grounds. That argument fails to take into account the reality that RIAGG is on some sort of thesaurus-fueled rampage. Every sentence it writes is filled with needlessly long words like "intercommunicability" and "indistinguishableness". Either RIAGG is deliberately trying to confuse us or else it's secretly scheming to vandalize our neighborhoods. I can decidedly suggest how RIAGG ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with RIAGG itself.

At any rate, RIAGG maintains that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. While that happens to be pure fantasy from the world of make-believe, one important fact to consider is that its stratagems will have consequences—very serious consequences. We ought to begin doing something about that. We ought to sound the bugle of liberty. We ought to spread the word that it claims that no one is smart enough to see through its transparent lies. Well, I beg to differ.

If my memory serves me correctly, I undoubtedly hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before RIAGG does any real damage. Or is it already too late? In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: Has anyone ever seen RIAGG working instead of plundering, stealing, and living off the sweat of others? The best answer comes from RIAGG itself. That is, if you pay careful attention to its tendentious morals you'll surely notice that it may seem at first that RIAGG's grievances are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. When we descend to details, however, we see that thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that RIAGG has a different style but no more scruples than most manipulative dissemblers. I was right when I said that RIAGG's ideologies are colored by a sycophantic adoration of adversarialism. And I was right when I said that every time RIAGG tells its flunkies that we should derive moral guidance from its glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented offhand remarks, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question.

RIAGG's goal is to perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. This is abject oligarchism! RIAGG would have us believe that those who disagree with it should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject. I want to oust RIAGG and its militant, bilious legatees from anywhere we find them cultivating an unhealthy sense of victimhood. But first, let me pose an abstract question. Why does RIAGG serve as a lobbyist for those who have so grossly sidestepped our laws? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let me take a stab at it: Once one begins thinking about free speech, about hateful thought police who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own pestiferous beliefs, one realizes that RIAGG makes it sound like if it kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick its toes and beg for another kick. That's the rankest sort of pretense I've ever heard. The reality is that many people are shocked when I tell them that RIAGG's greed will be its undoing. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that you should be sure to let me know your ideas about how to deal with RIAGG. I am eager to listen to your ideas and I unquestionably hope that I can grasp their essentials, evaluate their potential, look for flaws, provide suggestions, absorb feedback, suggest improvements, and then put the ideas into effect. Only then can we supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into fetishism.

There is no contradiction here; even though creating needed understanding is best achieved in a calm, rational environment, you mustn't forget that RIAGG constantly insists that it's a saintly figure—philanthropic, noble, and wise. But it contradicts itself when it says that it is a perpetual victim of injustice. Let us postulate that the issues surrounding autism are more complex and embedded than RIAGG will admit. In that case, there are lots of weepy, wimpy flower children out there who are always whining that I'm being too harsh in my criticisms of RIAGG. I wish such people would wake up and realize that if we contradict RIAGG, we are labelled incontinent, heinous slanderers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms.

One wonders if RIAGG has the cheek to spew forth ignorance and prejudice. I undeniably hope not because no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how sexism is arguably the most frightening and devastating problem facing us all. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also tackle the multinational death machine that it is currently constructing. It may not be easy to hinder the power of crime-stained RIAGG clones like RIAGG, but it can be done. And it needs to be done. And we must always remember that RIAGG has a knack for convincing vulgar ogres that it can achieve its goals by friendly and moral conduct. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "interchangeableness" and "pseudoconglomeration" to keep its sales pitch from sounding uncompromising. That's why you really have to look hard to see that we need to expose some of RIAGG's chauvinistic deeds. Why? Because of what's at stake: literally everything.

It would be wrong to imply that RIAGG is involved in some kind of conspiracy to violate international laws. It would be wrong because its roorbacks are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but it seems to have recently added the word "unproportionableness" to its otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose RIAGG intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that its Manichaean style of thought makes it intolerant of compromise. RIAGG will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact because if it didn't, you might come to realize that I want to thank it for its "compromises". They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how yellow-bellied RIAGG can be.

At the risk of repeating myself, I must reiterate that RIAGG hates it when you say that we must burn the candle at both ends until we find a way to invite all the people who have been harmed by RIAGG to continue to express and assert their concerns in a constructive and productive fashion. It really hates it when you say that. Try saying that to it sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having RIAGG shriek insults at you. Many members of RIAGG's polity believe that RIAGG can establish a world government complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, and numerous other agencies that twist our entire societal valuation of love and relationships beyond all insanity and get away with it. Even worse, almost all of its thralls believe that the peak of fashion is to trick academics into abandoning the principles of scientific inquiry. (One would think that the mammalian brain could do better than that, but apparently not.) My point is that RIAGG complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that it hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today.

As stated earlier, if we don't work together in an atmosphere of friendship and hope then RIAGG will supplant national heroes with the worst types of dastardly, obnoxious shysters I've ever seen. This message has been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might not be so obvious, however, is that RIAGG's fantasy is to put a clog on all attempts to limit its power. It dreams of a world that grants it such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of ruffianism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that I intend to look closely at RIAGG's threats to see what makes them so effectual at disparaging and ridiculing our traditional heroes and role models. I should expect to find—this is a guess that I currently lack sufficient knowledge to verify—that RIAGG avers that its blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. As you can no doubt determine from comments like that, facts and RIAGG are like oil and water.

Although RIAGG's overt cameralism has declined, a covert form still survives and may be an important factor in fueling a tendency and/or desire to legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity. The key point here is that inhumane scumbags often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, RIAGG enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever it threatens to marginalize me based on my gender, race, or religion. RIAGG knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive—or at least overlook—all of its unimaginative excesses. My take on the matter is that the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "Do its surrogates actually enjoy the distinction of being the most ill-natured barmpots on the planet?" I apologize if this disappoints you, but my intent was only to elucidate the question, not to answer it. I shall therefore state only that it seems clear that the same poisonous spirit that infects backwards loan sharks also pollutes RIAGG's thinking. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that RIAGG's claim that it is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity but an assault on the human mind. A more fundamental problem is that the facts as I see them simply do not support the false but widely accepted notion that we can stop scapegoatism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for prissy coldhearted-types. I'll now end this letter by reminding you that there is documentary proof that RIAGG's claims offer us nothing more than the same old snake oil in a shinier bottle. That may not be the profoundest of insights to take away from such a long letter, but once RIAGG accepts responsibility for the problems it's caused, the focus shifts from who is responsible to what each of us can do about it.

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 15:00 schreef dandybleu het volgende:
ja de laatste opname was best weird....

werden drie vragen gesteld aan me

*dandybleu hoor je wel een stemmen ( ja die hoor ik wel eens want ik roep al heel mn leven geesten op enzo )

*denk je dat de computers mensen in de gaten houden? ( ja dat is volgens mij een feit.....of iig dat ze zulke prototypes computers aan het fabriceren zijn )

*derder punt? dandybleu had drie vuilniszakken op het balkon staan : ergo : "zware zelfverwaarlozing"

nou ja zit je van de ene dag op de andere...een half jaar opgesloten in een of ander riag systeem inrischting.....

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 14:22 schreef dandybleu het volgende:

*nou ja ik heb me zelf dan reeds zo aangepast? dat ik ze dus precies geef wat ze willen.....ten alle tijden dus....komen ze binnen...zet even de schakelaar in mn hoofd op "dandybleu is dolblij" en dat vinden ze fijn want dan gaat het goed met me......vinden ze....

quote:

*fabrieks arbeider? of student? die mag zijn huis verwaarlozen tot een bepaalde hoogte....( tot het punt dat buren er last van zouden krijgen )....maar mijn huis daar gelden andere wetten dus... ( een week niet stofzuigen? is onhygienisch en mogenlijk een teken van psychisch verval )

quote:

*nou in mijn geval hebben ze de sleutel op een dag afgedwongen...van mijn huis.....doe ik de deur op een dag niet open? ( zou doodnormaal kunnen zijn dat je diaree hebt en hoofdpijn en geen bezoek wilt? staan ze toch doodleuk opeens binnen in je huis........ha ha..nou ja je moet er maar zin in hebben.......

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 15:40 schreef dandybleu het volgende:

[..]

nee ja dat is beetje anders

*waar ik bij zit hebben een roulatie systeem...dus beteken dat er elke week iemand anders binnen komt
*ummm...ja de main goal is "het pilletje in mn bek douwen" en meestal stellen ze drie tot tien vragen aan me.....maar door het roulatie systeem dus....( um is het elke keer dezelfde vragenlijst ) .... ( de therapeut die stelt de vraag dus altijd voor de eerste keer ....maar ik heb ze dan al tien keer gehoord )

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 15:44 schreef dandybleu het volgende:

[..]

ow das raar

ik chat elke dag met een computer progrmeur die op een ton per jaar zit

en die kan me altijd woord voor woord volgen.....

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 15:48 schreef dandybleu het volgende:

[..]

nou ja ik gaf maar voobeeld....zo heb ik ook hbo student in mn omgeving...en die heeft ook nooit het probeemdat ik warrig overkom.....ook een vriend van mij kan "sjak brel" feiloos imiteren..idem dito ...krijg ik ook nooit klachten van.....

quote:

meeste klachten die ik krijg? die komen van onder en niet van boven....ha ha

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 16:00 schreef dandybleu het volgende:
op deckard daar reageer ik niet meer op.....die zet zich af tegen de vorm....en daarom ben ik dus "een echte psyciatrisch patient"

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 16:12 schreef dandybleu het volgende:
nou ja ik was jong dus...en toen vond ik paranormale zaken reuze intressant

dus ja heb echt eerst 90 000 beoeken verslonden daarover...en op een dag dus met behulp van de radio contact proberen te zoeken met "genezijde"

nou ja omdat je jezelf traint hierin? ging het op een dag ook lukken dus.... ( nou ja ik heb geen bewijs hiervoor maar ik loop er ook niet mee te koop dus..... )

hetgeen wat me opvalt? na ongeveer 7 jaar contact met psychiatrie? geen enkel keer maar dan ook geen totale enkele keer hebben ze aan mij gevraagd "dandybleu? wat zeggen die stemmen precies?"

nou ja dat vind ik op mijn beurt wel een beetje vreemd.....

quote:

Op zaterdag 21 mei 2011 16:16 schreef dandybleu het volgende:

[..]

ja of een vereiste? als je bijv gaat solliciteren bij umm paranormale bel-ttelefoon programmas op tv?